The impact of granulocyte colony stimulating factor at content of donor lymphocytes collected for cellular immunotherapy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Donor lymphocyte infusions (DLI) have become widely used for prevention or treatment of relapse after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Increasing use of reduced intensity conditioning regimens (RICR) and subsequent application of DLI forced the hemapheresis centers to collect donor lymphocytes in certain quantity and quality. The place of growth factors especially granulocyte colony stimulating factor (rhG-CSF, filgrastim) in allogeneic hemapoietic stem cell (HSC) collection is established, but there is no consensus about the role of rhG-CSF. We aimed to clarify the dose effect of rhG-CSF on lymphocyte subpopulations (CD3+, CD3+4+, CD3+8+, CD19+, CD3-16+56+) cells and CD34+ HSC. DONORS AND METHODS: Major indications for DLI (mean volume: 180+/-52 ml) were for relapse or transplants using RICR mainly in patients with acute leukemia (n=20) or chronic myeloid leukemia (n=15). In four years we performed 40 lymphocyte apheresis (LA) on 30 healthy (med. age 28, M/F 21/9) donors using continuous flow cell separators by processing 2-2.5 times of their total blood volume (TBV). The apheresis data is divided into three groups according to rhG-CSF dose used for priming. Donors in Group I (n=18), Group II (n=9) and Group III (n=13) received no rhG-CSF (steady state), rhG-CSF 5 microg/kg/dsc x 5 days and rhG-CSF 10 microg/kg/dsc x 5 days, respectively. There was no difference within groups concerning TBV processed and recipient body weight. RESULTS: A total of 11,565 ml (+/-3700) of blood was processed in 216 min (+/-36.5) at an inlet of 56.8 ml/min (+/-10.6) using 999 ml (+/-307) ACD. The CD34+ HSC increased with increasing rhG-CSF dose as expected. Median CD3+ lymphocyte yield per recipient body weight in Group I, II and III were 0.9 x 10e8/kg (range: 0.1-2.1), 2.9 x 10e8/kg (range: 1.6-4.3) and 2.1 x 10e8/kg (range: 0.6-6.9), respectively. The primed donors T lymphocyte yield was 2-3-fold more in comparison to Group I. This gain was most significant between Group I and III in terms of mean CD3+ (1.09 x 10e8/kg vs 2.41 x 10e8/kg, p=0.02), CD3+4+ (0.64 x 10e8/kg vs 1.44 x 10e8/kg, p=0.02) and CD3+8+ (0.42 x 10e8/kg vs 0.89 x 10e8/kg, p=0.03) cells, respectively. CONCLUSION: Though the yield of lymphocyte subsets in G-CSF primed donors exceeds the non-primed donors, the target range of 1 x 10e7-1 x 10e8/kg CD3+ lymphocytes could be achieved in the majority of the apheresis procedures without rhG-CSF priming. The yield of T and B lymphocyte subsets are increased by G-CSF stimulation but not on a logarithmic scale, which did not correlate into a clinical relevance.     

Large-volume leukapheresis using femoral venous access for harvesting peripheral blood stem cells with the Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors: predictors of CD34+ cell yield and collection efficiency

The current paper reports on the predicting factors associated with satisfactory peripheral blood stem cell collection and the efficacy of large-volume leukapheresis (LVL) using femoral vein catheterization to harvest PBSCs with Fenwal CS 3000 Plus from normal healthy donors for allogeneic transplantation. A total of 113 apheresis procedures in 57 patients were performed. The median number of MNCs, CD3+ cells, and CD34+ cells harvested per apheresis was 5.3 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.3-11.0 x 10(8)/kg), 3.0 x 10(8)/kg (range, 0.2-6.6 x 10(8)/kg), and 7.9 x 10(6)/kg (range, 0.1-188.9 x 10(6)/kg), respectively. The median collection efficiency of MNCs and CD34+ cells was 49.8% and 49.7%, respectively. A highly significant correlation was found between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis WBC counts in the donors (P = 0.013), and between the collected CD34+ cell counts and the pre-apheresis peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts (P<0.001). Harvesting at least >4 x 10(6)/kg CD34+ cells from the 1st LVL was achieved in 44 (77.2%) out of 57 donors and in 19 (90.5%) out of 21 donors with a PB-CD34+ cell count of >40/microl. There was no significant difference in the harvested MNC and CD34+ cell counts between the 1st and 2nd apheresis. The catheter-related complications included catheter obstruction (n = 2) and hematoma at the insertion site (n = 3). Accordingly, LVL using femoral venous access for allogeneic PBSC collection from normal healthy donors would appear to be safe and effective.     

