Prostate-specific antigen adjusted for the transition zone volume versus free-to-total prostate-specific antigen ratio in predicting prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: We performed this study to assess the efficacy of prostate-specific antigen adjusted for the transition zone volume (PSATZ) and free-to-total prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ratio (F/T ratio) in predicting prostate cancer in men with intermediate PSA levels of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL. METHODS: Between March 1997 and September 1998, PSATZ was obtained from 67 patients who underwent ultrasonography guided systemic sextant biopsies and had a PSA of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL. PSATZ was compared with F/T ratio via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Of 67 patients, 22 (32.8%) had prostate cancer and 45 (67.2%) had benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) on pathologic examination. Mean PSA, PSA density, F/T ratio and PSATZ were 7.96+/-2.01ng/mL, 0.28+/-0.14 ng/mL/cc, 0.10+/-0.06 and 0.70+/-0.28 ng/mL/cc in patients with prostate cancer and 6.39+/-1.68 ng/mL, 0.16+/-0.06 ng/mL/cc, 0.15+/-0.05 and 0.29+/-0.10 ng/mL/cc in patients with BPH, respectively. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PSATZ predicted the biopsy outcome significantly better than F/T ratio in all 67 patients (P<0.01) and in a subset of 53 men with normal digital rectal examination (P<0.01). With a cut-off value of 0.35 ng/mL/cc, PSATZ had a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 89% for predicting prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that PSATZ and F/T ratio may be useful in diagnosing prostate cancer with intermediate levels of PSA. Prostate-specific antigen adjusted for the transition zone volume is more accurate than F/T ratio in distinguishing benign prostatic disease from prostate cancer. But large prospective studies are required to assess the precise role of PSATZ and F/T ratio in early prostate cancer detection.     

Comparison of value of free-to total prostate specific antigen, prostate specific antigen density and prostate specific antigen density of transition zone for diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with a PSA level of 4.1-10 ng/ml

PURPOSE: We evaluated the utility of free-to total PSA (F/T PSA) ratio, PSA density (PSAD) and PSA density of the transition zone (PSATZ) in diagnosis of prostate cancer with intermediate PSA level (4.1-10 ng/ml). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2003, systematic prostate biopsies were performed on 178 patients with intermediate PSA level. The clinical values of F/T PSA ratio, PSAD and PSATZ for the detection of prostate cancer were compared by using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: Overall, 57 of the 178 (32%) patients had prostate carcinoma. The ROC curve analysis showed PSAD and PSATZ were superior to F/T PSA ratio in patients with intermediate PSA level. In patients with total prostate volume greater than 30 cm3, the area under the ROC curve for F/T PSA ratio was greater than that for PSAD and PSATZ. CONCLUSIONS: PSAD and PSATZ were more powerful predictors of prostate cancer than F/T PSA ratio in patients with intermediate PSA level. While F/T PSA ratio was effective for diagnosis of prostate cancer in prostate volume greater than 30 cm3.     

The potential role of prebiopsy magnetic resonance imaging combined with prostate-specific antigen density in the detection of prostate cancer

Aim:   Two-thirds of patients with a gray-zone prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level undergo unnecessary biopsy. Sensitivity is not yet sufficient to permit the use of modified PSA parameters or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging alone for prostate cancer screening. Thus, we evaluated the combination of MR imaging and PSA density (PSAD) for specificity and sensitivity.
Methods:   During the period April 2004 through March 2006, 185 patients with a PSA level of 4.0–10.0 ng/mL underwent MR imaging and transrectal ultrasonography-guided 8-core biopsy (systemic sextant biopsy of the peripheral zone plus two cores of transition zone). All MR images were interpreted prospectively by two radiologists. An image was considered positive for prostate cancer if any feature indicated a cancerous lesion. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to compare the usefulness of the PSA level, PSAD and PSA transitional zone density (PSATZ) for the detection of prostate cancer.
Results:   Of the 185 patients, 62 had prostate cancer. Sensitivity and specificity of the axial T2-weighted MR imaging findings for cancer detection were 79.0% and 59.4%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve was 0.590 for the PSA level, 0.718 for PSAD and 0.695 for PSATZ. MR imaging findings and PSAD were shown by multivariate analysis to be statistically significant independent predictors of prostate cancer ( P  < 0.001). With a PSAD cut-off value of 0.111, sensitivity was 96.8%, but specificity was 19.5%. Combining MR imaging findings with PSAD increased the specificity to 40% and retained 95% sensitivity.
Conclusion:   MR imaging findings combined with PSAD provide high sensitivity and improve the specificity for the early detection of prostate cancer.     

