老年急性阑尾炎患者行开腹切除术与腹腔镜切除术的临床疗效比较

目的比较腹腔镜切除术与开腹切除术治疗老年急性阑尾炎的临床疗效。方法选择该院2013-01~2015-10期间收治65岁以上老年急性阑尾炎并已实施手术患者50例,并根据所选的手术方式,分为腹腔镜阑尾炎手术组(LA组)25例,传统开腹手术组(OA组)25例,记录两组术中及术后相关指标并作数据分析。结果与LA组比较,OA组的手术时间较长,术中出血量较多,切口长度及住院时间较长(P0.01),但综合就医费用较少(P0.01);OA组的术后镇痛药使用和并发症发生率较高(P0.05)。结论老年急性阑尾患者行腹腔镜阑尾炎切除手术具有创伤小、出血少、住院时间短、术后并发症少、镇痛药使用少等优势,值得在临床上推广应用。     

腹腔镜及开腹手术治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎268例

目的:对比分析腹腔镜和开腹阑尾切除术在治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎中的疗效.方法:回顾性分析2000-01/2009-11小儿复杂性阑尾炎患者268例临床资料,其中腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)128例,开腹阑尾切除术(OA)140例,比较两组手术情况和疗效.结果:手术时间:LA组较OA组长(62.2 min±15.3 min vs 57.1 min±6.4 min,P<0.01);术后肛门排气时间:LA组较OA组短(26.8 h±7.6 h vs 42.9 h±8.3 h.P<0.001);术后住院时间:LA组较OA组短(5.2 d±2.3 d vs 9.5 d±2.6d,P<0.001);术后腹腔脓肿LA组1例,OA组9例(P=0.036);切口感染:LA组3例,OA组28例(P<0.001);肠梗阻:LA组2例,OA组5例(P=0.518).结论:LA较OA具有创伤小、恢复快、并发症少、住院时间短和美容效果好等优点,是治疗小儿复杂性阑尾炎一种安全有效的手术方式.     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗老年急性阑尾炎的疗效

目的探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗老年急性阑尾炎的疗效及影响。方法 134例老年急性阑尾炎患者,其中开腹组51例行开腹阑尾切除术,腹腔镜组83例行腹腔镜阑尾切除术。比较两组手术时间、术中出血量、病理类型、肛门排气时间、住院时间、生活质量评分以及并发症发生率。结果腹腔镜组手术时间、术中出血量、病理类型与开腹组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。腹腔镜组肛门排气时间、住院时间、生活质量评分、并发症发生率均明显优于开腹组。结论采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗老年急性阑尾炎相比开腹手术有明显优势,具有很好的临床应用价值。     

老年腹腔镜阑尾切除术80例分析

腹腔镜阑尾切除术(laparoscopic appendectomy,LA)正逐渐被广大外科医生及患者所接受[1].LA具有术后疼痛轻、住院时间短、恢复快、并发症少等优点,明显优于传统的开腹手术(open appendectomy,OA).近年来老年阑尾炎发病率有上升趋势[2].本文对2005年~2010年我院老年阑尾炎患者临床资料进行临床分析.     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗老年人阑尾炎41例

目的：探讨老年人阑尾炎行腹腔镜阑尾切除术（LA）的疗效。方法：对41例老年阑尾炎患者采用LA,并对其手术指征、手术方法、术后恢复情况、并发症、住院时间及费用等进行回顾性分析。结果：41例阑尾炎均经病理证实,6例术前不能确诊,经腹腔镜探查时证实;5例并存其他疾病;中转开腹2例。术后疼痛轻,无切口感染及院内感染,平均住院时间4d;住院费用比同期同类手术高20％－30％。结论：LA对老年阑尾炎患者损伤较小,术后并发症少、恢复快,可避免误、漏诊,是治疗老年人阑尾炎的一种较为理想的术式。     

内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术与腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎的疗效对比研究

