Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy in simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplant recipients: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: With the introduction of more potent immunosuppressive agents, rejection rates have decreased markedly in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant (SPK) recipients. However, with more intense immunosuppression, opportunistic infections such as polyoma virus have been more frequent. The purpose of this article is to outline the clinical course of SPK patients who developed documented polyoma infection in the transplanted kidney. METHODS: A retrospective review of 146 consecutive SPK recipients from 1996 to 2002 was performed. Induction and maintenance immunosuppression, surgical complications, rejection episodes, and opportunistic infections were reviewed. Patients who developed biopsy-proven polyoma virus infection in the renal allograft were identified. RESULTS: Nine patients (6%) were identified who developed polyoma. All had received induction therapy with either OKT3 (5 mg/d for 10.5 days) or thymoglobulin (5.7 mg/kg). Patients without polyoma had received similar induction. Maintenance immunosuppression included Prograf/MMF in six patients, CsA/MMF in two, and CsA/azathioprine in one. Time to diagnosis was an average of 359.3 days (range 136 to 836) after transplantation. Two patients had undergone treatment for kidney rejection prior to the diagnosis of polyoma. Immunosuppression was decreased in all patients when polyoma was identified, and more recently Cidofovir has been administered. Despite these interventions, five of the nine lost kidney function (creatinine > 5.0 or resumption of dialysis). However, none of the nine developed pancreatic abnormalities as demonstrated by normal blood glucose and amylase and no requirement for exogenous insulin. Two patients underwent LRRT more than 1 year after polyoma diagnosis; both have normal kidney function (Cr < 1.5 mg/dL) at 4 years of follow-up. Polyoma virus was the leading cause of renal loss in this cohort of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Polyoma is a serious concern for SPK transplant recipients. The pancreas, however, is spared from clinical evidence of infection, and no rejection was noted when immunosuppression was decreased. These graft losses appear to be a penalty of more potent immunosuppression, and a better treatment strategy is needed to prevent renal graft loss when polyoma is diagnosed. Retransplantation can be considered based on our limited experience.     

BK virus-associated nephropathy in sirolimus-treated renal transplant patients: incidence, course, and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND: Because the course of polyoma virus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has not been evaluated in a large cohort of patients receiving sirolimus (SRL)-based regimens, we have herein presented the incidence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of 378 renal transplant recipients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression. METHODS: This retrospective single center study evaluated 344 kidney alone (KTX) and 34 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantations performed between June 2000 and December 2004. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 43.3 months, six kidney (1.7%) and three kidney-pancreas (9.0%) transplanted patients displayed biopsy-proven PVAN. The mean time to diagnosis after transplantation was 18.2 months (range: 3.5-31.1 months), with a higher incidence among patients exposed (4.23%) versus not exposed to rabbit antithymocyte globulin (rATG; 0.53%; P=0.019) or SPK (9.0%) versus KTX (1.7%) recipients (odds ratio: 5.43; confidence interval: 1.29-22.8; P=0.038). Despite treatment with cidofovir, reduced immunosuppression and maintenance therapy with no agents other than SRL (C0=10.2+/-2.7 ng/dL) plus modest doses of prednisone (< or =5 mg), five patients (55.5%) experienced renal allograft failure. No rejection episodes were documented during the PVAN treatment and pancreatic function continued to be excellent among the SPK patients. CONCLUSIONS: Patients treated with SRL-based immunosuppression showed an incidence at the lower end of the range described with various other contemporaneous immunosuppressive regimens and with other cohorts not undergoing BK virus polymerase chain reaction surveillance. Exposure to rATG and SPK transplantation represented risk factors for the occurrence of PVAN, which showed a pernicious course despite withdrawal of calcineurin antagonists and/or mycophenolate mofetil.     

