Dialysis as bridge therapy for renal transplantation: single center experience, a comparison of hemodialysis and continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BACKGROUND: Kidney transplantation is the most ideal treatment in renal replacement therapy for patients with end-stage renal disease. However, the prevalence of transplantation is extremely low and most patients with ESRD should continue dialysis for their whole life. Recently, high transposition rate of renal transplantation from peritoneal dialysis (PD) was reported, however, it was unclear whether a difference in dialytic modality can influence the outcome. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of dialytic modality on the rate of kidney transplantation and outcome in our single center. METHODS: Forty-two kidney transplants were carried among 1,573 dialysis patients from the years 1986 to 2004 in our center. Transposition rates from two modalities (HD and PD) and graft survival were compared. The incidence of acute rejection episode, complications after receiving transplantations, and coexisting diseases were also evaluated between the two modalities prior to transplantation. RESULT: The number of patients who received HD was larger than PD (HD 77.1%, PD 22.9%, respectively). Forty-two patients undergoing dialytic therapy received a living-donor kidney transplantation. Overall graft survival was 92% at 5 years and 75% at 10 years. Among these cases, dialytic modality prior to transplantation was 57.1% in HD, and 42.9% in PD. The transfer rate from PD to transplantation was significantly (p = 0.0036) higher (4.7%) than that of HD (1.9%). The reason for the high transfer rate of PD patients might be cooperation with their family and the provision of relevant information by nephrologists during PD. There were no differences between the two modalities prior to transplantation in the graft survival rate, incidence of acute rejection, and complications before and after transplantation. CONCLUSION: Difference in pretransplant dialysis modality did not affect the outcomes, however, the transfer rate from PD was significantly higher than from HD. Accordingly, PD is useful compared to HD as bridge therapy for kidney transplantation from the high feasibility of living-donor kidney transplantation.     

血液透析和腹膜透析对肾移植术后并发症和预后的影响

目的 探讨血液透析(HD)与腹膜透析(PD)对肾移植术后并发症和预后的影响。 方法 回顾分析402例术前维持性透析超过3个月的同种异体尸体肾移植术患者的临床资料。按透析方式将患者分为HD组（303例）和PD组（99例），并对345例随访（30.2±15.2）月。比较术前HD和PD对肾移植术后受者和移植肾存活率以及肾移植术后并发症，包括急性排斥、移植肾功能延迟恢复（DGF）、感染、慢性排斥等的影响。 结果 除了术前平均透析时间PD组长于HD组，乙型肝炎（乙肝）感染率HD组明显高于PD组外，在原发病、年龄、性别、血压、血红蛋白、HLA配型、冷热缺血时间、丙型肝炎感染等方面两组间差异无统计学意义。移植术后两组在DGF、急性排斥、慢性排斥、巨细胞病毒（CMV）感染和其他感染的发生率等方面差异无统计学意义。HD组术前透析时间>12个月的患者急性排斥的发生率显著高于<12个月的患者（P ＜ 0.05）。乙肝患者比非乙肝患者更易发生移植肾丧失功能（19.23% 比 8.86％，P = 0.021）。PD组乙肝病毒阴性的患者术后感染发生率较低。术后患者1年和5年存活率在两组间差异无统计学意义（1年：HD 94.34%，PD 91.25%；5年：HD 92.83%，PD 90%）；同样移植肾1年和5年存活率两组间差异也无统计学意义（1年：HD 93.21%，PD 96.25%；5年：HD 87.17%，PD 91.25%）。 结论 HD和PD对肾移植术后并发症、患者及移植肾1年和5年存活率的影响相似，均可作为慢性肾衰竭患者肾移植术前替代治疗。HD患者的急性排斥发生率随着透析时间的延长而增加，因此，缩短肾移植前透析时间将有助减少肾移植术后并发症。     

Dialysis modality and the risk of allograft thrombosis in adult renal transplant recipients