目的 比较内镜逆行阑尾炎治疗术(ERAT)与腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)在治疗急性非复杂性阑尾炎(UCAA)中的疗效。方法 以2020年8月至2023年8月中山市人民医院黄圃院区消化内科收治的80例急性非复杂性阑尾炎患者作为本研究研究对象,根据患者是否愿意进行ERAT治疗进行分组,将患者分为ERAT组(n=40)和LA组(n=40)。ERAT组行ERAT术,LA组行LA术,比较两组患者手术相关指标(手术时间、术后卧床时间、住院时间、术中出血量)、炎症指标(IL-6、CRP、PCT、TNF-α)及疼痛介质指标(DA、SP、5-HT、PGE2)及术后并发症(消化道出血、切口感染、腹腔脓肿、肠梗阻)发生情况。结果 ERAT组患者的手术时间、术后卧床时间、住院时间均较LA组显着缩短,同时ERAT组的术中出血量也较LA组明显减少(P<0.05)。ERAT组与LA组两组患者的炎症指标(IL-6、CRP、PCT、TNF-α)水平均较术前上升,ERAT组炎症指标(IL-6、CRP、PCT、TNF-α)均显着低于LA组(P<0.05)。ERAT组患者术后并发症发生率明显低于LA组(P<0....     

糖尿病合并急性阑尾炎患者的临床治疗方法及其治疗效果

目的分析糖尿病合并急性阑尾炎患者的临床治疗方法及其治疗效果。方法 2010年1月—2017年2月,于该院收治的糖尿病合并急性阑尾炎患者中选取90例,随机将其分为两组,传统开腹阑尾切除术为对照组手术方式,腹腔镜阑尾切除术为观察组手术方式,对比两组患者手术时间、术后随机血糖值、胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间、排气时间以及并发症发生情况。结果相对于对照组,观察组手术时间、胃肠功能恢复时间、住院时间以及排气时间更短,术后随机血糖值更低(P0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率为2.22%,相较于对照组的20.00%更低。结论相对于传统开腹阑尾切除术,采用腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗糖尿病合并急性阑尾炎的效果显著,具有较高的手术安全性,且术后并发症发生率低,可推广。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性化脓性阑尾炎合并糖尿病36例效果分析

目的探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)治疗合并糖尿病的急性化脓性阑尾炎患者的可行性和疗效。方法选取该院在2012年1月—2014年1月收治的合并糖尿病的急性化脓性阑尾炎患者36例,对所有患者均行LA术式。结果除1例患者因存现广泛盆腔粘连中转开腹手术外,其余35例患者均顺利完成手术,术后仅1例患者发生并发症,经对症处理后痊愈,最终所有患者均顺利出院。结论 LA手术治疗合并糖尿病的急性化脓性阑尾炎患者,在严格控制血糖的基础上安全、可行。     

腹腔镜阑尾切除术临床观察

目的:探讨腹腔镜阑尾切除术(LA)治疗阑尾炎的效果以及总结经验。方法:回顾分析620例急慢性阑尾炎患者均行LA的临床资料,并进行总结分析。结果:620例阑尾炎患者中,613例行LA,3例行腹腔镜阑尾周围脓肿引流手术,其中有7例患者因异位阑尾根部穿孔伴盲肠水肿,LA不满意而转为开腹,所有患者均顺利完成手术。平均手术时间为(44.6±11.8)min,平均术中出血量(26.7±6.8)ml,平均术后使用抗生素时间(3.6±1.2)d;平均术后住院时间(3.2±0.9)d。术后6例患者出现伤口感染,发生率0.97%,均经换药后治愈。结论:腹腔镜阑尾切除术是一种安全、有效的阑尾切除手术,可以在临床上广泛推广和应用。     

经腹腔镜与开腹作阑尾切除术的比较

本文收集了哥伦比亚医院1990年12月至1994年12月间所有阑尾切除手术病例资料,分析比较腹腔镜手术(LA)组与开腹手术(OA)组下列诸因素:术后并发症的发生率、患者恢复程度及住院天数等。 方法:应用多元回归分析、方差分析及卡方检验,回顾性研究434例接受阑尾切除术者的资料。 结果:LA组234例,OA组200例,平均年龄33.9岁,术后并发症发生率11.5%,腹腔内感染     