Prostate cancer detection by prostate-specific antigen-related parameters

Total serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, free-to-total PSA ratio (F/T ratio) and PSA density (PSAD) were compared to clarify the clinical significance of these parameters in the diagnosis of prostate cancer (CaP) with intermediate PSA concentrations (4-10 ng/ml). PSAD and F/T ratio were obtained during the period from May 1999 to April 2001 from 43 patients with serum PSA concentrations of 4-10 ng/ml who underwent ultrasound-guided systematic sextant biopsies. PSAD was compared with total serum PSA and F/T ratio via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for diagnosis of CaP. Diagnosis of CaP and non-CaP was made in 12 (27.9%) and 31 (72.1%) of the 43 patients, respectively. Mean serum PSA, PSA density and F/T ratio were 7.308 +/- 0.636 ng/ml, 0.271 +/- 0.039 ng/ml/cm3 and 16.225 +/- 4.911% in patients with CaP and 6.300 +/- 0.289 ng/ml, 0.178 +/- 0.020 ng/ml/cm3 and 15.213 +/- 0.980% in those with non-CaP, respectively. The ROC curve analysis demonstrated that PSAD predicted the biopsy outcome significantly better than F/T ratio and total PSA in all 43 patients (p < 0.05). In distinguishing CaP patients, the cutoff value of 0.16 ng/ml/cm3 for PSAD yielded a specificity level of 71.0% at a sensitivity level of 83.3%. Our study revealed that PSAD is a significant predictor in distinguishing CaP from non-CaP in Japanese men.     

PSAD在PSA 4～10ng患者前列腺癌诊断中的价值

目的探讨前列腺特异性抗原密度（PSAD）在前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）值介于4～10ng之间患者前列腺腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法回顾性分析183例血清PSA值介于4～10ng之间疑似前列腺癌患者的临床资料,所有患者均经直肠B超测得前列腺体积后再行经直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺术,通过接受者工作特征曲线分析法评价PSAD在预测诊断前列腺癌中的应用价值。结果 183例患者中36例经直肠超声下前列腺活检的患者被诊断为前列腺癌,占19.7%。良性前列腺增生组与前列腺癌患者之间,PSA（0.681 5）与PSAD（0.721 4）的曲线下方面积比较相似,而游离前列腺特异性抗原与总前列腺特异性抗原比值（f/tPSA）的曲线下面积只有0.318 2,相比PSA,PSAD值将是一个更好的预测前列腺癌的指标。结论 PSAD对于PSA值介于4～10ng/mL的中国患者是一项更好的预测前列腺癌的指标。     

Usefulness of prostate-specific antigen velocity in screening for prostate cancer

BACKGROUND: The cut-off value of prostate-specific antigen velocity (PSAV) was investigated in relation to the initial prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value in subjects with initial values of 1.0-4.0 ng/mL, and the usefulness and limitations of PSAV as a screening test for prostate cancer were examined. METHODS: In this study, 4883 men who underwent mass screening for prostate cancer two or more times between 1987 and 1998 and had initial PSA levels of 1.0-4.0 ng/mL were investigated. The subjects ranged in age from 42 to 96 years (mean: 68.0 +/- 6.6 years). The cut-off value of PSAV was set at 0.1-1.5 ng/mL per year, and the sensitivity, specificity, efficiency and positive predictive value (PPV) of PSAV for detecting prostate cancer were determined according to the initial PSA value. A similar examination of the average PSAV was carried out in 2888 subjects with three or more visits for mass screening for prostate cancer. RESULTS: The diagnostic efficiency of PSAV was optimal with cut-off values of 0.3 and 0.75 ng/mL per year in those subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively, but the PPV was low at 1.8% in subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. When the cutoff value of PSAV was set at 1.2 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL, the PPV increased to 7.3% and the sensitivity was 40%. The diagnostic efficiency of the average PSAV was optimal at the cut-off values of 0.2 and 0.4 ng/mL per year in subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively, but the PPV was low at 2.2% in the subjects with initial PSA values of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL. When the cut-off value of PSAV was set at 0.75 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 ng/mL, the PPV was 9.8% and the sensitivity was 46%. CONCLUSION: It is possible to improve the diagnostic accuracy of prostate cancer screening using the cut-off value of PSAV and average PSAV in subjects with initial PSA levels of 1.0-4.0 ng/mL. The cut-off values of PSAV should be set at 1.2 and 0.75 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively. The cut-off values of the average PSAV should be set at 0.75 and 0.4 ng/mL per year in individuals with initial PSA levels of 1.0-1.9 and 2.0-4.0 ng/mL, respectively.     

