Profile of Antiepileptic Pharmacotherapy in a Tertiary Referral Center in South India: A Pharmacoepidemiologic and Pharmacoeconomic Study

Summary: Purpose: To study the current pharmacotherapy practices of epilepsy and its economics in a developing country by correlating the epidemiology and economics of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in general epilepsy care and comprehensive epilepsy care.
Methods: We compared the AED-use profiles, efficacy, and tolerability at entry and at last follow-up for 972 patients seen at a comprehensive epilepsy care program in South India from 1993 to 1995. The relative cost was expressed as the average percentage of the per capita gross national product (GNP/capita) each individual spent for AED treatment.
Results: At entry, 562 (57.8%) subjects were receiving poly-therapy; at last follow-up, 743 (76.4%) patients were receiving monotherapy, an increase of 34.3% in the use of monotherapy. One or more adverse drug reactions were reported by 28.6% of patients at entry and by 19.8% at last follow-up. The proportion of patients who were seizure free increased from 29.0 to 44.8%. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was the most frequently used AED, followed by diphenylhydantoin (DPH), valproate (VPA), and phenobarbitone (PB). The relative cost (% GNP/capita) for standard AEDs were as follows: PB, 4.4%; DPH, 7.1%; CBZ, 16.8%; and VPA, 29.5%. The average annual cost of AED treatment per patient in U.S. dollars was $64.32 at entry and $47.73 at last follow-up. Reduction in polytherapy resulted in the net annual saving of $16,128 ($16.59 per patient, or 5.4% GNP/capita).
Conclusions: The more frequent use of relatively expensive drugs like CBZ and VPA and the use of polytherapy—still quite prevalent in developing countries—has escalated the cost of AED therapy. Although in recent years AEDs have become more available in developing regions, primary and secondary care physicians have not been adequately educated about the current trends in the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy.     

Efficacy and Adverse Effects of Established and New Antiepileptic Drugs*

Summary: Antiepileptic drug (AED) selection is based primarily on efficacy for specific seizure types and epileptic syndromes. However, efficacy is often similar for the different AEDs, and other properties such as adverse effects, pharmacokinetic properties, and cost may also be of importance. For idiopathic generalized epilepsies with absence, tonic-clonic, and myoclonic seizures, the AED of choice is valproate (VPA). Secondarily generalized epilepsies with tonic, atonic, and other seizure types are difficult to treat with any single AED or combination of AEds. The AEDs of choice for absence seizures are ethosuximide (ESM) and VPA. For control of primary generalized tonic-clonic seizures, any of the other major AEDs can be effective. If VPA cannot be prescribed, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), or primidone (PRM) may be effective, but ESM or a benzodiazepine (BZD) must be added to control associated absence or myoclonic seizures. The AEDs of first choice for partial epilepsies with partial and secondarily generalized tonic-clonic seizures are CBZ and PHT. Increasing evidence suggests that VPA is a good alternative when CBZ and PHT fail. PB and PRM are second-choice selections because of adverse effects. A combination of two of the five standard AEDs may be necessary to treat intractable seizures, but no studies have been done to indicate an optimal combination. Other epilepsy syndromes such as neonatal and infantile epilepsies, febrile epilepsy, alcoholic epilepsy, and status epilepticus require specific AED treatment. Ultimately, AED selection must be individualized. No “drug of choice” can be named for all patients. The expected efficacy for the seizure type, the importance of the expected adverse effects, the pharmacokinetics, and the cost of the AEDs all must be weighed and discussed with the patient before a choice is made. A number of new AEDs with unique mechanisms of action, pharmacokinetic properties, and fewer adverse effects hold important promise of improved epilepsy treatment.     

