Reverse distal femoral locking compression plate a salvage option in nonunion of proximal femoral fractures

Background:When primary fixation of proximal femoral fractures with implants fails, revision osteosynthesis may be challenging. Tracts of previous implants and remaining insufficient bone stock in the proximal femur pose unique problems for the treatment. Intramedullary implants like proximal femoral nail (PFN) or surface implants like Dynamic Condylar Screw (DCS) are few of the described implants for revision surgery. There is no evidence in the literature to choose one implant over the other. We used the reverse distal femur locking compression plate (LCP) of the contralateral side in such cases undergoing revision surgery. This implant has multiple options of fixation in proximal femur and its curvature along the length matches the anterior bow of the femur. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of this implant in salvage situations.Results:All fractures exhibited union without any complications. Union was assessed clinically and radiologically. One case of ipsilateral femoral neck and shaft fracture required bone grafting at the second stage for delayed union of the femoral shaft fracture.Conclusions:Reverse distal femoral LCP of the contralateral side can be used as a salvage option for failed fixation of proximal femoral fractures exhibiting nonunion.     

病灶刮除植骨联合股骨近端解剖钢板在股骨近端良性肿瘤治疗中的应用

目的:探讨病灶刮除植骨联合股骨近端解剖钢板治疗股骨近端良性肿瘤的临床疗效。方法 :自2010年1月至2014年10月,采用病灶刮除、自体髂骨或自体髂骨加同种异体骨植入及解剖钢板内固定术治疗股骨近端良性肿瘤患者30例,其中男13例,女17例;年龄12~68岁,平均42岁;病程1个月~2年,平均9个月。手术前后采用MSTS评分评价患者的下肢功能,并将末次MSTS评分与术前评分进行比较,随访时同时行X线检查,评价病灶愈合情况,并观察不良反应发生情况。结果:30例患者均获得随访,时间12~48个月,平均29个月。末次随访时MSTS评分为27.06±2.59高于术前的16.44±1.35,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。末次随访时X线片均显示植骨融合,合并病理骨折者骨连续性恢复,内固定位置良好,无松动、变形及移位等。术后1例切口脂肪液化,1例骨巨细胞瘤患者术后13个月复发。结论:病灶刮除植骨联合股骨近端解剖钢板是治疗股骨近端肿瘤的有效方法,可以有效地控制肿瘤,缓解疼痛,改善功能并且预防病理性骨折的发生。     

What Is the Survival of the Telescope Allograft Technique to Augment a Short Proximal Femur Segment in Children After Resection and Distal Femur Endoprosthesis Reconstruction for a Bone Sarcoma?

