TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉治疗肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效

目的：探讨TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁关节治疗肩锁关节脱位的疗效。方法回顾性分析2013年5月至2015年5月于我院采用TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁关节治疗的13例肩锁关节脱位病人（TightRope+锚钉组）及采用肩锁钩钢板治疗的21例肩锁关节脱位病人（肩锁钩钢板组）的临床资料,比较两组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后及末次随访时的X线片及术后3、6个月及末次随访时的Neer肩关节功能评分。结果两组的手术时间、术中出血量比较,差异均无统计学意义（均P＞0.05）。在术后3、6个月及末次随访时,TightRope+锚钉组的Neer肩关节功能评分分别为（84.5±8.1）分、（91.8±9.4）分、（96.1±11.1）分,而肩锁钩钢板组的相应得分分别为（72.4±7.5）分、（86.9±9.6）分、（89.2±9.8）分,TightRope+锚钉组明显优于肩锁钩钢板组,差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。末次随访时的X线片提示TightRope+锚钉组病人无复位丢失、创伤性关节炎等出现;肩锁钩钢板组出现4例肩峰下撞击征,1例肩峰骨溶解,所有病人均在8~10个月后取出内固定,2例病人取出钢板后出现复位丢失。结论采用TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁关节治疗肩锁关节脱位,可获得更符合生物力学的复位,肩锁关节稳定,肩关节功能恢复满意,无需二次手术取出内固定。     

肩锁钩钢板联合带线锚钉重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位

目的探讨肩锁钩钢板联合带线锚钉重建喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。方法对17例肩锁关节脱位进行肩锁钩钢板内固定（钩钢板组）,12例进行肩锁钩钢板联合带线锚钉重建喙锁韧带治疗（联合锚钉组）。结果 29例均得到随访8-24个月,平均16个月。钩钢板组术后肩锁关节间隙增宽1例、术后4个月肩峰切割并取出内固定后轻度脱位1例、术后1年取出内固定后轻度脱位1例。联合锚钉组术后至取出内固定后未见不良并发症出现。结论肩锁钩钢板联合带线锚钉治疗肩锁关节脱位能有效避免肩峰切割、取出内固定后再脱位等并发症,是肩锁关节脱位的有效治疗方法。     

锁骨钩钢板配合带线锚钉治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位

目的比较单纯锁骨钩钢板与锁骨钩钢板配合带线锚钉治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效。方法应用锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗肩锁关节脱位30例（A组）,应用锁骨钩钢板配合带线锚钉修复喙锁韧带治疗肩锁关节脱位25例（B组）。B组术后3个月取出锁骨钩钢板,带线锚钉不取出。采用Lazzcano标准评定患肩功能。结果两组患者均获得6个月以上随访。术后1~3个月,两组均未发生内固定松动、脱钩、肩锁关节再脱位。术后1、3、6个月,A、B两组肩关节功能评分差异无统计学意义。结论锁骨钩钢板配合带线锚钉治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位疗效与单纯应用锁骨钩钢板无明显差异,说明肩锁关节的解剖结构重建有效。     

锁扣带袢钛板联合锚钉治疗Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效分析

目的比较锁扣带袢钛板(TightRope)重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁韧带与单纯锁骨钩钢板治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位的疗效。方法将72例Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位患者按内固定方法分为观察组(采用TightRope+3.5 mm锚钉,35例)和对照组(采用锁骨钩钢板,37例)。记录两组手术时间、术中出血量及术后并发症;按Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分评价疗效。结果患者均获得随访,时间12~18个月。对照组于术后6~11个月拆除内固定。两组手术时间、术中出血量差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。术后3、6个月及末次随访Constant-Murley肩关节功能评分:观察组分别为(88.4±1.7)、(90.0±2.9)、(90.8±2.4)分,对照组分别为(82.1±2.1)、(86.4±1.8)、(86.6±1.7)分,差异均有统计学意义(P0.05)。并发症发生率:观察组为5.71%,对照组为24.32%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论与单纯锁骨钩钢板相比,TightRope重建喙锁韧带联合锚钉修复肩锁韧带治疗Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位可以更好地促进肩关节功能恢复,减少肩峰撞击及肩峰下骨溶解等并发症的发生,并能避免二次内固定取出术。     

带线锚钉修复喙锁韧带对肩锁关节脱位术后疼痛的影响

目的 探讨带线锚钉修复喙锁韧带对肩锁关节脱位患者术后肩关节疼痛的影响.方法 回顾性分析2017年2月～2020年6月本科开展手术治疗的45例RockwoodⅢ-V型肩锁关节脱位患者临床资料,依据术中是否接受喙锁韧带修复,分为两组:喙锁韧带修复组(观察组)22例,单纯钩钢板组(对照组)23例.记录两组患者的手术时间、术中...     

