Indicators of prognosis after transhiatal esophageal resection without thoracotomy for cancer

BACKGROUND: Various techniques have been described for the surgical treatment of esophageal cancer. The transhiatal approach has been debated for its safety and oncologic results. STUDY DESIGN: Between January 1993 and September 1996, 115 patients underwent a transhiatal esophagectomy with curative intent for adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the middle or distal esophagus or esophagogastric junction. Procedure-related hazards, pathologic results, and prognostic factors for survival were evaluated. Median duration of postoperative followup was 27 months (range 1 to 74 months) for all patients and 45 months (range 30 to 74 months) for those alive at final followup. RESULTS: No emergency thoracotomies were experienced. In-hospital mortality was 3.5%. Vocal cord dysfunction (24%) and pulmonary complications (23%) were the most frequent early postoperative complications. A microscopically radical resection was achieved in 73% of patients. Overall survival was 45% at 3 years. In univariate analysis, the most pronounced indicators of longterm survival (p < 0.0001) were radicality of the resection, lymph node involvement, lymph node ratio (ie, the ratio of invaded to removed lymph nodes), and pathologic tumor stage. Multivariate analysis identified the lymph node ratio (p < 0.0001) as the strongest independent predictor of long-term survival, followed by radicality of the resection (p = 0.0064) and duration of ICU stay (p = 0.027). CONCLUSION: Transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy can be considered a safe procedure for resectable cancer of the midesophagus, distal esophagus, or esophagogastric junction. Radicality and survival results were in line with the data reported for traditional transthoracic approaches. A prognostic value of the lymph node ratio was observed. It emphasizes the need for controlled trials aimed at delineating the prognostic impact of an extended lymph node dissection.     

Adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: influence of esophageal resection margin and operative approach on outcome

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the length of esophageal resection or the operative approach influences outcome for patients with adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: While R0 resection remains the mainstay of curative treatment of patients with GEJ cancer, the optimal length of esophageal resection remains controversial. METHODS: Patients with Siewert I, II, or III adenocarcinoma who underwent complete gross resection without neoadjuvant therapy were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Proximal margin lengths were recorded ex vivo as the distance from the gross tumor edge to the esophageal transection line. Operative approaches were grouped into gastrectomy (limited esophagectomy) or esophagectomy (extended esophagectomy). RESULTS: From 1985 through 2003, 505 patients underwent R0/R1 gastrectomy (n = 153) or esophagectomy (n = 352) without neoadjuvant treatment. There were no differences in R1 resection rate, number of nodes examined or operative mortality between gastrectomy and esophagectomy. Univariate analysis found >3.8 cm to be the ex vivo proximal margin length (approximately 5 cm in situ) most predictive of improved survival. Multivariable analysis in patients who underwent R0 resection with >or=15 lymph nodes examined (n = 275) found the number of positive lymph nodes, T stage, tumor grade, and ex vivo proximal margin length >3.8 cm to be independent prognostic factors. Subset analysis found that the benefit associated with >3.8 cm margin was limited to patients with T2 or greater tumors and 相似文献   

Individualised surgical treatment of patients with an adenocarcinoma of the distal oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction

In this review we discuss the different strategies to improve surgical outcomes after potentially curative resection for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. For tumours of the distal oesophagus, there is a 17% survival benefit after transthoracic resection with two-field lymph node dissection when compared with transhiatal resection. This survival benefit is absent for tumours of the gastro-oesophageal junction or gastric cardia. These patients should, in the absence of tumour-positive lymph nodes at or proximal to the carina, undergo a transhiatal resection to minimise peri-operative complications. New developments include endoscopic resection or minimally invasive oesophagectomy, but these therapies should still be considered experimental.     

Transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma of the esophagus.

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagus is no longer rare and is treated by resection. To determine whether the approach used for resection influences outcome, we studied 88 patients who underwent resection; 14 had stage I or II disease, 74 had stage III, and 40 had stage IV. One third of those with Barrett's esophagus were noted on screening endoscopy to have potentially curable disease; the others were diagnosed with stage III or IV disease. Transhiatal esophagectomy was performed in 63 patients; 24 patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. We found no difference in survival or morbidity between transhiatal and transthoracic esophagectomy. Overall 5-year survival for stage I and II disease was 86%. For stage III and IV disease, 5-year survival was 14.5%. Aggressive surveillance of Barrett's esophagus facilitates the discovery of early disease. Esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma can result in cure of early cancers and improved palliation of more advanced disease.     

Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of occult cervical nodal metastases in patients with squamous cell cancer and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, and to determine the impact of esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection on survival and recurrence rates. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Although esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection is commonly practiced in Japan, its role in the surgical management of esophageal cancer in the United States, especially in patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma, is essentially unknown. METHODS: This is a prospective observational study of esophagectomy with three-field lymphadenectomy. Eighty patients underwent resection between August 1994 and April 2001. Clinicopathological information and follow-up data were collected on all patients until death or June 2001. RESULTS: Hospital mortality and morbidity rates were 5% and 46%, respectively. Metastases to the recurrent laryngeal and/or deep cervical nodes occurred in 36% of patients irrespective of cell type (adenocarcinoma 37%, squamous 34%) or location within the esophagus (lower third 32%, middle third 60%). Overall 5-year and disease-free survival rates were 51% and 46%, respectively. Sixty-nine percent presented with nodal metastases. The 5-year survival rate for node-negative patients was 88%; that for those with nodal metastases was 33%. The 5-year survival rate in patients with positive cervical nodes was 25% (squamous 40%, adenocarcinoma 15%). CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection can be performed with a low mortality and reasonable morbidity. Unsuspected metastases to the recurrent laryngeal and/or cervical nodes are present in 36% of patients regardless of cell type or location within the esophagus. Thirty percent of patients were upstaged, mainly from stage III to stage IV. An overall 5-year survival rate of 51% suggests a true survival benefit beyond that achieved solely on the basis of stage migration.     

Limited resection for early adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus

OBJECTIVE: To assess the extent of disease in patients with pT1 esophageal adenocarcinoma and to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a limited surgical approach. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Radical esophagectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy is widely advocated as the treatment of choice in patients with early adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus. This approach, however, is associated with substantial complications and long-term side effects. The extent of resection necessary to achieve cure in such patients is not clear. METHODS: Seventy-one patients with pT1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus underwent transmediastinal or transthoracic esophagectomy with two-field lymphadenectomy. Twenty-four patients with uT1N0 tumors underwent a limited resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction, regional lymphadenectomy, and reconstruction by interposition of an isoperistaltic pedicled jejunal segment. The two groups were compared for extent and multicentricity of the primary tumor and associated high-grade dysplasia, pattern of lymph node metastases, complications, deaths, and outcome of surgical treatment. RESULTS: Multicentric tumor growth or associated high-grade dysplasia was observed in 60.6% of the resection specimens. Complete resection of the tumor and the entire segment with intestinal metaplasia was achieved in all patients, irrespective of the surgical approach. Patients undergoing limited resection had fewer complications. Lymph node metastases or micrometastases were present in none of the 38 patients with tumors limited to the mucosa (pT1a) versus 10 of the 56 (17.9%) patients with tumors invading the submucosa (pT1b). Distant lymph node metastases occurred only in patients with more than three positive regional lymph nodes. Lymph node metastases were prognostic, but the pT1a/pT1b category and the surgical approach were not. The mean Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index after limited resection did not differ from that of healthy controls: 20 of the 24 patients were completely asymptomatic. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with early adenocarcinoma in the distal esophagus, resection of the distal esophagus and esophagogastric junction, with regional lymphadenectomy and jejunal interposition, is an attractive limited surgical alternative to radical esophagectomy.     