BackgroundLarge, malignant bone tumors and revision limb salvage procedures often result in the resection of extensive lengths of the involved bone segment, leaving a residual segment of bone that may be too short to support a standard intramedullary stem for endoprosthetic reconstruction. Telescope allografting, in which an allograft is used to augment the remaining bone segment by telescoping it into the residual bone segment, was described for situations in which residual bone stock is insufficient after tumor resection or prosthetic revision. Apart from one study that first described the procedure [15], there are no other studies reporting the outcome of this telescopic concept for restoring bone stock.Questions/purposesFor patients younger than 18 years who underwent the telescopic allograft technique to augment a short segment of the proximal femur after resection of bone sarcomas who also underwent endoprosthesis reconstruction of the distal femur, we asked: (1) What is the survivorship free from removal of the telescopic allograft and the endoprosthetic stem at 7 years after surgery? (2) What proportion of these reconstructions will heal to the host bone without delayed union or nonunion? (3) What is the functional outcome based on the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score?MethodsWe retrospectively studied our institutional database and identified 127 patients younger than 18 years who underwent surgery for a primary malignant bone tumor of the distal femur between December 2008 and October 2018. After excluding 16 patients undergoing amputation and rotationplasty and 57 patients undergoing recycled autograft/allograft reconstruction, 54 patients who underwent primary or revision distal femur endoprosthesis reconstruction were identified. Among these patients, we considered 15 patients who underwent telescopic allograft augmentation of the femur for analysis. One patient was lost to follow-up before 2 years but was not known to have died, leaving 14 for analysis at a median (range) 49 months (24 to 136 months) of follow-up. The indications for telescopic allograft augmentation of the femur in our institution were a proximal femur length of less than 120 mm after resection or resection of more than two-thirds of the total length of the femur. Ten of 14 patients underwent telescopic allograft augmentation as a revision procedure (distal femur resorption in five patients, endoprosthesis stem loosening in three patients, implant fracture in one patient, and infection in one patient), and the remaining four patients underwent telescopic allograft augmentation as a primary limb salvage procedure for large malignant bone tumors of the distal femur. The histologic diagnosis in all patients was osteosarcoma. At the time of telescopic allograft augmentation and reconstruction, the median age of the patients was 14 years (7 to 18 years). The size and the type of bone allograft to be used (femoral shaft or proximal femur) was planned before surgery, with consideration of the extent of resection, level of osteotomy, diameter of the host bone at the osteotomy site, and approximate diameter of the endoprosthesis stem to be used. The segment of the cylindrical allograft used for telescoping was thoroughly washed, prepared, and impacted onto the native femur to achieve telescoping and overlap. Serial digital radiographs were performed once a month for the first 6 months after the procedure, every 2 months until 1 year, and then every 6 months thereafter. Two surgeons in the department (at least one of which was involved in the surgery) retrieved and reviewed clinical notes and radiographs to determine the status of the telescopic allograft and endoprosthesis stem. We defined delayed union as radiological union at the osteotomy site more than 6 months after the procedure without additional surgery; we defined nonunion as no radiological evidence of callus formation at the osteotomy site 9 months after the procedure, necessitating additional surgery. The reviewers did not disagree about the definition of healing time. None of the patients missed radiographic follow-up. Kaplan-Meier survivorship free from removal of telescopic allograft and the endoprosthesis stem at 7 years after surgery was estimated. Patient function was assessed using the 1993 version of the MSTS [9], as determined by chart review of the institutional database performed by one of the surgeons from the department.ResultsThe survivorship free from removal of the telescopic allograft and endoprosthesis stem at 7 years after surgery was 80% (95% confidence interval 22% to 96%). The allograft united with the host bone in 100% (14 of 14) of the patients. Though 21% (3 of 14) had delayed union, no nonunions were seen. The median (range) MSTS score at the final follow-up interval was 27 (22 to 30).ConclusionAlthough this is a small group of patients, we believe that allograft segments help augment short bone stock of the proximal femur after long-segment resections, and the telescopic technique seems to be associated with a low proportion of nonunion or delayed union, which is one of the most common complications of allografts. Maintaining an adequate length of the proximal femur is important in preserving the hip, and this technique may be especially useful for young individuals who may undergo repeated revision procedures.Level of EvidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study.     

Radiographic,Functional, and Oncologic Outcomes of Cemented Modular Proximal Femur Replacement Using the “French Paradox” Technique

BackgroundEndoprostheses are frequently used in the management of tumors involving the proximal femur. Aseptic loosening is a common complication that has been linked to the cementing technique. The “French paradox” is well-known cementing technique in the arthroplasty literature. No previous reports have assessed loosening in proximal femur replacements using this technique. We examined rates of femoral stem aseptic loosening in proximal femur replacements, functional outcomes, complications, and oncologic outcomes.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of 47 patients who underwent proximal femur replacement between 2000 and 2019. Two reviewers evaluated preoperative and postoperative radiographs using the International Society of Limb Salvage scoring system and Barrack criteria for stem loosening. The acetabulum was evaluated according to the criteria of Baker et al. Functional outcomes were assessed using Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score. The mean follow-up was 44 months.ResultsThe mean International Society of Limb Salvage scores for the 2 reviewers were 86% ± 6% and 84% ± 6%. The first reviewer graded femoral stem loosening as “possibly loose” in 2 patients, one of whom was graded as possibly loose by the second reviewer. The 2 reviewers found no acetabular erosion in 16 (70%) and 15 (65.4%) patients, respectively. The mean Musculoskeletal Tumor Society score and Toronto Extremity Salvage Score at last follow-up were 61% and 72%, respectively. Twenty complications occurred in 13 patients, and 5 patients experienced local recurrence.ConclusionDespite complications, we showed favorable femoral component survival rates. Cementing the proximal femur prosthesis with tight canal fit and thin cement mantle is a viable option for the short and medium term.Level of EvidenceIII.     