锁骨钩钢板治疗新鲜 NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折及Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位

目的 总结锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗新鲜Neer Ⅱ型锁骨远端骨折及Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位的手术方法及临床疗效.方法 2004年8月～2008年10月,应用锁骨钩钢板治疗28 例Neer Ⅱ型锁骨远端骨折和21 例 Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位,术中仅行锁骨钩钢板固定,未刻意修复喙锁韧带、喙肩韧带.术后X光片评估锁骨骨折愈合及肩锁关节脱位的复位,根据Constant-Murley 评分系统评价肩关节功能康复情况.结果 手术后复查X 线片示锁骨远端骨折及肩锁关节均完全复位.患者均获随访,随访12～48月,平均14.9月,均提示锁骨远端骨折愈合、无螺钉松动、钢板或钩部折断.术后8～18月内固定取出后,无肩锁关节再脱位.2例术后4个月患肩活动过大时明显感肩部酸痛不适,8月后取出钢板后症状消失.随访终末,所有患者Constant-Murley 评分平均为89.6分(83～92分).结论 采用锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗新鲜NeerⅡ型锁骨远端骨折及Tossy Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位,具有复位简单、固定确切、肩关节可以早期活动、肩关节功能恢复好等优点.     

锁骨钩钢板加喙肩韧带移位修复肩锁关节脱位

目的 总结锁骨钩钢板内同定联合喙肩韧带移位重建喙锁韧带修复肩锁关节脱位的手术方法及疗效.方法 2004年8月-2007年12月,应用锁骨钩钢板加喙肩韧带移位修复12例肩锁关节脱位患者.男9例,女3例;年龄22～56岁,平均32岁.摔伤6例,砸伤4例,车祸伤2例.左侧5例,右侧7例.肩锁关节脱位参照王亦璁分型方法:Ⅲ型8例,Ⅳ型3例,Ⅴ型1例.受伤至手术时间为3～28 d,平均6 d.术后患肢悬吊保护,3～5 d后开始功能锻炼.结果 术后切口均Ⅰ期愈合,1周后X线片示肩锁关节均完全复位.患者均获随访,随访时间12～30个月.无钢板螺钉松动、钩部折断及肩峰骨折发生.2例术后2个月患肩活动时稍感酸痛不适,取出钢板后症状消失.术后6～10个月取出钢板后均末发生再次脱位.术后1年根据Karlsson等疗效标准评价肩关节功能:优11例,良1例.结论 采用锁骨钩钢板内固定联合喙肩韧带移位术修复肩锁关节脱位,具有创伤小、操作简便、对肩关节生理影响小、肩关节稳定性恢复确切等优点.     

锁骨钩钢板加喙肩韧带转位治疗肩锁关节Ⅲ度脱位

目的介绍锁骨钩钢板加喙肩韧带转位治疗Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位的方法和经验。方法2003年4月至2008年4月采用锁骨钩钢板内固定加喙肩韧带转位治疗Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位18例,术中清理肩锁关节,喙肩韧带转位重建喙锁韧带,肩锁关节复位,锁骨钩钢板固定。结果术后均接受随访,按照Lazzcano标准评定患者术后功能,均未发生感染及钢板螺钉松动断裂现象,钢板取出后脱位无复发,效果良好。结论该术式治疗肩锁关节脱位具有操作简单、牢固可靠、动态固定、复位良好、重建韧带效果可靠、肩关节功能恢复快、优良率高、并发症少及内固定取出后不复发等特点,是目前治疗新鲜Ⅲ度肩锁关节脱位理想的方法,可推广应用。     

钩钢板联合喙锁韧带动力重建治疗肩锁关节脱位

目的观察应用锁骨钩钢板联合止点外移动力重建喙锁韧带治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位临床效果。方法通过应用切开复位锁骨钩钢板联合止点外移动力重建喙锁韧带的手术方法治疗TossyⅢ型肩锁关节脱位患者32例,男21例,女11例;年龄17～61岁,平均35岁。进行回顾性研究。结果所有患者均获得6个月～3年的随访,平均15个月。拆除钢板后无一例出现再脱位及术后肩部疼痛。按Poigenfurst的疗效评价标准进行评估优28例,良4例,优良率100％。结论该术式内固定牢固,术后可早期进行肩关节功能锻炼,保留肩锁关节微动的生理功能,取出内固定后避免肩锁关节再脱位。     