前列腺特异抗原水平为4～10 μg/L的前列腺癌诊断对策

目的评价现有的前列腺特异抗原(PSA)修正方法对PSA在4~10μg/L的前列腺癌的诊断价值。方法选取经直肠B超引导下前列腺多点穿刺活检血PSA测值在4~10μg/L的86例患者,分析其PSAD、PSATZ、F/T比值及PSA修正方法各域值范围内,对前列腺癌诊断的敏感度及特异度。结果PSAD、PSATZ和F/T比值在各域值范围内,对诊断前列腺癌的敏感度均未超过50%,将PSAD域值设为0.18μg/L/cc时有较高的敏感度,F/T比值设为0.25时有较高的特异度,而PSATZ在各域值范围内对前列腺癌的敏感度及特异度无显著优势。结论PSA修正方法不能有效提高国人血PSA4~10μg/L的前列腺癌检出率;当PSAD超过0.18μg/L应建议患者作前列腺穿刺活检,F/T比值小于0.25则应增加穿刺点。     

Prostate specific antigen density for discriminating prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia in the gray zone of prostate-specific antigen.

Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) is currently the best blood marker for prostate cancer. However, low specificity for detection of prostate cancer, especially in the gray zone of PSA, is a problem. We evaluated the clinical significance of PSA density (PSAD) in gray zone PSA cases with conversion of serum PSA to a Stanford reference value. In a series of histologically confirmed 63 benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) patients and 234 prostate cancer patients, 36 BPH patients and 25 prostate cancer patients had gray zone PSA levels. Serum PSA was measured with the Markit-F or Markit-M PA assay. All data were converted to Stanford reference values. We used transabdominal ultrasound to determine prostate volume. PSAD was determined as the serum PSA/prostate volume ratio. The mean PSA values for BPH and prostate cancer were 6.42 +/- 1.80 and 7.80 +/- 2.15 ng/ml (p = 0.0116), respectively, and prostate volume was 33.4 +/- 14.1 ml and 17.1 +/- 8.2 ml, respectively (p < 0.0001). The mean PSAD for prostate cancer was 0.572 +/- 0.363 while that for BPH was 0.218 +/- 0.085 (p = 0.0001). Cut-off values with sensitivity > 90% were 0.218 for PSAD and 30 ml for prostate volume. At these cut-off values, specificity reached 56% for each marker. In discriminating prostate cancer from BPH in the gray zone of PSA, PSAD demonstrated better performance than PSA.     

Value of the Free to Total Prostate Specific Antigen Ratio and Prostate Specific Antigen Density for Detecting Prostate Cancer in Japanese Patients

Background : This study evaluated the free to total serum prostate specific antigen (f/t PSA) ratio and prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) in detecting prostate cancer in Japanese males with a PSA level between 2.5 and 20.0 ng/mL in a community-based urology practice.
Methods : Twenty-six patients with clinically localized prostate cancer and 44 patients with histologically-proven benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) were studied. The serum levels of free PSA (fPSA) and total (t) PSA were determined using a chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay. The f/t PSA ratio was calculated by dividing the fPSA value by the total PSA value and was compared with the PSA and PSAD via the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results: Patients with prostate cancer had a significantly lower f/t PSA ratio than patients with BPH. The PSAD was a superior diagnostic tool over PSA (P < 0.01) when analyzed by ROC curves. The f/t PSA ratio was also superior to PSA, but lacked significance (P=0.12), and similarly, the PSAD was superior, but not significant, to the f/t PSA ratio. Using a cut-off value of 0.1 9, the PSAD had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 82%. With a cut-off value of 14.0%, the f/t PSA ratio had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 66%.
Conclusion: This study showed that PSAD alone improved cancer detection significantly better than PSA. However, it is still unclear whether the f/t PSA ratio is superior to PSA or PSAD in the discrimination between BPH and prostate cancer in Japanese male patients.     