Superior Survival of Fully Cemented Fixation Compared to Hybrid Fixation in a Single Design Rotating Hinge Knee Implant

BackgroundClinical observations revealed higher rates of aseptic loosening for hybrid fixated rotating hinge knee implants compared to fully cemented ones. We hypothesize that the use of a fully cemented fixation technique had a higher survival rate for aseptic loosening compared to a hybrid fixation technique in a rotating hinge knee implant.MethodsAll procedures of patients who were treated with the RT-PLUS rotating hinge knee implant (Smith & Nephew, Memphis, TN) between 2010 and 2018 were included. Primary outcome was revision for aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were performed to calculate survival rates and hazard ratios.ResultsA total of 275 hinge knee implants were placed in 269 patients (60 primary procedures, 215 revisions). Median follow-up was 7.3 ± 3.9 years. In total, 24 components (16 hybrid femur, 2 fully cemented femur, 6 hybrid tibia; all revision procedures) in 19 patients were revised for aseptic loosening. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis showed superior survival rates of fully cemented components (femur 97.1%; tibia 100%) compared to hybrid fixated components (femur 89.5%; tibia 95.9%) at the 10-year follow-up. Multivariate Cox hazard analysis showed a significantly higher risk of aseptic loosening for hybrid fixated components, a prior stemmed component and the femoral component.ConclusionFully cemented fixation showed superior survival rates for aseptic loosening compared to hybrid fixation in a single design rotating hinge knee implant. A prior stemmed component appears to be a risk factor for aseptic loosening and the femoral component seems to be more prone to loosening.     

Limb salvage surgery for primary bone sarcoma of the lower extremities: Long-term consequences of endoprosthetic reconstructions

Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy and endoprosthetic replacement for bone sarcomas of the lower extremity is well established. The specific long-term consequences of these endoprosthetic reconstructions for the patient's affected limb are unknown. Method: The oncologic results and the survival of the endoprostheses were reviewed in 32 patients with primary bone sarcoma of the femur or proximal tibia. There were 26 high-grade sarcomas, and 6 low-grade sarcomas. A proximal femoral endoprosthesis was used for reconstruction in 4 patients, a total or push-through femoral endoprosthesis in 11 patients, a distal femoral endoprosthesis in 15 patients, and a proximal tibial endoprosthesis in two patients. Results: Median survival was 10 years (range, 1.1 to 18.9 years) for patients with high-grade sarcoma, and 8.1 years (range, 7.1 to 10 years) for patients with low-grade sarcomas. Distant metastases developed in seven patients (22%), all with stage IIB sarcoma, with concomitant local recurrence in 3 patients (9%). Five-year overall and disease-free survival rates for high-grade sarcomas were 81% and 73%, respectively. The overall endoprosthetic survival rate was 87% at 5 years, 80% at 10 years, and 56% at 15 years. Median follow-up of the original endoprostheses was 8.3 years (range, 0.6 to 18.7 years). Endoprosthesis-related complications occurred in 13 patients (41%); most complications were mechanical failures. The highest complication rate was found in distal femoral replacements (60%); amputation was necessary in both patients treated with a proximal tibial endoprosthesis. Five endoprostheses (16%) were revised. An amputation of the involved limb was performed in four patients (13%): in two patients because of local recurrence and in the other two patients because of infection. For patients alive at follow-up, the median functional Enneking evaluation score was 22 points (range, 12 to 28 points), with the highest functional scores in patients with a distal femoral endoprosthesis, and the lowest functional scores in patients with total or push-through femoral replacements. Conclusion: Endoprosthetic reconstructions gave satisfying functional results in most patients after long-term survival. However, the proximal tibial and distal femoral endoprosthesis are particularly at risk for long-term endoprosthetic complications requiring additional surgical procedures.Presented at the Ninth International Symposium of the International Society of Limb Salvage (ISOLS), New York, September 11, 1997.     