BK virus nephropathy after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation

Akpinar E, Ciancio G, Sageshima J, Chen L, Guerra G, Kupin W, Roth D, Ruiz P, Burke G. BK virus nephropathy after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation.
Clin Transplant 2010: 24: 801–806. © 2010 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: BK virus nephropathy (BKVN) was reported in up to 7.5% of patients after simultaneous pancreas–kidney transplantation (SPK). Its management by reduction in immunosuppression might pre‐dispose to pancreatic graft loss. Methods: A retrospective analysis of 178 SPK recipients was performed. All patients received thymoglobulin, daclizumab and a maintenance of low‐dose steroids, tacrolimus, and either sirolimus or mycophenolate. Results: Two (1.1%) patients were identified with BKVN. Time of diagnosis was 22 and 45 months after transplant. Both patients had superimposed calcineurin toxicity in their graft biopsies. Immunosuppression was reduced in both patients, and leflunomide (LEF) was used in one patient. Concurrent kidney rejection episodes were treated with steroid pulses in both patients. One kidney graft improved with a last estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of 43 mL/min, and another kidney graft showed limited improvement with a last GFR of 30 mL/min. Pancreatic graft function remained excellent in both patients as assessed by serum c‐peptide, glycosylated hemoglobin, amylase‐lipase, and urine amylase levels. Conclusion: Low incidence of BKVN was observed in our SPK series. Reduction in immunosuppression and sometimes LEF can be effective. The underlying mechanism of stable pancreatic allograft function despite ongoing kidney rejection warrants further investigation.     

Kidney retransplantation following graft loss to polyoma virus-associated nephropathy: an effective treatment option in simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant recipients.

Polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PVAN) has emerged as an important cause of graft loss following kidney transplantation. Experience with kidney retransplantation (reKT) in PVAN is very limited, especially in the setting of uninterrupted immunosuppression protecting the still functioning pancreatic graft after simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation (SPK). We present a review of five cases of reKT in four SPK recipients with Type 1 diabetes mellitus from a single centre (a second reKT was performed in one patient following first reKT failure due PVAN recurrence). Pre-emptive nephrectomy of the failed graft was performed in three of the cases and all kidney grafts for reKT were harvested from cadaveric donors. All patients are dialysis- and insulin-independent at 30 (9-55), median (range), months following last reKT with maintenance immunosuppression consisting of tacrolimus/sirolimus in three and cyclosporine A/mycophenolate mofetil in one patient. In conclusion, reKT represents an effective treatment option in SPK patients with kidney failure on account of PVAN. Use of interventions designed to reduce active viral replication, including pre-emptive nephrectomy of the failed graft, should be considered before reKT.     

A three-year experience with serum anodal trypsinogen as a biochemical marker for rejection in pancreatic allografts. False positives, tissue biopsy, comparison with other markers, and diagnostic strategies.

Serum values of immunoreactive anodal trypsinogen (sAT) have been claimed to correlate well with rejection occurring in pancreatic allografts. We have studied the behavior of sAT in serial serum samples obtained from 39 type I diabetics undergoing whole-organ pancreas transplantation during the past 3 years. Patients had either received a pancreatic allograft simultaneously with a transplanted kidney (SPK, n = 33) or after a previous kidney transplant (pancreas after kidney [PAK] n = 6). The behavior of sAT was studied in relation to the clinical diagnosis of rejection. Graft amylase output for all 39 patients and serum creatinine for the 33 SPK recipients were also studied. Tissue biopsies were obtained from 11 patients with elevated sAT values and a presumptive diagnosis of rejection. Nine of these patients had SPK grafts and simultaneously elevated creatinine values. Tissue was obtained from the simultaneously transplanted kidney; all specimens revealed rejection. Two of the 11 patients had PAK allografts. Biopsies performed on the graft duodenum were consistent with acute rejection. Three additional patients with unchanged sAT values had biopsies for other reasons; these biopsies failed to demonstrate signs of acute rejection. Thus graft biopsy correlated exactly with sAT behavior in every case in which rejection was suspected. Five patients had elevations of sAT not associated with rejection: one resulted from direct trauma, two had outlet obstruction, and two had clinical diagnoses of graft pancreatitis. The sAT was more sensitive and specific than GAO and as sensitive as creatinine for SPK recipients. These studies confirm that sAT is a reliable, graft-specific biochemical marker for the early diagnosis of pancreatic rejection. The use of sAT should allow for the proper timing of graft biopsies and the judicious use of immunosuppressive agents, which will result in increased allograft survival for PAK and pancreas-alone allografts.     