PSA密度在PSA 2.5～10.0 ng/mL和10.1～20.0 ng/mL患者前列腺癌诊断价值的多中心研究

目的探讨前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)在前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)值位于2.5~10 ng/m L和10.1~20.0 ng/m L患者前列腺癌诊断的效能。方法回顾性分析广州地区两家医院中PSA在2.5~20.0 ng/m L之间,行经直肠前列腺体积测量并行前列腺穿刺的461名患者临床资料,入选者分为PSA 2.5~10.0 ng/m L和PSA10.1~20.0 ng/m L两组,通过受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)分析法评价PSAD与PSA在预测前列腺癌的诊断效力。结果 PSA 2.5~10.0 ng/m L和PSA 10.1~20.0 ng/ml两组的曲线下面积比较,PSAD均高于PSA。在PSA 2.5~10.0 ng/m L组,PSAD预测前列腺癌的最佳临界点为0.15 ng·m L~(-1)·m L~(-1),敏感性和特异性分别为64.4%和64.6%;在PSA10.1~20.0 ng/m L组,PSAD预测前列腺癌的最佳临界点为0.33 ng·m L~(-1)·m L~(-1),敏感性和特异性分别为60.3%和82.7%。结论对于PSA2.5~10.0 ng/m L和10.1~20.0 ng/m L的中国男性,PSAD是一种更优的前列腺癌预测指标。     

The clinical potential of pretreatment serum testosterone level to improve the efficiency of prostate cancer screening

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical value of the pretreatment serum testosterone (T) level as a potential predictor of prostate cancer risk in screening for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The subjects were 420 patients suspected of having prostate cancer who underwent prostate biopsy, and whose pretreatment T levels were recorded. We checked for association between the presence of prostate cancer and the following clinical factors: pretreatment serum T level, age, pretreatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, digital rectal examination findings, ratio of free to total PSA, prostate volume, and PSA density (PSAD). RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in mean pretreatment T level between patients diagnosed with cancer (3.9+/-2.4 ng/ml) and patients diagnosed with benign prostate disease (BPD; 3.7+/-1.7 ng/ml); diagnosis was based on prostate biopsy. However, among patients with PSA <10 ng/ml, the pretreatment T level was significantly higher in patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (4.2+/-2.6 ng/ml) than in patients diagnosed with BPD (3.6+/-1.4 ng/ml) (p=0.007); a similar trend was observed among patients with PSAD <0.15 ng/ml/cc. Multivariate analysis indicated that pretreatment T level was an independent significant predictor of positive prostate biopsy (p=0.020). Additionally, the serum T level was significantly lower in patients with a Gleason score >or=7 (3.7+/-2.1 ng/ml) versus a score <7 (4.2+/-1.7 ng/ml) (p=0.030). Also, serum T levels were significantly higher in well-differentiated prostate cancer (4.8+/-2.1 ng/ml) versus moderately differentiated (3.8+/-1.3 ng/ml) or poorly differentiated (3.7+/-1.4 ng/ml) (p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Among relatively low-risk patients, serum T level was an independent significant predictor of positive prostate biopsy, suggesting that the efficiency of prostate cancer screening can be improved by including measurement of serum T level.     

Diagnostic value of prostate-specific antigen-related parameters in discriminating prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Using the percentage (of total) of free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in discriminating prostate cancer (CaP) from benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) has not been fully delineated in Japanese men. To clarify the clinical significance of percent free PSA, various parameters, including total prostate volume, percent free PSA, PSA density (PSAD) and PSA density of transition zone volume (PSAT), were compared. METHODS: Ninety-seven patients who had visited one of three community-based hospitals, and whose total PSA value ranged from 4 to 20 ng/mL were prospectively enrolled in this study. Fresh sera were applied to measure the percent free PSA. RESULTS: Of the 97 patients, CaP and BPH were diagnosed in 24 (25%) and 73 patients, respectively. In discriminating CaP patients, the cutoff values of 17% for percent free PSA, 0.3 ng/mL per cm3 for PSAT, and 0.19 ng/mL per cm3 for PSAD yielded specificity levels of 56, 40 and 58% at sensitivity levels of 92, 92 and 79%, respectively. As for the 65 patients with intermediate PSA, range 410 ng/mL, and normal digital rectal examination, the percent free PSA and total prostate volume statistically discriminated CaP patients from BPH patients. A multiple logistic regression model proved percent free PSA to be the only significant discriminating factor (P=0.045; odds ratio, 9.06). CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study revealed percent free PSA to be a significant useful predictor in discriminating CaP from BPH in Japanese men.     

