Pharmacological outcomes in newly diagnosed epilepsy

The response to antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been examined in 780 adult and adolescent patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy presenting with a range of seizure types and epilepsy syndromes over a 20-year period. Carbamazepine (CBZ, n=312), sodium valproate (VPA, n=315), and lamotrigine (LTG, n=249) were the most common AEDs prescribed as monotherapy. More patients with localization-related epilepsies became seizure free with LTG (63%) than with CBZ (45%, P=0.006) or VPA (42%, P=0.006). For idiopathic generalized epilepsies a greater proportion of patients achieved control with VPA (68%) than with CBZ (31%) or LTG (45%). In particular, more patients with juvenile myoclonic epilepsy responded to VPA (75%) compared with LTG (39%, P=0.014). Seizure freedom was achieved with modest or moderate daily doses (median CBZ 400mg, VPA 1000 mg, (LTG) 150 mg) of all three AEDs in the majority of patients achieving remission. Time to first seizure did not differ among these three drugs when given as first treatment. Adverse effects leading to withdrawal were more frequent with CBZ (16%) than with VPA (7%, P=0.03) or LTG (7%, P=0.018). In patients failing initial monotherapy, response to a combination of two AEDs (27%) was not different from that with alternative monotherapy (32%). The majority of patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy responding to treatment did so rapidly and completely with moderate doses of AEDs, with no differences in time to first seizure.     

Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interactions between common antiepileptic drugs and acetone, the chief anticonvulsant ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet in mice

Purpose:   Acetone is the principal ketone body elevated in the ketogenic diet (KD), with demonstrated robust anticonvulsant properties across a variety of seizure tests and models of epilepsy. Because the majority of patients continue to receive antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during KD treatment, interactions between acetone and AEDs may have important clinical implications. Therefore, we investigated whether acetone could affect the anticonvulsant activity and pharmacokinetic properties of several AEDs against maximal electroshock (MES)–induced seizures in mice.
Methods:   Effects of acetone given in subthreshold doses were tested on the anticonvulsant effects of carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), oxcarbazepine (OXC), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), topiramate (TPM) and valproate (VPA) against MES-induced seizures in mice. In addition, acute adverse effects of acetone–AEDs combinations were assessed in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Pharmacokinetic interactions between acetone and AEDs were also studied in the mouse brain tissue.
Results:   Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, intraperitoneally [i.p.]) enhanced the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, LTG, PB, and VPA against MES-induced seizures; effects of OXC, PHT, and TPM were not changed. Acetone (7.5 mmol/kg) did not enhance the acute adverse-effect profiles of the studied AEDs. Acetone (5 or 7.5 mmol/kg, i.p.) did not affect total brain concentrations of the studied AEDs. In contrast, VPA, CBZ, LTG, OXC, and TPM significantly decreased the concentration of free acetone in the brain; PB and PHT had no effect.
Conclusions:   Acetone enhances the anticonvulsant effects of several AEDs such as VPA, CBZ, LTG, and PB without affecting their pharmacokinetic and side-effect profiles.     

Pregnancy and teratogenicity of antiepileptic drugs

Maternal use of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) during pregnancy has been associated with an increased risk of congenital abnormalities in the fetus. This is partly attributable to AEDs. We aimed to analyse seizure frequency and the rate and type of any congenital malformation related to pregnancies in women with epilepsy in this prospective study. Eighty four pregnant women with epilepsy on AEDs were followed for congenital malformations. Z test was used for statistical analysis. Pregnancy did not influence the seizure frequency in 64 (76.2%) pregnancies. The seizure frequency increased in 16 (19.04%) pregnancies. In 4 (4.76%) pregnancies the number of seizures decreased during pregnancy. Overall percentage of congenital malformations in infants of mothers with epilepsy treated with AEDs was 10%, versus 3.65% in the general Turkish population. Percentages of malformations in children of pregnancies in women with epilepsy on antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) were; 6.52% (3/46) for carbamazepine (CBZ), 14.28% (2/14) for phenytoin (PHT), 13.33% (2/15)for valproic acid (VPA) and 20% (1/5) for phenobarbital (PB). This comfirms previous reports that all four AEDs (CBZ, PHT VPA, PB) are associated with an increased risk of congenital malformations, although CBZ seems to be the the safest agent in monotherapy.     