胰肾联合移植治疗1型糖尿病合并终末期肾病1例报告并文献复习

目的探讨胰肾联合移植治疗糖尿病合并终末期肾病的手术方式及移植效果。方法对1例1型糖尿病合并糖尿病肾病、尿毒症患者施行胰肾联合移植手术,将肾脏移植于左侧髂窝,胰腺移植于右侧髂窝,胰腺移植采用胰腺外分泌肠道引流、内分泌体循环系统回流的术式(肠道-体循环回流术式);术后常规给予免疫抑制、防治感染、支持等治疗。结果受者手术顺利。联合移植后胰、肾均发挥正常功能,血清肌酐逐渐恢复正常水平,血糖趋于稳定,第14日完全停用胰岛素及降糖药物。无严重手术并发症发生,受者健康存活,门诊随访移植胰腺、肾脏功能正常。结论胰肾联合移植是治疗1型糖尿病合并终末期肾病的理想方法 。     

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplant from living related donor: a single-center experience

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK) from cadaveric donors has become a widely accepted therapeutic option for insulin-dependent uremic patients. In 1996 the first SPK from a live donor was performed. This procedure offers the advantage of a better immunologic match, reduced cold ischemia injury, and decreased waiting time. As such, it is an attractive alternative treatment for diabetic patients with end-stage nephropathy with an available living donor. METHODS: We performed six SPKs from living-related donors. There were four men and two women among the recipients; median age was 34 (range, 29-39) years. All donors were recipients' siblings with excellent HLA matching. Donors underwent standardized metabolic workup, anti-insulin and anti-islet antibody assays, and computed tomography of the abdomen. Both donors and recipients were treated with octreotide for 5 days perioperatively. After transplantation, the patients were maintained on tacrolimus-based immunosuppression, with the exception of one recipient of SPK from an identical twin, who received cyclosporine monotherapy. RESULTS: All the donors are doing well and have normal renal function and blood glucose levels. One-year patient, renal, and pancreatic graft survival rates were 100%, 100%, and 83%, respectively. Acute kidney rejection was documented in two patients, and both recovered completely after OKT3 therapy. No rejection of pancreatic graft has been documented. Except for one patient who lost the graft because of hemorrhagic pancreatitis, all recipients maintained serum glucose levels at less than 130 mg/dL without insulin therapy. No major surgical complications such as graft thrombosis, intra-abdominal infection, or abscess were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Living donor SPK can represent a successful alternative to cadaveric donor SPK. The procedure can be performed safely in the donor and with low morbidity in the recipient.     

Prevalence and risk factors of polyomavirus BK replication in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients from a single transplant center

Mindlova M, Boucek P, Saudek F, Skibova J, Jedinakova T, Lipar K, Adamec M, Hirsch HH. Prevalence and risk factors of polyomavirus BK replication in simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipients from a single transplant center.
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01488.x.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Background: BK virus (BKV) replication is considered as a marker of risk for polyomavirus BK‐associated nephropathy (PVAN). We evaluated the occurrence and risk factors for BKV DNA positivity following simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplantation (SPK). Methods: Point prevalence of BK viruria and viremia was assessed in 183 SPK recipients. Real‐time polymerase chain reaction was used with a detection threshold of 10³ copies/mL. High‐level BKV positivity was defined as viruria and/or viremia >10⁷ and >10⁴ copies/mL, respectively. BKV‐positive patients were retested after 4–13 months and underwent an additional six‐month clinical follow‐up. Results: Urine and serum BKV positivity was detected in 28 (17.3% of available samples) and 7 (3.8%) patients, with high‐level viruria and viremia occurring in 6 (3.7%) and 3 (1.6%) patients, respectively. PVAN was biopsy‐confirmed in 1 and suspected as a cause of progressive renal failure in another SPK recipient. Patients with single low‐level viruria did not progress to high‐level positivity or PVAN at follow‐up. In multivariate analysis, pre‐transplant diabetes duration and delayed graft function were independently associated with BKV positivity. Conclusions: Point prevalence of high‐level BKV positivity and PVAN was low in SPK recipients from a single center. Diabetes duration and delayed graft function were independent risk factors for BKV replication.     

