Laser in situ keratomileusis for correction of myopia in eyes after retinal detachment surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correction of myopia in eyes with previous retinal detachment surgery. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted of all consecutive eyes that underwent LASIK after retinal detachment surgery. Data was collected regarding previous ocular surgery and its time prior to LASIK, intra- and postoperative complications, and visual outcome measures pre- and postoperatively. RESULTS: Ten eyes with previous retinal detachment surgery were scheduled for LASIK. One eye was excluded from data analysis as LASIK was aborted due to inadequate microkeratome suction because of conjunctival scarring. Nine eyes underwent an uneventful LASIK procedure. On average, LASIK was performed 130+/-123 months following retinal detachment surgery. Postoperative LASIK follow-up was 14.8+/-12.5 months. No significant intraoperative, postoperative, or retinal complications were observed. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -9.00+/-3.00 diopters (D), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 0.06+/-0.02, and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was 0.64+/-0.16. At the end of follow-up, the mean spherical equivalent refraction was 0.65+/-0.88 D, mean UCVA was 0.57+/-0.14, and mean BSCVA was 0.72+/-0.19. Differences between BSCVA before and after LASIK were statistically significant (P=.038). At final follow-up, the safety index was 1.22 and efficacy index was 1.01. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis was found to be a safe and efficient option for treating refractive errors in eyes with previous retinal detachment surgery.     

LASIK for the correction of residual refractive errors from previous surgical procedures.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To evaluate laser assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) efficacy in correcting residual refractive errors after corneal or intraocular surgery (penetrating keratoplasty, radial keratotomy, photorefractive keratectomy, phacoemulsification with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation, penetrating ocular trauma and phakic IOL implantation). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We performed LASIK in 87 eyes of 62 patients previously operated by means of other surgical techniques to completely correct the residual refractive error. We report the mean refractive error (in terms of spherical equivalent refraction), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) and spectacle corrected visual acuity (SCVA) before and after the surgical procedure. We also analyze safety and stability, in these results with a minimum of 12 months follow-up. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -5.25 +/- 2.1 diopters (D). Postoperatively, mean spherical equivalent was -0.70 +/- 0.65 D, 76% of eyes were between plano and -1.00 D and 99% were between plano and -2.25 D. At 12 months follow-up the change in the refractive result was equal or less than 0.5 D in 94% of eyes. Preoperatively SCVA was 1.0 or better in 24.13% of cases, and 0.5 or better in 89.65%. Postoperative SCVA was 1.0 or better in 26.43% and 0.5 or better in 95%. Preoperative UCVA was 0.1 in 2 eyes, 0.05 in 4 eyes and count fingers in the rest of the cases. Postoperative UCVA was 1.0 or better in 1.1% and 0.5 or better in 70.1%. We had an extremely low complication rate in this particular group of patients. CONCLUSIONS: LASIK can be successfully used to correct residual refractive errors after other surgical procedures.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis in patients with diabetes

PURPOSE: To study the outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) in patients with well-controlled diabetes mellitus. SETTING: Gimbel Eye Centres, Calgary and Edmonton, Canada. METHODS: The charts of all patients with diabetes who had LASIK surgery at the Gimbel Eye Centres were reviewed retrospectively. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), final refraction, and complications were assessed. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients (16 men and 8 women) were identified. Mean patient age was 42 years (range 24 to 57 years). Seventeen patients had diabetes type II, and 7 had diabetes type I. Mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.88 +/- 2.13 diopters (D) (range +1.625 to -9.00 D). Median follow-up was 6 months (range 4 to 44 months). No eye lost BSCVA. Twenty-nine eyes (63%) achieved UCVA 20/25 or better, and 31 eyes (67%) were within +/-0.5 D of the intended refraction after the first LASIK surgery. Retreatment was required in 13 eyes (28.3%) because initial surgery was not adequate to correct the refractive error. At the last follow-up visit, 40 eyes (87%) achieved UCVA of 20/25 or better and 43 eyes (93.5%) were within +/-0.5 D of the intended refraction. Three eyes (6.5%) developed an epithelial defect after surgery, and secondary epithelial ingrowth developed in 2 of these eyes. No advancement of diabetic retinopathy was noticed in any eye at the end of the follow-up period. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis surgery was safely performed in patients with well-controlled diabetes. Enhancement may often be required for optimal correction.     

