Combined Procedure of Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting and Valve Repair

The safety of combined operative procedures for valvular and coronary artery disease was reviewed in 27 patients. Twelve patients had aortic valve disease and 15 had mitral valve disease. Forty-seven coronary artery reconstructions were performed, an average of 1.7 per patient. Twenty-two patients underwent valve replacement and 5 had valvuloplasty. Congestive heart failure was the major symptom in 20 patients, and angina was the major symptom in 7. Eight of the patients with congestive heart failure had no angina, but significant coronary stenoses were demonstrated at routine coronary angiography.Coronary reconstruction was performed before valve repair. Two patients died postoperatively (a hospital mortality of 7.4%), and there were 4 late deaths from 2 to 28 months postoperatively. There were no postoperative myocardial infarctions.Contrary to previous reports, coronary artery reconstruction and valve repair need not be associated with an increased risk. Protection of the myocardium by coronary perfusion through reconstructed coronary arteries enables valve repair to be done without greater risk than valve repair alone. All patients considered for valve repair should have coronary angiography.     

Ten-year survival following aortic valve replacement: A multivariate analysis of coronary bypass as a risk factor

The additional risk of coronary bypass surgery was analysed in 664 patients over 40 years of age undergoing aortic valve replacement between 1969 and 1981. Four hundred sixty-seven patients underwent aortic valve replacement alone, while 197 patients with coronary artery disease underwent combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. There were no significant differences in the preoperative hemodynamic characteristics of the two groups of patients. There were 41 (9%) operative deaths following aortic valve replacement alone and 20 (10%) following aortic valve replacement with coronary bypass surgery. Since 1976, operative mortality has fallen to 5% and perioperative myocardial infarction to 2% following the combined procedure. Ten-year actuarial survival (standard error) was 56 (3%) following aortic valve replacement and 49 (6%) following aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass surgery. A multivariate analysis including both groups of patients revealed that age, functional class and year of operation significantly affected ten-year survival (p less than 0.05). The same analysis showed that coronary artery disease requiring coronary bypass surgery also decreased ten year survival in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (p = 0.06).     

Aortic valve replacement and aorta-coronary bypass surgery. Results with perfusion of proximal and distal coronary arteries.

The results in 80 patients undergoing simultaneous aortic valve replacement and aorta-coronary saphenous vein bypass grafting were analyzed to assess the effect of operative technique. The over-all operative mortality rate of 6.3% (five of 80) did not differ significantly from our results with aortic valve replacement alone. All patients who had isolated aortic valve replacement were operated upon with moderate hypothermia. The combined operation was performed in two ways. Thirty-one patients had aortic valve replacement prior to bypass grafting with intermittent coronary ostila perfusion. There were two deaths (6.5%), and five myocardial infarctions (16.1%) were diagnosed by standard electrocardiographic and enzyme criteria. More recently, 49 patients have undergone bypass grafting prior to aortic valve replacement. The proximal ends of the grafts were either anastomosed high on the aortic root or else individually cannulated to provide continuous distal perfusion during subsequent aortic valve replacement, with continuous coronary ostial perfusion. There were three operative deaths (6.1%) and one myocardial infarction (2.0%). The risk of combined aortic valve replacement and coronary bypass need be no greater than the risk of aortic valve replacement alone. Our experience suggests that myocardial perfusion distal to significant coronary artery stenoses reduces the risk of myocardial infarction in patients with coronary artery disease requiring aortic valve replacement.     

Mitral valve replacement: a nine-year follow-up of risks and survivals.