Open versus laparoscopic appendectomy

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To asses the role of laparoscopic appendectomy in the treatment of acute as well as chronic appendicitis on the basis of our own experiences. METHODOLOGY: From the set of 849 patients treated with appendectomy (from January 1993 to December 2000) 331 were singled out, i.e.; those unable to work for some time and thus being on sickness benefit who asked for a medical certificate. They were operated on for either acute or chronic appendicitis. RESULTS: In our set of 331 patients (158 males, 173 females, the average age 29.4) open appendectomy was performed on 179 patients and laparoscopic appendectomy on 152. Laparoscopic appendectomy was performed in 43 males (28%) and 109 females (72%); open appendectomy in 115 males (64%) and 64 females (36%). Laparoscopic appendectomy took 53.7 +/- 18.1 minutes, open appendectomy took 43.6 +/- 8.99 minutes. The time of work disablement is longer in open appendectomy (open appendectomy: 41.2 +/- 9.91 days; laparoscopic appendectomy; 29.1 +/- 15.11 days). A significant difference (p < 0.00001) can be seen in the length of hospitalization (laparoscopic appendectomy: 5.0 +/- 2.75 days, open appendectomy: 8.3 +/- 2.83 days). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who undergo laparoscopic appendectomy spent less time in hospital, and they can return to work rather earlier. On the other hand the time of surgery is longer. Higher cost is compensated for with shorter hospitalization and early return to work.     

Laparoscopic apendicectomy vs open approach for the treatment of acute appendicitis

BackgroundThere is no international consensus on the approach of choice for performing appendectomy.AimsTo analyze and compare open and laparoscopic approaches in the surgical treatment of acute appendicitis.Material and MethodsA retrospective study was carried out on patients over 14-years-old operated on for suspected acute appendicitis between January 2007 and December 2009. Variables were: age, sex, body mass index, specialized surgeon or resident in training, progression duration, conversion rate, use of drains, abdominal cavity irrigation, macroscopic appearance of the appendix, onset time of anesthesia, ASA classification, postoperative hospital stay, resumption of intake of liquids, and complications. The patients were divided into two groups: laparoscopic approach (LA) and open approach (OA).ResultsA total of 533 patients were enrolled (290 LA and 243 OA). Onset time of anesthesia was 75 min (30-190 min) in LA vs 55 min (20-160 min) in OA (p<0,0001). Complications: intraabdominal abscesses in 17 LA cases vs 13 OA cases (p=0,79); surgical wound alterations in 16 LA cases vs 47 OA cases (p=0,0001); incisional hernias in 2 LA cases (1%) vs 10 OA cases (p=0,008). There were no statistically significant differences in postoperative hospital stay (3 days), resumption of intake of liquids (1 day) or readmission rate (8%).ConclusionsThere are fewer surgical wound alterations and incisional hernias with the laparoscopic approach, but there is higher cost, lengthier surgery duration, and a longer learning curve. Our results cannot provide a clear indication for one approach or the other, and therefore each case must be evaluated on an individual basis.     

