G蛋白偶联受体激酶活性调控及其在恶性肿瘤中的作用

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR),是一类重要的细胞表面受体。G蛋白偶联受体激酶(GRK)属于丝氨酸/苏氨酸蛋白激酶家族,其亚型广泛存在与各种组织,能够特异性地使活化的GPCR发生磷酸化及脱敏,从而终止GPCR介导的信号转导通路。新的研究还发现,GRK不仅作用于GPCR,也可以通过使非GPCR磷酸化或通过非磷酸化作用参与信号转导。GRK不仅能够调节GPCR和非GPCR,其自身活性也可受到多种因素的调节。本文结合GRK的多种功能作用和GRK活性调控,对GRK在脑、内分泌、生殖系统、消化系统及黑色素肿瘤中的作用做简要综述。     

阿片受体脱敏作用中G蛋白偶联受体激酶和arrestin的研究进展

临床上,许多病人使用阿片类药物来缓解疼痛,但由于反复或长期使用导致的耐受和依赖而限制其应用。长期使用阿片受体激动剂会导致受体本身适应性变化,称为阿片受体的脱敏(desensitization),包括受体与G蛋白脱偶联、受体内吞和下调[1]。阿片受体的脱敏是其信号途径调节的重要机制,与耐受的形成密切相关。越来越多的研究显示,G蛋白偶联受体激酶(G protein coupled receptor kinases,GRKs)所介导的受体磷酸化,以及β-arrestin的结合与阿片受体脱敏之间具有密切关系,提示了GRKs和arrestin在调节阿片受体脱敏中具有关键性作用。本文综述了GRK…     

G蛋白偶联受体固有活性研究进展与新药开发

G蛋白偶联受体(G-prote in-coup led receptor,GPCR)是与G蛋白有信号连接的一大类受体家族,是人体内最大的膜受体蛋白家族,是一类具有7个跨膜螺旋的跨膜蛋白受体。GPCR的结构特征和在信号传导中的重要作用决定了其可以作为很好的药物靶标。目前世界药物市场上有三分之一的小分子药物是GPCR的激活剂(agon ist)或拮抗剂(antagon ist)。以其为靶点的药物在医药产业中占据显著地位。在当今前50种最畅销的上市药物中,20%属于G蛋白受体相关药物。近来的研究发现,大多数G蛋白偶联受体具有一个很重要的特性,就是具有固有活性(Constitutive ac-tivity),即无激动剂条件受体自发的维持激活并维持下游信号传导通路的活性。固有活性涉及受体、G蛋白及下游信号通路之间的关系。该文就G蛋白偶联受体固有活性概念、研究进展、反相激动剂与固有活性研究、固有活性与新药开发4个方面,进行以下论述。     

与糖尿病肾病相关的G蛋白偶联受体及相关治疗药物的研究进展

目的:了解糖尿病肾病(DN)的病理机制,从而为治疗DN提供新途径。方法:根据文献,综述了在DN发生、发展中起重要作用的G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)的结构特点及其主要的信号转导机制,以及与DN进展相关的GPCR类型及相关治疗药物等内容。结果与结论:GPCR是一种与三聚体G蛋白相偶联的细胞表面受体,由1条多肽链构成;其信号转导途径由细胞膜受体、G蛋白、第二信使和效应器4部分组成,包括腺苷酸环化酶系统和磷脂酶C系统。与DN进展相关的GPCR有5-羟色胺2A受体(相关药物:酮色林、盐酸沙格雷酯等)、前列腺素E2受体、血管紧张素Ⅱ受体(相关药物:替米沙坦等)、生长抑素受体(相关药物:奥曲肽)。作用于GPCR的药物,正成为研发治疗DN药物的新方向。     

