Evaluating Barriers to Bystander CPR among Laypersons before and after Compression-only CPR Training

Objective: Bystander CPR is an essential part of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survival. EMS and public safety jurisdictions have embraced initiatives to teach compression-only CPR to laypersons in order to increase rates of bystander CPR. We examined barriers to bystander CPR amongst laypersons participating in community compression-only CPR training and the ability of the training to alleviate these barriers. The barriers analyzed include fear of litigation, risk of disease transmission, fear of hurting someone as a result of doing CPR when unnecessary, and fear of hurting someone as a result of doing CPR incorrectly. Methods: Laypersons attending community compression-only CPR training were administered surveys before and after community CPR training. Data were analyzed via standard statistical analyses. Results: A total of 238 surveys were collected and analyzed between September 2015 and January 2016. The most common reported motivation for attending CPR training was “to be prepared/just in case” followed by “infant or child at home.” Respondents reported that they were significantly more likely to perform CPR on a family member than a stranger in both pre-and post-training responses. Nevertheless, reported self-confidence in and likelihood of doing CPR on both family and strangers increased from pre-training to post-training. There was a statistically significant decrease in reported likelihood of all four barriers to prevent respondents from performing bystander CPR when pre-training responses were compared to post-training responses. Previous CPR training and history of having witnessed a sudden cardiac arrest (SCA) were both associated with decreased barriers to CPR, but previous training had no effect on reported likelihood of or confidence in performing CPR. Conclusion: The training initiative studied significantly reduced the reported likelihood of all barriers studied to prevent respondents from performing bystander CPR and also increased the reported confidence in doing CPR and likelihood of doing CPR on both strangers and family. However, it did not alleviate the pre-training discrepancy between likelihood of performing CPR on strangers versus family. Previous CPR training or certification had no impact on likelihood of or confidence in performing CPR.     

A Simulation Trial of Traditional Dispatcher-Assisted CPR Versus Compressions—Only Dispatcher-Assisted CPR

Objectives. Growing evidence indicates that it may not be essential to deliver ventilations in the first few minutes of CPR. We compared time to delivery of first compression in traditional CPR with ventilations andcompressions to compression-only CPR performed by untrained laypersons assisted by a mock 911 dispatcher. Methods. This randomized-controlled simulation study included a convenience sample of English-speaking emergency department visitors during a 6-month period. Exclusion criteria were prior CPR training or physical incapacity. A cardiac arrest scenario was presented to subjects who were then provided with one of two sets of telephone CPR instructions by a mock 911 dispatcher. One group received traditional CPR instructions (TCPR) andthe second group received compression only CPR instructions (COCPR). Subjects performed CPR on a Laerdal Resusci-Anne CPR manikin andrecording strips were analyzed for frequency andquality measures. Pre-and post-test questionnaires assessed subject fatigue andtelephone instruction understanding. The primary outcome was the time interval from 911 call to initiation of chest compressions. Analysis included Student t-test, Chi-square, andWilcoxon Rank Sum. Results. Of 377 potential subjects, 54 consented to randomization. The data from 50 subjects were analyzed. Compared to group TCPR, group COCPR initiated chest compressions faster (72 vs 117 sec, p < 0.0001), completed four cycles of CPR faster (168 vs. 250 sec, p < 0.0001), andpaused for a smaller percentage of the resuscitation (13% vs. 36%, p < 0.0001). Only 9% of ventilation opportunities in the TCPR group yielded ventilations of the correct volume. There were no differences between groups in perceived understanding of CPR instruction or fatigue. Conclusions. We have identified the potential timesavings that may occur during compressions-only CPR. Bystander resuscitation may be more efficient when ventilations are excluded from the CPR sequence.     

Quality of CPR performed by trained bystanders with optimized pre-arrival instructions

Objective

Telephone-CPR (T-CPR) can increase initiation of bystander CPR. We wanted to study if quality oriented continuous T-CPR would improve CPR performance vs. standard T-CPR.