Experience with mitral valve replacement over a nine-year period is reviewed. Hospital mortality was 8.9%, with an additional late mortality of 18.5% during a mean follow-up period of 4.34 years. Study of the factors influencing the results of valve replacement revealed a direct correlation between long-term survival and New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class, as judged preoperatively, as well as left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, cardiac index, type of valve lesion, and presence of associated coronary artery disease. Hospital mortality was 32% (p less than 0.01) for those patients in NYHA Functional Class IV before operation, compared with 3% for Class III patients. Untreated concomitant coronary artery disease was associated with a significantly higher perioperative mortality of 28% (p = 0.002) compared with an 8% mortality in patients with coronary artery disease treated by vein bypass at the time of mitral valve replacement. Patients with normal coronary arteries documented angiographically before operation had a 1% hospital mortality. Seventy-two percent of all patients are still alive at a maximum follow-up of nine years. Eighty-three percent of those survivors who were in Functional Class III or IV before operation are now considered to be in Class I or II. We conclude that patients should undergo mitral valve replacement before the development of the advanced functional stage of valve disease. In addition, coronary arteriograms should be performed on all patients who are more than 40 years old at the time of cardiac catheterization, and revascularization considered at the time of mitral valve replacement for those patients with significant coronary disease.     

Similar neurobehavioral outcome after valve or coronary artery operations despite differing carotid embolic counts

OBJECTIVES: The interrelationships among coronary and valvular operations, microemboli, and neurobehavioral outcome are unclear. We hypothesized that adult patients undergoing cardiac valve operations would have more total emboli delivered to the brain than patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and that this would associate with worse neurobehavioral outcomes. METHODS: One hundred ninety-three patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting and 73 patients undergoing cardiac valve operations were compared. Patients received neurologic, neuro-ophthalmologic, and 11 standardized neurobehavioral tests preoperatively and 5 to 7 days, 1 month, and 6 months postoperatively. Left common carotid Doppler ultrasonographic embolus detection was performed intraoperatively. Repeated measures and logistic regression analyses of outcome were performed. RESULTS: Patients undergoing either coronary or valve operations were well matched by age (61 +/- 10 and 59 +/- 12 years, respectively), but a significantly greater fraction of patients undergoing valve operations were female, diabetic, or had undergone previous cardiac operations. Neurobehavioral scores of patients undergoing either coronary artery bypass grafting or cardiac valve operations did not differ significantly at any time. Total embolus counts differed significantly: the median was 105 during coronary artery bypass grafting and 479 during cardiac valve operations (geometric means of 104 and 412, respectively; P =.0001). Significantly more emboli were detected in the patients undergoing cardiac valve operations after removal of the left ventricular vent and after separation from cardiopulmonary bypass, but comparable numbers of emboli were seen in the 2 groups before cardiopulmonary bypass. In both groups decreased neurobehavioral performance was apparent at 5 to 7 days, with improvement at 1 and 6 months. Increasing numbers of carotid emboli significantly associated with worse performance on the letter cancellation test. There were no significant differences between patients undergoing valve and coronary operations in neurobehavioral outcomes, strokes, transient ischemic attacks, or deaths. CONCLUSIONS: The significantly greater number of emboli in the group of patients undergoing cardiac valve operations is likely the result of the entrainment of intracardiac air. The greater numbers of emboli during cardiac valve operations do not appear associated with a commensurately greater risk of adverse neurologic or neurobehavioral outcome.     

Successful combined minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and transapical aortic valve implantation

Transapical aortic valve implantation is indicated in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis and peripheral vascular disease requiring aortic valve replacement. Minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass grafting is also a valid, minimally invasive option for myocardial revascularization in patients with critical stenosis on the anterior descending coronary artery. Both procedures are performed through a left minithoracotomy, without cardiopulmonary bypass, aortic cross-clamping, and cardioplegic arrest. We describe a successful combined transapical aortic valve implantation and minimally invasive direct coronary bypass in a high-risk patient with left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and severe aortic valve stenosis.     