Differential effects of antiepileptic drugs on neonatal outcomes

Offspring of women with epilepsy (WWE) on AEDs are at increased risks for major congenital malformations and reduced cognition. They may be at risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with epilepsy on carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the neurodevelopmental effects of AEDs. The odds ratio for small for gestational age (SGA) was higher for VPA vs. PHT, VPA vs. LTG, and CBZ vs. PHT. Microcephaly rates were elevated to 12% for all newborns and at 12 months old, but normalized by age 24 months. Reduced Apgar scores occurred more frequently in the VPA and PHT groups at 1 min, but scores were near normal in all groups at 5 min. This study demonstrates increased risks for being born SGA in the VPA and CBZ groups, and transiently reduced Apgar scores in the VPA and PHT groups. Differential risks among the AEDs can help inform decisions about AED selection for women during childbearing years.     

Comparison of antiepileptic drug levels in sudden unexpected deaths in epilepsy with deaths from other causes

PURPOSE: (a) To compare postmortem antiepileptic drug (AED) levels in patients with sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) with those in a control group of subjects with epilepsy. If SUDEP patients more frequently had undetectable or subtherapeutic AED levels, this would suggest that compliance with AED treatment is poorer in this group and that poor compliance is a risk factor for SUDEP. (b) To determine whether a particular AED was detected more commonly in the SUDEP group, suggesting that this AED is associated with a higher risk of SUDEP. METHODS: A retrospective study of coronial cases was performed. Postmortem AED levels in 44 SUDEP cases and 44 control cases were compared. The control group consisted of epileptics who died of causes other than epilepsy, including natural disease (e.g., ischemic heart disease, accidents, and suicide). The AEDs measured included carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin, (PHT), valproate (VPA), phenobarbitone (PB), lamotrigine (LTG), clonazepam (CZP), and clobazam (CLB). The number of SUDEP and control cases in which CBZ only was detected were compared, as were the number in which PHT only was detected. RESULTS: Compared with the controls, the SUDEP group showed no difference in the number with no detectable AEDs (13 vs. 11), the number with subtherapeutic AEDs (10 vs. 13), and the number with therapeutic levels (21 in both groups). CBZ only was detected in 11 SUDEPs and 11 controls, and PHT only in five SUDEPs and 10 controls. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests the SUDEP group were no less compliant with AED treatment than the control group. This study does not support the hypothesis that poor compliance with AED treatment is a risk factor for SUDEP. There was no evidence that PHT or CBZ is associated with a higher risk of SUDEP.     

Effects of long-term antiepileptic drug monotherapy on vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis

Purpose: Long‐term therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been associated with metabolic consequences that lead to an increase in risk of atherosclerosis in patients with epilepsy. We compared the long‐term effects of monotherapy using different categories of AEDs on markers of vascular risk and the atherosclerotic process. Methods: One hundred sixty adult patients who were receiving AED monotherapy, including two enzyme‐inducers (carbamazepine, CBZ; and phenytoin, PHT), an enzyme‐inhibitor (valproic acid, VPA), and a noninducer (lamotrigine, LTG) for more than 2 years, and 60 controls were enrolled in this study. All study participants received measurement of common carotid artery (CCA) intima media thickness (IMT) by B‐mode ultrasonography to assess the extent of atherosclerosis. Other measurements included body mass index, and serum lipid profile or levels of total homocysteine (tHcy), folate, uric acid, fasting blood sugar, high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), or thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Key Findings: Long‐term monotherapy with older‐generation AEDs, including CBZ, PHT, and VPA, caused significantly increased CCA IMT in patients with epilepsy. After adjustment for the confounding effects of age and gender, the CCA IMT was found to be positively correlated with the duration of AED therapy. Patients with epilepsy who were taking enzyme‐inducing AED monotherapy (CBZ, PHT) manifested disturbances of cholesterol, tHcy or folate metabolism, and elevation of the inflammation marker, hs‐CRP. On the other hand, patients on enzyme‐inhibiting AED monotherapy (VPA) exhibited an increase in the levels of uric acid and tHcy, and elevation of the oxidative marker, TBARS. However, no significant alterations in the markers of vascular risk or CCA IMT were observed in patients who received long‐term LTG monotherapy. Significance: Patients with epilepsy who were receiving long‐term monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, or VPA exhibited altered circulatory markers of vascular risk that may contribute to the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process, which is significantly associated the duration of AED monotherapy. This information offers a guide for the choice of drug in patients with epilepsy who require long‐term AED therapy, particularly in aged and high‐risk individuals.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Lamotrigine and Other Antiepileptic Drugs in Children with Intractable Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : We wished to determine the oral pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine LTG and to assess possible interactions with other AEDs in an unselected population of children. Concentration data in plasma and in CSF for lamotrigine as well as for the other AEDs are presented.
Methods : Thirty-one children, children and young adults aged > 2 years with intractable generalized epilepsy despite adequate duration and dose of at least three conventional AEDs were studied.
Results : There was a linear relation between the dose administered and the maximal plasma concentration, indicating that saturation of absorption or elimination mechanisms did not occur in the dose range studied. The median elimination half-life (t1/2) in patients receiving concomitant valproate (VPA) was 43.3 h; in patients receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) and/or phenobarbital (PB), it was 14.1 h; and in patients receiving both VPA and CBZI PB or other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it was 28.9 h. No clinically important changes in the plasma levels of CBZ, VPA, valproate, ethosuximide, or PB were observed in the follow-up period (2–12 months). No dose adjustments of concomitant AEDs were necessary. The plasma concentration of clonazepam (CZP) was reduced when LTG was introduced.
Conclusions : The complex interaction between LTG and other AEDs in children with intractable epilepsy makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) desirable.     