Method

Ninety-five trained rescuers aged 22–69 were randomized to standard T-CPR or experimental continuous T-CPR (comprises continuous instructions, questions and encouragement). They were instructed to perform 10 min of chest compressions-only on a manikin, which recorded CPR performance in a small, confined kitchen. Three video-cameras captured algorithm time data, CPR technique and communication. Demography and training experience were captured during debriefing.

Results

Participants receiving continuous T-CPR delivered significantly more chest compressions (median 1000 vs. 870 compressions, p = 0.014) and compressed more frequently to a compression rate between 90 and 120 min⁻¹ (median 87% vs. 60% of compressions, p < 0.001), compared to those receiving standard T-CPR. This also resulted in less time without compressions after CPR had started (median 12 s vs. 64 s, p < 0.001), but longer time interval from initiating contact with dispatcher to first chest compression (median 144 s vs. 84 s, p < 0.001). There was no difference in chest compression depth (mean 47 mm vs. 48 mm, p = 0.90) or in demography, education and previous CPR training between the groups.

Conclusion

In our simulated scenario with CPR trained lay rescuers, experimental continuous T-CPR gave better chest compression rate and less hands-off time during CPR, but resulted in delayed time to first chest compression compared to standard T-CPR instructions.     

A tourniquet assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation augments myocardial perfusion in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

ObjectiveDuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), myocardial blood flow generated by chest compression rarely exceeds 35% of its normal level. Cardiac output generated by chest compression decreases gradually with the prolongation of cardiac arrest and resuscitation. Early studies have demonstrated that myocardial blood flow during CPR is largely dependent on peripheral vascular resistance. In this study, we investigated the effects of chest compression in combination with physical control of peripheral vascular resistance assisted by tourniquets on myocardial blood flow during CPR.MethodsVentricular fibrillation was induced and untreated for 7 min in ten male domestic pigs weighing between 33 and 37 kg. The animals were then randomized to receive CPR alone or a tourniquet assisted CPR (T-CPR). In the CPR alone group, chest compression was performed by a miniaturized mechanical chest compressor. In the T-CPR group, coincident with the start of resuscitation, the thin elastic tourniquets were wrapped around the four limbs from the distal end to the proximal part. After 2 min of CPR, epinephrine (20 μg/kg) was administered via the femoral vein. After 5 min of CPR, defibrillation was attempted by a single 150 J shock. If resuscitation was not successful, CPR was resumed for 2 min before the next defibrillation. The protocol was continued until successful resuscitation or for a total of 15 min. Five minutes after resuscitation, the elastic tourniquets were removed. The resuscitated animals were observed for 2 h.ResultsT-CPR generated significantly greater coronary perfusion pressure, end-tidal carbon dioxide and carotid blood flow. There was no difference in both intrathoracic positive and negative pressures between the two groups. All animals were successfully resuscitated with a single shock in both groups. There were no significant changes in hemodynamics observed in the animals treated in the T-CPR group before-and-after the release of tourniquets at post-resuscitation 5 min.ConclusionsT-CPR improves myocardial and cerebral perfusion during CPR. It may provide a new and convenient method for augmenting myocardial and cerebral blood flow during CPR.     

出诊医师参与电话指导目击者实施心肺复苏

目的 评估出诊医生参与电话指导目击者实施心肺复苏(CPR)的可行性和有效性,并探讨电话指导的方法及影响电话指导的相关因素.方法 回顾分析2008-01～2009-04 32例院前心脏骤停(CA)患者的救治方法,没有电话指导或指导不成功18例,目击者未实施CPR;出诊医生采用预先制定的电话指导方案成功给予了电话指导14例,目击者实施了CPR.比较两组的复苏结果,并计算通过电话指导方案正确识别CA的比率,目击者对出诊医师电话指导CPR的接受率及CPR正确率等.结果 电话指导目击者25例,接受指导19例(19/25,76%),不接受6例.经指导成功完成CPR 14例(14/19,73.7%),未完成5例.指导人员采用电话指导方案正确识别CA 17例(17/19,89.5%),目击者正确实施CPR 5例(5/14,35.7%).目击者行CPR 14例中院前成活5例(35.7%),目击者未行CPR 18例中院前成活1例(5.6%).院前成活率两组比较有统计学意义(P＜0.01).结论 出诊医生依据简化的电话指导CPR方案参与电话指导目击者实施CPR能提高CA院前复苏结果.但值得注意的是电话指导受诸多因素影响.     