BACKGROUND: Renal vascular thrombosis (RVT) is a rare but catastrophic complication of renal transplantation. Although a plethora of risk factors has been identified, a large proportion of cases of RVT is unexplained. Uremic coagulopathy and dialysis modality may predispose to RVT. We investigated the impact of the pretransplant dialysis modality on the risk of RVT in adult renal transplant recipients. METHODS: Renal transplant recipients (age 18 years or more) who were enrolled in the national registry between 1990 and 1996 (N = 84,513) were evaluated for RVT occurring within 30 days of transplantation. Each case was matched with two controls from the same transplant center and with the year of transplantation. The association between RVT and 18 factors was studied with multivariate conditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Forty-nine percent of all cases of RVT (365 out of 743) occurred in repeat transplant recipients with an adjusted odds ratio (OR) of 5.72 compared with first transplants (P < 0.001). There were a significantly higher odds of RVT in peritoneal dialysis (PD)-compared with hemodialysis (HD)-treated patients (OR = 1.87, P = 0.001). Change in dialysis modality was an independent predictor of RVT: switching from HD to PD (OR = 3.59, P < 0.001) and from PD to HD (OR = 1.62, P = 0.047). Compared with primary transplant recipients on HD (OR = 1.00), the highest odds of RVT were in repeat transplant recipients treated with PD (OR = 12.95, P < 0.001) and HD (OR = 4.50, P < 0.001). Other independent predictors of RVT were preemptive transplantation, relatively young and old donor age, diabetes mellitus and systemic lupus erythematosus as causes of end-stage renal disease, recipient gender, and lower panel reactive antibody levels (PRAs). CONCLUSIONS: The strongest risk factors for RVT were retransplantation and prior PD treatment. Prevention of RVT with perioperative anticoagulation should be studied in patients who have a constellation of the identified risk factors.     

Access to, and outcome of, renal transplantation according to treatment modality of end-stage renal disease in France

BACKGROUND: Although peritoneal dialysis (PD) is recognized as one of the methods of treatment of end-stage renal disease (ESRD), there have been recurrent concerns about the access of patients treated by this modality to kidney transplantation (KTx), as well as reports showing increased complications of KTx in such patients, such as graft thrombosis and infections. METHODS: The aim of this study was to provide a comprehensive view of the impact on transplantation of pretransplant modality of treatment of ESRD using a multivariate analysis of the French database. From 1997 to 2000, after exclusion of pediatric patients, multiple transplantations, and living donors, 6420 were patients registered on the waiting list, and 3464 were transplanted. RESULTS: Using a Cox proportional hazard analysis, we found a shorter waiting time for PD patients (RR 0.71, P < 0.0001), which became equivalent to hemodialysis (HD) patients when taking into account the transplant center as a variable (RR 1.0, P= 0.95). Concerning graft survival, only preemptive transplantation had a significant impact, being associated to a decreased risk of graft failure (RR 0.46, P= 0.005). Conclusion. Our study supports the concept that the choice of any pretransplant dialysis modality does not influence waiting time for transplant or the results of transplantation.     

Increased incidence of postoperative infections associated with peritoneal dialysis in renal transplant recipients.

BACKGROUND: Infection is a frequent postoperative complication in renal transplant recipients. However, little information is available concerning the effect of pretransplantation dialysis modality on posttransplantation complications including infection. We therefore evaluated the effect of hemodialysis (HD) versus peritoneal dialysis (PD) on the incidence of postoperative infection as well as several other posttransplantation outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using medical records covering the period 30 days after transplantation of 156 dialysis patients who underwent renal transplantation at a single center during a 22-month period. Of these patients, 103 received only HD, 32 received only PD, 13 received PD in the past and HD immediately before transplantation (PH/HD), and 8 received HD in the past and PD immediately before transplantation (HD/PD). The presence of culture-proven infection, types of infecting organisms, length of initial hospital stay, and incidence of rejection during the first 30 days after transplantation were determined for each patient. RESULTS: All groups were similar with regard to age, race, gender, underlying disease, donor type, incidence of delayed graft function, and perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis. There were more infectious complications within 30 days after transplantation in patients on PD just prior to transplantation (PD and HD/PD) than in HD patients (67.5% vs. 25.9%, P<0.00001). When types of infectious organisms were assessed, PD patients were found to have a greater incidence of infections with microorganisms that colonize human skin (P<0.0001). The median length of hospital stay was 3 days longer for PD patients and 6.5 days longer for HD/PD patients than for patients receiving HD (P=0.01 and 0.04), and PD and HD/PD patients were more likely to have an episode of rejection than HD patients (P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Renal replacement therapy with PD immediately before transplantation negatively affects outcome as compared with HD, predisposing patients to a greater incidence of postoperative infections and rejection and a longer hospital stay. Further study in a randomized controlled trial may help determine how adjustment of the dialysis method can optimize transplantation outcome.     

