Germline mutations in RAD51, RAD51AP1, RAD51B, RAD51C,RAD51D, RAD52 and RAD54L do not contribute to familial chronic lymphocytic leukemia.

While familial predisposition to B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is well recognized no gene which when mutated in the germline has been unambiguously shown to confer susceptibility to the disease. An approach based on mutation screening methods targeted to coding regions of candidate genes offers an attractive strategy for the identification of rare disease-causing alleles. The RAD genes participate in the cellular response to DNA double strand breaks, detecting DNA damage, activating cell cycle checkpoints and apoptosis. Defects in members of these genes are linked to increased chromosomal instability and in lymphoma predisposition, thereby representing strong candidate susceptibility genes a priori. To examine this proposition we screened 75 familial CLL probands for germline mutations in this set of genes. No overt pathogenic mutations were identified. These findings indicate that germline mutations in RAD51, RAD51AP1, RAD51L1, RAD51L3, RAD52 and RAD54L are unlikely to be causal of an inherited predisposition to CLL.     

The RAD51 gene family, genetic instability and cancer

Prostate cancer (CaP) is the most commonly diagnosed nonskin cancer and the second leading cause of cancer death in American men. Its etiology is not fully understood. Ethnicity/race and family history are associated with it, and incidence increases with age. As with other solid tumors, accumulation of mutations and decline in DNA repair during aging may lead to CaP. However, we believe that conducting a large population screening for every cancer susceptibility gene (e.g. DNA repair) is only meaningful, if we can predict to what extent genetic variants contribute to DNA-repair functional phenotype and CaP risk. This review focuses on the association between CaP and nucleotide excision repair (NER), because some of the DNA adducts generated by CaP-related carcinogens are removed by the NER pathway, and our previous data showed a significant association between lower NER capacity (NERC) and CaP risk. Many laboratories, including ours, have employed a variety of approaches to evaluate the functional significance of DNA-repair single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in human cancer risk assessment. Genetic profiling and computational modeling that can predict NERC may have great potential for CaP-risk assessment, because the current NERC assay is quite labor intensive, costly, and therefore not suitable for population-based screening.     

RAD51, genomic stability, and tumorigenesis

Genomic instability is characteristic of malignant cells, and a strong correlation exists between abnormal karyotype and tumorigenicity. Increased expression of the homologous recombination and DNA repair protein Rad51 has been reported in immortalized cell lines and multiple primary tumor cell types which could alter recombination pathways to contribute to the chromosomal rearrangements found in these cells. In addition, Rad51 participates in a complex network of interactions that includes DNA damage sensors, tumor suppressors, and cell cycle and apoptotic regulators, and mutation of many of these proteins have also been associated with tumor initiation or progression. Insights into the connection between disregulated Rad51 and malignant phenotype indicate that Rad51 is a potential target for new anti-cancer regimens including those that use siRNA technology.     

Mutation analysis of RAD51L1 (RAD51B/REC2) in multiple-case, non-BRCA1/2 breast cancer families

Although a significant proportion of familial aggregation of breast cancer remains unexplained, many of the currently known breast cancer susceptibility genes, including BRCA1, BRCA2 and TP53, play a role in maintaining genome integrity by engaging in DNA repair. RAD51L1 is one of the five RAD51 paralogs involved in homologous recombination (HR) repair of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs); it also interacts directly with p53. Deleterious mutations have been found in one RAD51 paralog, RAD51C (RAD51L2), in non-BRCA1/2 breast and ovarian cancer families, which suggests that all five paralogs are strong candidate breast cancer susceptibility genes. A genome-wide association study (GWAS) has already identified a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) deep within intron 10 of RAD51L1 as a risk locus for breast cancer. Based on its biological functions and association with RAD51C, there is reason to suggest that RAD51L1 (RAD51B/REC2) may also contain high risk mutations in the gene that give rise to multiple-case breast cancer families. In order to investigate this hypothesis, we have used high resolution melt (HRM) analysis to screen RAD51L1 for germline mutations in 188 non-BRCA1/2 multiple-case breast cancer families and 190 controls. We identified a total of seven variants: one synonymous, three intronic, and three previously identified SNPs, but no truncating or nonsense changes. Therefore, our results suggest that RAD51L1 is unlikely to represent a high-penetrance breast cancer susceptibility gene.     