Pregabalin drug interaction studies: lack of effect on the pharmacokinetics of carbamazepine, phenytoin, lamotrigine, and valproate in patients with partial epilepsy

PURPOSE: Pregabalin (PGB) is an alpha2-delta ligand with demonstrated efficacy in epilepsy, neuropathic pain, and anxiety disorders. PGB is highly efficacious as adjunctive therapy in patients with refractory partial seizures. METHODS: Given its efficacy as adjunctive therapy, the potential for interaction of PGB with other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) was assessed in patients with partial epilepsy in open-label, multiple-dose studies. Patients received PGB, 600 mg/day (200 mg q8h) for 7 days, in combination with their individualized maintenance monotherapy with valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), lamotrigine (LTG), or carbamazepine (CBZ). RESULTS: Trough steady-state concentrations of CBZ (and its epoxide metabolite), PHT, LTG, and VPA were unaffected by concomitant PGB administration. Likewise, PGB steady-state pharmacokinetic parameter values were similar among patients receiving CBZ, PHT, LTG, or VPA and, in general, were similar to those observed historically in healthy subjects receiving PGB alone. The PGB-AED combinations were generally well tolerated. PGB may be added to VPA, LTG, PHT, or CBZ therapy without concern for pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions.     

Association between antiepileptic drug dose and long-term response in patients with refractory epilepsy

Seizures in patients with medically refractory epilepsy remain a substantial clinical challenge, not least because of the dearth of evidence-based guidelines as to which antiepileptic drug (AED) regimens are the most effective, and what doses of these drugs to employ. We sought to determine whether there were regions in the dosage range of commonly used AEDs that were associated with superior efficacy in patients with refractory epilepsy. We retrospectively analyzed treatment records from 164 institutionalized, developmentally disabled patients with refractory epilepsy, averaging 17 years of followup per patient. We determined the change in seizure frequency in within-patient comparisons during treatment with the most commonly used combinations of 12 AEDs, and then analyzed the response to treatment by quartile of the dose range for monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), valproate (VPA), or phenytoin (PHT), and the combination LTG/VPA. We found that of the 26 most frequently used AED regimens, only LTG/VPA yielded superior efficacy, similar to an earlier study. For the monotherapies, patients who were treated in the lowest quartile of the dose range had significantly better long-term reduction in seizure frequency compared to those treated in the 2nd and 3rd quartiles of the dose range. Patients with paired exposures to CBZ in both the lowest quartile and a higher quartile of dose range experienced an increase in seizure frequency at higher doses, while patients treated with LTG/VPA showed improved response with escalation of LTG dosage. We conclude that in this population of patients with refractory epilepsy, LTG/VPA was the most effective AED combination. The best response to AEDs used in monotherapy was observed at low dosage. This suggests that routine exposure to maximally tolerated AED doses may not be necessary to identify those patients with drug-resistant seizures who will have a beneficial response to therapy. Rather, responders to a given AED regimen may be identified with exposure to low AED doses, with careful evaluation of the response to subsequent titration to identify non-responders or those with exacerbation of seizure frequency at higher doses.     

Adverse effects of carbamazepine,phenytoin, valproate and lamotrigine monotherapy in epileptic adult Chinese patients

Objective

Antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been widely used in patients with epilepsy but the adverse effects in adult Chinese patients have not been investigated. This study evaluated the adverse effects of four commonly prescribed AED monotherapies with carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), and lamotrigine (LTG) in adult Chinese patients with epilepsy.