Proximal femoral osteotomy as an adjunct in cementless revision total hip arthroplasty

Cementless total hip replacement techniques are increasingly used in revision arthroplasty. A major challenge is to achieve implant stability in a femur distorted by a failed arthroplasty. Five patients with aseptic loosening of cemented primary or revision total hip replacements complicated by significant proximal femoral disease, four with marked angular deformity of the femur and one with a subtrochanteric nonunion, were treated successfully with cementless revision arthroplasty combined with proximal femoral osteotomy. At follow-up examination, all femoral and trochanteric osteotomies had healed and D'Aubigne and Postel scores for pain, function, and range of motion had improved. All porous prostheses demonstrated radiographic features consistent with bone ingrowth fixation. No progressive stress shielding has been observed. Concomitant femoral osteotomy to correct anatomic deformity, in association with cementless total hip arthroplasty, results in union of the osteotomy and restoration of hip function.     

Proximal femoral replacement: A salvage treatment of cephalomedullary nails’ mechanical failures in the elderly population

BackgroundThe use of proximal femoral replacements (PFR) has been recently described for catastrophic internal fixation failures. PFR is an attractive treatment option because it is technically straightforward and allows for immediate mobilization of the patient. The aim of the study was to determine the survivorship, functional outcome and complications’ rate in a group of elderly patients who underwent proximal femoral replacement as a salvage treatment after femur cephalomedullary nails’ mechanical failures.MethodsWe evaluated 21 patients who underwent salvage of a failed cephalomedullary nail by using a single design PFR at our institution between 2014-2017. A cemented stem was used in all cases. Radiographs were assessed for fractures, sign of loosening, presence of heterotopic ossification and leg length discrepancy. Functional evaluation was performed through Harris Hip Score (HHS), FIM™ and Time Up and Go test (TUG). Kaplan-Meier estimator was used to determine the overall implants’ survival.ResultsThe average age at the time of surgery was 83years. The mean follow-up was 3.1years. We recorded 3 dislocations of which 2 required a revision. No case of septic or aseptic failure was reported. Two patients died respectively at 11 and 14 months after surgery. At the last follow-up the mean HHS, FIM™, and the TUG improved significantly (p<0.05).ConclusionImmediate weight bearing, good functional outcomes, low complications’ and one-year mortality rate make the proximal femur replacement with megaprostheses a potential first line treatment of intertrochanteric/subtrochanteric fixations’ failures among elderly, osteoporotic, frail patients. Dislocation is the most common complication to bear in mind within the first six months after surgery.     

Use of irradiated autologous bone in joint sparing endoprosthetic femoral replacement tumor surgery

Background:

Joint preservation is usually attempted in cases of bone tumors, though insufficient bone following tumour resection may prevent fixation of conventional joint sparing prosthesis. To preserve the hip joint in skeletally immature patients, we have combined autologous proximal femoral irradiation and intercalary re-implantation with custom made distal femoral replacements.

Materials and Methods:

A retrospective cohort study of four patients (aged 4-12 years); in whom irradiated autologous bone was combined with an extendable distal femoral endoprostheses was performed. There were three cases of osteosarcoma and one case of Ewing’s sarcoma.