The predictive value of white cell or CD34+ cell count in the peripheral blood for timing apheresis and maximizing yield

BACKGROUND: The collection of peripheral blood stem and progenitor cells (PBPCs) for transplantation can be time-consuming and expensive. Thus, the utility of counting CD34+ cells and white cells (WBCs) in the peripheral blood was evaluated as a predictor of CD34+ cell yield in the apheresis component. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The WBC and CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood and the apheresis components from 216 collections were assessed. Sixty-three patients underwent mobilization with chemotherapy plus filgrastim, and 17 patients and 14 allogeneic PBPC donors did so with filgrastim alone. The relationship between the number of WBC and CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood and in the apheresis component was analyzed by using rank correlation and linear regression analysis. RESULTS: The correlation coefficient for CD34+ cells per liter of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6)/kg) was 0.87 (n = 216 collections). This correlation existed for many patient and collection variables. However, patients with acute myeloid leukemia had fewer CD34+ cells in the apheresis component at any level of peripheral blood CD34+ cell count. Components collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 10 x 10(6) per L in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.75 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. When the WBC count in the blood was below 5.0 x 10(9) per L, the median number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood was 5.6 x 10(6) per L (range, 1.0-15.5 x 10(6)/L). A very poor correlation was found between the WBC count in the blood and the CD34+ cell yield (p = 0.12, n = 158 collections). CONCLUSION: The number of CD34+ cells, but not WBCs, in the peripheral blood can be used as a predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. This is a robust relationship not affected by a variety of patient and collection factors except the diagnosis of acute myeloid leukemia. Patients who undergo mobilization with chemotherapy and filgrastim also should undergo monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, beginning when the WBC count in the blood exceeds 1.0 to 5.0 x 10(9) per L.     

The absolute number of peripheral blood CD34+ cells predicts a timing for apheresis and progenitor cell yield in patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors

Retrospective analysis was conducted in 51 autologous peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collections using the Spectra AutoPBSC System from patients with hematologic malignancies and solid tumors to study the predictive value of CD34+ cell counts in the peripheral blood for the yield of CD34+ cells in the apheresis product. The correlation coefficients for CD34+ cells microL(-1) of peripheral blood with CD34+ cell yield (x 10(6) kg(-1) of body weight and x 10(5) kg(-1) of body weight L(-1) of blood processed) were 0.903 and 0.778 (n=51 collections), respectively. Products collected from patients with CD34+ cell counts below 15 microL(-1) in the peripheral blood contained a median of 0.49 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) (range: 0.05-2.55), whereas those with CD34+ cell counts more than 15 microL(-1) contained a median of 3.72 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) (range: 1.06-37.57). From these results, a number of at least 15 CD34+ cells microL(-1) in the peripheral blood ensured a minimum yield of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells kg(-1) as obtained by a single apheresis procedure. The number of CD34+ cells in the peripheral blood can be used as a good predictor for timing of apheresis and estimating PBPC yield. With regard to our results, apheresis with a possibly poor efficiency should be avoided because the collection procedure is time-consuming and expensive.     

短程大剂量粒细胞集落刺激因子动员外周血造血干细胞的研究

研究短程大剂量粒细胞集落刺激因子对外周血造血干细胞的动员作用。方法采用短程大剂量Ｇ－ＣＳＦ对１１例患者进行外周血造血干细胞动员，Ｇ－ＣＳＦ５μｇ／ｋｇ皮下注射，每日２次，共３天，动员当天及第４天，分别取骨髓及外周血增生明显活跃，外周血白细胞计数明显升高。     

Mobilization factors of peripheral blood stem cells in healthy donors.