Artisan iris-claw phakic intraocular lens followed by laser in situ keratomileusis for high hyperopia

PURPOSE: To evaluate safety, efficacy, predictability, stability, complications, and patient satisfaction after Artisan phakic intraocular lens (IOL) implantation followed by laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the correction of high hyperopia. SETTING: Instituto Oftalmólogico de Alicante, Alicante, Spain. METHODS: This prospective trial included 39 eyes with a mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) of 7.39 diopters (D) +/- 1.30 (SD) and a cylinder between 0 and -4.25 D. The Artisan iris-fixated phakic IOL (Ophtec) for hyperopia was implanted, and LASIK was performed 6 to 8 months later. The best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), refraction, endothelial cell loss (ECL), endothelium morphologic analysis, and patient satisfaction were recorded. The minimum follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: At 1 year, 37 eyes (94.9%) were within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and 31 eyes (79.5%) were within +/-0.50 D. Thirty-five eyes (89.7%) achieved a UCVA of 0.5 or better. There was a statistically significant decrease in BCVA after phakic IOL implantation, but this effect was corrected after LASIK. Nine eyes (23.1%) lost 1 line of BCVA; 7 eyes (17.9%) gained at least 1 line. One eye (2.6%) showed a change in SE greater than 1.0 D over the follow-up period. The mean ECL was 10.9%, but morphologic analysis suggested no additional damage caused by LASIK over that produced by phakic IOL surgery. Overall patient satisfaction was high. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of Artisan phakic IOL implantation and LASIK safely, predictably, and effectively reduced high hyperopia. A loss of 1 line of BCVA should be expected in about one third of eyes implanted with this IOL. Halos and glare at night remain a potential problem.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement after photorefractive keratectomy

OBJECTIVE: To describe the safety, effectiveness, and predictability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after primary photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). DESIGN: A retrospective, noncomparative case series. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: Thirty-six consecutive eyes of 30 patients underwent LASIK after primary PRK. A Multiscan Schwind excimer laser was used for LASIK enhancement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, refraction, videokeratography, and complications were determined before and after LASIK retreatment. Follow-up was at least 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 11.11% of eyes showed a UCVA of 20/40 or better. This increased to 94.44% 12 months after LASIK. A UCVA of 20/25 or better was achieved in 0% before and in 72.22% after retreatment. Refraction +/-0.5 diopters (spherical equivalent) represented 0% of eyes before and 77.78% of eyes after enhancement. Before LASIK, two eyes had significant haze. Haze remained in these two eyes and appeared in another eye. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis proved to be safe and effective for treating residual myopia after PRK. Care must be taken when considering LASIK retreatment in patients with significant haze after primary PRK.     

Photorefractive keratectomy with mitomycin C versus LASIK in custom surgeries for myopia: a bilateral prospective randomized clinical trial

PURPOSE: To compare photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) with prophylactic use of mitomycin C (MMC) and LASIK in custom surgeries for myopic astigmatism. METHODS: Eighty-eight eyes of 44 patients with a minimum estimated ablation depth of 50 microm were randomized to receive PRK with MMC 0.002% for 1 minute in one eye and LASIK in the fellow eye. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), cycloplegic refraction, slit-lamp microscopy, contrast sensitivity, specular microscopy, aberrometry, and a subjective questionnaire were evaluated. Forty-two patients completed 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: Mean spherical equivalent refraction error before surgery and mean ablation depth were -3.99+/-1.20 diopters (D) and 73.09+/-14.55 microm in LASIK eyes, and -3.85+/-1.12 D and 70.7+/-14.07 microm in PRK with MMC eyes, respectively. Uncorrected visual acuity was significantly better in PRK with MMC eyes 3 months (P=.04) and 6 months (P=.01) after surgery. Best spectacle-corrected visual acuity and spherical equivalent refraction did not differ significantly in the groups during follow-up (P>.05). Significant haze was not observed in any PRK with MMC eye. Mean higher order aberration was lower in PRK with MMC eyes postoperatively compared with LASIK eyes (P=.01). Better contrast sensitivity was observed in PRK with MMC eyes than LASIK eyes (P<.05). The endothelial cell count did not differ significantly between groups (P=.65). In terms of visual satisfaction, PRK with MMC eyes were better rated. CONCLUSIONS: Photorefractive keratectomy with MMC appears to be more effective than LASIK in custom surgery for moderate myopia. During 6-month follow-up, no toxic effects of MMC were evident. Long-term follow-up is necessary to attest its safety.     