Prognostic factors associated with resectable carcinoma of the esophagus

A retrospective review of esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma between 1982 and 1999 was performed. Two hundred twenty-two patients (mean age 61.7 years) underwent esophagectomy: 128 transhiatal, 74 Ivor Lewis, and 20 abdominal. Most tumors were adenocarcinoma (65%); the majority were in the lower third or cardia (78%). Excluding operative mortality the one-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 67, 39, and 31 per cent (median survival, 16.3 months) respectively. The hospital mortality rate was 6.8 per cent. Through univariate analysis race other than white, history of weight loss, poor or moderate differentiation (P = 0.05), full-thickness invasion (P = 0.02), positive lymph nodes (P < 0.01), Ivor Lewis esophagectomy (P = 0.02), intraoperative blood transfusion (P = 0.01), and tumor location in the upper or middle third in node-positive patients (P = 0.02) were associated with a poorer survival. Adjuvant therapy improved survival for patients with positive lymph nodes (P < 0.01). In multivariate analysis positive lymph nodes, tumor location, intraoperative blood transfusion, and adjuvant therapy were independent predictors of survival. To optimize survival esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma should be performed without blood transfusion, and node-positive patients should receive multimodal therapy.     

Surgical treatment of adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus and prognosis]

There is no consensus regarding the surgical approach to adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus. From 1980 to 1988, 8 patients with adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital. Seven patients underwent subtotal esophagectomy with extended lymph node dissection, and one transhiatal esophagogastrectomy with regional lymph node dissection. In 4 patients tumor invasion was limited within the submucosa and in 4 within the muscularis propria. Four of 8 patients had stage I disease. The 5-year survival rate for the 8 patients was 64.3%. Some reports have indicated that endoscopic survey for Barrett's esophagus is important for early diagnosis. We conclude that survival after esophagectomy for adenocarcinoma in Barrett's esophagus is dependent on the method of operation, and that patients with early lesions may expect significantly better survival after extended lymph node dissection.     

Adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastric cardia. Comparison of results of transhiatal esophagectomy and thoracoabdominal esophagogastrectomy

Between 1965 and 1984, 72 patients underwent operation for adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastric cardia. A standard transthoracic esophagogastrectomy and esophagogastrostomy was performed in 43 and a transhiatal esophagectomy without thoracotomy and partial proximal gastrectomy was performed in 29. There was no significant difference between the two groups in age, sex, or TNM tumor staging. The perioperative complication rate was 86% in the esophagogastrectomy patients and 48% in the transhiatal esophagectomy patients (p less than 0.05). Mortality was higher in the esophagogastrectomy group (14%) than in the transhiatal esophagectomy group (7%). Average operative blood loss was greater in the esophagogastrectomy patients (2,510 versus 1,187 ml). Average postoperative hospitalization was longer for the esophagogastrectomy patients (22.2 days versus 12.3 days). Both differences are statistically significant (p less than 0.05). Late results, as evaluated by life-table analysis, showed no significant difference in survival between the two groups of patients. Because the morbidity and mortality rates of transhiatal esophagectomy are as low as or lower than those for esophagogastrectomy, late survival is as good, and palliation is superior (less suture-line tumor recurrence and reflux esophagitis), we believe that transhiatal esophagectomy is the preferred operative approach in patients with adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus or gastric cardia.     

Lymph node metastases identified with mediastinoscopy in a patient with superficial carcinoma of the esophagus

Superficial esophageal cancers limited to the lamina propria are not associated with lymph node metastases. Mediastinoscopic transhiatal esophagectomy was planned in a patient with widespread superficial cancer of the midthoracic esophagus. Sampling of the upper mediastinal lymph nodes revealed metastases. The operation was converted to a transthoracic esophagectomy with radical lymphadenectomy. Histopathologic examination of the resection specimen showed three metastatic lymph nodes, despite local invasion limited to the lamina propria. This is the first report of a patient with superficial esophageal cancer and lymph node metastases.     

Adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction: results of surgical therapy based on anatomical/topographic classification in 1,002 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE: To assess the outcome of surgical therapy based on a topographic/anatomical classification of adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Because of its borderline location between the stomach and esophagus, the choice of surgical strategy for patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction is controversial. METHODS: In a large single-center series of 1,002 consecutive patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction, the choice of surgical approach was based on the location of the tumor center or tumor mass. Treatment of choice was esophagectomy for type I tumors (adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus) and extended gastrectomy for type II tumors (true carcinoma of the cardia) and type III tumors (subcardial gastric cancer infiltrating the distal esophagus). Demographic data, morphologic and histopathologic tumor characteristics, and long-term survival rates were compared among the three tumor types, focusing on the pattern of lymphatic spread, the outcome of surgery, and prognostic factors in patients with type II tumors. RESULTS: There were marked differences in sex distribution, associated intestinal metaplasia in the esophagus, tumor grading, tumor growth pattern, and stage distribution between the three tumor types. The postoperative death rate was higher after esophagectomy than extended total gastrectomy. On multivariate analysis, a complete tumor resection (R0 resection) and the lymph node status (pN0) were the dominating independent prognostic factors for the entire patient population and in the three tumor types, irrespective of the surgical approach. In patients with type II tumors, the pattern of lymphatic spread was primarily directed toward the paracardial, lesser curvature, and left gastric artery nodes; esophagectomy offered no survival benefit over extended gastrectomy in these patients. CONCLUSION: The classification of adenocarcinomas of the esophagogastric junction into type I, II, and III tumors shows marked differences between the tumor types and provides a useful tool for selecting the surgical approach. For patients with type II tumors, esophagectomy offers no advantage over extended gastrectomy if a complete tumor resection can be achieved.     

Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a negative prognostic factor in T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

OBJECTIVE: To assess prognosis according to whether lymph node involvement is intracapsular or with extracapsular breakthrough in adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction.Materials and methods One hundred ninety-five consecutive patients with T3 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus and gastroesophageal junction between 1990 and 1999 were studied. All patients underwent primary R0 esophagectomy. The mean number of resected nodes per patient was 36.9. Survival was analyzed according to intracapsular and extracapsular involvement. RESULTS: In N0 patients 5-year survival was 57% and 9-year survival was 38.7%. In patients with positive nodes these figures were 26.2% and 18.1%, respectively (P =.0069). Intracapsular and extracapsular node involvement showed 5- and 10-year survival of 40.9% and 21.7% versus 18% and 15.7%, respectively. There was no significant difference in 5- and 10-year survival between N0 and intracapsular node involvement (P =.43). However, there was a significant difference in survival between N0 and extracapsular node involvement (P =.002) and between intracapsular and extracapsular node involvement (P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows a significant difference in survival according to whether lymph node involvement was intracapsular or extracapsular. Patients with intracapsular lymph node involvement have similar survival rates as N0 patients. Extracapsular lymph node involvement is a bad prognostic factor, independent of the number of involved lymph nodes. The number of involved lymph nodes has an additive negative effect. These data may have an impact on treatment strategies.     

The recurrence pattern of esophageal carcinoma after transhiatal resection

BACKGROUND: There is much controversy about the optimal resection for carcinoma of the esophagus. Little is known about the pattern of recurrence after transhiatal resection for esophageal carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 149 patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the mid or distal esophagus or gastroesophageal junction between June 1993 and June 1997. Recurrence was classified as locoregional or distant recurrence. Nine patients with macroscopically evident tumor left after resection and three patients (2.0%) who died in the hospital were excluded from the analysis. This left 137 patients; 105 men and 32 women with a median age 65 years (range 37 to 84 years). RESULTS: There were 95 adenocarcinomas (69.3%) and 42 squamous cell carcinomas (30.7%). Overall the median followup was 24.0 months (range 1.4 to 69.2 months). For patients alive at the end offollowup without recurrence, the median followup was 36.5 months (range 23.6 to 69.2 months). Seven patients died of other causes. The median interval between operation and recurrence was 11 months (range 1.4 to 62.5 months) for patients who had recurrence, with no significant difference in interval between locoregional and systemic recurrence. Seventy-two of the 137 patients (52.6%) developed recurrent disease. Thirty-two patients (23.4%) developed locoregional recurrence only, 21 patients (15.3%) developed systemic recurrence only, and 19 patients (13.9%) had a combination of both. In only 8.0% of all patients was there recurrence in the cervical lymph nodes. The most frequent sites of distant recurrence were liver (37.5%), bone (25.0%), and lung (17.5%). Recurrence was related to postoperative lymph node status (p<0.001) and the radicality of the operation (p<0.001) in multivariate analysis. Recurrence was not associated with localization or histologic type of the tumor. CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence after transhiatal resection is an early event. Almost 40% of patients developed locoregional recurrent disease. For this patient group a more extended procedure may be of benefit, especially in the patients (23.4%) with locoregional recurrence in whom this is the only site of recurrent disease. But the potential benefit of a more extended procedure has to be balanced against a possible increase in perioperative morbidity and mortality.     