Methods

The prospective open-label clinical trial was conducted at the Chongqing Epilepsy Center. The study enrolled 505 adults with newly diagnosed epilepsy, including generalized tonic–clonic (n = 110), partial and partial secondarily generalized (n = 395) seizures. Patients were evaluated by two clinicians at the Center and were prescribed one type of AED monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA or LTG for a 24-month period. An adverse effect profile, as well as efficacy of monotherapy, was obtained through a face-to-face interview with the patient at each visit. A physical examination and routine laboratory tests were performed during a clinical screening.

Results

A total of 62.6% (316/505) patients successfully completed the AED monotherapy study: 64.3% of those receiving CBZ, 55.9%—PHT, 61.5%—VPA, and 66.2%—LTG. However, 34.7% of the patients discontinued the AED monotherapy because of unsatisfactory seizure control. Overall, 18% of patients experienced adverse effects: for CBZ (25/168; 14.9%), PHT (18/59; 30.5%), VPA (32/192; 16.7%) and LTG (16/86; 18.6%). The most common drug-related adverse events included gastrointestinal disturbances, loss of appetite and nausea, weight gain and fatigue/tiredness. Tremor and nystagmus occurred in some patients receiving PHT and VPA. Two CBZ, one PHT and four LTG patients (n = 7) discontinued the study due to rash.

Conclusion

Adult Chinese patients with epilepsy accepted and tolerated monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, VPA, and LTG. No fatal adverse events occurred. Unsatisfactory seizure control was a primary reason for withdrawal from the AED monotherapy study.     

Effects of long-term antiepileptic drug monotherapy on vascular risk factors and atherosclerosis

Purpose: Long‐term therapy with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) has been associated with metabolic consequences that lead to an increase in risk of atherosclerosis in patients with epilepsy. We compared the long‐term effects of monotherapy using different categories of AEDs on markers of vascular risk and the atherosclerotic process. Methods: One hundred sixty adult patients who were receiving AED monotherapy, including two enzyme‐inducers (carbamazepine, CBZ; and phenytoin, PHT), an enzyme‐inhibitor (valproic acid, VPA), and a noninducer (lamotrigine, LTG) for more than 2 years, and 60 controls were enrolled in this study. All study participants received measurement of common carotid artery (CCA) intima media thickness (IMT) by B‐mode ultrasonography to assess the extent of atherosclerosis. Other measurements included body mass index, and serum lipid profile or levels of total homocysteine (tHcy), folate, uric acid, fasting blood sugar, high sensitivity C‐reactive protein (hs‐CRP), or thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS). Key Findings: Long‐term monotherapy with older‐generation AEDs, including CBZ, PHT, and VPA, caused significantly increased CCA IMT in patients with epilepsy. After adjustment for the confounding effects of age and gender, the CCA IMT was found to be positively correlated with the duration of AED therapy. Patients with epilepsy who were taking enzyme‐inducing AED monotherapy (CBZ, PHT) manifested disturbances of cholesterol, tHcy or folate metabolism, and elevation of the inflammation marker, hs‐CRP. On the other hand, patients on enzyme‐inhibiting AED monotherapy (VPA) exhibited an increase in the levels of uric acid and tHcy, and elevation of the oxidative marker, TBARS. However, no significant alterations in the markers of vascular risk or CCA IMT were observed in patients who received long‐term LTG monotherapy. Significance: Patients with epilepsy who were receiving long‐term monotherapy with CBZ, PHT, or VPA exhibited altered circulatory markers of vascular risk that may contribute to the acceleration of the atherosclerotic process, which is significantly associated the duration of AED monotherapy. This information offers a guide for the choice of drug in patients with epilepsy who require long‐term AED therapy, particularly in aged and high‐risk individuals.     