G蛋白偶联受体在肝细胞癌中调控作用研究进展

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR),又称为7-α螺旋跨膜蛋白受体,是己知的3类涉及跨膜信号转导的膜受体之一。GPCR与G蛋白结合产生生物学效应,对机体生理功能和病理过程有广泛的调控作用。大量研究表明,GPCR通过调节下游某些信号的转导途径影响肝癌细胞的增殖、侵袭和转移过程,参与肝细胞癌(HCC)的发生和发展。本文就趋化因子受体、前列腺素受体、肾上腺素受体和血管紧张素受体等GPCR及其相关的信号通路在HCC发生发展进程中的作用进行综述,并对靶向GPCR的HCC治疗前景予以展望。     

G蛋白信号调节因子在心血管系统中的作用

G蛋白偶联受体（G-Protein-Coupled-Receptors,GPCRs）在体内分布广泛,几乎参与所有生理活动的调节。G蛋白调节因子（Regulator of G protein Signaling,RGS）参与了G蛋白失活的调节。目前研究已证明,参与心血管系统生理和病理活动的很多递质和激素都是通过GPCR信号转导通路发挥作用的。RGS蛋白通过调节GPCR通路信号转导和非GPCR依赖性途径影响多种心血管疾病的发生,其在心脏血管结构和功能中的地位已逐渐引起重视,有望成为相关疾病治疗的新靶点。本文将就RGS蛋白及其在心血管系统中的作用作一综述。     

与类风湿关节炎相关的G蛋白偶联受体及治疗药物作用靶点

很多胞外信号直接或间接通过G蛋白偶联受体向胞内传输。多种G蛋白偶联受体包括趋化因子受体、前列腺素(prostaglandins,PGs)受体、β2-肾上腺素受体(β2-adrener-gicreceptor)、致炎肽P物质(proinflammatorypeptidesub-stanceP,SP)受体、蛋白酶活化受体2(protease-activatedre-ceptor2,PAR-2)等在免疫应答调节中起至关重要的作用。该文综述了与类风湿关节炎相关的G蛋白偶联受体(Gpro-tein-coupledreceptors,GPCRs)信号转导的一些蛋白作用,包括G蛋白偶联受体激酶、视紫红质抑制蛋白(arrestin)、G蛋白信号转导调节因子、G蛋白偶联致炎受体等。作用于这些信号或其转导过程的药物正成为类风湿关节炎治疗的新策略之一。     

细胞核G蛋白偶联受体研究进展

传统观念认为,G蛋白偶联受体通过自身在细胞表面的激活启动信号转导,从而介导细胞响应外界刺激。近年来研究发现了细胞核G蛋白偶联受体（nGPCR）的存在,有别于细胞质膜G蛋白偶联受体（mGPCR）,细胞核G蛋白偶联受体具有独特的来源、功能、信号途径和作用模式。本文总结了目前对于细胞核G蛋白偶联受体的研究成果,以期为靶向G蛋白偶联受体的药物研发提供新的理念和思路。     

肾脏中G蛋白偶联受体信号转导的多样性

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)是最重要的药物靶点之一;临床有超过30%处方药是直接作用在GPCR上的。在肾脏中,升压素受体、血管紧张素受体、内皮素受体、前列腺素受体和嘌呤受体等都对肾脏的多种功能有重要的调控作用,也是重要的治疗肾病的药物靶点。多种靶向这些肾脏GPCR的激动剂或者拮抗剂已经进入临床应用或者临床测试阶段。然而,这些GPCR药物的设计主要以激动剂和拮抗剂进行区分,与GPCR的功能多样性存在着一定的鸿沟。我们最近在研究靶向血管紧张素受体(AT1R)的药理学研究过程中,不仅发现了高同型半胱氨酸是血管紧张素受体的内源性配体,还发现Arrestin偏向性信号途径不仅可以介导传统的第二波信号途径,还可以在时序上进行第一波信号转导,通过激活TRPC3来促进肾上腺素的释放,从而产生在治疗心血管疾病时的有害作用。我们据此提出了更合理的靶向AT1R开发药物的方法。不仅如此,我们还针对升压素受体的磷酸化编码,阐明了Arrestin对GPCR的磷酸化编码的识别机制,Arrestin的多聚脯氨酸码头的分选机制,以及配体通过操控受体7此跨膜核心与Arrestin的相互作用来指导Arrestin功能的机制。这些研究工作为以后特异性的靶向GPCR的Arrestin信号通路开发药物奠定了基础。     