胰肾联合移植术后排斥反应分析

目的 探讨预防和逆转胰肾联合移植术后排斥反应的方法。方法 回顾性分析1999年9月～2003年9月17例同种异体胰肾联合移植手术患者的临床资料。全部病例采用口服免疫抑制剂：环孢素A、霉酚酸酯或硫唑嘌呤、激素三联用药。其中2例术前及术后第5天应用抗IL-2R单克隆抗体,3例应用OKT3进行免疫诱导。结果 17例患者中1例发生移植胰腺、肾脏加速性排斥反应．经保守治疗无效,切除移植物;8例发生急性排斥反应,其中单纯肾脏排斥反应6例,同时累及胰腺、肾脏的排斥反应2例,经甲泼尼龙或OKT3治疗后均逆转。结论 胰肾联合移植术后合理应用免疫抑制剂。术前采用综合措施降低高危受者的致敏性,是预防和治疗排斥反应的有效方法。     

TTP/HUS occurring in a simultaneous pancreas/kidney transplant recipient after clopidogrel treatment: evidence of a nonimmunological etiology

BACKGROUND: One recently reported thrombotic thrombocytopenia purpura/hemolytic uremic syndrome (TTP/HUS) case involved a patient who underwent simultaneous pancreas/kidney (SPK) transplant followed by pancreas rejection and clopidogrel treatment, an antiplatelet agent that has been associated with immunologically mediated TTP/HUS. We present a second case of TTP/HUS developing in an SPK recipient who was also receiving clopidogrel. METHODS: After a stroke, a 48-year-old male SPK transplant recipient received clopidogrel. Four months later, thrombosis and rejection of the transplanted pancreas occurred. One week after a pancreatectomy, TTP/HUS developed that resolved with clopidogrel and sirolimus discontinuation and lowering of the tacrolimus dose. RESULTS: A plasma sample revealed von Willebrand factor cleaving metalloproteinase activity, although no immunoglobulins to the protease were identified. The patient continues taking tacrolimus with normal renal function 1 year after the incident. DISCUSSION: Our findings suggest a nonimmunological etiology for TTP/HUS in clopidogrel-treated transplant recipients. Furthermore, mechanistic focused laboratory studies can facilitate interpretation of case report findings.     

The use of intravenous tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil as induction and maintenance immunosuppression in simultaneous pancreas--kidney recipients with previous transplants

Clinical trials using quadruple immunosuppression that include the combination of tacrolimus (TAC) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) have been shown to reduce the incidence of acute rejection episodes in simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation. In attempting to obtain a low rejection rate without antibody induction therapy, we proceeded with the combination of TAC intravenous (i.v.), MMF, and steroids as induction therapy and as primary immunosuppression for recipients with previous transplants. In this study, we analyzed 10 patients who received previous transplants, treated with low-dose TAC i.v. as induction therapy. Group A consisted of 6 patients with previous transplants that underwent SPK and group B consisted of four recipients with previous SPK that underwent cadaveric kidney transplants. For group A, the previous transplants were: living related kidney (LRK) followed by islet cell (IC) transplant (n=2), LRK transplant (n=1), cadaver kidney (CAD) and IC transplant (n=1), SPK (n=1), and three previous CAD kidney transplants (n=1). In group A, all six kidneys were lost due to recurrent diabetic nephropathy, IC possibly to rejection, and the pancreas due to thrombosis. In group B with previous SPK transplants, three recipients lost their kidney to chronic rejection and one to long-term use of a nephrotoxic antibiotic. Currently, in all group A and B patients, the kidney and the pancreas are functioning, although 1 patient in group A developed type 2 diabetes (normal fasting C-peptide). Two patients in group A developed three rejection episodes that responded to steroid treatment. The results indicate the TAC i.v. in combination with oral TAC, MMF, and steroids offer effective induction therapy in patients with previous transplants.     

Incidence and outcomes of cytomegalovirus in pancreas transplantation with steroid‐free immunosuppression

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is a common opportunistic infection encountered after pancreas transplantation. The records of 407 pancreas transplant recipients (226 simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplant (SPK), 101 pancreas transplant after kidney (PAK), and 97 pancreas transplants alone [PTA]) performed at a single center with at least 1‐yr follow‐up were reviewed. Immunosuppression included rabbit antithymocyte globulin induction, steroid withdrawal, and maintenance therapy of tacrolimus and sirolimus (± mycophenolate). In addition, PTA recipients received a single dose of rituximab. All recipients received valganciclovir prophylaxis. Donor (D)+/recipient (R)− recipients received 6 months of prophylaxis; all others received 3 months. The overall CMV infection rate was 12%. The cumulative incidences of CMV infection at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after transplant were 0.25%, 3%, 7%, and 8%, respectively. CMV infection rates were 20.2% in the D+/R− group, 16.5% in the D+/R+ group, 5.0% in the D−/R+ group, and 2.8% in the D−/R− group. Infections were less common in SPK recipients. Most infections developed at least 3 months post‐transplant, and 24% demonstrated tissue‐invasive disease. Immunosuppression was NOT reduced in 72% of patients with infections. Ganciclovir‐resistant CMV occurred in four patients. No patients died or lost their allografts due to CMV‐related infection; one graft was lost due to chronic rejection associated with a reduction in immunosuppression. In many cases, CMV infections may be treated in pancreas transplant recipients without necessarily reducing immunosuppression.     