胰头癌扩大切除在胰头癌根治术中的作用

目的 探讨后腹膜软组织和淋巴结扩大清扫在胰头癌根治术中的作用.同时合并肠系膜上-门静脉切除的安全性和对生存率的影响.方法 2001年6月至2004年12月共施行56例胰头癌扩大切除术,根据术后病理检查有无淋巴结转移分为两组,A组:存在淋巴结转移,B组:未发现淋巴结转移;根据有无合并门静脉-肠系膜上静脉切除分为两组,Ⅰ组:未合并门静脉切除,Ⅱ组:合并门静脉切除.比较各组术后生存率.结果 56例胰头癌扩大切除术并发症发生率为30%,死亡率2%,术后1年,3年、5年生存率分别为63%,29%和16%.术后病理检查发现淋巴结阳性(A组)40例(71%),其中腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性(A1组)11例;淋巴结阴性(B组)16例(29%),A、B两组术后生存率无明显差别,但腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性组生存率较A、B组降低.合并门静脉切除17例,Ⅰ、Ⅱ组术后生存率无明显差别.切缘阳性5例,中位生存时间9个月,切缘阴性51例,中位生存时间23个月.结论 胰头癌扩大切除以及合并门静脉切除可以安全施行,对部分淋巴结阳性的胰头癌有一定意义,但未能提高腹主动脉旁淋巴结阳性病人的长期生存率,门静脉侵犯并非预后不良的组织学指标.     

Three-field lymphadenectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction in 174 R0 resections: impact on staging, disease-free survival, and outcome: a plea for adaptation of TNM classification in upper-half esophageal carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To determine the impact of esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy on staging, disease-free survival, and 5-year survival in patients with carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). BACKGROUND: Esophagectomy with 3-field lymphadenectomy is mainly performed in Japan. Data from Western experience with 3-field lymphadenectomy are scarce and dealing with relatively small numbers. As a result, its role in the surgical practice of cancer of the esophagus and GEJ remains controversial. METHODS: Between 1991 and 1999, primary surgery with 3-field lymphadenectomy was performed in 192 patients, of whom a cohort of 174 R0 resections was used for further analysis. RESULTS: Hospital mortality of the whole series was 1.2%. Overall morbidity was 58%. Pulmonary complications occurred in 32.8%, cardiac dysrhythmias in 10.9%, and persistent recurrent nerve problems in 2.6%. pTNM staging was as follows: stage 0, 0.6%; stage I, 9.2%; stage II, 27.6%; stage III, 28.7%; and stage IV, 33.9%. Overall 3- and 5-year survival was 51% and 41.9%, respectively. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival was 51.4% and 46.3%, respectively. Locoregional lymph node recurrence was 5.2%; no patient developed an isolated cervical lymph node recurrence. Five-year survival for node-negative patients was 80.2% versus 24.5% for node-positive patients. Five-year survival by stage was 100% in stages 0 and I, 59.1% in stage II, 36.8% in stage III, and 13.3% in stage IV. Twenty-three percent of the patients with adenocarcinoma (25.8% distal third and 17.6% GEJ) and 25% of the patients with squamous cell carcinoma (26.2% middle third) had positive cervical nodes resulting in a change of pTNM staging specifically related to the unforeseen cervical lymph node involvement in 12%. Cervical lymph node involvement was unforeseen in 75.6% of patients with cervical nodes at pathologic examinations. Five-year survival for patients with positive cervical nodes was 27.7% for middle third squamous cell carcinoma. For distal third adenocarcinomas, 4-year survival was 35.7% and 5-year survival 11.9%. No GEJ adenocarcinoma with positive cervical nodes survived for 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: Esophagectomy with 3-field lymph node dissection can be performed with low mortality and acceptable morbidity. The prevalence of involved cervical nodes is high, regardless of the type and location of tumor resulting in a change of final staging specifically related to the cervical field in 12% of this series. Overall 5-year and disease-free survival after R0 resection of 41.9% and 46.3%, respectively, may indicate a real survival benefit. A 5-year survival of 27.2% in patients with positive cervical nodes in middle third carcinomas indicates that these nodes should be considered as regional (N1) rather than distant metastasis (M1b) in middle third carcinomas. These patients seem to benefit from a 3-field lymphadenectomy. The role of 3-field lymphadenectomy in distal third adenocarcinoma remains investigational.     