Impact of dialysis modality on posttransplantation results in kidney transplantation

Studies looking at the type of pretransplantation renal replacement therapy on graft and patient survivals after kidney transplantation have produced conflicting results. Therefore, we studied the effect of pretransplantation dialysis modality (peritoneal dialysis [PD] or hemodialysis [HD]) on transplant outcomes. We performed a retrospective study of 78 patients (39 PD and 39 HD) who had their first renal transplantation between January 1986 and December 2004. Comparisons between groups were made using chi-square tests for qualitative parameters and nonpaired Student t tests for continuous variables. Comparisons between actuarial curves of patient and technique survivals used log-rank tests. The percentages of recipient males, cadaveric donors, transplant-induced diabetes, mean period of dialysis, mean transplantation follow-up, mean duration of first hospital stay, first infection, acute tubular necrosis, and acute rejection episodes were not significantly different among PD versus HD patients, whereas recipient and donor mean ages were significantly higher in HD and PD patients, respectively. There were no differences in graft and recipient survivals among PD versus HD patients. After kidney transplantation, there was no difference between PD and HD patients concerning percentages of infection, acute tubular necrosis, acute rejection episodes or graft and recipient survivals.     

Association between initial and pretransplant dialysis modality and graft and patient outcomes in live- and deceased-donor renal transplant recipients

The association between pretransplant dialysis modality and transplant outcomes remains inconsistent. The aim of this study is to address the association between alteration in dialysis modality and post-transplant outcomes. Using Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, primary live- and deceased-donor renal transplant recipients (RTR) between 1997 and 2009 were examined. Pre-emptive and multiple-organ transplants were excluded. The association between initial and pretransplant dialysis modality and transplant outcomes were examined. Of the 6701 RTR, 18.6% were initiated-maintained on peritoneal dialysis pretransplant (PD-PD), 9.2% were initiated on PD, but maintained on haemodialysis (HD) pretransplant (PD-HD), 63.3% were HD-HD and 8.9% were HD-PD. PD-HD [odds ratio(OR)1.44, 95% CI 1.21,1.72] and HD-HD (OR1.25, 95% CI 1.12,1.41) were associated with a significantly greater risk of slow graft function compared with the overall mean of the groups, whereas a change in initial dialysis modality from HD to pretransplant PD was associated with higher risk of overall graft failure [hazard ratio(HR)1.19, 95% CI 1.04,1.36) and recipient death (HR1.34, 95% CI 1.13,1.59). Our registry analysis suggest that dialysis modality pretransplant may affect transplant outcomes and future studies evaluating patient selection, choice of modality and/or potential interventions in the pre and post-transplant period may have a beneficial effect on post-transplant outcomes.     

Influence of dialysis on post-transplant events

INTRODUCTION: We examined the effect of haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD) on acute rejection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft and patient survival after cadaveric renal transplantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out a retrospective analysis of 325 patients (cyclosporin [CyA]-based therapy) who had their first cadaver renal transplant between January 1991 and December 1996 and followed up for a mean of 61 +/- 26 months. They were divided into three groups: HD, PD and CD (where both PD and HD was used for at least 3 months). Delayed graft function was diagnosed if the patient needed dialysis in the first week post-transplant while primary non-function (PNF) was diagnosed if the kidney never achieved function. Graft rejection was confirmed by biopsy; early acute rejection (EAR) was defined as acute rejection occurring before 90 days and late acute rejection (LAR) as one after 90 d. RESULTS: A total of 183 patients had PD, 117 HD and 25 CD. The mean time period in which the patients were on dialysis for PD was 24 months, HD 34.5 months and CD 50.6 months (p < 0.01). The recipients were matched for age and gender. The donor variables (age, gender and cold ischaemia time) did not differ between the groups. The mean time for the development of first acute rejection following renal transplant in each group was as follows: PD group: 68.8 d, HD group: 81.3 d and CD group: 105 d (p = 0.08). The number of patients who developed EAR was 90 (49.2%) in PD group, 51 (43.6%) in HD group and 11 (56%) in CD group (p = 0.6); the number who developed LAR was nine in PD group (4.9%), six in HD group (5.1%) and one in CD group (4%) (p = 0.9). Fifty-six patients with PD had DGF compared with 58 with HD (p = 0.01). There was no difference in the number and severity of rejection episodes or DGF based on the duration of dialysis. The 5-yr survival of patients was 79% for PD, 81% HD and 78% CD groups (p = n.s), while the graft survival for PD group was 61%, HD group 63% and CD group 74% (p = n.s). SUMMARY: We could find no difference in the patient or graft survival between patients who had pre-transplant HD, PD or CD. There was no difference in the incidence of acute rejection episodes between the three groups of patients as well. However, we found a significantly higher rate of DGF in the HD versus PD patients.     