胰肾一期联合移植

目的 总结胰肾联合移植治疗糖尿病并发晚期肾功能不全病人的疗效,并探讨分析术后并发症防治经验。方法 对５例糖尿病并发现期肾小功能不全者采用胰十二指肠肾一期联合移植。免疫抑掉方案采用激素,ＣｓＡ及硫唑嘌呤或激素,ＣｓＡ及骁悉三联用药。结果 联合移植后５例胰肾均发挥正常功能,病人均立即停用胰岛素,１例术后发生移植肾急性排斥以应,死于多器官功能衰竭,余４例分别发生胰周脓肿,急性胰腺炎,十二指肠瘘,血尿等并     

Combined pancreas kidney transplantation after isolated kidney transplantation

Simultaneous pancreas kidney transplantation (SPK) is an established therapy for type 1 diabetics with end stage or preterminal renal disease. SPK is superior to isolated kidney transplantation (KTX) in diabetic patients. Even pancreas-re-transplantations are more common in these patients now, mostly after SPK. But Experience with SPK after KTX is rare. Between 1994 and 2003 six Re-SPK 4.5 to 8.5 years after KTX were performed in our department. Average age of the recipients was 40.5 years. They had been suffering from diabetes for an average of 29.3 years. Four recipients were on dialysis again, whereas two had preterminal renal insufficiency. Pancreas transplants were drained through the bladder (n = 1) or into the small intestine (n = 5) with systemic venous anastomosis. After a median observation period of 28 months (8 to 99 months) all six recipients are insulin free. One patient lost his kidney graft due to severe acute rejection. Therefore kidney graft survival is 83 %. Four acute rejections (66 %) were observed in 4 patients. Only one rejection was treated successfully by steroids. Two rejections could be stopped with antibodies. 3 patients had infections in the early postoperative period (sinusitis, urinary tract infection, wound infection). Even after KTX with graft failure, diabetic patients suffering from renal disease can be re-transplanted successfully with SPK.     

Effect of HLA matching in simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation

Simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) transplantation has become the therapy of choice for type 1 diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease. The current analysis examined the impact of HLA matching on graft outcome following SPK transplantation. The study population was obtained from patients enrolled in the Euro-SPK 001 study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The effect of HLA matching on graft function and survival was assessed in 180 SPK recipients in whom complete donor-recipient HLA data were available. A group of 45 patients with 0 to 3 HLA mismatches (MM) was compared to 135 patients with 4 to 6 MM. RESULTS: There were no differences in 3-year kidney, pancreas, or patient survival rates between the 0 to 3 and 4 to 6 MM groups. Biological parameters of kidney and pancreas graft function were similar in both groups. Significantly more patients with 0 to 3 MM (66%) were rejection free at 3 years than those with 4 to 6 MM (41%; P = .003). The relative risk of acute rejection was 2.6 times higher among patients with 4 to 6 MM than among those with 0 to 3 MM. In conclusion, there was no evidence that HLA matching was associated with improved kidney or pancreas survival. However, a higher rate of acute rejection was observed with poor HLA matches, which may impact long-term survival.     

Simultaneous cadaver pancreas living-donor kidney transplantation: a new approach for the type 1 diabetic uremic patient