单孔对比传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的多中心回顾性分析：一项倾向性评分匹配研究

目的分析单孔对比传统三孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎的临床疗效,行亚组分析探索影响单孔腹腔镜手术时间的因素,明确获益人群。 方法回顾性分析三个中心2019年1月至2021年5月连续收治的急性阑尾炎并行腹腔镜阑尾切除术的患者的临床资料,用倾向性匹配方法消除年龄、性别因素对结果的影响,对比单孔和传统三孔腹腔镜手术时间、术后住院时间、术后并发症的区别,行亚组分析影响单孔腹腔镜手术时间的因素。 结果单孔组的手术时间延长（50.42±10.661 min vs. 37.76±11.023 min,t=6.566,P=0.000）,术后VAS疼痛评分降低（3.42±1.98 vs. 4.44±2.37,t=2.569,P=0.011）、需要使用镇痛药比例降低（8.3% vs. 22.9%,χ²=4.600,P=0.032）、疤痕美容SCAR评分降低（4.59±2.87 vs. 6.74±3.34,t=3.910,P=0.000）,术中出血量、术后住院时间及术后并发症差异无统计学意义。Logistic回归分析发现手术方式、BMI和阑尾直径是影响手术时间的独立影响因素,亚组分析发现BMI对单孔组和三孔组的手术时间均有影响,但对单孔组的影响更大;阑尾直径对三孔组的手术时间有影响,不影响单孔组的手术时间。 结论单孔腹腔镜阑尾切除术治疗急性阑尾炎是一种安全、有效的方法,可减少术后疼痛,术后腹壁疤痕更美观,尤其在BMI正常、阑尾直径较大的患者中效果更佳。     

Appendicitis: the impact of computed tomography imaging on negative appendectomy and perforation rates

Objective: The purposes of this study were to investigate the use of computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with suspected acute appendicitis and to evaluate the impact of CT on negative appendectomy and perforation rates. In patients clinically diagnosed of acute appendicitis the reported overall negative appendectomy rate is about 15–20%; 10% in men and 25–45% in women of childbearing age. This is associated with a perforation rate of 21–23%.
Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 146 consecutive patients presenting with clinical symptoms suspicious of appendicitis over a 2-yr period in whom CT examinations were performed before therapy was instituted. The overall negative appendectomy and perforation rates were calculated for the entire group, as well as for the 54 women aged 15–50 yr in the childbearing cohort.
Results: The negative appendectomy rate was 4% in 122 patients operated on and the perforation rate was 22%. Among 36 women 15–50 yr of age operated on, the negative appendectomy rate was 8.3% and the perforation rate was 19%. Surgery was avoided in 24 patients, 18 of whom were women of childbearing age.
Conclusions: The judicious use of CT imaging in patients with equivocal clinical presentation suspected of having appendicitis led to a significant improvement in the preoperative diagnosis. It resulted in a substantial decrease in the negative appendectomy rate compared to previously published reports, without incurring an increase in the perforation rate.     

The justification for laparoscopic appendectomy]

Laparoscopic appendicectomy (LA), in contrast to open appendicectomy (OA), is not generally accepted as the treatment of choice for suspected appendicitis because it is technically difficult, not readily available everywhere, takes longer to perform, is expensive, and is associated with an increased incidence of intra-abdominal abscesses. However, LA has shown a superior outcome compared to an OA in terms of less postoperative pain, earlier hospital discharge, quicker return to normal activity and work and decreased incidence of wound infection. Furthermore, a diagnostic laparoscopy is valuable in case of an equivocal diagnosis of appendicitis especially in premenopausal women and obese individuals because it allows a thorough examination of the whole abdomen under direct vision. It, therefore, permits accurate diagnosis and hence reduces the negative appendectomy rate. Nevertheless, before endorsing routine and widespread use of LA, it is essential that this technique is critically evaluated in well designed, controlled, randomised, prospective trials clearly showing major benefits to the patient in terms of quicker hospital discharge, reduced postoperative pain, decreased wound infection and early return to full activities.     

Unusual histopathological findings in appendectomy specimens: a retrospective analysis and literature review

AIM: To document unusual findings in appendectomy specimens. METHODS: The clinicopathological data of 5262 patients who underwent appendectomies for presumed acute appendicitis from January 2006 to October 2010 were reviewed retrospectively. Appendectomies performed as incidental procedures during some other operation were excluded. We focused on 54 patients who had unusual findings in their appendectomy specimens. We conducted a literature review via the PubMed and Google Scholar databases of English langu...     