Association of RAD51 and XRCC2 Gene Polymorphisms with Cervical Cancer Risk in the Bangladeshi Women

Objective: Alterations in common DNA repair genes (RAD51 and XRCC2) may lead to cervical cancer (CC) development. In the present study, we analyzed the association between RAD51 rs1801320 and XRCC2 rs3218536 polymorphisms and CC. Methods: Variants were selected based on their associations with some cancers in several ethnicities and the risk allele frequency (>0.05) in different populations. The variants were detected using the PCR-RFLP method. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined by logistic regression models. Result: Significantly increased risk (p <0.05) were detected for both SNPs with CC (rs1801320- GC vs. GG: aOR=2.21, 95% CI=1.43-3.42; CC vs. GG: aOR=4.48, 95% CI=1.76-11.42; dominant model: aOR=2.49, 95% CI=1.65-3.76; recessive model: aOR=3.52, 95% CI=1.40-8.88; allele model: OR=2.30, 95% CI=1.63-3.26, and rs3218536- GA vs. GG: aOR=2.77, 95% CI=1.85-4.17; AA vs. GG: aOR=5.86, 95% CI=2.08-16.50; dominant model: aOR=2.97, 95% CI=1.99-4.42; recessive model: aOR=3.56, 95% CI=1.30-9.73; and allele model: aOR=2.21, 95% CI=1.62-3.00). Besides, older patients (>60 years) with rs1801320 showed significantly reduced risk (OR=0.53, 95% CI=0.29-0.96, p=0.04) but with rs3218536 depicted significantly increased risk (aOR=2.44, 95% CI=1.20-4.96, p=0.01) for CC. Conclusion: This study indicates an association of rs1801320 and rs3218536 polymorphisms with CC and confirms that patients older than 60 years are more likely to develop CC for rs3218536 polymorphism.     

Loss of heterozygosity in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions in breast cancer

Background: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 15q14-21 and 13q12-13 regions can contribute to the inactivation of RAD51 and BRCA2 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions, and their association with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Methods: The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using D15S118, D15S214, D15S1006 polymorphic markers in the 15q14-21 region and D13S260, D13S290 polymorphic markers in the 13q12-13 region in 36 sporadic breast cancer cases. Results: LOH in the RAD51 region ranged from 29% to 46% and in the BRCA2 region from 38% to 43% of informative cases. Eleven percent of the breast cancer cases displayed LOH for at least one studied marker in the RAD51 region exclusively. On the other hand, 44% of cases manifested statistically significant LOH for at least one microsatellite marker concomitantly in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions. LOH in the RAD51 region similarly as in the BRCA2 region appeared to correlate with steroid receptors content and lymph node status. Discussion: The obtained results indicate that alteration in RAD51 region may contribute to the disturbances of DNA repair involving RAD51 and/or BRCA2 penetration and thus enhance the risk of breast cancer development.     

Detection of loss of heterozygosity at RAD51, RAD52, RAD54 and BRCA1 and BRCA2 loci in breast cancer: pathological correlations.

Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in loci of the 15q15.1, 12p13, 1p32, 17q21 and 13q12-13 regions may collaborate in the inactivation of RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, BRCA1, BRCA2 and possibly other genes implicated in the repair of double-stranded DNA and in DNA recombination. We investigate allelic losses in microsatellites of the RAD51, RAD52, RAD54, BRCA1 and BRCA2 regions, and their correlations with nine pathologic parameters in 127 breast carcinomas. The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using 15 markers of the 15q15.1, 12p13.3, 1p32, 17q21 and 13q12-13 regions. LOH was found in the RAD51 region in 32% of tumours, in the RAD52 region in 16%, in RAD54 in 20% and in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 regions in 49% and 44% respectively. Significant correlations between one or more regions with concomitant LOH and pathologic parameters were observed with respect to age (P = 0.008), oestrogen receptor content (P = 0.03), progesterone receptors (P = 0.003), higher grade (P = 0.001), more advanced stage (P = 0.004) and peritumoural vessel involvement (P < 0.0001). The number of cases in which LOH was observed simultaneously in two or more regions was always higher than expected on the basis of their statistical probability, and curiously, the three patients with LOH at five regions concomitantly were under the age of 30 years. These results suggest that LOH at these regions could be related to breast cancer, and probably to a poor tumour prognosis.     

Correlation between Selected XRCC2, XRCC3 and RAD51 Gene Polymorphisms and Primary Breast Cancer in Women in Pakistan

Genetic polymorphisms in homologous recombination repair genes cause an abnormal development ofcancerous cells. In the present study we evaluated the possibility of breast cancer association with single nucleotidepolymorphisms of RAD51, XRCC2 and XRCC3 genes. Polymorphisms selected in this study were RAD51 135G/C,XRCC2 Arg188His; and XRCC3 Thr241Met. Each polymorphism was genotyped using Polymerase chainreaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism in study cohort of 306 females (156 breast cancer patientsand 150 controls). We observed that heterozygous variant genotype (GC) of RAD51 135 G/C polymorphism wasassociated with a significantly (OR=2.70; 95%CI (0.63-1.79); p<0.03) increased risk of breast cancer. In caseof the XRCC3 gene we observed that frequency of heterozygous (OR=2.88; 95%CI (1.02-8.14); p<0.02) andhomozygous (OR=1.46; 95%CI (0.89-2.40); p<0.04) genotype of Thr241Met polymorphism were significantlyhigher in breast cancer patients. For the Arg188His polymorphism of XRCC2, ~2fold increase in breast cancerrisk (OR=1.6, 95%CI = 0.73-3.50) was associated with GA genotype with a p value for trend of 0.03. Our resultssuggest that the 135G/C polymorphism of the RAD51, Thr241Met polymorphism of XRCC3 and Arg188Hispolymorphism of XRCC2 can be independent markers of breast cancer risk in Pakistan.     

BRCA2-dependent and independent formation of RAD51 nuclear foci

The formation of RAD51 foci in response to ionizing radiation (IR) represents an important step in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks. RAD51 foci also appear during S phase and are thought to be required for the restart of stalled or broken replication forks. The RAD51 recombinase interacts directly with the breast cancer-associated tumour suppressor BRCA2, an interaction that is required for normal recombination proficiency, radiation resistance and genome stability. In CAPAN-1 cells, which express a truncated form of BRCA2 that is cytoplasmic because of loss of the nuclear localization signal, the formation of IR-induced RAD51 foci is impaired. In this work, we show that S-phase RAD51 foci form normally in CAPAN-1 cells expressing truncated BRCA2. Moreover, we find that RAD51 specifically associates with chromatin at S phase in a reaction that is BRCA2-independent. The observed BRCA2-dependent and independent formation of RAD51 foci shows that intact BRCA2 is not required for RAD51 focus formation per se, leading us to suggest that S phase and IR-induced RAD51 foci assemble by distinct pathways with defined protein requirements.     