Comparison between LASEK with mitomycin C and LASIK for the correction of myopia of -7.00 to -13.75 D

PURPOSE: To compare laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) and LASIK for the correction of high myopia. METHODS: A prospective, single-masked study was conducted. Patients treated with LASEK to correct myopia > or = -7.00 diopters (D) (spherical equivalent manifest refraction) with a cylinder < or = -3.50 D (LASEK group) were compared to patients treated with LASIK (LASIK group) using the same excimer laser (Technolas 217C). Mitomycin C (MMC) 0.02% was applied for 1 minute in all LASEK-treated eyes. RESULTS: A total of 228 consecutive eyes were included in the study (114 in each group, matched for preoperative refraction). The mean preoperative spherical equivalent manifest refraction was -8.72 +/- 1.20 D in the LASEK group and -8.74 +/- 1.20 D in the LASIK group (range: -7.00 to -13.75 D) (P = .9). Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was significantly lower in LASEK eyes 1, 7, and 30 days postoperatively (P = .0001 for each comparison). No significant differences were found at 3 months postoperatively in UCVA (P = .3), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) (P = .2), or in the safety (P = .6) and efficacy (P = .8) indices. Uncorrected visual acuity was 1.0 or better in 34.2% of LASEK eyes and 44.7% of LASIK eyes. Spherical refraction was +0.25 +/- 0.6 D after LASEK and -0.06 +/- 0.5 D after LASIK (P = .0001). Sixty-eight percent of LASEK eyes and 79% of LASIK eyes were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction. No LASEK eye versus 7 LASIK eyes lost 2 lines of BSCVA. Eight LASEK eyes gained 2 or more lines of BSCVA versus 1 LASIK eye. CONCLUSIONS: Visual improvement after LASEK with intraoperative MMC was significantly slower than after LASIK. Visual outcomes (UCVA, BSCVA, and safety and efficacy indices) 3 months after surgery were similar with both techniques for the correction of high myopia. Ten percent more eyes after LASIK were within +/- 0.50 D of intended refraction.     

Outcomes of ZB5M angle-supported anterior chamber phakic intraocular lenses at 12 years

PURPOSE: To evaluate the visual and refractive stability and the potential long-term risks associated with ZB5M phakic intraocular lens (PIOL) implantation. METHODS: A retrospective, non-randomized, cumulative clinical study was performed over 12 years in a consecutive group of 225 eyes implanted with the ZB5M PIOL. The main analyzed variables were visual and refractive outcomes (best spectacle-corrected visual acuity [BSCVA], uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA], and spherical equivalent), endothelial cell density, and postoperative complications. RESULTS: Mean preoperative spherical equivalent refraction was -17.23 +/- 7.69 diopters (D) and 12 years postoperatively it was -1.80 +/- 0.80 D. Mean BSCVA at 1- and 12-year follow-up was 0.38 +/- 0.19 and 0.57 +/- 0.18, respectively (Wilcoxon test, P < .001). At 12 years postoperatively, 3.5% of eyes lost > or = 2 lines of BSCVA. An initial 10.6% reduction in endothelial cell density was noted in the first year, followed by a mean annual rate of decrease of 1.78%. The cumulative incidence of pupil ovalization was 34.7% (78 eyes), and there was no statistical correlation with endothelial cell impairment. Bilateral hypertensive uveitis was diagnosed in 3 (1.33%) eyes. CONCLUSIONS: The ZB5M PIOL offers good refractive outcomes and stability in the long-term; however, endothelial cell loss increases over 12 years, requiring annual endothelial cell counts.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis versus laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy for the correction of high myopia