OBJECTIVE: To review the authors' experience with a new approach for type I diabetic uremic patients: simultaneous cadaver-donor pancreas and living-donor kidney transplant (SPLK). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Simultaneous cadaver kidney and pancreas transplantation (SPK) and living-donor kidney transplantation alone followed by a solitary cadaver-donor pancreas transplant (PAK) have been the transplant options for type I diabetic uremic patients. SPK pancreas graft survival has historically exceeded that of solitary pancreas transplantation. Recent improvement in solitary pancreas transplant survival rates has narrowed the advantage seen with SPK. PAK, however, requires sequential transplant operations. In contrast to PAK and SPK, SPLK is a single operation that offers the potential benefits of living kidney donation: shorter waiting time, expansion of the organ donor pool, and improved short-term and long-term renal graft function. METHODS: Between May 1998 and September 1999, the authors performed 30 SPLK procedures, coordinating the cadaver pancreas transplant with simultaneous transplantation of a laparoscopically removed living-donor kidney. Of the 30 SPLKs, 28 (93%) were portally and enterically drained. During the same period, the authors also performed 19 primary SPK and 17 primary PAK transplants. RESULTS: One-year pancreas, kidney, and patient survival rates were 88%, 95%, and 95% for SPLK recipients. One-year pancreas graft survival rates in SPK and PAK recipients were 84% and 71%. Of 30 SPLK transplants, 29 (97%) had immediate renal graft function, whereas 79% of SPK kidneys had immediate function. Reoperative rates, early readmission to the hospital, and initial length of stay were similar between SPLK and SPK recipients. SPLK recipients had a shorter wait time for transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Early pancreas, kidney, and patient survival rates after SPLK are similar to those for SPK. Waiting time was significantly shortened. SPLK recipients had lower rates of delayed renal graft function than SPK recipients. Combining cadaver pancreas transplantation with living-donor kidney transplantation does not harm renal graft outcome. Given the advantages of living-donor kidney transplant, SPLK should be considered for all uremic type I diabetic patients with living donors.     

Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) retransplantation in prior SPK recipients

LaMattina JC, Sollinger HW, Becker YT, Mezrich JD, Pirsch JD, Odorico JS. Simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) retransplantation in prior SPK recipients.
Clin Transplant 2011 DOI: 10.1111/j.1399‐0012.2011.01540.x.
© 2011 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Abstract: Introduction: We have performed 113 renal and 28 isolated pancreas retransplants in our cohort of more than 1200 prior simultaneous pancreas and kidney (SPK) recipients. On the basis of these experiences, we began performing repeat SPK in prior SPK recipients (n = 9). Methods: This retrospective review summarizes our experience with repeat SPK transplantation in prior SPK recipients. Mean age at retransplant was 39 yr; mean interval to retransplant was 7.8 yr. Thirty‐three percent were pre‐dialysis. Eighty‐nine percent of patients underwent transplant nephrectomy (five during the repeat SPK and three prior to it), and 78% underwent transplant pancreatectomy (four during the repeat SPK and three prior to it). Enteric drainage was performed in all repeat SPKs. Results: Median length of stay was 11 d. Perioperative complications included the following: renal artery thrombosis (1), pancreatic portal venous thrombosis (1), enteric leak (1), and hematoma (2). Overall pancreatic allograft survival was 78% at one yr and 67% at two yr. Overall renal allograft survival was 89% at one yr and 78% at two yr. Patient survival at one and three yr was 100%. Conclusions: Survival of repeat SPK allografts is acceptable despite the increased technical and immunologic demands of retransplantation. Graftectomy prior to or at the time of retransplantation is often necessary.     

Pancreas Transplantation From Living Donors: A Single Center Experience of 20 Cases

Living donor pancreas transplantation (LDPT) has several advantages over deceased donor pancreas transplantation (DDPT), including better HLA matching, shorter ischemic time, and shorter waiting time. It remains an attractive option for diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with end stage renal disease. We reviewed 20 cases of LDPT performed in Asan Medical Center between October 1992 and March 2015. Six cases (30%) were pancreas transplantation alone (PTA), and the rest (70%) were simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK). Relations of donor and recipient were parents in 7 (35%), siblings in 6 (30%), spouse in 6 (30%), and cousin in 1 (5%). Graft survival in SPK at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years was 91.7%, 83.3%, 83.3%, and 83.3%, respectively, and that in PTA recipients was 50%, 33.3%, 16.7%, and 16.7%, respectively (p = 0.005). Causes of graft failure in SPK were thrombosis (one case), and rejection (one case), whereas those in PTA were noncompliance (two cases), thrombosis (one case), reflux pancreatitis (one case), and chronic rejection (one case). In terms of pancreas exocrine drainage, two grafts (25%) maintained their function in bladder drainage, while all grafts maintained in enteric drainage p < 0.05). Seven (35%) donors experienced minor pancreatic juice leakage and one underwent reoperation due to postoperative hematoma. Most donors maintained normoglycemia and normal renal function. However, two donors developed DM (at 1 and 90 months postdonation), and were treated with oral hypoglycemic agents. Graft survival in PTA recipients was poorer than in SPK due to poor compliance and bladder drainage–related problems. The surgical and metabolic complication rates of donors can be minimized by applying strict donor criteria. Therefore, LDPT with enteric drainage is an acceptable treatment for SPK.     

