创伤后重型急性弥漫性脑肿胀临床治疗策略

目的 探讨重型创伤后急性弥漫性脑肿胀（PADBS）患者保守治疗与手术治疗的疗效。方法 分析 2016年1月—2019年12月该院神经外科收治的44例重型PADBS患者，根据治疗方式分为手术组和保守治疗组，统计入院时格拉斯哥昏迷量表（GCS）评分、头颅CT检查情况、伤后6个月格拉斯哥预后量表（GOS）评分等资料。结果 两组患者入院时年龄、性别及GCS评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。两组患者伤后6个月时GOS评分比较，差异无统计学意义（P>0.05），但两组住院时间比较，差异有统计学意义（P<0.05），手术组长于保守治疗组。结论 重型PADBS在无瞳孔变化及GCS评分下降的情况下，可密切观察病情下选择保守治疗。     

去骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死的短期疗效评价

目的:评价去骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死的效果。方法:制定入选和排除标准,统一术式,比较术前、术后不同时期的神经功能变化,并对存活病例进行随访(6个月),评价术后3和6个月时的预后评分(GOS)和BarthelIndex(BI)的变化。结果:按入选标准行去骨瓣减压术26例,术后死亡率为30.8%。术前昏迷评分GCS对决定手术时机有指导作用。共随访14例患者,术后3和6个月GOS分别为3.6±0.8和4.0±0.8,与出院时GOS评分比差异有统计学意义。术后3和6个月BI分别为68.9±29.4和77.5±28.3,其中术后6个月BI>60者占85.7%。结论:对保守治疗无效的大面积脑梗死患者,去骨瓣减压术不仅可作为一种“救命”手术,而且多数存活病例恢复较好。合理选择手术适应证、及时把握手术时机以及充分手术减压可能是影响预后的重要因素。     

应用联合减压术治疗中晚期脑疝疗效观察

目的　观察联合减压术治疗特重型颅脑损伤合并嵌顿性脑疝的效果。方法　将 97例格拉斯哥昏迷评分 (GCS) 3～ 5分的特重型颅脑损伤合并嵌顿性脑疝患者随机分为两组 ,分别采用联合减压术 (46例 )与常规骨瓣开颅术 (5 1例 )治疗 ,术后两组均经常规治疗。随访 1～ 32个月 ,平均 7个月。比较两组患者临床疗效、颅内压变化及并发症发生率。结果　联合减压治疗组有效率为 80 .4 % (37/ 4 6例 ) ,其中恢复良好、中残2 7例 (占 5 8.7% ) ,重残 10例 (占 2 1.7% ) ,死亡 9例 (占 19.6 % ) ;常规骨瓣开颅术对照组有效率为 33.4 %(17/ 5 1例 ) ,其中恢复良好、中残 6例 (占 11.8% ) ,重残 11例 (占 2 1.6 % ) ,死亡 34例 (占 6 6 .6 % ) ,两组有效率和病死率比较差异均有显著性 (P均 <0 .0 1)。联合减压治疗组患者颅内压下降速度和程度优于常规骨瓣开颅术对照组 (P<0 .0 5 )。联合减压治疗组患者的急性脑膨出、切口疝、切口脑脊液漏、外伤性癫疒间及术后枕叶脑梗死发生率均明显低于常规骨瓣开颅术对照组 (P<0 .0 5或 P<0 .0 1) ,但两组术后颅内感染发生率差异无显著性 (P>0 .0 5 )。结论　联合减压术治疗特重脑损伤合并嵌顿性脑疝患者的疗效优于常规骨瓣开颅术。     

急性脑肿胀去大骨瓣减压术后迟发性血肿

目的探讨外伤后急性脑肿胀去大骨瓣减压术后迟发性血肿的发病机制及临床表现，以提高该类病人的手术疗效。方法回顾性分析28例急性脑肿胀去大骨瓣减压术后迟发性颅内血肿病人的临床表现。结果外伤后急性脑肿胀去大骨瓣术后迟发性血肿的发生率为19．56％，术区继发硬膜外血肿10．87％。死亡率为32．12％。结论急性脑肿胀去大骨瓣术后迟发性血肿的发生率较高，多见于脑肿胀缓解病例，对术中出现的急性脑膨出和术后病情恶化应考虑到迟发性血肿的可能，早期的诊断是提高疗效的关键。     

Pedicled,vascularized occipital bone graft to supplement atlantoaxial arthrodesis for the treatment of pseudoarthrosis

