临床少见的腹腔隙综合征一例报告

结肠造口旁疝是与结肠造口有关的一种特殊的腹壁切口疝,发生率约10％。小的造口旁疝通常不用手术治疗,但是当巨大的造口旁疝影响日常生活、有嵌顿肠管坏死或穿孔的危险时,则需手术治疗。我科对1例直肠癌(Miles)术后的复发性巨大造口旁疝的患者采用造口易位、腹腔内修补术,术后病人出现腹腔隙综合征(Abdominal Compartment Syndrome ACS),现报告如下。     

腹壁造瘘口旁疝的预防与处理（附13例报告）

目的探讨腹壁造瘘口旁疝的手术治疗方法。方法回顾性分析13例腹壁造瘘口旁疝的临床特点及修补方法。结果本组13例患者中,采用局部缝合2例,无张力修补7例,重新造瘘加补片4例。切口Ⅰ期愈合9例（69.23%）,切口感染4例（30.77%）,复发1例,术后复发率（7.69%）。结论腹壁造瘘口旁疝的治疗关键在于预防,按照腹壁造瘘旁疝发生的原因,及时治疗伴发疾病或基础疾病,改进操作技术及手术方式,对于缺损在5 cm 以上造瘘口疝则可行补片修补,可降低造瘘口旁疝的发生。     

复合材料补片无张力修补腹壁巨大切口疝18例围术期护理

为18例腹壁巨大切口疝患者采用复合材料补片行无张力修补术,术前认真评估患者,做好心理、呼吸道及肠道护理,合理用药,行腹腔扩容、腹壁顺应性锻炼;术后做好饮食护理,防治感染,预防腹内压增高,严密观察心肺功能,并做好出院指导。结果手术修补成功,未发生切口感染;术后出现少量积液2例,经穿刺抽液治愈;随访1～4年,无复发病例。认为应用复合材料补片无张力修补腹壁巨大切口疝疗效满意,围术期精心护理是治疗成功的关键。     

复合材料补片无张力修补腹壁巨大切口疝18例围术期护理

为18例腹壁巨大切口疝患者采用复合材料补片行无张力修补术,术前认真评估患者,做好心理、呼吸道及肠道护理,合理用药,行腹腔扩容、腹壁顺应性锻炼;术后做好饮食护理,防治感染,预防腹内压增高,严密观察心肺功能,并做好出院指导.结果手术修补成功,未发生切口感染;术后出现少量积液2例,经穿刺抽液治愈;随访1～4年,无复发病例.认为应用复合材料补片无张力修补腹壁巨大切口疝疗效满意,围术期精心护理是治疗成功的关键.     

腹腔镜下造口旁疝修补手术的围手术期护理

造口旁疝是造口术后最常见的晚期并发症之一,发病率高达50％以上。既往造口缺损区域的直接缝合修补和造口移位加缺损区域缝合修补,有较高的复发率,而且存在新造口旁疝发生的可能。进腹补片修补术虽可降低复发率,却有因补片污染而导致手术失败的可能。因此,我院普外科自2004-2007年,采用腹腔镜技术对17例造口旁疝的患者进行了补片修补术,效果满意,现将围手术期护理报道如下。     

腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术后的护理

目的探讨腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术后患者的护理措施，提高患者的生存质量。方法10例腹腔镜下造口旁疝补片修补术后患者进行针对性护理措施。结果10例患者手术顺利，术后恢复良好，无造口感染和肠瘘发生。结论护理人员加强专业理论知识及新业务新技术的学习，为患者提供更专业的健康指导，促进患者的康复。     

腹腔镜下老年腹壁切口疝修补术的围手术期护理

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的护理方法、安全性及临床效果。方法总结我科17例行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术老年切口疝患者的临床护理经验。结果腹腔镜下老年腹壁切口疝修补术术前强调消除致腹内压升高的因素、加强心肺功能监测、作好腹腔扩容及腹肌顺应性训练等护理;术后要注意活动、避免腹内压增高、并发症护理等。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补老年腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,要充分做好围手术期护理,增加手术成功率。     

腹腔镜下老年腹壁切口疝修补术的围手术期护理

目的 探讨腹腔镜下应用补片行老年腹壁切口疝修补术的护理方法、安全性及临床效果.方法 总结我科17例行腹腔镜下应用补片行切口疝修补术老年切口疝患者的临床护理经验.结果 腹腔镜下老年腹壁切口疝修补术术前强调消除致腹内压升高的因素、加强心肺功能监测、作好腹腔扩容及腹肌顺应性训练等护理;术后要注意活动、避免腹内压增高、并发症护理等.结论 腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用缝合器和缝线贯穿腹壁固定补片来修补老年腹壁切口疝是一种安全、有效的微创方法,要充分做好围手术期护理,增加手术成功率.     

腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术的效果与护理

目的探讨腹腔镜下应用补片修补巨大腹壁切口疝的护理及临床效果。方法对2004年9月至2006年4月腹腔镜下应用补片修补腹壁巨大切口疝的21例患者进行精心护理,并观察其结果。结果21例腹腔镜下腹壁巨大切口疝修补术顺利完成。术后住院天数为5～8d,平均6．5d。术后疼痛达3个月以上有8例（38．1％）,浆液肿9例（42．9％）,无手术死亡,无切口感染和肠瘘发生。随访6～25个月,平均11个月,未见切口疝复发。结论腹腔镜下行腹腔内粘连松解、采用补片来修补腹壁巨大切口疝是一种安全、有效的方法。加以行之有效的护理措施能有效预防切口疝的复发。     

开放式完全腹腔内修补术治疗腹壁巨大切口疝21例围术期护理

目的:探讨应用强生Proceed补片对腹壁巨大切口疝患者行开放式完全腹腔内修补术(IPOM)的围术期护理方法.方法:对21例腹壁巨大切口疝患者行IPOM治疗,术前给予充分评估和准备,术后进行精心护理、严密观察病情变化及防治并发症等.结果:本组患者均手术成功,切口均为甲级愈合,其中1例创面局限性积液,置细管负压引流4 d后消失;患者均痊愈出院,平均住院14.6 d;随访10个月~2年,无一例出现疝复发、肠梗阻等.结论:对腹壁巨大切口疝患者行IPOM治疗效果确切,良好的围术期护理是手术成功的关键.     