组成型激活突变体在G蛋白偶联受体研究中的应用

G蛋白偶联受体(GPCR)组成型活性概念的提出，使组成型激活突变体(CAM)成为研究GPCR的新方法。CAM促进了对GPCR的结构、激活机制、活性调节及病理生理的研究。通过对CAM的研究发现了GPCR激活的关键结构区域，提出配体受体相互作用的”扩充的三元复合物模型”和GPCR激活过程中存在多个中间激活态的观点。CAM在一定程度上模拟了野生型受体激活的失敏过程，并为疾病的研究提供新的思路。     

Morphine-induced physiological and behavioral responses in mice lacking G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6

G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are a family of intracellular proteins that desensitize and regulate the responsiveness of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). In the present study, we assessed the contribution of GRK6 to the regulation and responsiveness of the G protein-coupled mu-opioid receptor (μOR) in response to morphine in vitro and in vivo using mice lacking GRK6. In cell culture, overexpression of GRK6 facilitates morphine-induced beta-arrestin2 (βarrestin2) recruitment and receptor internalization, suggesting that this kinase may play a role in regulating the μOR. In vivo, we find that acute morphine treatment induces greater locomotor activation but less constipation in GRK6 knockout (GRK6-KO) mice compared to their wild-type (WT) littermates. The GRK6-KO mice also appear to be “presensitized” to the locomotor stimulating effects induced by chronic morphine treatment, yet these animals do not display more conditioned place preference than WT mice do. Furthermore, several other morphine-mediated responses which were evaluated, including thermal antinociception, analgesic tolerance, and physical dependence, were not affected by ablation of the GRK6 gene. Collectively, these results suggest that GRK6 may play a role in regulating some, but not all morphine-mediated responses. In addition, these findings underscore that the contribution of a particular regulatory factor to receptor function can differ based upon the specific cell composition and physiology assessed, and illustrate the need for using caution when interpreting the importance of interactions observed in cell culture.     

G protein-coupled receptor kinases regulate metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 function and expression

Metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluR) serve important neuromodulatory roles at glutamatergic synapses to shape excitatory neurotransmission. Recent evidence indicates that the desensitization of mGluRs is an important determinant in regulating the functions of these receptors. The present results demonstrate that G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs), which are known to regulate the desensitization of many G protein-coupled receptors, regulate both the expression and function of mGluR5 in a heterologous expression system. This regulatory event is limited to members of the GRK2 family since GRK4 family members do not elicit the same effects on mGluR5. Kinase activity is shown to be required for GRK-mediated regulation of mGluR5. Furthermore, the ability of GRK2 to regulate mGluR5 is dependent, at least in part, on the presence of threonine 840 in the carboxyl terminus of mGluR5. These studies identify novel roles for GRKs in regulating mGluR5 that may serve to further shape the function of these receptors in neurotransmission.     

Non-binding site modulation of G protein-coupled receptor signalling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are by far the most successful drug targets yet known, due to their key role in cellular communication. Historically, these drugs bind to the same site at which the endogenous agonist interacts. However, as the details of cell signalling are clarified, it is becoming apparent that there are many other sites at which GPCR signalling can be modulated. Furthermore, the emerging ability to block protein-protein interactions with small molecules means that these sites are now also viable therapeutic targets. Potential points of therapeutic intervention of GPCR signalling are at the level of the G protein, where the activities of both a and βγ subunits could be controlled; at multiple effectors such as the adenylyl cyclases, phospholipases and phosphodiesterases; at regulatory proteins such as the regulators of G protein signalling (RGS) proteins or receptor kinases; or at the mitogenic pathways, which offer many sites for intervention. By targeting these sites, perhaps just one arm of the multiple pathways through which a receptor works can be modified, thus providing a greater degree of therapeutic selectivity and specificity than can be attained using receptor agonists or antagonists.     