Atlantoaxial pseudoarthrosis is a challenging postoperative complication. The use of a local, vascularized bone graft, without free tissue transfer, to support a revision atlantoaxial fusion has not been previously described. We report the first surgical patient who received a semispinalis capitis muscle pedicled, occipital bone graft for supplementation of a revision atlantoaxial arthrodesis. A 72-year-old female had a failed atlantoaxial fusion and developed neck pain from continued instability and fractured hardware. The fixation and fusion were revised and supplemented with a novel, pedicled occipital bone graft. A craniectomy was performed in the occipital bone while still attached to the semispinalis capitis muscle to provide graft vascularity. This graft was rotated inferiorly from the skull base to the C1 arch and C2 spinous process in order to supplement a revision atlantoaxial arthrodesis. The patient had excellent clinical recovery over 18-month clinical follow up. The bone graft harvesting and rotation were performed safely and without complication. The 6-month postoperative CT scan showed partial fusion into the graft. This novel surgical technique leverages the advantages of vascularized structural autograft without adding extensive time or morbidity to the procedure as observed in free-tissue transfers. It is a safe and useful salvage technique to supplement revision atlantoaxial fusion surgeries.     

Post-traumatic hydrocephalus following decompressive hemicraniectomy: Incidence and risk factors in a prospective cohort of severe TBI patients

BackgroundIn severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients undergoing decompressive hemicraniectomy (DHC), the rate of post-traumatic hydrocephalus (PTH) is high at 12–36%. Early diagnosis and shunt placement can improve outcomes. Herein, we examined the incidence of and predictors of PTH after craniectomy.MethodsA retrospective analysis of prospectively collected database of severe TBI patients at a single U.S. Level 1 trauma center from May 2000 to July 2014 was performed. Demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), bleeding pattern and time-to-cranioplasty were analyzed. Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) scores at 6 and 12-months were studied. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05.ResultsA total of 402 patients were enrolled and 105 patients had DHC. Twenty-two (21.0%) of 105 required ventriculoperitoneal shunt (VPS), compared to 18 (6%) of 297 patients without DHC. There was increased odds ratio for shunting after DHC at 3.62 (95%CI:1.62–8.07; p < 0.01). Mean age at time of DHC was 43.8 ± 17.7 years old, and 81.9% were male. Subdural hematoma (SDH) was most common at 57.1%. Median time from admission to cranioplasty was 63 days. Patients who experienced PTH after DHC were younger (35.5 ± 17.7 versus 46.0 ± 17.7 years, p < 0.01) and had higher ISS scores (35 versus 26, p = 0.04) compared to patients without shunt after DHC.ConclusionsAfter severe TBI requiring hemicraniectomy, shunt-dependent hydrocephalus was 21%. Younger patients and higher ISS score were associated with PTH. Shunt-dependent patients achieved similar 6- and 12-month outcomes as those without PTH. Early diagnosis and shunt placement can enhance long-term neurological recovery.     

内科保守治疗与不同手术时机去骨瓣减压治疗大面积脑梗死的对比研究

目的对比内科保守治疗与不同手术时机去骨瓣减压手术治疗大面积梗死的临床效果。方法选取我院收治的60例急性大面积梗死患者,根据治疗情况及手术时机的不同,分为A组(内科保守治疗)、B组(脑疝发生后行去骨瓣减压手术)、C组(脑疝发生前行去骨瓣减压手术)各20例。比较3组治疗后NIHSS、GCS、BI、mRS评分、功能恢复状况、病死率及预后情况。结果与治疗前相比,3组治疗后1个月NIHSS评分均明显下降(P0.05),且C组下降幅度更大,3组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05);3组治疗后GCS、BI及mRS评分比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05),C组GCS及BI评分最高,mRS评分最低。治疗后6个月,3组病死率、功能恢复状况及预后比较差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。讨论去骨瓣减压术治疗大面积脑梗死的疗效及短期预后情况显著优于内科保守治疗,且脑疝前期实施手术有利于患者生存率的提高及功能恢复、预后情况的改善。     

骨瓣减压术治疗儿童重型颅脑外伤的预后分析

目的：探讨骨瓣减压术治疗儿童重型颅脑外伤的预后效果。方法选择该院2012年5月—2014年5月收治的重型颅脑外伤患儿90例,根据手术方法将其分为研究组（行骨瓣减压术）45例及对照组（常规开颅手术）45例。观察对比两组患儿预后效果及术后并发症情况。结果研究组恢复良好率为33.33%,显著高于对照组的17.78%（P<0.05）;研究组植物生存率及死亡率分别为8.89%、11.11%,显著低于对照组的17.78%、22.22%,两组间比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。两组术后并发症的发生率对比差异无统计学意义（P>0.05）。结论骨瓣减压术治疗儿童重型颅脑外伤可以有效提高预后效果,保障生存质量。