As a source of hematopoietic stem cells for transplantation, the use of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) has become routine and comparable to that of the use of bone marrow. Recently, elderly patients with hematological malignancies also have been allowed to receive minitransplantations with nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens under sufficient PBSC infusion. As a result of these minitransplantations, elderly donors have been chosen increasingly from the siblings of elderly patients. We analyzed factors influencing the condition of CD34+ cells in the first days of collection in 49 healthy donors from July 1995 to January 2001. The median dose of recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor was 8 microg/kg/day (range 8 - 10) over 3 days. The target number of CD34+ cells used in this study was > or = 3 x 10(6) cells/kg of recipient body weight. The median apheresis volume was 12 L. Except for one 60 year old man, we obtained an adequate number of stem cells. In the regression analysis, a negative correlation was seen between donor age and the number of CD34+ cells/kg of recipient body weight per 12 L volume (Y = aX + b; a = -0.07507; b = 6.629996; r = -0.50985; p = 0.000252). Significantly higher apheresis results were obtained in donors younger than 45 years compared with donors 45 years old and older (p < 0.0227). There were no correlations among the number of CD34+ cells, donor body weight, and the number of leukocytes in peripheral blood on the first day of apheresis.     

The effect of G-CSF on lymphocyte subsets and CD34+ cells in allogeneic stem cell transplantation.

The effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) on peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBL) and CD34+ cell frequency in the apheresis product has been determined in 25 healthy stem cell donors. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMNC) were collected after five days of G-CSF 10 microg/kg/day s.c., which was well tolerated. The median number of leukocytes increased eight-fold over that of pretreatment levels. Collection of PBMNC lasted a median of two (range, 1-3) days. The mean mononuclear cell (MNC) count and total lymphocyte percentage were 6.69 x 10(8)/kg and 59.08%, respectively, and the frequency of CD34+ cell expression was 2.1% in the apheresis product. The frequency of CD3+, CD4+, CD25+, NK and CD122+ cell expressions in mobilized PBMNC and PBL showed no significant difference. However, the frequency of CD8+, CD8+28+, CD3+DR+, CD19+, CD20+ and CD22+ B cells expression in the apheresis product increased significantly compared to steady-state PBL. In contrast, the frequency of the CD11 a+ and CD8+38+ cell expressions in the apheresis product was decreased compared to the steady-state PBL. The mean yield of CD34+ and CD3+ cells were 13.6 x 10(6) and 2.69 x 10(8)/kg of recipient body weight (RBW), respectively. Following allograft all patients engrafted with >0.5 x 10(9)/l neutrophil and < or = 20 x 10(9)/l platelets on a median of day 13 and 12, respectively. Nine patients had grade II-IV acute GVHD and chronic GVHD occurred in eight patients. Four patients died due to transplant-related complications. There was one late engraftment failure which occurred on the fifth month. Thirteen patients are still alive. In conclusion, these results indicate that administration of G-CSF at 10 microg/kg/day in normal donors alters the lymphocyte subsets and there are significant differences in the lymphocyte contents of the recipients before apheresis and in apheresis product.     

Monitoring of peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts on the first day of apheresis is highly predictive for efficient CD34+ cell yield.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation of preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/micro L, white blood cells (WBC), and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis with the yield of collected CD 34+ cell counts in 40 patients with hematological malignancies (n = 29) and solid tumors (n = 11). The median numbers of apheresis cycles, numbers of CD 34+ cells, peripheral blood (PB) mononuclear cells, and total nucleated cells collected were 2 (range, 1-4), 5.5 x 106/kg (range, 0.05-33.78), 2.59 x 108/kg (range, 0.04-20.68), and 7.36 x 108/kg (range, 0.15-28.08), respectively. There was a strong correlation between the number of preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/micro L and the yield of collected CD 34+ cells per kilogram (r = 0.962, p < 0.001). The threshold levels of PB C 34+ cell/micro L to obtain > or =1 x 106/kg and > or =2.5 x 106/kg CD 34+ cell in one collection were 12/micro L and 34/ micro L, respectively. Fifteen of 17 (88%) patients who had > or =34 CD 34+ cells/ micro L in the PB before collection reached the level of > or =2.5 x 106/kg in a single apheresis. Despite a low r value, WBC and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis also correlated with the yield of collected daily CD 34+ cells per kilogram (r = 0.482, p < 0.01 and r = 0.496 p < 0.01, respectively). These data suggest that preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells/ micro L correlated significantly better with the yield of collected CD 34+ cells than WBC and platelet counts on the first day of apheresis. Using a value of 34/micro L preleukapheresis circulating CD 34+ cells as a guide for the timing of peripheral blood stem cells collections can be time saving and cost-effective.     