Combining off pump coronary artery bypass with mitral valve replacement

Background Conventional approach to combined coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and mitral valve replacement (MVR) is associated with longer cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross clamp (ACC) time leading to high operative risk. Methods We conducted a retrospective review of nine consecutive patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement combining the off pump technique with cardioplegic arrest. Elective intra aortic balloon pump (IABP) support was instituted in all cases. CABG was first done in all cases without cardiopulmonary bypass support. Mitral valve replacement was then done using conventional cardiopulmonary bypass and cardioplegic arrest using the superior septal approach. Results Nine consecutive patients underwent coronary artery bypass grafting with mitral valve replacement including three patients with acute myocardial infarction. Preoperative echocardiogram revealed a mean ejection fraction (EF) of 38.4 ± 6.0%. Intra aortic balloon pump was inserted in all patients preoperatively. The average number of grafts were 3.0 ± 0.7. Eight patients received bioprosthetic valve while one patient received mechanical prosthesis. The average length of stay in intensive care unit was 3.3 ± 0.5 days. There was no mortality. One patient had superficial wound infection. Conclusion The data suggest that the combined technique (off pump coronary artery bypass grafting and conventional mitral valve replacement) is a safe method to perform coronary artery bypass grafting/mitral valve replacement with minimal morbidity and mortality.     

Damage to the circumflex coronary artery during mitral valve repair with sliding leaflet technique

We report a case of damage to the circumflex coronary artery during mitral valve repair using sliding leaflet technique in a patient with a posterior mitral leaflet prolapse and coronary artery disease who underwent mitral valve reconstruction using Carpentier’s technique and coronary artery bypass grafting. This case underscores the risk of circumflex coronary artery injury during mitral valve reconstruction, especially in patients with left coronary dominance or codominance, and therefore emphasizes the importance of knowing the coronary artery anatomy preoperatively. The use of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is mandatory for the evaluation of mitral valvuloplasty.     

风湿性瓣膜病合并冠心病的外科治疗

报告１９９１年１月至１９９５年１１月期间１５例风湿性瓣膜病合并冠心病病人瓣膜替换及冠脉桥术（ＣＡＢＧ）的体会。手术均在低温体外循环下进行。其中二尖瓣替换＋ＣＡＢＧ６例，主动脉瓣替换＋ＣＡＢＧ６例、双瓣替换＋ＣＡＢＧ３例，术后死亡３例，其余治愈出院，作者强调了术前明确诊断的重要性，并就冠脉搭桥、心肌保护、主动脉气囊反搏（ＩＡＢＰ）及药物的应用加以讨论。     

A simple technique to rule out occlusion of right coronary artery after aortic valve surgery

Mechanical occlusion of the right coronary artery during aortic valve surgery is an infrequent but serious complication. Early recognition and expeditious management are important to reduce mortality. We developed a safe, quick, and easy technique to assess right coronary artery flow after aortic valve surgery. Direct intraoperative right coronary artery flow was measured by placing a transit-time flowmeter probe around the right coronary artery. We were able to promptly detect severe right coronary artery insufficiency in patients with acute unexpected right ventricular failure after aortic valve replacement.     

Combined valvular and coronary artery surgery.

Between July 1, 1971, and March 1, 1975, 45 patients underwent combined valvular and coronary artery operation. Aortic valve disease was present in 30 patients, mitral valve disease in 13, aortic and mitral valve disease in 1, and tricuspid valve disease in 1. The average age was 57 years. Seventeen patients were in New York Heart Association Functional Class IV. Seventeen patients had had a previous myocardial infarction. Significant coronary artery disease was an unexpected finding at the time of coronary angiography in 14 patients. The average number of grafts inserted was 2.5 per patient. The grafts were placed prior to valve replacement, and periods of myocardial ischemia were kept at a minimum by maintaining coronary perfusion throughout the operation. Operative mortality was 16%; late mortality was 8%. Perioperative myocardial infarction occurred in 2 patients.     