PURPOSE: To compare the visual and refractive outcomes of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) in the treatment of high myopia. SETTING: Institute of Vision Research, Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, Yonsei University, and Balgeunsesang Ophthalmology Clinic, Seoul, South Korea. METHODS: Four hundred seventy eyes of 240 patients with manifest refraction spherical components greater than -6.00 diopters (D) were assigned to 2 groups: 324 eyes (167 patients) were treated with LASIK and 146 eyes (73 patients), with LASEK. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), remaining refractive error, corneal haze, and complications were followed in both groups for 12 months. RESULTS: At 12 months, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia in 205 eyes (63.3%) in the LASIK group and 81 eyes (55.5%) in the LASEK group and within +/-1.00 D in 261 eyes (80.6%) and 104 eyes (71.2%), respectively. The UCVA was 20/25 or better in 269 LASIK eyes (83.0%) and 111 LASEK eyes (76.0%). There was more than a 1-line loss of BSCVA in 4 LASIK eyes (1.2%) and 21 LASEK eyes (14.3%). The between-group differences in SE, magnitude of cylinder, UCVA, and haze were statistically significant (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Both LASIK and LASEK were safe and effectively treated eyes with high myopia. Laser in situ keratomileusis provided superior results in visual predictability and corneal opacity.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis enhancement for consecutive hyperopia after myopic overcorrection.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for the treatment of consecutive hyperopia after myopic LASIK. SETTING: Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA. METHODS: In a retrospective study, 36 eyes of 30 patients with consecutive hyperopia after myopic LASIK had LASIK retreatment using the VISX S2 excimer laser. Primary outcome variables including uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, complications, and vector analysis were evaluated preoperatively and 1 day and 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The mean spherical equivalent decreased from +1.52 diopters (D) +/- 0.55 (SD) (range +0.63 to +2.63 D) preoperatively to -0.10 +/- 0.52 D (range -1.25 to +1.50 D) 3 months after retreatment. The UCVA was 20/20 or better in 24 eyes (66.7%) and 20/40 or better in 34 eyes (94.4%). Twenty eyes (55.5%) were within +/-0.5 D of the intended correction and 34 eyes (94.4%), within +/-1.0 D. No eye lost 2 or more lines of BSCVA. One eye (2.8%) developed diffuse lamellar keratitis that resolved without sequelae, and 2 eyes (5.6%) developed nonprogressive epithelial ingrowth that did not require removal. CONCLUSIONS: Laser in situ keratomileusis retreatment for consecutive hyperopia following myopic LASIK was an effective, predictable, and safe procedure. Long-term follow-up is needed to assess stability.     

Posterior corneal ectasia following LASIK

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cases of posterior corneal ectasia following laser in situ keratomileusis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirteen eyes of 7 patients, that were diagnosed to have posterior corneal ectasia (?0.060 mm) on Orbscan topographic system following LASIK, were identified. The parameters evaluated were uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), refraction, contrast sensitivity, glare, corneal topography, keratometry and pachymetry. The preoperative and postoperative data at day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: The mean UCVA of the patients before LASIK surgery was 0.032 +/- 0.04. It was 0.320 +/- 0.159 in follow-up of LASIK surgery after 1 year. The mean Pre-LASIK BCVA was 0.59 +/- 0.11. There was no change in mean BCVA at 1 year. The mean preoperative spherical equivalent was -14.25 +/- 2.91 D except in 2 hyperopic eyes in which the mean spherical equivalent preoperatively was +5.75 +/- 0.35 D. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent after 1 year of LASIK surgery in last follow-up (+/- enhancement) was - 3.45 +/- 2.08 in the myopic eyes and + 1.0 +/- 0.70 in the two hyperopic eyes. The mean preoperative posterior corneal elevation was 0.022 +/- 0.011 mm, which at the end of 1 week following LASIK was 0.067 +/- 0.009 and at 1 year/ last follow-up following LASIK, it was 0.068 +/- 0.006 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Higher amplitudes of refractive correction may lead to the occurrence of posterior corneal ectasia.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis to correct residual myopia after cataract surgery

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness, predictability, and safety of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients underwent LASIK for the correction of residual myopia after cataract surgery. LASIK was carried out using the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper and the NIDEK EC-5000 excimer laser. In all eyes, the follow-up was 12 months. RESULTS: Before LASIK, 1 eye (4.5%) had an uncorrected visual acuity of 0.5 or better; 12 months after LASIK, 10 eyes (45.4%) achieved this level of visual acuity and 0 eyes achieved 1.00 or better. Before LASIK, mean refraction was -2.90 +/- 1.80 D; 12 months after LASIK it decreased significantly to 0.40 +/- 0.60 D (P < .01). In 18 eyes (81.8%) at 12 months after LASIK, spherical equivalent refraction was within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia; 11 eyes (50%) were within 0.50 D. No vision-threatening complications occurred. CONCLUSION: LASIK with the Automated Corneal Shaper and Nidek EC-5000 excimer laser was an effective, predictable, stable, and safe procedure for correcting residual myopia after cataract surgery. No intraocular lens or cataract incision related complications occurred when LASIK was performed at least 3 months after phacoemulsification.     