Renal transplantation, chronic dialysis, and chronic renal insufficiency in children and adolescents. The 1995 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study

The 1995 Annual Report of the North American Pediatric Renal Transplant Cooperative Study summarizes data voluntarily collected from 123 centers on 5,197 children and adolescents grouped into three cohorts: (1) patients who received renal transplants on or after 1 January 1987 (n = 3,066), (2) patients who were maintained on peritoneal dialysis (PD) or hemodialysis (HD) on or after 1 January 1992 (n = 1,488), and (3) patients treated for chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) on or after 1 January 1994 (n = 643). The transplant and dialysis information update previous registry data whereas the CRI information reflects 1st-year registry data. Three-year graft survival rates were 83% and 66% for living donor grafts and cadaver donor (CD) grafts, respectively. Triple drug maintenance therapy with prednisone, cyclosporine, and azathioprine was used by >70% of all transplant recipients through 5 years of follow-up. The 2-year CD survival has steadily improved from 65% in 1987 to 82% in 1992. Fifty malignancies have been reported, the majority of which are lymphoproliferative disorders. The 2-year patient survival posttransplantation is 95%. Mortality rates for the youngest patients have drastically improved over the past 2 years. Approximately two-thirds of patients in the dialysis cohort are maintained on PD; automated PD remains the preferred modality. Overall, the peritonitis rate is one infection every 13.3 patient months, the frequency of infection being greatest in the youngest patients. Whereas the primary reason for dialysis modality termination is transplantation, approximately 40% of the entire dialysis cohort (PD and HD) were not considered active transplant candidates. Baseline CRI data revealed the most common primary diagnoses to be obstructive uropathy (24%) and aplastic/hypoplastic/dysplastic kidneys (19%). The standardized height deficit in the CRI cohort was greatest in the youngest patients and those with the most impaired renal function.     

Peritoneal dialysis favorably influences early graft function after renal transplantation compared to hemodialysis

BACKGROUND: Delayed graft function (DGF) and acute renal failure (ARF) after renal transplantation negatively influence short- and long-term graft outcome. Peritoneal dialysis as pretransplantation dialysis modality was reported to influence favorably the recovery of renal function immediately after kidney transplantation. It has been hypothesized that fluid status was the factor explaining this better outcome. This hypothesis was tested in this study by multivariate analysis, also including other factors related to DGF and ARF. METHODS: The records of peritoneal dialysis (PD; n=40) and hemodialysis (HD; n=79) patients receiving a first cadaveric kidney transplantation at the University Hospital Gent were analyzed. RESULTS: DGF and ARF were observed in 33 (27 HD and 6 PD, P=0.03) and 14 (14 HD and 0 PD, P=0.01) patients, respectively. The number of days needed to reach a serum creatinine 50% below that before transplantation (T1/2(SCr)), was correlated with cold ischemia time (CIT) (P<0.001) and body weight gain (BWG) (P<0.01) and was inversely correlated with urinary output in the first 24 hr (P<0.001), fluid load (P<0.001), and central venous pressure (P<0.001). A multivariate model with CIT (P<0.001), PD as pretransplantation dialysis mode (P=0.01), urinary output in the first 24 hr (P=0.001), BWG (P=0.05), and fluid load (P=0.01) resulted in an R2 of 0.32 (P<0.001). Using Cox regression analysis, the relative risk for a prolonged T1/2(SCr) increased with 4%/hr CIT (P=0.01) and with 1%/kg BWG (P=0.02). Fluid load decreased the relative risk with 5%/liter (P<0.001) and PD as pretransplantation modality favorably modified the relative risk by a factor of 1.6 (P=0.01). CONCLUSION: PD as pretransplantation dialysis modality can reduce the incidence and the severity of delayed recovery of renal function after renal transplantation. This protective effect was independent from CIT, and fluid status, two other major influencing factors.     