Metal endoclips for the closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy

Closure of the appendiceal stump in laparoscopic appendectomy is the most crucial part of the procedure. In this retrospective clinical study, we describe a technique for laparoscopic appendectomy, in which the appendiceal stump is secured by metal endoclips. Medical data of the patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis between January 2005 and January 2011 at our institution were reviewed. The patients who had their appendiceal stump secured by metal endoclips were recruited for the study. The outcome measures were the rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, operative time, and the length of hospital stay. A total of 233 patients were included to the study. The rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, the mean operative time, and median length of hospital stay were 3 and 4%, 31.1 (15–75) min, and 18 (8–96) h, respectively. The closure of the appendiceal stump with metal endoclips in laparoscopic appendectomy is simple, quick, and safe with outcomes comparable to those of other methods.     

Transumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in children: Clinical andsurgical outcomes

The aim of this paper is to present and describe tran-sumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy in chil-dren, focusing on its technical aspects and clinical andsurgical outcomes. The surgical charts of all patientsaged between 0 and 14 years treated with transumbili-cal laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy admitted tothe authors' institution from January 2009 to Septem-ber 2013 with a diagnosis of suspected appendicitis fol-lowing clinical, laboratory and ultrasound findings werereviewed. Operating time, intraoperative findings, needfor conversion or for additional trocars, and surgicacomplications were reported. During the study period,120 patients aged between 6 and 14 years(mean age:9.9 years), 73 females(61%) and 47 males(39%),were treated with transumbilical laparoscopic-assistedappendectomy. There were 37 cases of hyperemicappendicitis(subserosal and retrocecal), 74 cases ofphlegmonous appendicitis and 9 cases of perforatedgangrenous appendicitis. It was not possible to estab-lish a correlation between grade of appendicitis andmean operating time(P 0.05). Eleven cases(9%)needed the use of one additional trocar, while 8 pa-tients(6%) required conversion to the standard laparo-scopic technique with the use of two additional trocars. No patient was converted to the open technique. Tran-sumbilical laparoscopic-assisted appendectomy is a safe technique in children and it could be used by surgeons who want to approach other minimally invasive tech-niques.     

Results of laparoscopicvs. conventional appendectomy in complicated appendicitis

BACKGROUND: Although many trials show some advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy, the value of laparoscopic appendectomy is still controversial. Specifically the question of whether there are benefits of laparoscopic appendectomy over open appendectomy in complicated appendicitis remains to be answered. METHODS: Of 1,106 consecutive appendectomies (717 laparoscopic appendectomies, 330 open appendectomies, and 59 conversions) between 1989 and 1999, the results of 299 patients with complicated appendicitis (defined by perforation, abscess, or peritonitis) were analyzed retrospectively to compare the complications of laparoscopic appendectomy and conversion (intention-to-treat group) with those of open appendectomy. RESULTS: Complicated appendicitis (n=299) was treated by laparoscopic appendectomy in 171 patients, by open appendectomy in 82 patients, and by conversion in 46 patients. Laparoscopic appendectomy and conversion showed fewer abdominal wall complications than open appendectomy (13/217; 6 percentvs. 15/82; 18.3 percent;P<0.003), which led to a decrease of the total complication rate in the intention-to-treat group (21/217; 9.7 percentvs. 19/82; 23.1 percent;P=0.004). The rate of intra-abdominal abscess formation was nearly the same after laparoscopic appendectomy (4.1 percent) and open appendectomy (4.9 percent). The total complication rate was higher in complicated appendicitis than in acute appendicitis (P<0.005) but was independent of the laparoscopic technique. The conversion rate was higher in complicated appendicitis than in acute appendicitis (21.2vs. 2.3 percent;P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In comparison with open appendectomy, laparoscopic appendectomy (by itself and in an intention-to-treat view) leads to a significant reduction of early postoperative complications in complicated appendicitis and therefore should be considered as the procedure of choice.Preliminary results of our first laparoscopically treated patients were presented in 1998 in German (Barkhausen S, Wullstein C, Gross E. Laparoskopische versus konventionelle Appendektomie—ein Vergleich hinsichtlich der frühpostoperativen Komplikationen. Zentralbl Chir 1998;123:858–62).