Visual improvement in high myopic amblyopic adult eyes following phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of angle-supported phakic anterior chamber intraocular lenses in amblyopic adult eyes with very high myopia. METHODS: We evaluated 12 eyes in nine patients with very high myopic amblyopia who received angle-supported phakic intraocular lenses (Phakic 6H) and followed them for more than six months. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and complications were evaluated. A satisfaction score was rated by patients using a 5-point (1-5) numeric scale. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 37.3 +/- 9.4 years, ranging from 29 to 59 years old. The preoperative mean refraction (spherical equivalent, SE) was -20.10 +/- 5.41 diopters (D). The postoperative mean refraction (SE) was -1.75 +/- 0.76 D at six months. The postoperative BCVA improved an average 3.92 +/- 1.24 lines over preoperative values, and mean endothelial cell loss was 8.9% at six months. Development of cataracts, glaucoma, and pupil abnormalities were not demonstrated in any case during the study. The patients were all very satisfied, as the average satisfaction score was 4.3. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that angle-supported phakic anterior chamber intraocular lens implantation may be an effective surgical alternative for the correction of amblyopic adult eyes with very high myopia. However, long-term evaluation is necessary to assess possible complications and long-term safety.     

Single Intacs segment for post-laser in situ keratomileusis keratectasia

PURPOSE: To describe the visual outcome of implantation of a single Intacs segment (Addition Technology Inc.) in eyes with keratectasia after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). SETTING: Private refractive surgery center, Jerusalem, Israel. METHODS: This retrospective, noncomparative, interventional, consecutive, small case series studied 5 eyes of 5 patients with post-LASIK keratectasia from 3 refractive laser centers treated by Intacs implantation. Before and 9 months after Intacs implantation, the uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), manifest refraction, keratometry, videokeratography, inferior-superior asymmetry, and patient questionnaires about visual function were assessed. RESULTS: Intacs implantation was performed 17 to 32 months post LASIK with no intraoperative complications and no loss of visual acuity. After implantation, the UCVA improved 8, 4, 3, 0.5, and 5 lines and the BSCVA, 2, 2.5, 1, 0.5, and 2 lines. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent improved from -1.60 diopters (D) +/- 1.67 (SD) to -0.80 +/- 1.05 D. The mean manifest astigmatic correction decreased from -3.9 +/- 2.96 to -2.46 +/- 2.77 D. Corneal topography showed improved inferior steepening and less irregular astigmatism. The mean inferior-superior asymmetry improved from 7.88 +/- 4.59 to 2.46 +/- 2.77 D. Self-reported visual symptoms improved significantly in Cases 1, 2, and 5 and slightly in Cases 3 and 4. CONCLUSIONS: Implantation of a single Intacs segment inferiorly appeared to improve progressive myopia and regular and irregular astigmatism in eyes with corneal ectasia after LASIK. With further study, this technique may prove to be an effective, relatively noninvasive approach.     

虹膜夹持型前房晶状体植入术治疗高度近视

目的探讨虹膜夹持型前房晶状体植入术治疗高度近视的疗效和安全性。方法2005年8月至2006年2月在本中心接受前房晶状体植入术治疗高度近视的患眼共12例（21只眼）。观察指标包括裸眼视力、最佳矫正视力、眼压、角膜地形图、瞳孔形态、角膜内皮计数、晶状体在前房的位置形态、人工晶状体表面色素沉着情况。结果患者术前最佳矫正远视球镜度为（-17．28±2．95）D,散光度（-1．90±1．02）D,植入度数平均为（-14．53±9．47）D。平均随访时间（13．2±2．1）个月。术后12个月随访到17只眼,其中裸眼远视力较术前最佳矫正远视力提高1行5只眼（29．41％）,提高2行4只眼（23．53％）,提高3行3只眼（17．65％）,提高4行2只眼（11．76％）;手术后最佳矫正远视力较术前最佳矫正远视力提高1行4只眼（23．53％）,提高2行2只眼（11．76％）,提高3行2只眼（11．76％）,提高4行2只眼（11．76％）,提高5行以上5只眼（29．41％）。术前眼压（17．25±2．92）mmHg（1mmHg=0．133kPa）,术后6个月眼压为（17．14±2．52）mmHg,12个月为（17．16±2．57）mmHg,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）;术前角膜内皮计数（2627．89±229．36）个／mm^2,术后6个月为（2605．28±239．22）个／mm^2,术后12个月为（2603．17±237．12）个／mm^2,差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论虹膜夹持型前房晶状体植入术治疗高度近视安全、有效,并且具有良好的预测性;但远期效果需进一步观察。     