G蛋白偶联受体激酶和arrestins在受体调节中的作用

Ｇ 蛋白偶联受体（ Ｇｐｒｏｔｅｉｎ ｃｏｕｐｌｅｄ ｒｅｃｅｐｔｏｒ ， Ｇ Ｐ Ｃ Ｒｓ）是一大家族，介导许多激素的信号转导。在激动剂的持续作用下， Ｇ Ｐ Ｃ Ｒｓ 可发生对激动剂的敏感性下降，即受体减敏，现认为这一过程主要由 Ｇ 蛋白偶联受体激酶（ Ｇｐｒｏｔｅｉｎ ｃｏｕ ｐｌｅｄ ｒｅｃｅｐｔｏｒ ｋｉｎａｓｅｓ ， Ｇ Ｒ Ｋｓ） 和ａｒｒｅｓｔｉｎｓ 两大蛋白家族介导： Ｇ Ｒ Ｋｓ 先结合并磷酸化被激动剂占领的受体，然后ａｒｒｅｓｔｉｎｓ与磷酸化的受体结合，阻止受体与 Ｇ 蛋白发生作用，导致受体功能减退。近来发现， Ｇ Ｒ Ｋｓ 和ａｒｒｅｓｔｉｎｓ 还参与受体的内陷机制，而受体的复敏又与内陷密切相关     

Enhanced expression of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 selectively increases the sensitivity of A2A adenosine receptors to agonist-induced desensitization

1. G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs) are thought to be important in mediating the agonist-induced phosphorylation and consequent desensitization of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) responses. We have previously shown that stable expression of a dominant negative mutant G protein- coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) construct in NG108-15 mouse neuroblastoma x rat glioma cells suppresses the agonist-induced desensitization of A_2A and A_2B adenosine receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity (Mundell et al., 1997). To further determine the role of GRK2 in agonist-induced desensitization of these adenosine receptors, we stably overexpressed wild type GRK2 in NG108-15 cells.
2. In homogenates prepared from cells overexpressing GRK2, the acute stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by activation of A_2A and A_2B adenosine receptors was markedly reduced, but could be reversed by pretreating the cells with AD (adenosine deaminase), to remove extracellular adenosine from the medium. On the other hand, acute stimulation of adenylyl cyclase by secretin, iloprost, NaF and forskolin was the same in GRK2 overexpressing cells and plasmid-transfected control cells.
3. Cells overexpressing GRK2 were more sensitive to adenosine receptor agonist-induced desensitization than plasmid-transfected control cells. This effect was selective since the agonist sensitivity of desensitization for secretin and IP-prostanoid receptor-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity was not affected by GRK2 overexpression.
4. These results further implicate GRK2 as the likely mechanism by which A₂ adenosine receptors undergo short-term desensitization in NG108-15 cells, and indicate that even when overexpressed, GRK2 retains its substrate specificity for native receptors in intact cells. Furthermore, the susceptibility of GPCRs to desensitization appears to depend on the level of GRK expression, such that in cells that express high levels of GRK2, low agonist concentrations may be sufficient to trigger GRK-mediated desensitization.