Relationship of body size and initial dialysis modality on subsequent transplantation, mortality and weight gain of ESRD patients

Background Whether peritoneal dialysis (PD) treatment leads to greater weight gain than with hemodialysis (HD) and if this limits access of obese end-stage renal disease patients to renal transplantation has not been examined. We undertook this study to determine the interrelationship between body size and initial dialysis modality on transplantation, mortality and weight gain. Methods Time to transplantation, time to death and weight gain were estimated in a 1:1 propensity score-matched cohort of incident HD and PD patients treated in facilities owned by DaVita Inc. between 1 July 2001 through 30 June 2006 followed through 30 June 2007 (4008 pairs) in four strata of body mass index (BMI) (<18.5, 18.5-24.99, 25.00-29.99 and ≥30 kg/m(2)). Results Transplantation was significantly more likely in PD patients [adjusted hazards ratio (aHR) 1.48, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.29-1.70]; the probability of receiving a kidney transplant was significantly higher in each strata of BMI >18.5 kg/m(2), including with BMI ≥30 kg/m(2) (aHR 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.89). PD patients had significantly lower all-cause mortality for patients with BMI 18.50-29.99 kg/m(2). Both these findings were confirmed on analyses of the entire unmatched incident cohort (PD 4008; HD 58 471). The effect of dialysis modality on weight gain was tested in 687 propensity score-matched pairs; the odds of >2, >5 or >10% weight gain were significantly lower in PD patients. Conclusion Treatment with PD is less likely to be associated with a significant weight gain and does not limit the access of obese patients to renal transplantation.     

Paired Analysis of Outcomes After Kidney Transplantation in Peritoneal and Hemodialysis Patients

Background

The impact of dialysis modality before kidney transplantation (hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis) on outcomes is not clear. In this study we retrospectively analyzed the impact of dialysis modality on posttransplant follow-up.

Platelet activity and serum homocysteine levels in patients with end-stage renal failure with regard to dialysis modality

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the activation of platelets and their interaction with circulating cells are important independent risk factors for atherosclerosis. In non-uremic patients with symptomatic peripheral vascular disease, a relationship between serum homocysteine (Hcy) levels and platelet activity had been reported. The purposes of this study were to evaluate of effects of dialysis modality on platelet activity in patients with end-stage renal failure and to investigate the relationship between platelet activity, Hcy, and left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In age and sex matched 19 healthy subjects, 20 hemodialysis (HD) patients, and 18 continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients, the expression of platelet surface receptors CD41, CD61, CD42a, and CD62P were investigated. CD62P expression was statistically significantly increased in HD patients compared with CAPD patients and controls (34.4 +/- 22.5%; 17.3 +/- 19.6%, 12.0 +/- 15.6%, respectively, p < 0.05), but not in CAPD patients compared with controls. There was a positive correlation between CD62 expression and duration of dialysis in HD patients (r = 0.498, p = 0.026). Mean plasma Hcy levels in dialysis patients were higher than reference levels. However, we could not find any relationship between CD62 expression, Hcy, and LVH in both groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis (PD) have a different impact on the expression of CD62: peritoneal dialysis seems to have a more favorable effect. It may be possible that the differences in biocompatibility between PD and HD potentially contribute to differences in CD62 expression.     

Quality of life over time in dialysis: the Netherlands Cooperative Study on the Adequacy of Dialysis. NECOSAD Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Information on the longitudinal quality of life (QL) of patients treated by different dialysis modalities is lacking. Therefore, we performed a prospective cohort study on the QL over time in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients. METHODS: New chronic dialysis patients from 13 Dutch dialysis centers were consecutively included. The patients' self-assessment of QL was measured with the SF-36 form at 3, 6, 12, and 18 months after the start of dialysis treatment. RESULTS: Out of 230 patients who completed the QL questionnaire at least once, 139 patients stayed on their initial dialysis modality, 26 patients switched dialysis modality, 35 patients were transplanted, 28 patients died, and two patients had a recovery of renal function. The QL of patients who died during the study period was considerably worse at baseline and worsened at a faster rate than in the other patient groups. In patients who stayed on their initial dialysis modality, the physical QL decreased over time, whereas the mental QL tended to remain stable. After an adjustment for the initial value of QL and comorbidity, a consistently favorable effect of HD on physical QL over time was found compared with PD, whereas mental QL values remained similar. Parameters of adequacy of dialysis were not associated with QL over time. CONCLUSION: This prospective cohort study shows that physical QL over time in HD patients is better than in PD patients.     