Cobe Spectra与Fenwal CS 3000 Plus血细胞分离器外周血造血干/祖细胞的采集效能比较

为了评价Cobe Spectra(Version6.1)和Fenwal CS 3000 Plus两种血细胞分离机在造血干／祖细胞采集中的采集效能，对36人64次外周血造血干／祖细胞的采集进行了回顾性分析．20人42次使用Cobe Spectra采集，16人22次使用Fenwal CS 3000 Plus采集对CD34^ 细胞采集量、采集效率以及红细胞与血小板的采集量进行比较，结果表明：Cobe Spectra和Fenwal CS 3000 Plus在CD34^ 细胞采集量和采集效率上无显著差异?CD34^ 细胞采集量与供者白细胞、单核细胞、造血祖细胞、CD34^ 细胞的动员情况呈正相关，在多因素stepwise线性回归模型中，采集前外周血干／祖细胞浓度是唯一有意义的影响因素，Fenwal CS 3000 Plus的采集效率与外周血单核细胞量呈负相关。Fenwal CS 3000 Plus对红细胞的收集量显著高于Cobe Spectra，并且采集后供者外周血血小板降低程度较Cobe Spectra更严重。结论：Cobe Spectra(Version 6．1)和Fenwal CS 3000 Plus在CD34^ 细胞的采集能力上无显著差别。当外周血单核细胞数量高，或是血型不合移植的及血小板减少的供者，推荐使用Cobe Spectra血细胞分离机.     

Factors affecting PBSC mobilization and collection in healthy donors.

Peripheral blood stem cells are widely used as stem cell source for allografting. Progenitor cells can be effectively mobilized into peripheral blood in majority of healthy donors with a brief administration of G-CSF. A mobilization course in 111 donors (median age 40years) was retrospectively studied and the factors influencing the efficacy of mobilization were analyzed. The median number of CD34+ cells per kg recipient weight 5.1x10(6) was obtained after a median of two aphereses. The target cell dose (4.0x10(6)/kg) was reached in 69% of donors. Circulating CD34+ count and CD34+ yield were negatively associated with donor's age. Other independent factors associated with superior yield were precollection platelet and WBC counts. In multivariate analysis only CD34+ precount predicted for CD34+ yield. G-CSF had an acceptable short-term safety profile. Our data confirm that apheresis is a safe procedure in healthy including aged donors and suggest that older donors could be poorer mobilizers than younger.     

Inverse relationship between patient peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts and collection efficiency for CD34+ cells in two automated leukapheresis systems

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to analyze the CD34 cell collection efficiency (CE) of automated leukapheresis protocols of two blood cell separators (Spectra, COBE [AutoPBSC protocol] and AS104, Fresenius [PBSC-Lym, protocol]) for peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest in patients with malignant diseases. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: PBPCs were collected by the Spectra AutoPBSC protocol in 95 patients (123 collections) and the AS104 PBSC-Lym protocol in 87 patients (115 harvests). Patients underwent a median of one (range, 1-4) conventional-volume apheresis procedure of 10.8 L (9.0-13.9) to obtain a target cell dose of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. RESULTS: The median overall CD34 CE was significantly better on the AS104 than on the Spectra: 55.8 percent versus 42.4 percent (p = 0.000). This was also true below (59.2% vs. 50.1%; p = 0.022) and above (51.2% vs. 41.3%; p = 0.001) the preleukapheresis threshold of 40 CD34+ cells per microL needed to collect a single-apheresis autograft. However, at > or =40 circulating CD34+ cells per microL, both cell separators achieved the target of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg. The CD34 CE dropped significantly, from 59.2 percent at <40 cells per microL to 51.2 percent at > or =40 cells per microL on the AS104 (p = 0.017) and from 50.1 percent to 41.3 percent on the Spectra (p = 0.033). CONCLUSION: Whereas the CD34 CE was significantly different with the AS104 and the Spectra, the CD34 CE of both machines correlated inversely with peripheral blood CD34+ cell counts, showing a significant decline with increasing numbers of circulating CD34+ cells. Nevertheless, at > or 40 preapheresis CD34+ cells per microL, sufficient hematopoietic autografts of > or =2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells per kg were harvested by a single conventional-volume (11 L) leukapheresis on both cell separators.     