Long-term results of superficial laser in situ keratomileusis after ultrathin flap creation

PURPOSE: To study the long-term efficacy, safety, and stability of laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after unintentional ultrathin flap creation less than 80 mum. SETTING: University refractive surgery center. METHODS: This retrospective case series comprised 25 patients (33 eyes) who had LASIK after flap creation less than 80 mum with the Moria M2 disposable microkeratome (head 90 microm). Flap thickness was measured with intraoperative ultrasound pachymetry. Manifest refraction, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, predictability, stability, complications, patient satisfaction, and confocal microscopy images were studied. RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 14.58 months +/- 3.73 (SD) (range 12 to 25 months). The mean flap thickness was 72.1 +/- 5.9 microm (range 58 to 80 microm), and the mean preoperative spherical equivalent (SE) refraction was -5.59 +/- 2.01 diopters (D) (range -10.25 to -3.25 D). On the first postoperative day, the UCVA was 20/25 or better. The SE manifest refraction was 1.00 D or less in all patients. The mean SE manifest refraction was -0.75 +/- 0.55 D (range -1.00 to +0.75 D) (P < .01). At the last follow-up, changes in visual acuity and manifest refraction were not statistically significant; no late postoperative complications were observed. All patients were satisfied with the final outcome. Qualitative analysis of confocal microscopy images revealed interface particles and activated keratocytes. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the small sample and retrospective nature of the study, superficial LASIK seemed to be a safe and predictable technique for myopic refractive corrections. Patients were satisfied with the results and had rapid visual recovery with no intraoperative or early or late postoperative complications. If the safety and efficacy of an ultrathin flap are confirmed by additional studies, superficial LASIK could represent a new approach that combines the advantages of surface and lamellar procedures.     

Clear lens extraction with intraocular lens followed by photorefractive keratectomy or laser in situ keratomileusis

OBJECTIVE: To study photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) or laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) after clear lens extraction (CLE) with intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for hyperopia or astigmatism. DESIGN: Retrospective, noncomparative interventional case series. PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-five eyes (55 subjects) had CLE with posterior chamber IOL implants for hyperopia up to 12.25 diopters (D); 31 eyes were retreated with PRK, and 34 eyes were retreated with LASIK for residual ametropias. INTERVENTION: For PRK and LASIK, the refractive surgery was performed with the slit-scanning excimer laser Nidek EC-5000, Nidek Co., Tokyo, Japan. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Manifest refraction, best-spectacle and uncorrected Snellen visual acuity, haze, and halos were evaluated before surgery and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperative. RESULTS: Forty-seven eyes were evaluated at the 12-month postoperative examination: 96% of these eyes had spherical equivalents (SE) within +/-2 D of emmetropia, 79% of eyes had SE within +/-1 D of emmetropia and 51% of eyes had SE within +/-0.50 D of emmetropia. Eighty-five percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/40 or better, and 46% of eyes had uncorrected visual acuity of 20/20 or better. Eighty-seven percent of the eyes at 12 months postoperative had uncorrected visual acuity within 1 Snellen line of their initial best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) before all treatment. No eye lost 2 Snellen lines of BSCVA at 3, 6, or 12 months after PRK or after LASIK. CONCLUSIONS: IOL implantation for CLE, although an invasive technique, resulted in better refractive outcomes without laser-related clinical complications after PRK or LASIK adjustment.     