Differential effects of antiepileptic drugs on neonatal outcomes

Offspring of women with epilepsy (WWE) on AEDs are at increased risks for major congenital malformations and reduced cognition. They may be at risk for other adverse neonatal outcomes. Women with epilepsy on carbamazepine (CBZ), lamotrigine (LTG), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy were enrolled in a prospective, observational, multicenter study of the neurodevelopmental effects of AEDs. The odds ratio for small for gestational age (SGA) was higher for VPA vs. PHT, VPA vs. LTG, and CBZ vs. PHT. Microcephaly rates were elevated to 12% for all newborns and at 12 months old, but normalized by age 24 months. Reduced Apgar scores occurred more frequently in the VPA and PHT groups at 1 min, but scores were near normal in all groups at 5 min. This study demonstrates increased risks for being born SGA in the VPA and CBZ groups, and transiently reduced Apgar scores in the VPA and PHT groups. Differential risks among the AEDs can help inform decisions about AED selection for women during childbearing years.     

Protein binding of four antiepileptic drugs in maternal and umbilical cord serum.

The total and protein free levels of 4 antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in serum from 35 maternity patients who had been treated with AED monotherapy throughout pregnancy were studied. Results were compared with those in the umbilical cord serum at the time of delivery, and the placental transfer of AEDs was evaluated from the viewpoint of the protein binding capacity of the drug. The materials consisted of 35 samples of maternal and umbilical cord serum in total and included 13 patients on phenobarbital (PB), 7 on phenytoin (PHT), 7 on carbamazepine (CBZ) and 8 on valproic acid (VPA). The mean fetal/maternal total concentration ratios were 0.86, 0.91, 0.73 and 1.59 for PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, respectively, only the VPA ratio being above 1. On the other hand, the mean fetal/maternal free fraction ratios were 1.13, 1.10, 1.42 and 0.50 for PB, PHT, CBZ and VPA, respectively, only the VPA ratio being less than 1. Correlation of the 2 ratios showed a reciprocal proportion with a correlation coefficient of -0.90 (P < 0.005). It was considered that the fetal/maternal total concentration ratio of 4 AEDs was regulated by the fetal/maternal free fraction ratio of the corresponding AEDs and that the difference in fetal/maternal free fraction ratio depended on the type of drug being administered.     

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Lamotrigine and Other Antiepileptic Drugs in Children with Intractable Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose : We wished to determine the oral pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine LTG and to assess possible interactions with other AEDs in an unselected population of children. Concentration data in plasma and in CSF for lamotrigine as well as for the other AEDs are presented.
Methods : Thirty-one children, children and young adults aged > 2 years with intractable generalized epilepsy despite adequate duration and dose of at least three conventional AEDs were studied.
Results : There was a linear relation between the dose administered and the maximal plasma concentration, indicating that saturation of absorption or elimination mechanisms did not occur in the dose range studied. The median elimination half-life (t1/2) in patients receiving concomitant valproate (VPA) was 43.3 h; in patients receiving carbamazepine (CBZ) and/or phenobarbital (PB), it was 14.1 h; and in patients receiving both VPA and CBZI PB or other antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), it was 28.9 h. No clinically important changes in the plasma levels of CBZ, VPA, valproate, ethosuximide, or PB were observed in the follow-up period (2–12 months). No dose adjustments of concomitant AEDs were necessary. The plasma concentration of clonazepam (CZP) was reduced when LTG was introduced.
Conclusions : The complex interaction between LTG and other AEDs in children with intractable epilepsy makes therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) desirable.     