Results:

At a mean follow-up of 70.5 months (range 26-185 months), all four patients were alive without evidence of local recurrence. There was no evidence of metastatic disease in three patients while one patient showed chest metastatic disease at presentation. In all cases, the irradiated segment of bone united with the proximal femur and demonstrated bone ongrowth at the prosthetic collar. There were no cases of loosening or peri-prosthetic fracture. One implant was revised after 14 years following fracture of the extending component of the endoprosthesis.

Conclusions:

We report encouraging results utilizing irradiated autologous proximal femoral bone combined with distal femoral replacement in skeletally immature patients.     

Results of noncemented revision

The results of revision of total hip replacements with noncemented fixation are dependent on implant design, postoperative treatment, and the technique selected in relationship to the bone quality and quantity. When proximal femoral bone ingrowth fixation is desired an implant must have a double wedge design, which permits a high percentage contact between the host bone and the porous coating of the implant. Bone graft in either the femur or acetabulum should be used at a minimum. Every attempt to obtain host bone contact to porous coating should be done. When a bone graft is used to replace the proximal femur or when an acetabular bone graft covers more than 50% of the cup, the implant should be cemented into the bone graft. Bone structure affects the outcome of noncemented revisions more than the thickness of the bone. Even thin and weak femoral bone has dynamic remodeling capability. The structure influences result more according to the ability to contact the host bone to the porous coating. When this can be done, the bone will heal to the porous coating. Postoperatively, 40% of our patients are treated with a cast to protect bone grafts and weak bones that are important for stability of the implant. We believe that conservative postoperative rehabilitation for noncemented revision arthroplasty significantly improves the healing for the bone to the implant.     

Structural proximal femoral allografts for failed total hip replacements: a minimum review of five years

There are few medium- and long-term data on the outcome of the use of proximal femoral structural allografts in revision hip arthroplasty. This is a study of a consecutive series of 40 proximal femoral allografts performed for failed total hip replacements using the same technique with a minimum follow-up of five years (mean 8.8 years; range 5 to 11.5 years). In all cases the stem was cemented into both the allograft and the host femur. The proximal femur of the host was resected in 37 cases. There were four early revisions (10%), two for infection, one for nonunion of the allograft-host junction, and one for allograft resorption noted at the time of revision of a failed acetabular reconstruction. Junctional nonunion was seen in three patients (8%), two of whom were managed successfully by bone grafting, and bone grafting and plating respectively. Instability was observed in four (10%). Trochanteric nonunion was seen in 18 patients (46%) and trochanteric escape in ten of these (27%). The mean Harris hip score improved from 39 to 79. Severe resorption involving the full thickness of the allograft was seen in seven patients (17.5%). This progressed rapidly and silently, but has yet to cause failure of any of the reconstructions. Profound resorption of the allograft may be related to a combination of factors, including a slow form of immune rejection, stress shielding and resorption due to mechanical disuse with solid cemented distal fixation, and the absence of any masking or protective effect which may be provided by the retention of the bivalved host bone as a vascularised onlay autograft. Although continued surveillance is warranted, the very good medium-term clinical results justify the continued use of structural allografts for failed total hip replacements with severe loss of proximal femoral bone.     

Femoral Fixation Methods in Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: An 11-Year Retrospective Comparison of 4013 Cases