47例造口旁疝腹腔内修补术患者的围手术期护理

报道了47例造口旁疝腹腔内修补术患者的围手术期护理经验.术后出现2例切口感染、2例皮下积液,均治愈.随访6-24个月,造口旁疝均未复发.3例局部出现较明显的慢性疼痛或异物感,在术后3-6个月症状消失.认为术前对症护理、做好肠道准备、术后严密观察病情变化、给予正确的出院指导是护理的关键内容.     

Two cases of early recurrence after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair

We performed transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in 46 patients (58 diseases), two of whom experienced early recurrence after mesh repair. Case 1 was a 76‐year‐old man with a bilateral inguinal hernia (recurrence site, left indirect hernia) after appendectomy. The recurrence occurred 1 month after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. The mesh was dislocated to the lateral side, and we repaired it using the direct Kugel ® patch with an anterior technique. Case 2 was a 79‐year‐old man with a bilateral inguinal hernia (recurrence site, right direct hernia with an orifice >3 cm) after appendectomy. The recurrence occurred 3 months after transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. The mesh was dislocated to the lateral side, and we repaired it using an ULTRAPRO ® Plug with an anterior technique under laparoscopic observation. We believe the recurrences resulted from insufficient internal exfoliation and fixation affected by complicated exfoliation of the preperitoneal space with omental adhesion after intraperitoneal surgery.     

13例腹膜前股疝无张力修补术效果观察

目的探讨无张力疝修补术治疗股疝的疗效。方法使用聚丙烯网塞及补片治疗股疝患者13例,手术重点修补股环上方腹壁缺损区,不填塞股环。结果所有患者平均手术时间45 min,未使用镇痛药,无并发症发生,均在术后1周出院,随诊无复发。结论腹膜前高位无张力疝修补术是股疝治疗的理想术式。     

Laparoscopic parastomal herniorrhaphy utilizing transversus abdominis release and a modified Sugarbaker technique: A case report

A 69-year-old woman was referred to our department with complaints of abdominal discomfort in the standing position. She had undergone robot-assisted radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion for bladder cancer 10 months earlier. Abdominal CT revealed a parastomal hernia. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair using the Pauli technique was performed successfully with no recurrence after a 4-month follow-up. Although there are concerns about potential mesh-related complications and long-term results, this novel approach can be a successful option for parastomal hernia repair. As far as we know, this is the first English-language report on the application of Pauli parastomal hernia repair combined with a pure laparoscopic approach.     

A rare cause of parastomal hernia: stomach herniation

Our case of a parastomal hernia is rare because the stomach became incarcerated in the hernial sac. The diagnosis of parastomal hernia is not a difficult one, but one must be aware of the possible complications of the colostomy and the rare occurrence of the parastomal hernia containing the stomach.     

Parastomal hernia: an exploration of the risk factors and the implications

Risk may be defined as 'the chance that something may happen to cause loss or an adverse effect' (Concise Oxford Medical Dictionary, 2003). Patients undergoing stoma formation are at risk of developing a wide range of complications following surgery. A parastomal hernia is an adverse effect that can contribute to postoperative morbidity. The risk of developing a parastomal hernia is dependent upon a number of variables, and stoma care nurses need to be aware of these to plan the appropriate care for patients undergoing stoma formation. This article discusses the issues surrounding the development of parastomal hernias and also looks at ways in which the risk factors associated with the development of a parastomal hernia may be minimized.     

Parastomal hernia: incidence, prevention and treatment strategies

Parastomal hernia continues to be a common and distressing problem for patients with stomas, and research investigating prevention strategies is scant. In March 2005 Thompson and Trainor reported that the introduction of a prevention programme for 1-year post-stoma surgery formation had significantly reduced the incidence of development of parastomal hernia. This was further supported by a follow-up study in 2007, strengthening the reliability and validity of the first findings by confirming a statistically significant reduction in the incidence of parastomal hernias through the introduction of a simple non-invasive prevention programme. This article reviews the current literature on incidence, prevention and treatment, together with a step-by-step guide for stoma care nurses to implement the prevention programme and/or study within their area.     

Giant left‐sided inguinoscrotal hernia containing the cecum and appendix (giant left‐sided Amyand's hernia)

The present case involved a 62‐year‐old male with a large left‐sided inguinoscrotal hernia. A CT scan and a clinical examination led to a diagnosis of a giant left‐sided Amyand's hernia. The hernia was repaired using the ULTRAPRO Hernia System (UHS), and the patient exhibited an uneventful postoperative course.     

两种腹带治疗肠造口旁疝的效果观察

目的比较两种腹带治疗肠造口旁疝的效果.方法将36例肠造口旁疝患者分为两组,造口腹带组20例,普通腹带组16例.比较治疗后1个月的效果.结果造口腹带组有15例(75.0%)、普通腹带组有3例(18.8%)1个月后能坚持使用腹带.造口腹带对于减轻造口周围不适症状、防止体形改变、减少造口袋渗漏等均优于普通腹带(P<0.01).结论肠造口旁疝非手术治疗时,佩戴造口腹带比佩戴普通腹带更有效.