大剂量足叶乙甙和G-CSF用于恶性血液病外周血造血干/祖细胞动员

为了观察大剂量足叶乙甙(VP16)和粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)在恶性血液病人动员采集自体外周血造血干/祖细胞的有效性和安全性,对10例恶性血液病患者(多发性骨髓瘤6例,非霍奇金淋巴瘤4例),第1天用足叶乙甙1.6g/m2静脉持续滴注10小时,第3天起给予G-CSF5μg/kg,每日1次,皮下注射,直至采集结束。结果显示:用VP16后平均第11(9-13)天开始外周血造血干/祖细胞单采,获CD34+细胞9.4×106/kg(4.2-17.3×106/kg),每例CD34+细胞>4.0×106/kg。平均采集次数2.6(1-4)次。1例发生口咽黏膜炎、2例尿道炎、咽喉炎。结论:足叶乙甙1.6g/m2和G-CSF5μg/kg是恶性血液病动员采集自体干祖细胞的有效安全方案。     

Peripheral blood stem cell collection and transplantation using the Haemonetics Multi Component System

AIM: To assess clinical usefulness of an intermittent-flow blood cell separator in peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) collection and transplantation. RESULTS: The Haemonetics Multi Component System (Multi) was used to collect PBSC (52 aphereses in 17 patients). The mean processing blood volume and the mean PBSC yield were 7407 ml and 2.16 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, respectively. When CD34+ cells exceeded 0.3% of the peripheral WBC, more than 2.0 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg could be collected by a single apheresis. Eight patients underwent PBSC transplantation after high-dose chemotherapy. Hematopoietic recovery was achieved in a median period of 10 days. CONCLUSIONS: (1) A single-arm, light-weight machine has sufficient capability to collect PBSC. (2) The percentage of CD34+ cells in the peripheral WBC is a good predictor of the CD34+ cell yield of the collection.     

Allogeneic blood progenitor cell collection in normal donors after mobilization with filgrastim: the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center experience

BACKGROUND: Information on the safety and efficacy of allogeneic peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) collection in filgrastim-mobilized normal donors is still limited. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PBPC donor database from a 42-month period (12/94-5/98) was reviewed for apheresis and clinical data related to PBPC donation. Normal PBPC donors received filgrastim (6 microg/kg subcutaneously every 12 hours) for 3 to 4 days and subsequently underwent daily leukapheresis. The target collection was > or =4 x 10(6)CD34+ cells per kg of recipient's body weight. RESULTS: A total of 350 donors were found to be evaluable. Their median age was 41 years (range, 4-79). Their median preapheresis white cell count was 42.8 x 10(9) per L (range, 18.3-91.6). Of these donors, 17 (5%) had inadequate peripheral venous access. Leukapheresis could not be completed because of apheresis-related adverse events in 2 donors (0.5%). Of the 324 donors evaluable for apheresis yield data, 221 (68%) reached the collection target with one leukapheresis. The median CD34+ cell dose collected (first leukapheresis) was 462 x 10(6) (range, 29-1463).The main adverse events related to filgrastim administration in donors evaluable for toxicity (n = 341) were bone pain (84%), headache (54%), fatigue (31%), and nausea (13%). These events were rated as moderate to severe (grade 2-3) by 171 (50%) of the donors. In 2 donors (0.5%), they prompted the discontinuation of filgrastim administration. CONCLUSION: PBPC apheresis for allogeneic transplantation is safe and well tolerated. It allows the collection of an "acceptable" PBPC dose in most normal donors with one leukapheresis, with minimal need for invasive procedures.     