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17 years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.     

Risk of aplastic anemia in patients using antiepileptic drugs

PURPOSE: To assess the association between exposure to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and the occurrence of aplastic anemia. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted using data from the U.K. General Practitioners Research Database (GPRD). Cases were defined as patients diagnosed with aplastic anemia. For each case, up to three control patients were matched on age, sex, and medical practice. Cases and controls were compared with respect to AED use. The effects of duration of AED use were assessed. Characteristics of individual cases with AED use were reviewed. RESULTS: The study population comprised 173 cases and 497 controls. AED use was more prevalent among cases (9.2%) than among controls (0.8%). After adjustment for confounders, the use of AEDs was significantly associated with aplastic anemia (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 9.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-39.7). The most frequently used AEDs were carbamazepine (CBZ), valproic acid (VPA), and phenytoin. The 16 exposed cases were heterogeneous with respect to patient and exposure characteristics: the age of these patients varied from 1 to 92 years, and the duration of AED use varied from 17 days to 6.8 years. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that use of AEDs, in particular CBZ and VPA, is associated with a ninefold increased risk of aplastic anemia. Physicians should be alert to the possibility of AED-associated aplastic anemia.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between common antiepileptic drugs and acetone, the chief anticonvulsant ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet in mice

Purpose:   Acetone is the principal ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet (KD), with demonstrated robust anticonvulsant properties across a variety of seizure tests and models of epilepsy. Because the majority of patients continue to receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during KD treatment, interactions between acetone and AEDs may have important clinical implications. Therefore, we investigated whether acetone could affect the anticonvulsant activity and pharmacokinetic properties of several AEDs against maximal electroshock (MES)–induced seizures in mice.
Methods:   Effects of acetone given in subthreshold doses were tested on the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), topiramate (TPM) and valproate (VPA) against MES-induced seizures in mice. In addition, acute adverse effects of acetone–AEDs combinations were assessed in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Pharmacokinetic interactions between acetone and AEDs were also studied in the mouse brain tissue.
Results:   Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, LTG, PB, and VPA against MES-induced seizures; effects of OXC, PHT, and TPM were not changed. Acetone (7.5 mmol/kg) did not enhance the acute adverse-effect profiles of the studied AEDs. Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect total brain concentrations of the studied AEDs. In contrast, VPA, CBZ, LTG, OXC, and TPM significantly decreased the concentration of free acetone in the brain; PB and PHT had no effect.
Conclusions:   Acetone enhances the anticonvulsant effects of several AEDs such as VPA, CBZ, LTG, and PB without affecting their pharmacokinetic and side-effect profiles.     

Seizure freedom with different therapeutic regimens in intellectually disabled epileptic patients.

BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is a frequent condition in persons with intellectual disability and is more often difficult to treat than in the average population. Seizure freedom is the primary therapeutic goal which has important implications for the patient's quality of life. The aim of this study was to find out which antiepileptic therapy regimens (monotherapy or combination therapy) are effective in achieving this goal in intellectually disabled epilepsy patients. We were especially interested in the impact of the new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) which were introduced during the past decade. METHOD: We investigated retrospectively the antiepileptic regimens on which the resident patients of a large epilepsy centre (as a rule with additional intellectual disabilities of different degrees) were seizure free in 2002. Information on antiepileptic medication and seizure frequency was taken out of the individual case documentation. It was also determined whether seizure free patients had already been seizure free in 1992. RESULTS: Two hundred and forty out of 675 patients (35,6%) with epilepsy were seizure free. The proportion of seizure freedom was 43,7% in patients with borderline intelligence, 39,2% in mild, 33,2% in moderate, 31,9% in severe, and 21,9% in profound intellectual disability. One hundred and twenty-two (50,8%) seizure free patients were on monotherapy; 53 of them were on CBZ (PB: 34, VPA: 25, PHT: 7, LTG: 3). Ninety-three patients (38,7%) were on duotherapies, CBZ/PB (27 patients), PB/PHT (17), and LTG/VPA (14) being the commonest. Of 18 (7,5%) triple therapies, LTG/PB/VPA (4 patients) was the commonest. Taken together, the five most frequent therapeutic regimens were CBZ monotherapy, PB monotherapy, CBZ/PB, VPA monotherapy and PB/PHT (a clear preponderance of classic AEDs). A distinction was made between "old seizure free" (seizure free already in 1992) and "new seizure free" (in 1992 still seizures) patients. In the 132 old seizure free patients the classic AEDs prevailed again, monotherapies with CBZ, PB and VPA being the most frequent regimens. In comparison, in the 78 new seizure free patients the novel combination LTG/VPA was the third most frequent, after the classic regimens CBZ/PB and CBZ; PB monotherapies were rare. CONCLUSION:In a majority of intellectually disabled patients with epilepsy (including those who became seizure free since 1992), complete seizure control has been achieved by monotherapy or duotherapy with classic AEDs. Of the new AEDs LTG in combination with VPA appears to be an important innovation.     

Pregabalin drug interaction studies: lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: Pregabalin (PGB) is an alpha2-delta ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). RESULTS: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB-AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.     

Oxcarbazepine in Focal Epilepsy and Hepatic Porphyria: A Case Report

PURPOSE: Despite the development of new antiepileptic agents (AEDs), the therapy of epilepsies along with hepatic porphyrias remains difficult. Most AEDs such as carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) may precipitate clinically latent porphyria by inducing hepatic metabolism and increasing hepatic heme synthesis. Actually, only gabapentin (GBP), an AED without any hepatic metabolism, is known as a potential therapy for partial seizures in patients having hepatic forms of porphyria. METHODS: We present the case of a 28-year-old man with porphyria cutanea tarda (PCT) who has had pharmacoresistant epilepsy with complex partial and secondarily generalized seizures since early childhood. Despite having undergone several AED therapies over the years, no seizure-free interval had been observed. Only CBZ could cause a seizure reduction, but this treatment had to be discontinued as an elevation of the transaminases as well as pruritus and erythema were noted. The patient was then started on oxcarbazepine (OCBZ), a ketoanalogue of CBZ similar in its pharmacologic mechanism as well as its clinical use, but which, in contrast to CBZ, has only a low hepatic induction of microsomal enzymes. A final maintenance dose four times higher than that of CBZ was prescribed. RESULTS: In the follow-up, the patient stopped having seizures, and his liver functions became normal. CONCLUSIONS: It can be concluded that OCBZ can successfully be administered to patients with hepatic porphyria and focal epilepsy who did not respond to treatment with GBP.     