The utility of preoperative routine carotid artery duplex scanning in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement

Patients with aortic valve disease (AVD) typically have a cardiac murmur that radiates to the neck and may be indistinguishable from a cervical bruit secondary to carotid artery occlusive disease. The purpose of this report was to determine the prevalence of significant asymptomatic carotid artery occlusive disease in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement (AVR). All patients scheduled for AVR were prospectively studied. Preoperative carotid artery color-flow duplex was performed in all patients. A total of 204 patients were included in the study and significant carotid disease (>50% stenosis of the internal carotid artery) was found in 17 (8%). In patients with isolated aortic valve disease, 4/129 (3%) had significant stenosis. Of the patients with concurrent aortic valve and coronary artery disease, 13/75 (17%) had significant stenosis. The incidence of significant carotid stenosis in patients with aortic valve disease was over five fold higher in patients with concurrent coronary artery disease (3% vs. 17%, p <0.001). The yield of routine carotid duplex scanning for patients undergoing isolated AVR is low. However, in the subset of patients with concurrent coronary disease, the yield is higher. This finding supports the use of routine carotid duplex scanning in patients with coexistent aortic valve and coronary artery disease.     

Surgical management of severe truncal insufficiency: experience with truncal valve remodeling techniques

BACKGROUND: Truncal valve insufficiency has been a significant short- and long-term risk factor for repair of truncus arteriosus. Recent reports have documented the virtues of truncal valve repair. The purpose of this report is to review our experience with truncal valve repair and illustrate our techniques. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2000, 8 patients had interventions for severe truncal valve insufficiency at primary repair (3 patients) or in conjunction with conduit replacement (5 patients). One neonate had truncal valve replacement at initial repair early in the experience. The other 7 patients had truncal valve repair, 3 by valvar suture techniques. The remaining 4 patients had leaflet excision and annular remodeling in 3 (coronary reimplantation was required in 2) and commissure resuspension in 1 patient. RESULTS: Trivial to mild truncal valve insufficiency is present in the patients who had leaflet excision and annular remodeling (n = 3) and commissure resuspension (n = 1). Of the 3 patients who had valvar suture truncal valve repair, there was one death and 2 patients required acute valve replacement. The 7 survivors are doing well 1 month to 6 years postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Truncal valve repair by valvar suture techniques has not been successful in our practice. Truncal valve remodeling by leaflet excision and reduction annuloplasty is an effective method for truncal valve repair. When leaflet excision of a coronary sinus of Valsalva is required, coronary artery translocation can be accomplished.     

Aortic valve replacement in patients with previous cardiac surgery

BACKGROUND: Whether minimally diseased aortic valves should be replaced during other necessary cardiac operations remains controversial. Part of the decision-making process in that issue revolves around the risks of subsequent aortic valve replacement. This study evaluated the results of aortic valve replacement in patients following prior cardiac surgery. METHODS: From February, 1984 through December, 2001 first-time aortic valve replacement was performed in 132 consecutive patients who had previous cardiac surgery utilizing cardiopulmonary bypass. Of those patients 89 (67%) had aortic valve replacement at a mean of 8.3 years after prior coronary artery bypass grafting, and 43 (33%) had aortic valve replacement at a mean of 13.0 years after previous procedures other than myocardial revascularization. Hospital records of all patients were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Early complications included operative mortality in six (6.7%) of the patients with prior coronary grafting and no mortality in the group with other prior operations. Patients having prior coronary grafting had more nonfatal complications than those with other previous procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve replacement in patients following previous cardiac surgery can be accomplished with acceptable mortality and morbidity. Routine replacement of aortic valves that are minimally diseased during coronary artery bypass grafting may not be warranted.     

心脏瓣膜病冠状动脉造影分析

目的：探讨心脏瓣膜病伴发冠心病的诊断方法。方法：对602例心脏瓣膜病术前临床资料和选择性冠状动脉造影结果进行综合分析。结果：冠状动脉造影显示,心脏瓣膜病并发冠心病为14．1％,其中无症状者占76．2％,21例核素心肌灌注显像中阳性率为9．5％。结论：选择性冠状动脉造影是确诊心脏瓣膜病伴发冠心病的最可行的方法。在临床,大于50岁（有冠心病危险因素提前到40岁）,需心脏瓣膜置换的病人,术前应常规行选择性冠状动脉造影检查。     

Coronary flow velocity waveforms in aortic stenosis and the effects of valve replacement