Volume-adjusted prostate-specific antigen (PSA) variables in detecting impalpable prostate cancer in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL: transabdominal measurement makes a significant contribution

OBJECTIVE: To examine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels adjusted according to prostate volume improve prostate cancer detection using transrected biopsies in men with PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL, and benign findings on a digital rectal examination (DRE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Men aged < or = 79 years and with serum PSA levels of 2-4 ng/mL and normal DRE findings were prospectively enrolled. Eligible patients were recommended for transrectal prostate biopsies after measuring prostate volumes with transrectal (TRUS) and transabdominal (TAUS) ultrasonography, and transition zone volumes with TRUS. In addition to PSA levels and the free-to-total PSA ratio, volume-adjusted PSA levels, PSA densities determined by TRUS (PSAD(TRUS)), and TAUS (PSAD(TAUS)), and PSA transition zone densities (PSATzD) were compared using receiver operating characteristic analysis. RESULTS: Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 31 (22%) of the 139 men who had prostate biopsies. The area under the curve (AUC) of PSAD(TRUS) (0.796) and PSATzD (0.792) was similar and significantly greater than that of PSA (AUC 0.588) and the free-to-total PSA ratio (AUC 0.658). PSAD(TAUS) was a significantly better indicator of prostate cancer than PSA levels alone (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION: As predictors of prostate cancer, there were no significant differences between PSAD(TRUS) and PSATzD. Although PSAD(TAUS) was worse than PSA variables adjusted by total and transition zone prostate volumes determined by TRUS, it was a better predictor than the PSA value alone in men with a low PSA level. These results indicate that TAUS is worthwhile where the routine use of TRUS before biopsy is difficult.     

Combined use of PSA density and free to total PSA ratio for cancer detection from patients with PSA elevations

Prostate specific antigen (PSA) has been used an excellent diagnostic indicator, but its low cancer specificity has been pointed out. In this study, we investigated whether or not the use of Prostate specific antigen density (PSAD) in combination with free/total (F/T) ratio could improve biopsy indication in patients with abnormal PSA levels. Investigated were 428 patients undergoing prostate biopsy in our institution between January 2001 and September 2004, in which PSA levels were 4-20 ng/ml, and F/T ratio and prostate volume (hereinafter 'PV') could also be measured. At the cut-off values of 0.15 for PSAD and 0.25 for F/T ratio, the specificity and sensitivity were 37.7% and 85.5%, respectively, with PSAD alone; 20.1% and 91.8%, respectively, with F/T ratio alone; and 46.5% and 100%, respectively, with PSAD and F/T ratio. These results indicated that PSAD in combination with F/T ratio could also be an excellent biopsy indicator.     

Value of prostate specific antigen α1-antichymotrypsin complex for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with a PSA level of 4.1–10.0ng/mL: Comparison with PSA-related parameters

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the usefulness of prostate specific antigen alpha1-antichymotrypsin complex (PSA-ACT) in the differential diagnosis of prostate cancer in patients with a PSA level of 4.1-10.0 ng/mL compared to several PSA- and PSA-ACT-related parameters. METHODS: Serum samples were obtained from 103 patients with no evidence of malignancy on biopsy and 29 with histologically confirmed prostate cancer. All patients had pretreatment serum PSA levels between 4.0 and 10.0 ng/mL. The different forms of serum PSA, including total PSA (tPSA), free PSA (fPSA) and PSA-ACT were measured using immunofluorometric techniques with different monoclonal antibodies against PSA and ACT. Furthermore, tPSA and PSA-ACT densities of the whole prostate (PSAD and ACTD, respectively) and the f-to-tPSA and the f-to-PSA-ACT ratios (F/T ratio and F/ACT ratio, respectively) were calculated. RESULTS: The differences between patients with prostate cancer and benign prostatic disease were significant with respect to all six parameters examined in this study. Analysis of receiver operating characteristics revealed that the areas under the curve for PSA-ACT, ACTD and the F/ACT ratio were larger than those for tPSA, PSAD and the F/T ratio, respectively. However, there were no significant differences in discrimination between benign and malignant diseases among these six parameters. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who have an intermediate serum PSA level, PSA-ACT and its associated parameters may not be significantly superior in the differential diagnosis between prostate cancer and benign prostatic diseases compared to tPSA and its traditional relatives.     