Dialysis as a bridge therapy to renal transplantation: comparison of graft outcomes according to mode of dialysis treatment

Background

Renal transplantation is the ideal renal replacement therapy in patients with end-stage renal disease. It was unclear whether a difference in dialysis modality influences outcomes after kidney transplantation. Therefore, we evaluated the influence of dialysis modality.

Methods

We compared various clinical and laboratory parameters of 70 peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 180 hemodialysis (HD) patients (n = 250), including 91 females and an overall age 36.7 ± 9.7 years who underwent transplantation between 2000 and 2008 to evaluate factors affecting delayed graft function (DGF) and of transplant graft failure.

Results

Overall graft survival was 82% at 3 and 75% at 5 years. Among HD patients, 16% displayed DGF, versus 12% of PD patients. Multivariate analysis showed that factors affecting DGF were: mode of dialysis (relative risk [RR] = 1.39, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.35-1.43; P < .01); parathyroid hormone (RR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.30-0.34, P < .05), C-reative protein (RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.97-1.09; P < .05), hemoglobin levels (RR = .75, 95% CI: 0.72-0.79; P < .05). At 3 and 5 years follow-up, PD patients' showed fewer graft failures than HD patients (14% vs 20%; P < .05 and 17% vs 28%; P < .05).

Conclusion

Early graft function rates were better for PD than for HD patients. Inflammation and anemia should be carefully investigated and corrected to achieve better graft function.     

Effects of pre-transplant dialysis modality on early outcome of kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death

Objective To compare the influence of hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) on early outcome of patients underwent kidney transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD). Methods Patients admitted in the First People's Hospital of Foshan with DCD kidney transplant from January 1st, 2011 to June 30th, 2016 were analyzed retrospectively. Recipients were grouped into HD group (n=61) and PD group (n=28) according to their pre-transplant dialysis modality. Their short-term outcomes after DCD kidney transplant were compared, including recovery of renal function, short-term complications and laboratory data. Results Patients had longer dialysis duration and lower hemoglobin, serum albumin and phosphorus in PD group than those in HD group (all P＜0.05), but no significant difference shown in age, gender, body mass index, primary disease, blood pressure, and hepatitis B infection (all P＞0.05). HD patients with 6.00(4.00, 11.00) d recovery time of renal function, 18.00(17.00, 21.50) d hospital time, had 24.59% the delayed graft function (DGF), 3.28% acute rejection and 16.39% infection during hospitalization. While for PD patients the recovery time of renal function was 4.00(3.75, 7.00) d; hospital time was 19.00(15.00, 21.75) d; the incidence rate of DGF was 14.29%; acute rejection was 3.57%; and infection during hospitalization reached 17.86%. Above indexes were not significantly different between HD and PD groups (all P＞0.05). Repeated measure ments showed that, compared with those before transplant surgery, after 1 month, 3 months and 6 months HD and PD groups had decreased creatinine and phosphorus, and increased hemoglobinserum albumin and calcium; Serum albumin and calcium were different between the two groups (P＜0.001, P=0.040), whereas creatinine, hemoglobin and phosphorus did not show difference (all P＜0.05). After transplantation the trends of creatinine, hemoglobin, calcium and phosphorus were not different between the two groups (P values were 0.295, 0.310, 0.501 and 0.063, respectively). Conclusions No significant difference of the recovery regarding renal function, anemia, nutrition status and mineral metabolites was found between pre-transplant HD and PD modality in patients who underwent DCD kidney transplantations.     

Pretransplant peritoneal dialysis relative to hemodialysis improves long-term survival of kidney transplant patients: a single-center observational study

Background

Kidney transplantation is the best option for the treatment of end-stage renal disease in terms of survival and quality of life. These results can be influenced by the pretransplant dialysis modality. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the pretransplantation dialysis modality influences patient and allograft survival beyond 10 years and examine the potential risk factors associated with the outcomes.

Methods

We conducted an observational, retrospective, single-center clinical study that included 236 patients [118 undergoing peritoneal dialysis (PD) and 118 undergoing hemodialysis (HD)] who proceeded to transplantation during the period December 1990–2002. Donor and recipient data were collected from our hospital’s clinical registries. The follow-up period extended to the patient’s death, the loss of the allograft, or loss to follow-up. The end date of the study was set at March 2012.