Effects of anticonvulsants on human p450c17 (17alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase) and 3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2

PURPOSE: Women with epilepsy apparently have a higher incidence of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) than do women without epilepsy. Whether the underlying disease or the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment is responsible for this increased risk is unknown, although clinical reports implicate valproic acid (VPA) as a potential cause. The steroidogenic enzymes 3beta HSDII (3beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase) and P450c17 (17alpha-hydroxylase/17,20 lyase) are essential for C19 steroid biosynthesis, which is enhanced during adrenarche and in PCOS. METHODS: To determine whether the AEDs VPA, carbamazepine (CBZ), topiramate (TPM), or lamotrigine (LYG) directly affect the activities of human 3beta HSDII and P450c17, we added them to yeast expressing human P450c17 or 3beta HSDII and assayed enzymatic activities in the microsomal fraction. RESULTS: Concentrations of VPA < or = 10 mM had no effect on activities of P450c17; however, VPA inhibited 3beta HSDII activity starting at 0.3 mM (reference serum unbound concentration, 0.035-0.1 mM) with an IC50 of 10.1 mM. CBZ, TPM, and LTG did not influence 3beta HSDII or P450c17 activities at typical reference serum unbound concentrations, but did inhibit 3beta HSDII and P450c17 at concentrations >10-fold higher. CONCLUSIONS: None of the tested AEDs influenced 3beta HSDII or P450c17 activities at concentrations normally used in AED therapy. However, VPA started to inhibit 3beta HSDII activity at concentrations 3 times above the typical reference serum unbound concentration. Because inhibition of 3beta HSDII activity will shift steroidogenesis toward C19 steroid production when P450c17 activities are unchanged, very high doses of VPA may promote C19 steroid biosynthesis, thus resembling PCOS. CBZ, TPM, and LTG influenced 3beta HSDII and P450c17 only at toxic concentrations.     

Antiepileptic drug therapy and its management in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: a case-control study

PURPOSE: Because frequent seizures constitute a major risk factor for sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), the treatment with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may play a role for the occurrence of SUDEP. We used data from routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) to study the association between various aspects of AED treatment and the risk of SUDEP. METHODS: A nested case-control study was based on a cohort consisting of 6,880 patients registered in the Stockholm County In Ward Care Register with a diagnosis of epilepsy. Fifty-seven SUDEP cases, and 171 controls, living epilepsy patients, were selected from the cohort. Clinical data including data on TDM were collected through medical record review. RESULTS: The relative risk (RR) of SUDEP was 3.7 (95% CI, 1.0-13.1) for outpatients who had no TDM compared with those who had one to three TDMs during the 2 years of observation. RR was 9.5 (1.4-66.0) if carbamazepine (CBZ) plasma levels at the last TDM were above and not within the common target range (20-40 microM). High CBZ levels were associated with a higher risk in patients receiving polytherapy and in those with frequent dose changes. Although the subgroup of patients with high CBZ levels was small (six cases of 33 with CBZ therapy), and the result should be interpreted with caution, no similar associations were demonstrated for phenytoin plasma levels and risk of SUDEP. No association was found between SUDEP risk and within-patient variation in AED levels over time. CONCLUSIONS: Polytherapy, frequent dose changes, and high CBZ levels as identified risk factors for SUDEP all point to the risks associated with an unstable severe epilepsy. It is unclear whether high CBZ levels per se represent a risk factor or just reflect other unidentified aspects of a severe epilepsy. Our results, however, prompt further detailed analyses of the possible role of AEDs in SUDEP in larger cohorts and suggest that reasonable monitoring of the drug therapy may be useful to reduce risks.     

The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.     

常用抗癫痫药对大鼠胚胎毒性的比较

对临床常用的三种抗癫痫药(AEDs)苯妥英钠(PHT)、丙戊酸内(VPA)和卡马西平(CBZ)进行胚胎毒性的比较,以期找到一种胚胎毒性较低的AEDs。用人类平均治疗量的10倍AEDs给予怀孕母鼠。孕末时,对其胎鼠进行胚胎毒性的鉴定。PHT组除了上枕骨骨化程度低于对照组外,未见其它胚胎毒性。VPA和CBZ组的胚胎毒性高于对照组。VPA组又高于CBZ组。VPA胚胎毒性最强,CBZ次之,PHT最弱。     

Adverse effects of carbamazepine,phenytoin, valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in epileptic adult Chinese patients

Objective

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been widely used in patients with epilepsy but the adverse effects in adult Chinese patients have not been investigated. This study evaluated the adverse effects of four commonly prescribed AED monotherapies with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in adult Chinese patients with epilepsy.