非小细胞肺癌RAD51、ERCC2和BAG-1基因多态性的表达

目的:研究DNA修复基因RAD51和着色性干皮病基因(ERCC2/XPD)以及Bcl-2结合抗凋亡基因1(Bcl-2 associated athanogene 1,BAG-1)基因多态性与非小细胞肺癌(non-small cell lung cancer,NSCLC)遗传易感性的关系。方法:采用病例对照研究设计,选取100例非小细胞肺癌病例和80例正常对照。以ERCC2/XPD Lys751Gln和RAD51 codon 135以及BAG-1codon 324基因多态性为研究位点,聚合酶链反应-限制性片段长度多态性(PCR-RFLP)方法对多态性进行检测。应用Logistic回归计算OR值及95%CI,比较不同基因型与NSCLC发病风险的关系。结果:ERCC2/XPD 751基因型在病例组的分布频率为C/C型69例(69%)、C/A型26例(30%)和A/A型5例(5%)。与野生基因型C/C型相比,携带ERCC2/XPD C/A基因型和A/A基因型者患NSCLC的危险度比值比(odds ratio,OR)分别是1.53(95%CI:1.15-3.32)和0.58(95%CI:0.15-2.39)。BAG-1 codon 324基因型的分布频率为C/C型81%(81/100)、C/T型19%(19/100)以及T/T型0%(0例)。与野生基因型C/C型相比,携带BAG-1 C/T基因型者患NSCLC的OR是1.28(95%CI:1.08-2.74)。RAD51 codon 135基因型的分布频率为G/G型67%(67/100)、G/C型33%(33/100)、未现C/C型。与野生基因型G/G型相比,RAD51 G/C基因型者患NSCLC的OR是1.03(95%CI:1.06-2.29)。分析结果提示吸烟、环境危险因素与XPD Lys751Gln基因多态存在交互作用,交互效应OR值分别为2.24(95%CI:1.18-2.87)和2.53(95%CI:1.71-3.46),携带XPD Ly s751Gln突变基因者若同时暴露于吸烟、环境危险因素下,则患NSCLC的危险显著增加,相较未暴露于上述因素者,OR值均增大。结论:BAG-1和ERCC2/XPD以及RAD51基因多态性可能与当地居民NSCLC遗传易感性有关,ERCC2/XPD与吸烟、饮酒、环境危险因素存在交互作用。     

Artesunate sensitizes ovarian cancer cells to cisplatin by downregulating RAD51

Artesunate, a semi-synthetic derivative of arteminisin originally developed for the treatment of malaria, has recently been shown to possess antitumor properties. One of the cytotoxic effects of artesunate on cancer cells is mediated by induction of oxidative stress and DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). We report here that in addition to inducing oxidative stress and DSBs, artesunate can also downregulate RAD51 and impair DSB repair in ovarian cancer cells. We observed that the formation of RAD51 foci and homologous recombination repair (HRR) were significantly reduced in artesunate-treated cells. As a consequence, artesunate and cisplatin synergistically induced DSBs and inhibited the clonogenic formation of ovarian cancer cells. Ectopic expression of RAD51 was able to rescue the increased chemosensitivity conferred by artesunate, confirming that the chemosensitizing effect of artesuante is at least partially mediated by the downregulation of RAD51. Our results indicated that artesunatecan compromise the repair of DSBs in ovarian cancer cells, and thus could be employed as a sensitizing agent in chemotherapy.     

Enhancing the efficacy of glycolytic blockade in cancer cells via RAD51 inhibition

Targeting the early steps of the glycolysis pathway in cancers is a well-established therapeutic strategy; however, the doses required to elicit a therapeutic effect on the cancer can be toxic to the patient. Consequently, numerous preclinical and clinical studies have combined glycolytic blockade with other therapies. However, most of these other therapies do not specifically target cancer cells, and thus adversely affect normal tissue. Here we first show that a diverse number of cancer models – spontaneous, patient-derived xenografted tumor samples, and xenografted human cancer cells – can be efficiently targeted by 2-deoxy-D-Glucose (2DG), a well-known glycolytic inhibitor. Next, we tested the cancer-cell specificity of a therapeutic compound using the MEC1 cell line, a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cell line that expresses activation induced cytidine deaminase (AID). We show that MEC1 cells, are susceptible to 4,4?-Diisothiocyano-2,2?-stilbenedisulfonic acid (DIDS), a specific RAD51 inhibitor. We then combine 2DG and DIDS, each at a lower dose and demonstrate that this combination is more efficacious than fludarabine, the current standard- of- care treatment for CLL. This suggests that the therapeutic blockade of glycolysis together with the therapeutic inhibition of RAD51-dependent homologous recombination can be a potentially beneficial combination for targeting AID positive cancer cells with minimal adverse effects on normal tissue.