In 6 patients with pure aortic stenosis, the flow velocity waveforms in the left anterior descending coronary artery were studied using an 80-channel 20-MHz pulsed Doppler velocimeter before and immediately after aortic valve replacement. All patients showed normal coronary arteriograms. The left anterior descending coronary artery flow velocity waveform in aortic stenosis was characterized by a reverse flow in the first half of systole and a slowly increasing diastolic inflow. After aortic valve replacement, the reverse flow in the first half of systole disappeared in all patients, but an end-systolic reverse flow was discerned in 5 of 6 patients. The increasing rate of the diastolic inflow was augmented in all patients. After aortic valve replacement, the time from onset of diastole to the diastolic peak velocity was shortened from 176.8 +/- 28.8 to 90.5 +/- 18.8 ms (p less than 0.01), and the diastolic peak velocity increased from 90.5 +/- 28.0 to 122.5 +/- 17.2 cm/s (p less than 0.05). Blood pressure and heart rate, however, did not change significantly before and after valve replacement. These changes in the left coronary artery velocity waveforms after valve replacement suggest the beneficial effects of removal of aortic stenosis on human coronary artery inflow.     

瓣膜病合并冠心病的外科治疗

目的探讨对心脏瓣膜病合并冠状动脉粥样硬化性心脏病(冠心病)患者行手术治疗的疗效。方法对22例心脏瓣膜病合并冠心病患者进行瓣膜置换或成形,同期行冠状动脉旁路移植。结果术后早期死亡1例,其余患者术后心功能恢复、生活质量明显提高,均无心绞痛发作。结论对心脏瓣膜病合并冠心病患者选择瓣膜置换或成形,同期进行冠脉血运重建,能够改善患者心功能,提高生活质量。     

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with anomalous left circumflex coronary artery

The anomalous left circumflex artery can be a risk for coronary stenosis or obstruction during transcatheter aortic valve replacement; however, the best procedural management has not been clarified. We describe three patients with severe aortic valve stenosis as well as anomalous left circumflex artery. In the first patient, a coronary guidewire with balloon was placed before deploying a SAPIEN 3 transcatheter heart valve, as protection from the coronary occlusion or stenosis. For the second and third patients, no coronary protection was used. All procedures were completed safely and no complications were detected at one‐year follow‐up.     

Open-heart surgery in patients more than 65 years old

At the Mayo Clinic from 1968 to 1973, 305 open-heart operations were performed on patients more than 65 years old. The overall operative mortality rate was 15.7%. Of the various types of operations, aortic valve replacement was associated with a mortality of 10.6%; mitral valve replacement, 20.0%; multiple valve replacements, 42.4%; coronary artery grafting, 3.7%; coronary grafting plus valve replacement, 23.1%; and miscellaneous procedures, 8.3%. Advanced disease, inability to achieve good coronary perfusion during operation, intraoperative ventricular fibrillation, postoperative myocardial infarction, and low cardiac output were factors in mortality. Open-heart operations can be done in patients more than 65 years old with an acceptable operative mortality.     

Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone

We have favored treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease with coronary bypass alone because of the high operative mortality of combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass. Between 1977 and 1983, coronary bypass alone was performed on 58 patients (mean age 63 +/- 8 years). Preoperatively, 90% had Canadian Cardiovascular Society class III or IV angina, and 10% had class III or IV congestive heart failure. In 72% mitral regurgitation had been caused by coronary disease. Hospital mortality was 3.4% (2/58). At follow-up (100% complete, mean 4.3 years) 66% of survivors were functional classes I and II (compared with 7% preoperatively, p less than 0.0001). Of those patients who worked preoperatively, 84% returned to work. There were no reoperations. The 5-year survival was 77%. In the same period combined mitral valve replacement and coronary bypass was required in 20 unmatched patients with moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease. Indications for valve replacement included congestive heart failure (10 cases), high left atrial pressure (three cases), and mitral stenosis (four cases). In these patients with more advanced symptoms the hospital mortality was 25%, and the 5-year survival was 31%. Treatment of moderate mitral regurgitation and coronary disease by coronary bypass alone achieved excellent hospital survival and long-term functional stability without a subsequent valve operation.