Bystander CPR in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the role of limited English proficiency

BackgroundThe proportion of non-native English speakers is increasing in the United States. We sought to determine if limited English proficiency in callers to 9-1-1 for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with provision of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and delays in telephone-assisted CPR.Materials and methodsWe completed a secondary analysis of cohort data collected as part of a randomized trial of emergency dispatcher bystander CPR instructions. Included patients suffered confirmed cardiac arrest treated by emergency medical services. Callers were identified as limited English proficient through review of the dispatcher report.ResultsOf 971 eligible cardiac arrest cases, 5.9% (n = 57) of 9-1-1 callers were limited English proficient. Comparing arrest events of limited English proficient 9-1-1 callers with English-fluent callers, a lower proportion of limited English proficient arrest cases received bystander CPR (64.3% [36/56] vs. 77.5% [702/906]; p = 0.02) or survived to hospital discharge (8.8% [5/57] vs. 16.5% [151/914]; p = 0.12). Dispatchers took longer to recognize cardiac arrest with limited English proficient callers compared with English-fluent callers (median 84 vs. 50 s; p < 0.001). Among callers attempting bystander CPR, the interval from call receipt to initiation of CPR was longer for limited English proficient compared with English-fluent callers (median 237 vs. 163 s; p < 0.001).ConclusionIn this observational study of dispatcher-identified cardiac arrest, limited English proficiency in 9-1-1 callers was associated with less frequent provision of bystander CPR and delays in arrest recognition and implementation of telephone CPR, underscoring the health challenges and potential disparities of pre-hospital care related to limited English proficiency.     

Does the sex of a simulated patient affect CPR?

IntroductionWhile males and females are equally at risk of sudden cardiac arrest (SCA), females are less likely to be resuscitated. Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) may be inhibited by socio-cultural norms about exposing female victims’ chests. Empirically confirming this hypothesis is limited by lack of patient simulators modeling realistic female physiques. A commercially-available patient simulator was transformed to evaluate how physical attributes of a patient's sex might influence lay participants who were asked to resuscitate a female versus a male during simulated cardiac arrest.MethodsSixty-nine participants consented to be in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to provide CPR and defibrillation as instructed by a commercially-available automated external defibrillator on a patient simulator presented as either a male or female experiencing cardiac arrest.ResultsRescuers removed significantly more clothing from the male than the female, with men removing less clothing from the female. More rescuers’ initial hand placements for CPR were centered between the female's breasts compared to the male, on which placement was distributed across the chest towards the nipples.DiscussionWhile rescuers had better hand placement for CPR on the female, both men and women rescuers were reluctant to remove the female's clothing, with men significantly more hesitant. Reticence to remove clothing was often articulated relative to social norms during structured interviews. We suggest that using only male simulators will not allow trainees to experience social differences associated with the care of a female simulated patient. Realistic female patient simulators are needed.     

Perception of CPR quality: Influence of CPR feedback,Just-in-Time CPR training and provider role

AimMany healthcare providers rely on visual perception to guide cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but little is known about the accuracy of provider perceptions of CPR quality. We aimed to describe the difference between perceived versus measured CPR quality, and to determine the impact of provider role, real-time visual CPR feedback and Just-in-Time (JIT) CPR training on provider perceptions.MethodsWe conducted secondary analyses of data collected from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial of 324 healthcare providers who participated in a simulated cardiac arrest scenario between July 2012 and April 2014. Participants were randomized to one of four permutations of: JIT CPR training and real-time visual CPR feedback. We calculated the difference between perceived and measured quality of CPR and reported the proportion of subjects accurately estimating the quality of CPR within each study arm.ResultsParticipants overestimated achieving adequate chest compression depth (mean difference range: 16.1–60.6%) and rate (range: 0.2–51%), and underestimated chest compression fraction (0.2–2.9%) across all arms. Compared to no intervention, the use of real-time feedback and JIT CPR training (alone or in combination) improved perception of depth (p < 0.001). Accurate estimation of CPR quality was poor for chest compression depth (0–13%), rate (5–46%) and chest compression fraction (60–63%). Perception of depth is more accurate in CPR providers versus team leaders (27.8% vs. 7.4%; p = 0.043) when using real-time feedback.ConclusionHealthcare providers’ visual perception of CPR quality is poor. Perceptions of CPR depth are improved by using real-time visual feedback and with prior JIT CPR training.     