两种血细胞分离机干/祖细胞采集和移植效果的比较

背景：外周血造血干/祖细胞通过血细胞分离机进行体外收集,血细胞分离机的性能、工作状况将直接关系到采集物的特性和数量,从而直接影响受者的造血重建。目的：比较Fenwal CS-3000Plus与Amicus两种血细胞分离机采集外周血造血干/祖细胞及受者移植效果。方法：共入选接受异基因外周血干细胞移植患者51例,Fenwal CS-3000Plus组27例,平均年龄（34.2±10.6）岁;Amicus组24例,平均年龄（35.4±12.1）岁。比较两组采集物有核细胞数、CD34＋细胞数、采集效率、红细胞与血小板采集量及造血重建时间。结果与结论：两组采集物的有核细胞数、CD34＋细胞数、采集效率、红细胞采集量及造血重建时间差异均无显著性意义;Fenwal CS-3000Plus组血小板采集量明显高于Amicus组（P〈0.01）。结果显示Fenwal CS-3000Plus与Amicus血细胞分离机在分离外周血干/祖细胞方面和移植效果没有差异;血小板较低被采集者使用Amicus血细胞分离机采集可能更为安全。     

Does continuous flow apheresis influence viability in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell harvest?

One of the important clinical variables determining the success of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the number of viable CD34+ stem cells transfused to the patient. G-CSF mobilized peripheral blood stem cells from 17 healthy donors were collected by continuous flow apheresis. The median (range) proportions of early apoptotic (Annexin V-FITC(pos)/7-AAD(neg)) and viable (Annexin V-FITC(neg)/7-AAD(neg)) CD45(dim)CD34+ stem cells were 1.5 (0.9-3.7)% and 97.7 (82.8-100)% in the peripheral blood before apheresis and 2.6 (0.8-7.9)% and 97.3 (91.9-99)% in the apheresis products, respectively. Despite an increase in the number of apoptotic cells among all cell compartments, this was statistically significant only in CD34+ cells and granulocytes. The majority of the cells still retained their viability.     

重组人G-CSF对健康供者外周造血干／祖细胞动员和采集效果的影响因素分析

应用重组人粒系集落刺激因子（rhG—CSF）对健康供者进行动员并采集造血干细胞用于异基因外周血造血干细胞移植已在临床广泛应用，本研究通过对影响外周干细胞动员和采集效果的多因素分析，进一步探讨最佳动员方案及采集时机。采取回顾性方法分析了431例健康供者外周血干细胞动员采集效果，并进一步分析了供者一般特征、rhG—CSF动员天数、每日皮下注射次数、剂量与采集效果的关系。结果表明：rhG—CSF在动员中平均应用剂量为5．7μg／（kg·d），平均采集1．7次，收获单个核细胞数平均为9．57×10^8／kg，CD34^＋细胞平均为4．91×10^6／kg。绝大多数供者不良反应轻微。多因素分析结果显示，采集效率主要与供者体重指数，采集天数相关。rhG—CSF动员第5天采集的供者，其MNC数、CD34^＋细胞数及第一次单采成功率均优于其他时间采集的供者。同时，本组供者应用rhG—CSF剂量较小且剂量范围较窄，rhG—CSF剂量不如采集时间对采集物质量的影响明显。结论：小剂量应用rhG—CSF动员并于第5天开始采集是健康供者造血干细胞动员的较理想方案。     