BackgroundThe optimal femoral fixation method remains unclear. To evaluate the role of femoral fixation techniques in hip resurfacing, we present a comparison of 2 consecutive groups: group 1 (739 hips) with cemented femoral components; group 2 (3274 hips) with uncemented femoral components.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed our clinical database to compare failures, reoperations, complications, clinical results, and radiographic measurements. Groups were consecutive, so cemented cases had longer follow-up. However, all patients from both groups were at least 2 years out from surgery. Two-year clinical and radiographic data were compared. Longer-term comparison data as well as Kaplan-Meier implant survivorship curves specifically focusing on femoral failure modes were analyzed.ResultsKaplan-Meier 10-year implant survivorship using nontraumatic femoral failure as an end point was 98.9% for the cemented and 100% for the uncemented femoral component. The uncemented, group 2 cases showed a significantly lower raw failure rate (1.1% vs 4.6%), 2-year failure rate (0.8% vs 2.8%), 2-year femoral failure rate (0.4% vs 0.9%), and a lower combined rate of femoral complications and failures (0.6% vs 1.8%). In cases that did not fail, patient mean clinical scores, pain scores, and combined range of motion were all significantly better for group 2.ConclusionWe have demonstrated that in the fully porous-coated ReCap device, uncemented femoral fixation is superior to cemented fixation at 11 years follow-up (0.0% vs 1.1% late femoral loosening) in this single-surgeon cohort. Early femoral fractures also reduced from 0.8% to 0.3%, but this may be partially or completely due to a new bone density management program. This study demonstrates better femoral implant survivorship for the uncemented device compared to the cemented femoral resurfacing component for this implant design.     

Influence of stem design on the primary stability of megaprostheses of the proximal femur

Purpose

Extended bone defects of the proximal femur can be reconstructed by megaprostheses for which aseptic loosening constitutes one of the major failure modes. The basic requirement for long-term success of endoprostheses is primary stability. We therefore assessed whether sufficient primary stability can be achieved by four different megaprostheses in a standardised bone defect of the proximal femur and whether their different design leads to different fixation patterns.

Methods

Four different designs of proximal femoral replacements were implanted into 16 Sawbones® after preparing segmental bone defects (AAOS type II). Primary rotational stability was analysed by application of a cyclic torque of ±7 Nm and measuring the relative micromotions between bone and implant at different levels. The main fixation zones and differences of fixation patterns of the stem designs were determined by an analysis of variance.

Results

All four implants exhibited micromotions below 150 μm, indicating adequate primary stability. Lowest micromotions for all designs were located near the femoral isthmus. The extent of primary stability and the global implant fixation pattern differed considerably and could be related to the different design concepts.

Conclusions

All megaprostheses studied provided sufficient primary stability if the fixation conditions of the femoral isthmus were intact. The design characteristics of the different stems largely determined the extent of primary stability and fixation pattern. Understanding these different fixation types could help the surgeon to choose the most suitable implant if the fixation conditions in the isthmus are compromised.     

Impaction bone grafting with proximal and distal femoral arthroplasty

Capacious diaphyses and poor bone stock in revision arthroplasty can lead to fracture and poor component fixation. Impaction bone grafting can be performed in salvage reconstructions in cases with extensive circumferential bone loss. We present a consecutive series of patients who underwent proximal or distal femoral reconstructions in combination with impaction bone grafting. The average age was 62 years, and the mean follow-up was 36 months (range, 24-84). No revisions were performed for mechanical failure, and radiographs revealed no evidence of implant loosening. No patient complained of end-of-stem thigh pain. There were 3 failures: 1 for periprosthetic fracture, 1 for instability, and 1 for infection. Impaction bone grafting can be used in combination with proximal and distal femoral arthroplasty to successfully manage cases with extensive bone loss after failed hip and knee arthroplasty. The procedure reconstitutes necessary bone stock, improves stress shielding, and provides immediate fixation in capacious canals.     