Implications: Combination therapy targeting glycolysis and specific RAD51 function shows increased efficacy as compared to standard of care treatments in leukemias.     

Mutation status of RAD51C,PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese familial breast cancer cases without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations

In addition to BRCA1 and BRCA2, RAD51C, PALB2 and BRIP1 are known as breast cancer susceptibility genes. However, the mutation status of these genes in Japanese familial breast cancer cases has not yet been evaluated. To this end, we analyzed the exon sequence and genomic rearrangement of RAD51C, PALB2 and BRIP1 in 100 Japanese patients diagnosed with familial breast and ovarian cancer and without BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. We detected a large deletion from exons 6 to 9 in RAD51C, 4 novel BRIP1 missense variants containing 3 novel non‐synonymous variants, c.89A>C, c.736A>G and c.2131A>G, and a splice donor site variant c.918+2T>C. No deleterious variant of PALB2 was detected. The results of pedigree analysis showed that the proband with a large deletion on RAD51C had a family history of both breast and ovarian cancer, and the families of probands with novel BRIP1 missense variants included a male patient with breast cancer or many patients with breast cancer within the second‐degree relatives. We showed that the mutation frequency of RAD51C in Japanese familial breast cancer cases was similar to that in Western countries and that the prevalence of deleterious mutation of PALB2 was possibly lower. Furthermore, our results suggested that BRIP1 mutation frequency in Japan might differ from that in Western countries.     

Loss of heterozygosity in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions in breast cancer

Background: Loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in the 15q14-21 and 13q12-13 regions can contribute to the inactivation of RAD51 and BRCA2 genes implicated in the pathogenesis of breast cancer. We investigated allelic losses in microsatellites in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions, and their association with clinicopathological parameters in breast cancer. Methods: The LOH analysis was performed by amplifying DNA by PCR, using D15S118, D15S214, D15S1006 polymorphic markers in the 15q14-21 region and D13S260, D13S290 polymorphic markers in the 13q12-13 region in 36 sporadic breast cancer cases. Results: LOH in the RAD51 region ranged from 29% to 46% and in the BRCA2 region from 38% to 43% of informative cases. Eleven percent of the breast cancer cases displayed LOH for at least one studied marker in the RAD51 region exclusively. On the other hand, 44% of cases manifested statistically significant LOH for at least one microsatellite marker concomitantly in the RAD51 and BRCA2 regions. LOH in the RAD51 region similarly as in the BRCA2 region appeared to correlate with steroid receptors content and lymph node status. Discussion: The obtained results indicate that alteration in RAD51 region may contribute to the disturbances of DNA repair involving RAD51 and/or BRCA2 penetration and thus enhance the risk of breast cancer development.     

RAD51 can inhibit PDGF-B-induced gliomagenesis and genomic instability

Faithful replication and DNA repair are vital for maintenance of genome integrity. RAD51 is a central protein in homologous recombination repair and during replication, when it protects and restarts stalled replication forks. Aberrant RAD51 expression occurs in glioma, and high expression has been shown to correlate with prolonged survival. Furthermore, genes involved in DNA damage response (DDR) are mutated or deleted in human glioblastomas, corroborating the importance of proper DNA repair to suppress gliomagenesis. We have analyzed DDR and genomic instability in PDGF-B-induced gliomas and investigated the role of RAD51 in glioma development. We show that PDGF-B-induced gliomas display genomic instability and that co-expression of RAD51 can suppress PDGF-B-induced tumorigenesis and prolong survival. Expression of RAD51 inhibited proliferation and genomic instability of tumor cells independent of Arf status. Our results demonstrate that the RAD51 pathway can prevent glioma initiation and maintain genome integrity of induced tumors, suggesting reactivation of the RAD51 pathway as a potential therapeutic avenue.     