Management issues for women with epilepsy—Focus on pregnancy (an evidence-based review): II. Teratogenesis and perinatal outcomes

A committee assembled by the American Academy of Neurology (AAN) reassessed the evidence related to the care of women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy, including antiepileptic drug (AED) teratogenicity and adverse perinatal outcomes. It is highly probable that intrauterine first-trimester valproate (VPA) exposure has higher risk of major congenital malformations (MCMs) compared to carbamazepine (CBZ), and possibly compared to phenytoin (PHT) or lamotrigine (LTG). It is probable that VPA as part of polytherapy and possible that VPA as monotherapy contribute to the development of MCMs. AED polytherapy probably contributes to the development of MCMs and reduced cognitive outcomes compared to monotherapy. Intrauterine exposure to VPA monotherapy probably reduces cognitive outcomes and monotherapy exposure to PHT or phenobarbital (PB) possibly reduces cognitive outcomes. Neonates of WWE taking AEDs probably have an increased risk of being small for gestational age and possibly have an increased risk of a 1-minute Apgar score of <7. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy should be considered to decrease the risk of MCMs. If possible, avoidance of VPA and AED polytherapy throughout pregnancy should be considered and avoidance of PHT and PB throughout pregnancy may be considered to prevent reduced cognitive outcomes.     

Profile of Antiepileptic Pharmacotherapy in a Tertiary Referral Center in South India: A Pharmacoepidemiologic and Pharmacoeconomic Study

Summary: Purpose: To study the current pharmacotherapy practices of epilepsy and its economics in a developing country by correlating the epidemiology and economics of antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment in general epilepsy care and comprehensive epilepsy care.
Methods: We compared the AED-use profiles, efficacy, and tolerability at entry and at last follow-up for 972 patients seen at a comprehensive epilepsy care program in South India from 1993 to 1995. The relative cost was expressed as the average percentage of the per capita gross national product (GNP/capita) each individual spent for AED treatment.
Results: At entry, 562 (57.8%) subjects were receiving poly-therapy; at last follow-up, 743 (76.4%) patients were receiving monotherapy, an increase of 34.3% in the use of monotherapy. One or more adverse drug reactions were reported by 28.6% of patients at entry and by 19.8% at last follow-up. The proportion of patients who were seizure free increased from 29.0 to 44.8%. Carbamazepine (CBZ) was the most frequently used AED, followed by diphenylhydantoin (DPH), valproate (VPA), and phenobarbitone (PB). The relative cost (% GNP/capita) for standard AEDs were as follows: PB, 4.4%; DPH, 7.1%; CBZ, 16.8%; and VPA, 29.5%. The average annual cost of AED treatment per patient in U.S. dollars was $64.32 at entry and $47.73 at last follow-up. Reduction in polytherapy resulted in the net annual saving of $16,128 ($16.59 per patient, or 5.4% GNP/capita).
Conclusions: The more frequent use of relatively expensive drugs like CBZ and VPA and the use of polytherapy—still quite prevalent in developing countries—has escalated the cost of AED therapy. Although in recent years AEDs have become more available in developing regions, primary and secondary care physicians have not been adequately educated about the current trends in the pharmacotherapy of epilepsy.     

Positive and Negative Psychotropic Effects of Lamotrigine in Patients with Epilepsy and Mental Retardation

Summary: Purpose: To describe significant positive or negative psychotropic effects of lamotrigine (LTG) observed in epilepsy patients with mental retardation (MR).
Methods: Seven mentally retarded epilepsy patients, [5 with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS)] who experienced significant behavioral improvements or worsening after addition of LTG to their medication regimen were studied.
Results: LTG produced behavioral improvements in 4 patients. Patient 1, a 14-year-old girl, had LTG added to valproate (VPA) and thioridazine, resulting in diminished lethargy, less hyperactivity, and more appropriate speech. In a 17-year-old boy (patient 2) LTG added to VPA, phenytoin (PHT), and gabapentin (GBP) lessened irritability and hyperactivity. In patient 3, a 41-year-old woman, LTG added to PHT, VPA, and carbamazepine (CBZ) diminished lethargy and enhanced her social interactions. In patient 4, a 27-year-old man, LTG monotherapy diminished irritability and hyperactivity. Adverse behavioral effects were noted in 3 patients. In patient 5, a 43- year-old man, LTG added to PHT, phenobarbital (PB), lorazepam, sertraline, and thioridazine produced irritability, hyperactivity, and poor cooperation. In patient 6, a 29-year-old woman, LTG added to VPA produced frequent screaming, temper tantrums, increased rocking movements, and hyperactivity. In patient 7, a 29-year-old man, LTG added to VPA and PHT resulted in severe exacerbation of baseline behaviors, including self-injurious activity, temper tantrums, and failure to obey simple instructions.
Conclusions: In some patients with epilepsy and MR, LTG has significant positive or negative effects on behavior.     