Ten year trend in prostate cancer screening with high prostate-specific antigen exposure rate in Japan

Background:   The tendency of the results and quality control of prostate cancer screening serially performed for 10 years in an area of Japan were evaluated.
Methods:   A total of 39 213 men over 55 years of age have participated in the mass screening of prostate cancer in the Otokuni District, since 1995. Men whose prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were more than 4.1 ng/mL were indicated for the second screening. In the second screening, prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) was calculated in men whose PSA levels ranged from 4.1 to 10.0 ng/mL.
Results:   Secondary screening was indicated in a total of 2428 subjects, of whom 1633 underwent it. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 267 men. As a result of the evaluation of the indication of prostate biopsy according to the PSAD in 894 who underwent secondary screening for the first time, the procedure was judged to be unnecessary in 269 (35%) of 765 cases. Of these 269 subjects, 23 (8.5%) were found to have cancer. Clinically localized prostate cancer increased by 17%, and locally advanced and metastatic cancers decreased by 12% in the second compared with the first five years of the ten-year period. The exposure rate of PSA screening in the Otokuni District was 65% with the application for the rate of screenees whose PSA level was 4.1 ng/mL or above.
Conclusions:   The Japanese basic health screening system allows the determination of high-PSA exposure areas. Serial prostate cancer screening showed a tendency of stage migration in the screened cancer patients. The use of PSAD in secondary screening substantially reduces the necessity of prostate biopsy; however, the encouragement of PSA-positive individuals to periodically receive prostate cancer screening is essential to maintain the quality of the screening system.     

Prospective evaluation of prostate cancer detection by prostate-specific antigen-related parameters

BACKGROUND: The diagnostic value of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for differentiating prostate cancer from benign prostatic conditions is limited by its lack of specificity. Several PSA-related parameters have been suggested as enhancing the discriminatory power of total PSA values, but their clinical utility should be considered preliminary until established in a prospectively evaluated cohort. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, results of ultrasound-guided biopsy and/or transurethral resection of the prostate gland were assessed in 706 consecutive Japanese men. The clinical usefulness of total PSA, free PSA, percentage of free PSA, PSA density (PSAD), PSA density for transition zone (PSADT) and gland volume for predicting prostate cancer was investigated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis in 16 different patient subgroups. RESULTS: Overall, 150 of the 706 patients (21.2%) had prostate carcinoma. The ROC curve analysis showed that PSAD and PSADT were more powerful predictors of prostate cancer than total PSA in most of the 16 patient subgroups tested. The improvement in performance was modest, however. No substantial difference was noted between PSAD and PSADT. Total gland volume did not significantly affect the performance of these parameters. The use of a PSAD threshold value of 0.11-10.15 ng/mL per cm3 (or a PSADT value of 0.23-0.27 ng/mL per cm3) would have avoided 24-48% (or, for PSADT, 34-40%) of unnecessary biopsies at the cost of missing 5-10% of detectable cancers in a patient subgroup with intermediate total PSA levels. The performance of free PSA and percentage of free PSA was worse than that of any other test in this study. This may be due to inappropriate handling of sera prior to measurement. CONCLUSIONS: The discriminatory potential of total PSA for predicting prostate cancer was modestly improved by the use of PSAD and PSADT. No substantial advantage of PSADT over PSAD could be demonstrated. Stringent and standardized storage conditions should always be maintained when applying free PSA-related parameters.     

Utility of Volume Adjusted Prostate Specific Antigen Density in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Arab Men