人重组粒细胞集落刺激因子动员后采集骨髓对健康供者外周血采集物成份的影响

本研究探讨健康供者体内应用人重组粒细胞集落刺激因子（G—CSF）后采集骨髓对外周血采集物成份的影响。62例健康供者皮下注射rhG—CSF5μg/（kg·d），连用5天，其中31例供者在第4、5天分别采集骨髓和外周血采集物（A组）；另31例供者于第4、5天均单采集外周血单个核细胞（B组）。应用流式细胞术检测两组供者外周血采集物中的淋巴细胞、CD3^＋、CD3^＋CD4^＋、CD3^＋CD8^＋、CD14^＋、CD34^＋细胞以及CD3^＋CD4^-CD8^-T细胞的数量。结果显示，A组供者每微升外周血采集物中单个核细胞中CD3^＋、CD3^＋CD4^＋、CD3^＋CD8^＋、CD14^＋、CD34^＋细胞以及CD3^＋CD4^-CD8^-T细胞的中位含量分别1．56×10^5μ1、8．56×10^4μl、6．12×10^4μl、3．38×10^4μl、2．27×10^4μl、3．83×10^4μl、744μl及3588μl，与B组的1．40×10^5μl、7．34×10^4μ1、5．32×10^4l、3．06×10^4μl、1．83×10^4μl、3．21×10^4μl、554μl及3120μl的差异无统计学意义（p〉0．05）；A组外周血采集物中CD4^＋细胞与CD8^＋细胞的比值[1．52（0．54—2．87）]、单核细胞与CD3^＋细胞的比值[0．57（0．15—1．64）]以及CD3^＋CD4^-CD8^-T细胞与CD3^＋细胞[0．064（0．018—0．673）]的比值与B组[1．68（0．31—3．35）]、[0．59（0．18—1．25）]、[0．063（0．021—0．136）]的差异均无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。结论：健康供者体内应用rhG—CSF后采集骨髓对外周血采集物成份无影响，对rhG—CSF动员的同一健康供者可单独采集骨髓、外周血采集物或同时采集两种采集物以满足临床移植的需要。     

The effect of age on peripheral stem cell mobilization in healthy donors,single center experience

Purpose : Peripheral stem cell transplantation is used as a life‐saving therapeutic option in hematological malignancies. As previously established, most hematological malignancies are seen in the elderly population. Therefore, possible HLA‐identical sibling donors of elderly patients are generally of an advanced age. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effect of old age on stem cell mobilization and quality in older adult healthy sibling donors. Materials and Methods : Between 2006 and 2014, we evaluated 38 healthy donors aged ≥55 years. The granulocyte‐colony stimulating factor (G‐CSF) analogs were used at a dose of 5 µg/kg/day and administered subcutaneously twice a day for five days. CD34+ cells were estimated in the peripheral blood before collection of the apheresis product. The National Marrow Donor Program selects healthy unrelated donors if they are younger than 60 years. Therefore, we compared the product quality in donors over the age of 60 to that in donors aged 60 years or less. Results : We collected sufficient products from all the donors with one to three apheresis procedures. No serious complication was detected in all donors. Reaching the target CD34+ cell count in one day were detected in 83% of younger and 79% of older donors (P = NS). Collected CD34+ cells x10e6/recipient body weight (kg) was same and 5.1 in the groups (P = NS). There were no correlation between the donor age and these parameters. Conclusion : Healthy donor apheresis in older adults can be performed effectively and possible donors should be evaluated regardless of their age. J. Clin. Apheresis 32:16–20, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Technical and safety aspects of blood and marrow transplantation using G-CSF mobilized family donors

An allogeneic transplantation programme using immunoselected blood progenitor and bone marrow CD34+ cells has been established. Thirteen healthy HLA-matched, MLC negative sibling donors received two doses of 5 micrograms kg-1 G-CSF (s.c. daily) for 5 days. On days 4 and 5, large-volume mononuclear cell aphereses were performed (COBE Spectra) and on day 5 one unit of autologous blood was obtained. Mononuclear cells were pooled and cryopreserved after CD34+ cell-immunoselection on day 5. Bone marrow (BM) of the same donors was procured under routine conditions 10-45 days later (median: 27 days). The final graft consisted of blood CD34+ cells with either complete BM (n = 5) or immunoselected BM CD34+ cells (n = 8). The present paper describes the progenitor cell mobilization and apheresis protocol and analyzes the cell loss by BM and peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) donation. Considerably larger amounts of mononuclear cells (CD45+), T-lymphocytes (CD3+) and platelets were lost by the apheresis as compared to bone marrow without apparent immediate clinical consequences for the donors. Owing to cross-cellular contamination of the apheresis concentrate, blood platelet count (PC) significantly decreased (mean PC after the second apheresis 116 x 10 microL-1); furthermore on average 3.04 x 10(10) CD3+ cells were removed by two apheresis sessions. This loss did not lead to long-term total lymphocyte count changes (2370 microL-1 versus 1889 microL-1) as observed during the long-term follow-up of 7/13 donors (mean 290 days). Subjectively, the PBPC collections were better accepted than BM donations in all but one family donor.