颈段食管癌的外科治疗

目的总结外科治疗颈段食管癌的经验体会。方法综合分析1993年12月至2005年12月在河南省肿瘤医院胸外科和头颈外科接受外科治疗的82例颈段食管癌患者的临床资料。结果本组患者1997年以前以单纯手术治疗为主（27例）；1997年后，除5例早期癌患者外，50例常规采用半量放疗后再手术的综合治疗模式。非开胸食管切除73例．开胸食管切除9例；同期行单侧或双侧区域性颈淋巴结清扫14例；联合脏器切除12例。单纯手术组和综合治疗组保喉率分别为81．3％和95．8％，差异无统计学意义（P〉0．05）。无术中或术后大出血、气管和（或）支气管撕裂及围手术期死亡者；并发症发生率为19．5％；术后病理证实上切缘阳性5例，均为单纯手术组；淋巴结转移14例（17．1％）。全组5年总生存率43％：其中综合治疗组50．2％，高于单纯手术组的33．9％（Χ^2=7．17；P=0．007）；开胸食管切除者、同期行单侧或双侧区域性颈淋巴结清扫者和联合脏器切除者的5年生存率分别为36．5％、45．8％和33．3％。结论颈段食管癌患者半量放疗后再手术．可明显减少肿瘤上切缘阳性的发生率，提高保喉率和5年生存率。手术方式以非开胸游离食管为首选，联合脏器切除或双侧颈部淋巴结清扫应非常谨慎。     

Skeletonizing En Bloc Esophagectomy for Cancer

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the long-term outcome of patients with esophageal cancer after resection of the extraesophageal component of the neoplastic process en bloc with the esophageal tube. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Opinions are conflicting about the addition of extended resection of locoregional lymph nodes and soft tissue to removal of the esophageal tube. METHODS: Esophagectomy performed en bloc with locoregional lymph nodes and resulting in a real skeletonization of the nonresectable anatomical structures adjacent to the esophagus was attempted in 324 patients. The esophagus was removed using a right thoracic (n = 208), transdiaphragmatic (n = 39), or left thoracic (n = 77) approach. Lymphadenectomy was performed in the upper abdomen and lower mediastinum in all patients. It was extended over the upper mediastinum when a right thoracic approach was used and up to the neck in 17 patients. Esophagectomy was carried out flush with the esophageal wall as soon as it became obvious that a macroscopically complete resection was not feasible. Neoplastic processes were classified according to completeness of the resection, depth of wall penetration, and lymph node involvement. RESULTS: Skeletonizing en bloc esophagectomy was feasible in 235 of the 324 patients (73%). The 5-year survival rate, including in-hospital deaths (5%), was 35% (324 patients); it was 64% in the 117 patients with an intramural neoplastic process versus 19% in the 207 patients having neoplastic tissue outside the esophageal wall or surgical margins (P <.0001). The latter 19% represented 12% of the whole series. The 5-year survival rate after skeletonizing en bloc esophagectomy was 49% (235 patients), 49% for squamous cell versus 47% for glandular carcinomas (P =.4599), 64% for patients with an intramural tumor versus 34% for those with extraesophageal neoplastic tissue (P <.0001), and 43% for patients with fewer than five metastatic nodes versus 11% for those with involvement of five or more lymph nodes (P =.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The strategy of attempting skeletonizing en bloc esophagectomy in all patients offers long-term survival to one third of the patients with resectable extraesophageal neoplastic tissues. These patients represent 12% of the patients with esophageal cancer suitable for esophagectomy and 19% of those having neoplastic tissue outside the esophageal wall or surgical margins.     