Laser in situ keratomileusis for the correction of residual ametropia after penetrating keratoplasty

PURPOSE: To evaluate the safety, efficacy, and predictability of excimer laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) to correct residual myopia and astigmatism after penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). SETTING: Buzard Eye Institute, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. METHODS: Twenty-six eyes had LASIK at least 1 year after PKP. All eyes were followed for at least 6 months after LASIK; 22 eyes were followed for 12 months. Sutures were removed at a mean of 13 months post PKP. Laser in situ keratomileusis was performed with the Chiron Automated Corneal Shaper microkeratome (Bausch & Lomb) and the Visx Star excimer laser. Before LASIK, the mean spherical equivalent (SE) was -4.94 diopters (D) +/- 2.79 (SD) and the mean astigmatism was 2.71 +/- 2.33 D; all eyes had regular astigmatism or slightly decentered, irregular astigmatism. RESULTS: At the last follow-up, the mean postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA) was 20/30, the mean SE was -0.35 +/- 0.65 D, and the mean residual astigmatism was 1.06 +/- 0.67 D. Eighty-six percent of patients had an SE within +/-1.00 D of emmetropia and a UCVA of 20/40 or better. Ten eyes (39%) had 1 or more enhancements, which were performed a mean of 6 months after the primary LASIK. Significant complications such as wound dehiscence, epithelial ingrowth, and corneal decompensation did not occur. At the last follow-up, 18% of patients lost 1 line of best corrected visual acuity and 27% gained 1 line. CONCLUSION: Laser in situ keratomileusis appeared to be a reliable and safe procedure to correct residual myopia and astigmatism after PKP.     

单眼LASIK矫正近视性屈光参差疗效分析

目的探讨单眼准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术（LASIK）治疗单眼近视所致屈光参差的效果。方法采用对单跟等效球镜度-2．50D以上的近视性屈光参差42例，进行单眼LASIK手术前后平均屈光度、屈光参差度数、最佳矫正视力和裸眼视力进行评价，术后随访6～12月。结果术前平均等值球镜度数为-4．66D（-2．50D--9．25D），术后减少至-0．62D（0～-1．70D），LASIK对平均等值球镜改变为-4．38D（-2．00D～-8．00D）。术前两眼平均屈光参差为-5．23D（-2．5D～-9．25D），术后减少至-0．50D（0～-1．25D）。术前术后BCVA（最佳矫正视力）范围均为0．6～1．0，平均最佳矫正视力从术前1．0提高到1．04；术后裸眼视力≥1．0者39跟，平均裸跟视力从术前的0．13术后提高至1．0。结论单眼LASIK治疗近视性届光参差不仅能提高患眼的最佳矫正视力和裸眼视力，解除单眼近视、散光所致的屈光参差对眼镜或角膜接触镜不能耐受的痛苦，而且对恢复双眼单视功能具有积极意义。     

Verisyse虹膜固定型人工晶状体植入与LASIK矫正高度近视术后波前像差分析

目的:检测虹膜固定型人工晶状体植入矫正高度近视术后波前像差并与常规准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(laser in situ keratomileusis,LASIK)术后波前像差进行比较,评价两种手术对波前像差的影响。方法:使用美国VISXStarS4准分子激光系统对A组10例(18眼)高度近视患者行常规LASIK手术。B组10例(15眼)行Verisyse有晶状体眼虹膜固定型人工晶状体植入(verisyse iris-fixated phakic intraocular lens,PIOL,AMO)。使用VISX Wavescan像差仪检测两组术前,术后3,6mo的波前像差。结果:PIOL组与常规LASIK组两组术后裸眼视力较术前最矫正视力,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。术后3,6mo慧差(C8)、球差(C12)两组相比:差异有显著性(P<0.05),LASIK组总高阶像差(0.749±0.096)μm,PIOL组总高阶像差(0.685±0.091)μm,两组相比差异无统计学意义。其中LASIK组术后慧差(C8)、球差(C12)、总高阶像差(RMSh)术后均有增加,球差(C12)增加倍数更多,较术前增加到2～3倍。随访期间两组屈光度数相比,差异无显著性(P>0.05)。最后一次随访LASIK组等效球镜为(-1.42±0.67)D,PIOL组等效球镜为(-1.43±0.31)D。结论:有晶状体眼虹膜固定型人工晶状体值入矫正高度近视,相对于常规LASIK手术,术后屈光度数及视觉质量无明显差异。