XPG Asp1104His,XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C gene polymorphisms and colorectal cancer risk: A meta-analysis

Background: DNA repair mechanisms are crucial for sustaining DNA integrity and preventing carcinogenesis. The xeroderma pigmentosum group G (XPG), X-ray repair cross complementing group 2 (XRCC2) and RAD51 are candidate genes for DNA repair pathways. Methods: We performed a meta-analysis of 26 studies that assessed the impact of XPG Asp1104His, XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G and RAD51 135G/C polymorphisms on colorectal cancer (CRC) risk. This study included 10288 CRC patients and 11885 controls, and odds ratio (OR) with its 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate the strength of association. Results: The results of overall meta-analysis suggested an association between the XPG Asp1104His polymorphism and CRC susceptibility in allele (OR=1.06; 95%CI=1.01-1.12) and heterozygote model (OR=1.16; 95%CI=1.02-1.31). In the subgroup analysis based on ethnicity and source of control, we found significantly increased CRC cancer risk in Asians (OR=1.12, 95%CI=1.04-1.21) and in hospital-based (OR=1.22, 95%CI=1.08-1.38) populations. Moreover, the RAD51 135 G/C polymorphism increased the risk of CRC in total using allele (OR=1.21) and recessive models (OR=1.62). However, XRCC2 rs3218536 A/G was not associated with the risk of CRC in total or in subgroups. Conclusions: According to the results of our meta-analysis, the XPG Asp1104His and RAD51 135 G/C polymorphisms might influence colorectal cancer risk.     

Genetic Association between ERCC2, NBN,RAD51 Gene Variants and Osteosarcoma Risk: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: To date, only a few studies have investigated associations between ERCC2, NBN, and RAD51 variants and risk of developing osteosarcoma. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we focused on clarifying links. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Google Scholar, and ISI web of knowledge databases to identify relevant studies. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the strength of associations with fixed effect models. Results: No statistical evidence of association was found between ERCC2 rs13181 (G vs. T: OR= 1.224, 95% CI: 0.970-1.545, p= 0.088; GT vs. TT: OR= 1.135, 95% CI: 0.830-1.552, p= 0.428; GG vs. TT: OR= 1.247, 95% CI: 0.738-2.108, p= 0.409; GG+GT vs. TT: OR= 1.174, 95% CI: 0.929-1.484, p= 0.179; GG vs. GT+TT: OR= 1.476, 95% CI: 0.886-2.460, p= 0.135), ERCC2 rs1799793 (GA+AA vs. GG: OR= 1.279, 95% CI: 0.912-1.793, p= 0.154), NBN rs709816 (OR= 1.047, 95% CI: 0.763-1.437, p= 0.775), NBN rs1805794 (OR= 1.126, 95% CI: 0.789-1.608, p= 0.513), RAD51 rs1801320 (OR= 0.977, 95% CI: 0.675-1.416, p= 0.904), RAD51 rs1801321 (TT+GT vs. GG: OR= 1.167, 95% CI: 0.848-1.604, p= 0.343), RAD51 rs12593359 (GG+GT vs. TT: OR= 0.761, 95% CI: 0.759-1.470, p= 0.744) polymorphisms and osteosarcomas. The lack of the original data limited our further evaluation of the adjusted ORs concerning age and gender; however, the previous individual studies results indicated the age- and gender-specific effects of two ERCC2 rs1799793 and NBN rs1805794 variants on osteosarcoma risk. Conclusion: The results suggested a lack of association between the ERCC2 (rs13181 and rs1799793), NBN (rs709816 and rs1805794), and RAD51 (rs1801320, rs1801321, and rs12593359) variants with osteosarcoma risk. Further comprehensive and well-designed studies are required to assess the role for ERCC2, NBN, RAD51 variants in osteosarcoma development more adequately.