Efficacy of chest compression-only BLS CPR in the presence of an occluded airway

Reluctance of the lay public to perform bystander CPR is becoming an increasingly worrisome problem in the USA. Most bystanders who admit such reluctance concede that fear of contagious disease from mouth-to-mouth contact is what keeps them from performing basic life support. Animal models of prehospital cardiac arrest indicates that 24-h survival is essentially as good with chest compression-only CPR as with chest compressions and assisted ventilation. This simpler technique is an attractive alternative strategy for encouraging more bystander participation. Such experimental studies have been criticized as irrelevant however secondary to differences between human and porcine airway mechanics. This study examined the effect of chest compression-only CPR under the worst possible circumstances where the airway was totally occluded. After 6 min of either standard CPR including ventilation with a patent airway or chest compressions-only with a totally occluded airway, no difference in 24 h survival was found (10/10 vs. 9/10). As anticipated arterial blood gases were not as good, but hemodynamics produced were better with chest compression-only CPR (P < 0.05). Chest compression-only CPR, even with a totally occluded airway, is as good as standard CPR for successful outcome following 6.5 min of cardiac arrest. Such a strategy for the first minutes of cardiac arrest, particularly before professional help arrives, has several advantages including increased acceptability to the lay public.     

CPR knowledge and attitude to performing bystander CPR among secondary school students in Norway

Background

Early bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is essential for survival from out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Young people are potentially important bystander CPR providers, as basic life support (BLS) training can be distributed widely as part of the school curriculum.

Methods

Questionnaires were distributed to nine secondary schools in North Norway, and 376 respondents (age 16-19 years) were included. The completed questionnaires were statistically analysed to assess CPR knowledge and attitude to performing bystander CPR.

Results

Theoretical knowledge of handling an apparently unresponsive adult person was high, and 90% knew the national medical emergency telephone number (113). The majority (83%) was willing to perform bystander CPR in a given situation with cardiac arrest. However, when presented with realistic hypothetical cardiac arrest scenarios, the option to provide full BLS was less frequently chosen, to e.g. a family member (74%), a child (67%) or an intravenous drug user (18%). Students with BLS training in school and self-reported confidence in their own BLS skills reported stronger willingness to perform BLS. 8% had personally witnessed a cardiac arrest, and among these 16% had performed full BLS. Most students (86%) supported mandatory BLS training in school, and three out of four wanted to receive additional training.

Conclusion

Young Norwegians are motivated to perform bystander CPR, but barriers are still seen when more detailed cardiac arrest scenarios are presented. By providing students with good quality BLS training in school, the upcoming generation in Norway may strengthen the first part of the chain of survival in OHCA.     

CPR Induced Consciousness During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: A Case Report on an Emerging Phenomenon

Background: High quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) has produced a relatively new phenomenon of consciousness in patients with vital signs absent. Further research is necessary to produce a viable treatment strategy during and post resuscitation. Objective: To provide a case study done by paramedics in the field illustrating the need for sedation in a patient whose presentation was consistent with CPR induced consciousness. Resuscitative challenges are provided as well as potential future treatment options to minimize harm to both patients and prehospital providers. Case Report: A 52-year-old male presented as a witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). During CPR the patient began to exhibit signs of life including severe agitation and thrashing of his limbs while CPR was ongoing for ventricular fibrillation prior to defibrillation. Resuscitation became considerably more complicated due to the violent and counterintuitive motions done by the patient during their own resuscitation. Despite the atypical presentation of cardiac arrest the patient was successfully resuscitated employing high quality CPR, standard advanced life support (ALS) care as well as two double sequential external defibrillation shocks. The patient underwent emergency percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for a 100% occlusion of his left anterior descending artery (LAD). The patient returned home 3 days later fully recovered with a Cerebral Performance Score of 1. Conclusion: CPR induced consciousness is emerging as a new phenomenon challenging providers of high quality CPR during cardiac arrest resuscitation. Our case report describes the manifestations of CPR induced consciousness as well as the resuscitative challenges which occur during resuscitation. Further research is required to determine the true frequency of this condition as well as treatment algorithms that would allow for appropriate and safe management for both the patient and EMS providers.     