     

N,N,N',N'-tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine inhibits ligand binding to certain G protein-coupled receptors

N,N,N',N'-Tetrakis(2-pyridylmethyl)ethylenediamine (TPEN) is used widely in biological systems to chelate certain heavy metals, particularly Zn2+. Here we show that TPEN inhibits ligand binding to certain G protein-coupled receptors and is an antagonist at muscarinic receptors. In intact human neuroblastoma SH-SY5Y cells, the binding of the muscarinic receptor ligand [N-methyl-3H]scopolamine methyl chloride was inhibited by TPEN (Ki approximately 26 microM), as was muscarinic receptor agonist-induced inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate formation (Ki approximately 26 microM). This antagonism was not due to metal ion chelation, indicating that it resulted from a direct interaction of TPEN with muscarinic receptors. Examination of the effects of TPEN on other receptors in SH-SY5Y cell membrane preparations showed that the binding of the nonpeptide opioid receptor ligand [15,16-3H]diprenorphine was strongly inhibited, whereas binding of [125I]vasoactive intestinal polypeptide was not. This pattern of selectivity was also seen in AR4-2J rat pancreatoma cell membranes, in which TPEN inhibited ligand binding to muscarinic receptors, but not that to cholecystokinin receptors. In conclusion, these data show that TPEN inhibits ligand binding to certain G protein-coupled receptors and exhibits selectivity towards those receptors whose transmembrane helices form the predominant site for ligand interaction. TPEN may have widespread antagonistic activity towards G protein-coupled receptors of this kind.     

Opioid control of MAP kinase cascade

Activation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) may result in phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases 1/2 (ERK 1/2). The signaling pathway involves ectodomain shedding, generating epidermal growth factor (EGF)-like ligands, which in turn stimulate the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) via EGF receptors. The present study investigates into the control of MAPKs by opioidergic GPCRs in human embryonic kidney cells (HEK 293). Experiments were conducted with cells expressing opioid receptors, G protein-coupled receptor kinases, and ERKs. The outcome of our studies let us suggest that EGF-like ligands released by opioid receptor stimulation utilize different EGF receptors to phosphorylate ERKs, while EGF utilizes type 1 receptors. Differences between multiple opioid receptors are apparent with respect to the activation of ERKs. EGF rapidly triggers internalization of the fluorescent EGF receptor type 1, but we failed to observe any sequestration of this receptor type upon exposure of cells to an opioid, since opioids most likely trigger stimulation of a different EGF receptor type. In conclusion, G protein-coupled opioid receptors control the MAPK cascade in a similar fashion as described for non-opioid GPCRs, although distinct differences exist between μ-, δ- and κ-receptors. EGF-induced ERK activation is mediated by EGF receptor type 1 while opioid receptor activation seems to brings about stimulation via EGF receptor type.     

Evolving concepts in G protein-coupled receptor endocytosis: the role in receptor desensitization and signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are seven transmembrane proteins that form the largest single family of integral membrane receptors. GPCRs transduce information provided by extracellular stimuli into intracellular second messengers via their coupling to heterotrimeric G proteins and the subsequent regulation of a diverse variety of effector systems. Agonist activation of GPCRs also initiates processes that are involved in the feedback desensitization of GPCR responsiveness, the internalization of GPCRs, and the coupling of GPCRs to heterotrimeric G protein-independent signal transduction pathways. GPCR desensitization occurs as a consequence of G protein uncoupling in response to phosphorylation by both second messenger-dependent protein kinases and G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). GRK-mediated receptor phosphorylation promotes the binding of beta-arrestins, which not only uncouple receptors from heterotrimeric G proteins but also target many GPCRs for internalization in clathrin-coated vesicles. beta-Arrestin-dependent endocytosis of GPCRs involves the direct interaction of the carboxyl-terminal tail domain of beta-arrestins with both beta-adaptin and clathrin. The focus of this review is the current and evolving understanding of the contribution of GRKs, beta-arrestins, and endocytosis to GPCR-specific patterns of desensitization and resensitization. In addition to their role as GPCR-specific endocytic adaptor proteins, beta-arrestins also serve as molecular scaffolds that foster the formation of alternative, heterotrimeric G protein-independent signal transduction complexes. Similar to what is observed for GPCR desensitization and resensitization, beta-arrestin-dependent GPCR internalization is involved in the intracellular compartmentalization of these protein complexes.