Background: This study was undertaken to assess the utility of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA density (PSAD) in discriminating between benign and malignant prostate disease in the Kuwaiti Arab population.Methods: A total of 100 consecutive patients suspected of having prostate cancer because of serum PSA > 4 ng/ml, or detection of a prostatic nodule on rectal examination were further investigated by determination of PSAD, TRUS of prostate, sexant prostatic biopsy and histological analysis to establish the correct diagnosis. Other diagnostic measures included the determination of the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, sensitivity and specificity. Results: Of the 100 prostate biopsies that were performed, 33 cases were confirmed to be prostate cancer and 67 were described as benign lesions comprising benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) with or without prostatitis. The age range for patients with prostate cancer was 42–90 years, and 52–90 years for those without prostate cancer. The mean prostate volume was 58.82 cc (range 9–177 cc) and 62.60 cc (range 15–140 cc), the mean PSA value was 36.65 ng/ml (range 5.8–200 ng/ml) and 16.49 ng/ml (range 1.4–46.0 ng/ml), while the mean PSAD was 0.92 (range 0.046–5.714) and 0.452 (range 0.034–2.294) for patients with prostate cancer and patients without prostate cancer respectively. Patients with PSA less than 4 ng/ml (3 cases) all had benign prostate lesions, and 7 cases with PSA more than 50 ng/ml all had prostate cancer and were excluded because values above 50 ng/ml have close to 100% specificity for prostate cancer. Further analysis was done on the remaining 90 cases which were patients with a PSA between 4 and 50 ng/ml. The discriminating power of serum PSA for detecting prostate cancer as estimated by the area under ROC was 0.686 while that for PSAD was 0.732. The maximum likelihood for a positive PSA was at a PSAD cut-off point of 0.32. For the PSA cut-off point of l0 ng/ml, the sensitivity was 80%, and specificity was 42.2%. For the PSAD cut-off point of 0.32, the sensitivity was 58% and the specificity 76.6%. Conclusions: Determination of PSAD is not a useful adjunct to serum PSA values in the range of 10–50 ng/ ml in our population. PSAD value less than 0.32 with PSA less than l0 ng/ml strongly suggests benign disease.     

PSA、PSAD和PSAT在前列腺穿刺活检中的价值

目的 研究血清前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)及其密度(PSAD)和移行带密度(PSAT)在前列腺穿刺活检中的价值.方法 选取本院2014年5月至2015年5月收治的150例患者进行前列腺穿刺活检,分析并比较PSA、PSAD、PSAT在前列腺穿刺活检中的差异及其在确诊疾病方面的价值.结果 在前列腺穿刺活检的150例中发现PSA＜4 ng/mL有8例,4 ng/mL≤PSA≤20 ng/mL有66例,PSA ＞20 ng/mL有76例.其中在PSA＜4 ng/mL的8例中,活检结果良性前列腺增生6例,前列腺小细胞癌1例,前列腺横纹肌肉瘤1例.在4 ng/mL≤PSA≤20 ng/mL的66例中,活检结果诊断为前列腺癌增生患者54例,活检阳性率为81.8％,PSA平均值为(13.98±1.51) ng/mL,PSAD平均值为(0.32±0.18);PSAT平均值为(0.35±0.18);活检前列腺癌12例,活检阳性率为19.2％,PSA平均值为(14.29±1.48) ng/mL,PSAD平均值为(0.42±0.15),PSAT平均值为(0.82±0.15);将其分为良性前列腺增生组和前列腺癌组,两组差异具有统计学意义(P＜0.05).当PSAD ＞0.13或PSAT＞ 0.15时,前列腺癌的敏感性分别为92.86％和96.94％.在PSA＞ 20 ng/mL的76例中,前列腺癌有68例,活检阳性率89.47％.结论 在4 ng/mL≤PSA≤20 ng/mL时,PSAD和PSAT对前列腺增生和前列腺癌的鉴别诊断具有重要意义,其中又以PSAT更为准确;PSA＞ 20ng/mL时,应高度怀疑前列腺癌,及时确诊治疗.     

8点及12点前列腺穿刺活检诊断前列腺癌的价值比较研究

目的比较8点及12点前列腺穿刺活检诊断前列腺癌的价值,分析前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)、前列腺特异性抗原密度(PSAD)及前列腺体积(PV)对前列腺癌检出率(PCDR)的影响。方法回顾性分析260例因PSA异常增高而接受首次直肠超声引导下前列腺穿刺活检的患者相关资料,其中132例患者接受8点穿刺,128例患者接受12点穿刺。结果依据PSA、PV、PSA与PV及PSAD,患者被进一步分组。8点及12点的总的PCDR没有显著的差异,在PV≥45mL、PSA≥10ng/mL且PV≥45mL及0.15ng/(mL·cm3)≤PSAD≤0.25ng/(mL·cm3)组中,12点的PCDR明显高于8点。结论 8点及12点前列腺穿刺总的PCDR没有显著区别(P0.05),但在PV较大同时PSA较高或者PSAD处于中等大小时(0.15~0.25)ng/(mL·cm3),12点的PCDR明显高于8点(P均0.05)。