Interictal Cardiovascular Autonomic Responses in Patients with Epilepsy

Summary: Purpose: To evaluate the interictal autonomic nervous system function in 84 patients with epilepsy: 37 with newly diagnosed, previously untreated epilepsy, and 47 patients receiving long-term carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), or valproate (VPA) monotherapy, or CBZ plus PHT, or CBZ plus VPA for their seizure disorder. Methods: We assessed autonomic control of the cardiovascular regulatory system, by standardized cardiovascular reflex tests measuring changes in heart rate (HR) and blood pressure (BP) at rest and after certain stimuli. Results: The HR and BP responses were similar to those of control subjects in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. However, HR variation during normal breathing and maximum systolic BP increase in isometric work were diminished in patients, who had been treated with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) for epilepsy for a long time. Diminished HR responses to the Valsalva maneuver were noted in patients receiving CBZ as monotherapy and during deep breathing in patients receiving CBZ combined with PHT or VPA. Furthermore, patients receiving CBZ had diminished BP responses in isometric work. When analyzed in relation to epilepsy type, suppressed HR responses in normal breathing were associated with primary generalized epilepsy (PGE), whereas diminished BP responses in isometric work were associated with partial epilepsy. Two patients with recently diagnosed partial epilepsy and 1 patient receiving long-term CBZ monotherapy for partial epilepsy had two abnormal cardiovascular response test results. Conclusions: Our results show that cardiovascular responses mediated by both the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous system are diminished in patients with epilepsy. However, the changes appear to be clinically significant in only a few of them and appear to be associated with CBZ medication. Further studies are needed to detect the underlying complex interactions and clinical significance of autonomic nervous system dysfunction in patients with epilepsy.     

Epilepsy and antiepileptic drug therapy in juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis

PURPOSE: To survey the characteristics of epilepsy in patients with juvenile neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis (JNCL) and determine the antiepileptic drug (AED) treatment most suitable for these patients. METHODS: The study included 60 patients with JNCL; their mean age was 16.5 years (range 5-33). The age at onset of epilepsy, type of seizures, effect of the first AED on seizures, and the current seizure frequency and AED therapy were studied. The side effects of the AEDs were also clarified. RESULTS: Fifty of the 60 patients had epilepsy. Patients' first epileptic seizure occurred at a mean age of 10.0 years (range 5-16), the most common type being generalized seizures. As the first AED tried, valproate (VPA) and lamotrigine (LTG) appeared equally effective, with 80% of the patients responding to these AEDs. During the study year, the median seizure frequency was four seizures a year (range 0-120), and 72% of the patients had good or satisfactory seizure control (0-6 seizures a year). In the different AED therapy groups, the proportion of patients with good or satisfactory seizure control ranged from 25% to 100%. LTG in monotherapy or in combination with clonazepam (CZP) was superior to other AEDs or combinations, but VPA also seemed effective. Adverse effects leading to the discontinuation of an AED were observed in 25% of the patients, most frequently in patients receiving phenobarbital (PB). No patient receiving LTG had to discontinue the drug due to adverse effects. CONCLUSION: Epilepsy in JNCL can usually be successfully treated with the current AEDs. In Finnish patients with JNCL, treatment is based on LTG, or, secondarily, VPA. In combination therapy, CZP seems a valuable add-on AED.     