喙肩韧带移位联合锁骨钩钢板治疗8例Rockwood Ⅲ型肩锁关节脱位

[目的]探讨喙肩韧带移位联合锁骨钩钢板治疗RockwoodⅢ肩锁关节脱位的临床疗效及并发症。[方法]回顾分析本院2010年8月~2013年7月收治的8例RockwoodⅢ型肩锁关节脱位,行喙肩韧带移位替代喙锁韧带,锁骨钩钢板固定。术后颈腕吊带固定1周,加强肩关节功能训练。[结果]8例患者均获得随访,随访时间24~59个月,平均38.5个月。6例取出钢板,取钢板时间为术后12~36个月,平均18.7个月,其中1例术后18个月钢板断裂,未见感染、畸形、再脱位等并发症。术后1年内,VAS评分随着时间延长而减少,而肩关节功能评分逐渐增加。末次随访时VAS评分(0.38±1.06)分,肩关节功能评分(96.13±4.36)分。6例去除钢板前后肩关节功能评分对比,两组间差异无明显统计学意义(P0.05),但去除钢板后肩关节功能评分仍高于去除前。[结论]喙肩韧带移位联合锁骨钩钢板短期内存在肩关节慢性疼痛及肩关节功能受限,长期随访临床疗效良好。锁骨钩钢板存留体内可能会影响肩关节功能,建议及早取出。     

The acromioclavicular joint

Acute or chronic instability and osteoarthritis of the acromioclavicular (ac) joint may cause significant impairment of the shoulder. In this continuing education report, the pathomorphology of acute ac dislocations is described based on the Rockwood classification. Decision making on conservative or surgical treatment is discussed. Surgical techniques are presented as acromioclavicular or coracoclavicular procedures. Persistent complaints may warrant additional surgical therapy after conservative treatment as well as after primary surgical treatment. In these cases, residual instability must be addressed. A modified Weaver-Dunn procedure is presented in detail. In any patient with shoulder pain, osteoarthritis of the ac joint has to be taken into consideration. Resection of the lateral clavicle has proved to be effective in these patients.     

Coplaning of the acromioclavicular joint

Purpose: Coplaning removes inferior spurs or portions of the distal clavicle to decrease injury to the rotator cuff. This study sought to determine if the presence or degree of coplaning influenced the results and if reoperations for distal clavicle symptoms were needed. Type of Study: Nonrandomized control study. Methods: A total of 76 patients undergoing arthroscopic subacromial decompression (ASD) followed for at least 25 months were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 included 28 patients who underwent ASD with removal of only an inferior clavicular osteophyte. Group 2 included 27 patients with resection of any inferior clavicle spur, violation of the inferior joint capsule, and removal of articular cartilage to a level adjacent with the resected acromion. As much as 50% of the articular cartilage was removed in some cases. Group 3 included 21 patients who underwent a complete distal clavicle excision. Radiographs, charts, and arthroscopic videotapes were reviewed and the degree of claviculectomy exactly determined. Follow-up evaluations included the Constant-Murley, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), SANE, and Rowe shoulder scores, with special attention given to acromioclavicular (AC) joint pain and additional operations. Results: The average age of the patients was 49 years (range, 19 to 81 years) and follow-up averaged 40 months (range, 25 to 68 months). Follow-up Constant, ASES, Rowe, and SANE scores for the various groups were calculated. Group 1 scores were 99.4, 98.7, 98.6, and 98.1, respectively; group 2 scores were 96.8, 98.7, 98.5, and 95.7, respectively; and group 3 scores were 98.4, 99.4, 99.3, and 98.6, respectively. No patient required any additional AC joint surgery. Conclusions: Violation of the AC joint capsule and partial distal clavicle resection to make it confluent with the resected acromion (coplaning), does not cause increased AC joint symptoms, compromise the results, or lead to additional surgery at an average 40-month follow-up.Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery, Vol 17, No 9 (November-December), 2001: pp 913–917     

锁骨钩钢板治疗肩锁关节脱位

2003-2005年，我院对31例肩锁关节脱位患者采用锁骨钩钢板内固定，疗效满意。     

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint

Injuries to the acromioclavicular joint are common but underdiagnosed. Sprains and minor subluxations are best managed conservatively, but there is debate concerning the treatment of complete dislocations and the more complex combined injuries in which other elements of the shoulder girdle are damaged. Confusion has been caused by existing systems for classification of these injuries, the plethora of available operative techniques and the lack of well-designed clinical trials comparing alternative methods of management. Recent advances in arthroscopic surgery have produced an even greater variety of surgical options for which, as yet, there are no objective data on outcome of high quality. We review the current concepts of the treatment of these injuries.     

Osteomyelitis post acromioclavicular joint reconstruction

Acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) injury is a common shoulder injury. There are various techniques of ACJ reconstruction. Superficial infection after ACJ reconstruction is not an uncommon complication. However, osteomyelitis post ACJ reconstruction has never been highlighted as a possible complication. Our patient is a 31-year-old male who sustained a Rockwood 5 ACJ dislocation and had anatomical ACJ reconstruction with autogenous gracilis and semitendinosus graft. Our technique involved the anatomical reconstruction of the ACJ and the coracoclavicular ligament with the usage of two bioscrews and the temporary stabilisation of the ACJ with two k-wires. As in any orthopaedic surgery, infection is often disastrous especially when the surgery involves implants. It can be disastrous with high morbidity to the patient as well as a costly complication to treat. Therefore, we wish to highlight this case as despite its rarity, osteomyelitis can be devastating to the patient and should be prevented if possible.