An audit of surgical outcomes of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma were increasingly recognized as two entities with different biologic behaviors and prognosis. Surgical risks and oncologic benefits of transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients are not confessed. METHODS: Between 1994 and 2005, 216 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients underwent esophagectomy were enrolled and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-six patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy and 50 patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy. The overall hospital mortality and postoperative complication rates were 9.7 and 49%, respectively. The amount of intra-operative blood loss or transfusion, postoperative complication rate, lengths of hospital stay and hospital mortality rate were not significantly different between both groups. However, shorter operative time was noticed in transhiatal group (p<0.001). The overall 5-year survival rate was 16.8%. ESCC patients underwent either transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy had comparable long-term survival. The pTNM stage was independent prognostic factor for patients underwent transthoracic esophagectomy. However, location of tumor (p=0.009) and pathologic tumor length (p=0.012) were predictors of prognosis for patients underwent transhiatal esophagectomy. CONCLUSIONS: For esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients, no significant differences in postoperative mortality or morbidity rates were observed between transthoracic and transhiatal esophagectomy. However, traditional pTNM staging system might underestimate the severity of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who underwent transhiatal esophagectomy. The information of dissimilar prognostic factors for transhiatal or transthoracic esophagectomies will be helpful in tailoring more individualized adjuvant therapy to optimize esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patient's outcome.     

En bloc vs transhiatal esophagectomy for stage T3 N1 adenocarcinoma of the distal esophagus

HYPOTHESIS: En bloc esophagectomy (EBE) provides improved survival over transhiatal esophagectomy (THE) in patients with similarly sized transmural tumors (T3) and lymph node metastases (N1). DESIGN: A retrospective case-control study of 2 methods of esophageal resection for cancer. SETTING: University hospital (tertiary referral center for esophageal disease). PATIENTS: There were 49 patients (27 who underwent EBE and 22 who underwent THE) with similar T3 N1 disease and the following matched criteria: tumors of similar size and location, more than 20 lymph nodes in the surgical specimen, R0 resection, no previous chemotherapy or radiation therapy, and follow-up until death or for a minimum of 5 years.Main Outcome Measure Survival adjusted for differences in demographic and patient characteristics. RESULTS: The number of nodes harvested was greatest after EBE vs THE (median, 52 vs 29 [range, 21-85 vs 20-60]; P<.001). The median number of involved nodes was similar after EBE vs THE (median, 5 vs 7 [range, 1-19 vs 1-16]). The only 2 independent factors that affected survival in a Cox analysis were the number of involved lymph nodes (P =.01) and the type of resection (P =.03). Patients who underwent EBE had a survival benefit over those who underwent THE (P =.01). The survival benefit of EBE was seen only in patients with fewer than 9 involved lymph nodes (P<.001). CONCLUSION: En bloc esophagectomy confers a better survival than THE in patients with T3 N1 disease and fewer than 9 lymph node metastases.     

The rationale for esophagectomy as the optimal therapy for Barrett''s esophagus with high-grade dysplasia.

OBJECTIVE: The authors determined the incidence of invasive adenocarcinoma after esophagectomy in patients endoscopically diagnosed as having Barrett's esophagus with high-grade dysplasia. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Barrett's esophagus is a well-recognized premalignant condition. There is controversy with regard to the optimal treatment of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus. Recognizing the morbidity and mortality associated with esophagectomy, some recommend a selective approach, reserving esophagectomy only for evidence of invasive cancer identified through endoscopic surveillance. Other advocate esophagectomy for all suitable operative candidates. METHODS: The authors reviewed their experience between 1985 and 1995 with 11 patients with high-grade dysplasia arising in Barrett's esophagus diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy and treated by esophagectomy. RESULTS: All patients were white men ranging in age from 47 to 70 years. Ten patients underwent esophagectomy by the Ivor Lewis technique; one had a transhiatal resection. Eight patients (73%) had invasive adenocarcinoma identified after esophagectomy; two (18%) had positive lymph nodes; one required a prolonged hospital stay for an anastomotic leak; two (18%) temporarily suffered delayed gastric emptying. The authors' review identified 85 additional patients previously reported during the same period. Including the current series, 39 patients (41%) had invasive adenocarcinoma identified in the resected specimen. A preponderance of early, potentially curable carcinomas are characteristically found in these patients. CONCLUSION: A high incidence of endoscopically undetected invasive carcinoma strongly supports esophagectomy as the preferred approach for suitable operative candidates with high-grade dysplasia in Barrett's esophagus.