Effect of sildenafil on the anticonvulsant action of classical and second‐generation antiepileptic drugs in maximal electroshock‐induced seizures in mice

Purpose: The goal of the present study was to evaluate the effects of sildenafil on the threshold for electrically induced seizures in mice. In addition, interactions between sildenafil and classical and second‐generation antiepileptic drugs (AEDs), that is, carbamazepine (CBZ), phenobarbital (PB), phenytoin (PHT), valproate (VPA), lamotrigine (LTG), topiramate (TPM), and oxcarbazepine (OXC) were evaluated. Methods: Two electroconvulsive tests were used: maximal electroshock seizure threshold (MEST) and maximal electroshock seizure (MES) tests in mice. Acute adverse effects of the studied combinations were investigated in the chimney test, step‐through passive avoidance task, and grip‐strength test. Total brain and free plasma concentrations of AEDs were also determined. Results: Sildenafil raised the threshold for electroconvulsions in a dose‐dependent manner. It also increased the anticonvulsant activity of CBZ, VPA, and TPM in the MES test, whereas the activity of the remaining AEDs was not significantly changed. Sildenafil increased total brain and free (protein unbound) plasma CBZ concentrations and total brain VPA concentration. Neither sildenafil nor its coadministration with the studied AEDs affected motor coordination and long‐term memory in mice. Interestingly, sildenafil dose‐dependently enhanced the skeletal muscle strength in mice, although combinations of sildenafil with AEDs were ineffective in this respect. Conclusions: Sildenafil significantly raised the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice without any impairment of motor performance and long‐term memory, but it enhanced muscle strength. Treatment of patients on CBZ or VPA with sildenafil may not be recommended due to pharmacokinetic interactions. Coadministration of sildenafil with other AEDs, especially with TPM, seems to be a reasonable choice.     

The importance of drug interactions in epilepsy therapy

Long-term antiepileptic drug (AED) therapy is the reality for the majority of patients diagnosed with epilepsy. One AED will usually be sufficient to control seizures effectively, but a significant proportion of patients will need to receive a multiple AED regimen. Furthermore, polytherapy may be necessary for the treatment of concomitant disease. The fact that over-the-counter drugs and nutritional supplements are increasingly being self-administered by patients also must be considered. Therefore the probability of patients with epilepsy experiencing drug interactions is high, particularly with the traditional AEDs, which are highly prone to drug interactions. Physicians prescribing AEDs to patients with epilepsy must, therefore, be aware of the potential for drug interactions and the effects (pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic) that can occur both during combination therapy and on drug discontinuation. Although pharmacokinetic interactions are numerous and well described, pharmacodynamic interactions are few and usually concluded by default. Perhaps the most clinically significant pharmacodynamic interaction is that of lamotrigine (LTG) and valproic acid (VPA); these drugs exhibit synergistic efficacy when coadministered in patients with refractory partial and generalised seizures. Hepatic metabolism is often the target for pharmacokinetic drug interactions, and enzyme-inducing drugs such as phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbitone (PB), and carbamazepine (CBZ) will readily enhance the metabolism of other AEDs [e.g., LTG, topiramate (TPM), and tiagabine (TGB)]. The enzyme-inducing AEDs also enhance the metabolism of many other drugs (e.g., oral contraceptives, antidepressants, and warfarin) so that therapeutic efficacy of coadministered drugs is lost unless the dosage is increased. VPA inhibits the metabolism of PB and LTG, resulting in an elevation in the plasma concentrations of the inhibited drugs and consequently an increased risk of toxicity. The inhibition of the metabolism of CBZ by VPA results in an elevation of the metabolite CBZ-epoxide, which also increases the risk of toxicity. Other examples include the inhibition of PHT and CBZ metabolism by cimetidine and CBZ metabolism by erythromycin. In recent years, a more rational approach has been taken with regard to metabolic drug interactions because of our enhanced understanding of the cytochrome P450 system that is responsible for the metabolism of many drugs, including AEDs. The review briefly discusses the mechanisms of drug interactions and then proceeds to highlight some of the more clinically relevant drug interactions between AEDs and between AEDs and non-AEDs. Understanding the fundamental principles that contribute to a drug interaction may help the physician to better anticipate a drug interaction and allow a graded and planned therapeutic response and, therefore, help to enhance the management of patients with epilepsy who may require treatment with polytherapy regimens.     