Results

In the multivariate analysis, the long-term patient survival rate was higher for the PD group than for the HD group [HR = 2.62 (1.01–6.8); p = 0.04]; however, the allograft survival rate was not significantly different between the two groups [HR = 0.68 (0.41–1.10); p = 0.12].

Conclusion

Pretransplantation dialysis modality is associated with long-term patient survival, with outcomes favoring peritoneal dialysis over hemodialysis. However, the pretransplant dialysis modality does not influence long-term graft loss risk.     

An evaluation of an integrative care approach for end-stage renal disease patients

Studies analyzing the outcome of integrative care of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, whereby patients are transferred from one renal replacement modality to another according to individual needs, are scant. In this study, we analyzed 417 files of 223 hemodialysis (HD) and 194 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients starting renal replacement therapy between 1979 and 1996, to evaluate the effect of such an approach. Analysis was done for survival of patients on their first modality, for intention-to-treat survival (counting total time on renal replacement therapy, but with exclusion of time on transplantation), and for total survival. Log rank analysis was used and correction for risk factors was performed by Cox proportional hazards regression. Intention-to-treat survival and total survival were not different between PD and HD patients (log rank, P > 0.05). Technique success was higher in HD patients compared to PD patients (log rank, P = 0.01), with a success rate after 3 yr of 61 and 48%, respectively. Thirty-five patients were transferred from HD to PD and 32 from PD to HD. Transfer of PD patients to HD was accompanied by an increase in survival compared to those remaining on PD (log rank, P = 0.001), whereas, in contrast, transfer of patients from HD to PD was not (log rank, P = 0.17). Survival of patients remaining more than 48 mo on their initial modality was lower for PD patients (log rank, P < 0.01). A matched-pair analysis between patients who started on PD and who were transferred to HD later (by definition called integrative care patients), and patients who started and remained on HD, showed a survival advantage for the integrative care patients. These results indicate that patient outcome is not jeopardized by starting patients on PD, at least if patients are transferred in a timely manner to HD when PD-related problems arise.     

Relationship between geriatric nutritional risk index and subpopulation lymphocyte counts in patients undergoing hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis

We investigated the relationship between geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) and subpopulation lymphocyte counts (SLCs) in hemodialysis (HD) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and evaluated whether they can be helpful in the diagnosis of malnutrition in these patients. We examined the GNRI and SLCs of 50 HD patients (mean: 55.8?±?12.7 years; 28 men and 22 women) and 16 Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) patients (mean: 49.8?±?14.5 years; 10 men and six women). The GNRI is calculated based on the serum albumin level, dry weight, and ideal body weight and uses the following equation: GNRI?=?[14.89?×?albumin (g/dL)]?+?[41.7?×?(weight/ideal body weight)]. SLCs were evaluated using flow cytometry. T-tests and χ² tests were performed to compare the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was performed for predicting malnutrition in dialysis patients. The average GNRI value was 100.1?±?8.4 in HD patients and 99.2?±?8.1 in PD patients, and no significant differences in GNRI or SLC were observed between the two groups. SLCs were higher in patients with higher GNRI (GNRI?≥?100) although there was no statistical difference. Logistic regression for predicting malnutrition according to GNRI revealed that age, female sex, and CD19 counts predicted malnutrition in HD and PD patients. These results suggest that GNRI and SLCs (especially CD19 count) may be significant nutritional markers in these patients.     

Residual renal function in children on haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis therapy

Residual renal function was studied in 28 haemodialysis (HD) and 31 peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients aged 1–20 years observed over 6–43 (median 19) months. After the start of dialysis urine volume (UV) decreased to 57%, 46% and 26% of initial mean values in HD patients after 6, 12 and 24 months, respectively. In PD patients the corresponding figures were 57%, 69% and 62%. Mean UV calculated from all individual mean UV measurements observed was higher in PD than HD patients (954 vs. 537 ml/m² per 24 h,P<0.01). A better conservation of diuresis in PD patients was also suggested by a significantly longer persistence of a UV greater than 500 ml/m² per 24 h compared with HD patients. Cox proportional hazard analysis identified dialysis modality and pre-dialysis UV of less than 1,000 ml/m² per 24 h as the only significant risk factors for UV survival. However, the decline of UV per time was similar in both modes of treatment. No significant changes of glomerular filtration rate were observed during both HD and PD treatment.