Wagner Cone Midterm Survivorship and Outcomes

BackgroundTotal hip arthroplasty (THA) in patients with abnormal proximal femoral anatomy requires an individualized treatment approach to prevent complications. Metaphyseal engaging stems in this population risk fracture, size/offset mismatch, and aseptic loosening. The Wagner conical femoral implant is a short diaphyseal engaging femoral stem that could improve treatment success in this difficult patient population.MethodsWe identified 302 consecutive patients undergoing THA using the Wagner cone femoral prosthesis between January 2010 and January 2017. Clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes were obtained through chart review and radiographic measurements of postoperative X-rays. We used multivariate analysis to determine predictors of poor outcomes. Kaplan-Meier curves were created to demonstrate implant survivorship with reoperation and revision as endpoints. The average follow-up was 3.2 years, with a minimum of 2 years.ResultsThe implant retention survival rate during the 3.2-year study period was 98.7%. The overall reoperation rate was 4.2%, with infection followed by fracture being the most common reasons for reoperation. No patients were revised for aseptic loosening, and no patients were revised for subsidence. The average subsidence was 1.1 mm. The Harris Hip Score improved from 48.6 ± 7.3 (range, 28-64) preoperatively to 86.1 ± 8.5 (range, 66-100) at latest follow-up. The patient-reported satisfaction rate was 98.3%.ConclusionThe Wagner cone femoral prosthesis demonstrated excellent clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported functional outcomes at midterm follow-up. We recommend use of the Wagner cone in THA patients with challenging proximal femoral anatomy, small femoral diameter, or poor metaphyseal bone quality.     

颗粒打压植骨辅钢板内固定治疗股骨近端骨肿瘤或瘤样病损

目的 :评价颗粒打压植骨辅钢板内固定治疗股骨近端骨肿瘤或瘤样病损的临床可行性。方法 :2013年1月至2016年1月治疗股骨近端骨肿瘤或瘤样病损26例,均未发生病理性骨折,男12例,女14例;年龄8~62岁,平均34.2岁。病理结果:纤维结构不良11例,骨孤立性骨囊肿7例,骨巨细胞瘤3例,动脉瘤样骨囊肿3例,非骨化性纤维瘤1例,良性纤维组织细胞瘤1例。术前未进行病灶活组织检查,术后送慢病理,手术采取颗粒打压植骨辅钢板内固定。结果:26例均随访至恢复日常生活,随访时间8~42个月,平均25个月。参照骨与软组织肿瘤协会(MSTS)进行功能评估。术后末次复查股骨正侧位X线片,植骨边缘及植骨体部未见低密度影,植骨区骨愈合良好,所有患者未见复发及转移病灶,内固定物无松动、变形。髋关节功能恢复良好,所有患者无再骨折和畸形进展。结论:股骨近端肿瘤复发与病灶刮除植骨技术有关,刮除后采用化学、物理方法处理消灭残留的肿瘤细胞,利用此方法可以获得疾病的长期治愈,减少复发,恢复髋关节功能。     

Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Osteopetrosis

BackgroundOsteopetrosis is an inherited bone disease associated with high risk of osteoarthritis and fracture non-union, which can lead to total hip arthroplasty (THA). Bone quality and morphology are altered in these patients, and there are limited data on results of THA in these patients. The goals of this study were to describe implant survivorship, clinical outcomes, radiographic results, and complications in patients with osteopetrosis undergoing primary THA.MethodsWe identified 7 patients (9 hips) with osteopetrosis who underwent primary THA between 1970 and 2017 utilizing our total joint registry. The mean age at index THA was 48 years and included two males and five females. The mean follow-up was 8 years.ResultsThe 10-year survivorship free from any revision or implant removal was 89%, with 1 revision and 1 resection arthroplasty secondary to periprosthetic femoral fractures. The 10-year survivorship free from any reoperation was 42%, with 4 additional reoperations (2 ORIFs for periprosthetic femoral fractures, 1 sciatic nerve palsy lysis of adhesions, 1 hematoma evacuation). Harris hip scores significantly increased at 5 years (P = .04). Five hips had an intraoperative acetabular fracture, and 1 had an intraoperative femur fracture. All postoperative femoral fractures occurred in patients with intramedullary diameter less than 5 mm at a level 10 cm distal to the lesser trochanter.ConclusionPrimary THA in patients with osteopetrosis is associated with good 10-year implant survivorship (89%), but a very high reoperation (58%) and periprosthetic femoral fracture rate (44%). Femoral fractures appear associated with smaller intramedullary diameters.