基于LC-MS的甘草炮制雷公藤降低肝毒性的代谢组学研究

目的 观察甘草炮制雷公藤Tripterygium wilfordii后对小鼠血清中代谢产物的影响，初步探讨其降低肝毒性的可能代谢通路。方法 将C57BL/6小鼠随机分为对照（Con）组、雷公藤（Raw）组、甘草炮制雷公藤（Pro）组，观察小鼠肝组织病理变化，检测小鼠肝功能生化指标、炎症因子水平；利用液质联用（LC-MS）技术结合代谢组学方法，对各组间的代谢差异进行表征。结果 与Raw组相比，Pro组小鼠肝组织损伤显著改善，肝功能生化指标、炎症因子水平显著降低，表明甘草炮制雷公藤后可以降低小鼠肝毒性；共筛选出脂肪酸、磷脂酸、甘油酯、磷脂酰胆碱、胆酸等12个潜在生物标志物，主要涉及脂肪酸生物合成、甘油磷脂代谢、花生四烯酸代谢等9个代谢通路。结论 甘草炮制雷公藤可有效降低小鼠的肝毒性，其机制可能与调节脂肪酸代谢等通路相关，为其临床合理应用提供参考依据。     

我国茯苓炮制加工和产品研发现状与展望

茯苓是我国大宗中药原料,也是卫生部批准的药食两用中药资源。趁鲜蒸制加工已基本取代"发汗"工艺,成为茯苓主流的初加工技术。茯苓经不同方法炮制得到有白茯苓、赤茯苓、茯苓皮、炒茯苓和朱茯苓,其功效各有侧重。茯苓在古代经典名方中应用广泛,现代已形成桂枝茯苓丸等主打中成药产品。国家中医药管理局公布的《古代经典名方目录(第一批)》100首方剂中,以茯苓为主要原料的经典名方占到了24%。以茯苓为原料的保健食品多达776个,主要保健功能为免疫调节、缓解体力疲劳和改善睡眠。茯苓的应用已经形成了涉及普通食品、化妆品、中兽药和饲料添加剂的综合开发体系。加强质量控制、规范化炮制生产和功效突出的产品研发将是茯苓产业发展的趋势。     

Ginsenoside Rg1 prevents acetaminophen-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis via Nrf2/ARE signaling pathway

Inappropriate use of acetaminophen (APAP) can lead to morbidity and mortality secondary to hepatic necrosis. Ginsenoside Rg1 is a major active ingredient in processed Panax ginseng, which is proved to elicit biological effects. We hypothesized the beneficial effect of Rg1 on APAP-mediated hepatotoxicity was through Nrf2/ARE pathway. The study was conducted in cells and mice, comparing the actions of Rg1. Rg1 significantly improved cell survival rates and promoted the expression of antioxidant proteins. Meanwhile, Rg1 reduced the excessive ROS and the occurrence of cell apoptosis, which were related to Nrf2/ARE pathway. Expression of Nrf2 has a certain cell specificity.

     

Immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Beyond an era of chemoradiation?

Now is an exciting era of development in immunotherapy checkpoint inhibitors and their effect on the treatment of NPC. While the general prognosis of R/M disease is poor, immunotherapy offers some promise in a malignancy associated with EBV and characterized by a peritumoural immune infiltrate. Our study aims to review past and on-going clinical trials of monoclonal antibody therapies against the checkpoint inhibitors (e.g. PD1 and CTLA-4), in R/M NPC. All randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials involving immune checkpoint inhibitor interventions for treatment of NPC were included in the study. We utilized a validated “risk of bias” tool to assess study quality. Four separate Phase I–II trials report the potential of PD1 inhibitor treatment for patients with NPC. Within the observed groups, camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy achieved an objective response in 91% of patients as first-line treatment for metastatic NPC (PFS 68% at 1-year) but this was associated with a high rate of grade >3 adverse events (87%; CTCAE version 4.03). The remaining three studies focused on recurrent NPC disease in patients who had received at least one line of prior chemotherapy. Within this group, camrelizumab monotherapy achieved an objective response in 34% of patients (PFS 27% at 1-year; range across all three studies 20.5–34%). No NPC trial has yet reported on specific outcomes for non-PD1 checkpoint inhibitors but 11 on-going studies include alternative targets (e.g. PD-L1/CTLA-4) as combination or monotherapy treatments. In considering checkpoint immunotherapies for NPC, initial results show promise for anti-PD1 interventions. Further phase I–III trials are in progress to clarify clinical outcomes, fully determine safety profiles, and optimize drug combinations and administration schedules.