A multicenter randomized controlled trial on the clinical impact of therapeutic drug monitoring in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The Italian TDM Study Group in Epilepsy

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical impact of monitoring serum concentrations of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) in patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. METHODS: One-hundred eighty patients with partial or idiopathic generalized nonabsence epilepsy, aged 6 to 65 years, requiring initiation of treatment with carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB), or primidone (PRM) were randomly allocated to two groups according to an open, prospective parallel-group design. In one group, dosage was adjusted to achieve serum AED concentration within a target range (10-20 microg/ml for PHT, 15-40 microg/ml for PB, 4-11 microg/ml for CBZ, and 40-100 microg/ml for VPA), whereas in the other group, dosage was adjusted on clinical grounds. Patients were followed up for 24 months or until a change in therapeutic strategy was clinically indicated. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics did not differ between the two groups. Most patients with partial epilepsy were treated with CBZ, whereas generalized epilepsies were most commonly managed with PB or VPA. PHT was used only in a small minority of patients. A total of 116 patients completed 2-year follow-up, and there were no differences in exit rate from any cause between the monitored group and the control group. The proportion of assessable patients with mean serum drug levels outside the target range (mostly below range) during the first 6 months of the study was 8% in the monitored group compared with 25% in the control group (p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the monitored group and the control group with respect to patients achieving 12-month remission (60% vs. 61%), patients remaining seizure free since initiation of treatment (38% vs. 41%), and time to first seizure or 12-month remission. Frequency of adverse effects was almost identical in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Only a small minority of patients were treated with PHT, the drug for which serum concentration measurements are most likely to be useful. With the AEDs most commonly used in this study, early implementation of serum AED level monitoring did not improve overall therapeutic outcome. and the majority of patients could be satisfactorily treated by adjusting dose on clinical grounds. Monitoring the serum levels of these drugs in selected patients and in special situations is likely to be more rewarding than routine measurements in a large clinic population.     

Lack of an effect of valproate concentration on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics in developmentally disabled patients with epilepsy

PURPOSE: to describe the population pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine (LTG) in developmentally disabled (DD) patients with epilepsy and (2) to determine if there is an effect of valproate (VPA) concentration on the extent of the pharmacokinetic interaction between VPA and LTG. METHOD: a NONMEM population analysis of steady-state LTG serum concentrations was conducted in patients receiving LTG either as mono or polytherapy with either an enzyme inducer (IND)-carbamazepine (CBZ), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PB) or an inhibitor (VPA). RESULTS: sixty-two patients (33.6+/-11.3 years, 47+/-9.9 kg) receiving LTG monotherapy (n=19) or polytherapy with VPA (n=15), inducer(s) (n=32) or both (n=5) were evaluated. LTG dose of 369+/-236 mg per day (8.1+/-5.9 mg/kg per day) achieved LTG plasma concentrations of 6.8+/-3.3 microg/ml. The observed LTG monotherapy, LTG+IND, and LTG+VPA oral clearance (Cl/F) were 0. 69+/-0.2, 1.60+/-0.65 and 0.2+/-0.05 ml/kg per min, respectively. The final LTG Cl/F model was dependent on body weight, concomitant VPA, and either single or multiple inducers. Including the serum concentrations of CBZ, PHT, or VPA in the model, did not significantly improve estimates of Cl/F. CONCLUSION: LTG Cl/F in DD patients is similar to literature values for ambulatory adult patients; however, low weight adult patients have higher elimination rates, as well as an increased response to enzyme induction. VPA inhibition of LTG Cl/F is maximal within the usually accepted therapeutic range for VPA.