Differential effects of preexisting uremia and a synchronous kidney graft on pancreas allograft functional survival in rats.

Pancreas transplant results have been better in uremic recipients of a simultaneous kidney than in nonuremic recipients of a pancreas alone. We studied the relative effect of uremia versus a double transplant on functional survival by performing bladder-drained pancreas transplants alone (PTA), kidney transplants alone (KTA), and simultaneous pancreas/kidney (SPK) transplants from Buffalo donors to diabetic Lewis rat recipients that were or were not made uremic 2-3 weeks before by 1 4/5 native nephrectomy. Pancreas graft exocrine function was monitored by urinary amylase (UA). In the PTA and SPK recipients made diabetic by streptozotocin, endocrine function was monitored by measuring nonfasting plasma glucose (PG) levels. Kidney graft function was monitored by plasma creatinine (Cr). Rejection of the endocrine pancreas was defined as an increase of PG to greater than 200 mg/dl; of the exocrine pancreas, as a decline in UA to less than 6000 U/L or to less than 100 U/24 hr; and of the kidney, as an elevation of Cr to greater than 3 mg/dl. The mean functional survival times (MST) of both the endocrine (12.0 +/- 2.1 versus 10.1 +/- 1.1 days, P = 0.036) and exocrine (8.0 +/- 2.1 versus 6.3 +/- 1.3 days, P = 0.016) components of the pancreas grafts were significantly longer in SPK than in PTA recipients. The MST of kidney allografts, however, was not significantly longer in nonuremic SPK than nonuremic KTA recipients (6.7 +/- 1.4 versus 5.7 +/- 0.7 days, P = 0.13). In parallel experiments in recipients immunosuppressed with cyclosporine, the graft survival times were longer, but the relative differences between the PTA, SPK, and KTA groups persisted. Histologically, lymphocyte infiltration began in the two organs almost simultaneously, but the severity of the rejection was more vigorous in the kidney than in the pancreas in doubly grafted rats, and destruction of pancreas grafts progressed more slowly in SPK than in PTA recipients. Preexisting uremia delayed pancreas rejection in both SPK (exocrine 10.6 +/- 2.3, P = 0.032, and endocrine 14.8 +/- 3.4 days, P = 0.065, versus nonuremics) and PTA (exocrine 8.5 +/- 1.7, P = 0.007, and endocrine 12.6 +/- 2.5, P = 0.026, versus nonuremics) nonimmunosuppressed recipients. The MST of kidney grafts was not significantly longer in uremic (8.9 +/- 2.8 days) than in nonuremic (6.7 +/- 1.4 days) SPK recipients (P = 0.081). A synchronous kidney transplant and uremia independently down-modulate the rejection response to a pancreas graft, and a simultaneous pancreas graft has no detrimental effect on the survival of a kidney graft.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Technical failure of the pancreas after SPK transplant: are these patients good candidates for later pancreas retransplant?

Abstract:  Technical failure of the pancreas graft after a simultaneous pancreas–kidney (SPK) transplant is not uncommon, affecting roughly 10% of SPK recipients. These patients often recover with good kidney function, but have persistent issues related to their diabetes. The aim of this study was to determine if these patients were good candidates for a later pancreas retransplant. Outcomes were compared between 21 PASPK (pancreas after SPK) recipients and 361 recipients of a primary pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplant. Except for kidney graft source, there was no significant difference in the demographic characteristics between these two groups. In general, early surgical complications were more common in PASPK than PAK recipients (47.6% vs. 35.5%, p = 0.15), although the difference was not statistically significant. The incidence of acute rejection was no different between these two groups (28% vs. 33%, p = NS). At three yr post-transplant, patient and pancreas graft survival rates were also no different between the two groups (p = NS). The most common cause for graft loss in both groups was acute or chronic rejection. In conclusion, pancreas retransplant is a viable option for SPK recipients experiencing early technical failure of the pancreas graft. These recipients are not at higher immunologic risk vs. primary PAK recipients.