Methods

The prospective open-label clinical trial was conducted at the Chongqing Epilepsy Center. The study enrolled 505 adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, including generalized tonic–clonic (n = 110), partial and partial secondarily generalized (n = 395) seizures. Patients were evaluated by two clinicians at the Center and were prescribed one type of AED monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA or LTG for a 24-month period. An adverse effect profile, as well as efficacy of monotherapy, was obtained through a face-to-face interview with the patient at each visit. A physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed during a clinical screening.

Results

A total of 62.6% (316/505) patients successfully completed the AED monotherapy study: 64.3% of those receiving CBZ, 55.9%—PHT, 61.5%—VPA, and 66.2%—LTG. However, 34.7% of the patients discontinued the AED monotherapy because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Overall, 18% of patients experienced adverse effects: for CBZ (25/168; 14.9%), PHT (18/59; 30.5%), VPA (32/192; 16.7%) and LTG (16/86; 18.6%). The most common drug-related adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, loss of appetite and nausea, weight gain and fatigue/tiredness. Tremor and nystagmus occurred in some patients receiving PHT and VPA. Two CBZ, one PHT and four LTG patients (n = 7) discontinued the study due to rash.

Conclusion

Adult Chinese patients with epilepsy accepted and tolerated monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA, and LTG. No fatal adverse events occurred. Unsatisfactory seizure control was a primary reason for withdrawal from the AED monotherapy study.     

Effects of antiepileptic drugs on sleep architecture: a pilot study

OBJECTIVES: The effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on sleep architecture are not well understood, especially in patients with localization-related epilepsy, in whom seizures themselves can disrupt sleep. To clarify the effects of AEDs on sleep architecture, we performed a prospective study, looking at sleep architecture in patients with epilepsy admitted for video-EEG monitoring. METHODS: Adult patients with localization-related epilepsy treated with a single AED and admitted between 10/1997 and 04/2001 were included. Control patients on no AEDs were also included. Both groups were withdrawn from other AEDs. Overnight polysomnography was recorded and was scored according to the standard method. Adult patients with localization-related epilepsy on no medication were also recorded and served as controls. Patients with no seizure during the recording and no seizure in the 24 h preceding the recording were analyzed in this paper. Patients with a seizure in the 24 h preceding the recording and patients with a seizure during the recording were analyzed separately. RESULTS: A total of 72 nights were recorded in 39 patients, and patients taking each AED were compared to controls. We did not find any statistically significant effect of carbamazepine (CBZ). Phenytoin (PHT) disrupted sleep by increasing stage 1 sleep (PHT: 13.2+/-7.3%; control: 7.7+/-4.8%; P=0.008), and decreasing slow wave sleep (SWS) (PHT: 7.9+/-4.2%; control: 11.3+/-4.4%; P=0.03) and REM sleep (PHT: 13.9+/-6.2; control: 18.8+/-5.1; P=0.01). Valproic acid (VPA) disrupted sleep by increasing stage 1 sleep (VPA: 16.8+/-9.8%; control: 7.7+/-4.8%; P=0.007). Gabapentin (GBP) improved sleep by increasing SWS (GBP: 19.4+/-4.2%; control: 11.3+/-4.4%; P=0.0009). PHT and VPA disrupt sleep in the absence of seizures, while CBZ and lamotrigine have no significant effects. GBP improves sleep by increasing SWS. CONCLUSIONS: AEDs have differing effects on sleep structure, which can be beneficial or detrimental. Consideration of these potential effects is important in maintaining optimal sleep in patients with epilepsy.