Identification of Factors Integral to Designing Community-based CPR Interventions for High-risk Neighborhood Residents

Abstract

Background. High-risk neighborhoods can be identified as census tracts in which cardiac arrest incidence is high and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) prevalence is low. However, little is known about how best to tailor community CPR training to high-risk neighborhood residents. The objective of this study was to identify factors integral to the design and implementation of community-based CPR intervention programs targeted to these areas. Methods. Using qualitative methods, six focus groups with 42 participants were conducted in high-risk neighborhoods in Columbus, Ohio during January and February 2011 to elicit resident views on how best to design community-based CPR educational programs for these neighborhoods. Snowball and purposeful sampling by community liaisons was used to recruit participants. Three reviewers analyzed the data in an iterative process to identify recurrent and unifying themes. Results. Focus group participants identified four principal considerations for the design of community-based CPR interventions: 1) identifying lay people to serve as motivated leaders while targeting both senior citizens and school children to increase reach, 2) finding appropriate community-based locations to hold CPR training, 3) providing incentives to encourage more people to participate, and 4) identifying and addressing barriers to participation. Conclusion. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a particular risk for minority and low-income communities. By working together with the community key factors integral to designing community-based CPR within these high-risk communities can be identified and implemented.     

TO SEE OR NOT TO SEE-Better dispatcher-assisted CPR with video-calls? A qualitative study based on simulated trials

BACKGROUND: Video communication through mobile telephone is now available in many parts of the world. We ask how mobile phone video-calls compares with traditional phone calls for dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (T-CPR). METHODS: Primary data was collected through individual interviews with six dispatchers after their participation in simulated cardiac arrest. They had 10 scenarios each, during which they guided rescuers on resuscitation. During half of the scenarios they used video-calls, and traditional phone calls for the rest. Concepts from modern systems theory were used to analyse the material. RESULTS: Video-calls influenced the information basis and understanding of the dispatchers. The dispatchers experienced that (1) video-calls are useful for obtaining information and provides adequate functionality to support CPR assistance; (2) their CPR assistance becomes easier; (3) the CPR might be of better quality; but (4) there is a risk of "noise". DISCUSSION: We emphasize visual observation as a way of constructing professional understanding when using video-calls, which may provide a new basis for dispatcher assistance. Video-calls may improve rescuer compliance. The role and content of telephone-directed protocols used by dispatchers may need adjustments when video-calls are used for medical emergencies. CONCLUSION: Video communication can improve the dispatchers' understanding of the rescuer's situation, and the assistance they provide.     

NAEMSE Abstracts 2006

Abstract

Objective. Early, high-quality, minimally interrupted bystander cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) is essential for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. However, rates of bystander intervention remain low in many geographic areas. Community CPR programs have been initiated to combat these low numbers by teaching compression-only CPR to laypersons. This study examined bystander CPR and the cost-effectiveness of a countywide CPR program to improve out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival. Methods. A 2-year retrospective review of emergency medical services (EMS) run reports for adult nontraumatic cardiac arrests was performed using existing prehospital EMS quality assurance data. The incidence and success of bystander CPR to produce prehospital return of spontaneous circulation and favorable neurologic outcomes at hospital discharge were analyzed. The outcomes were paired with cost data for the jurisdiction's community CPR program to develop a cost-effectiveness model. Results. During the 23-month study period, a total of 371 nontraumatic adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests occurred, with a 33.4% incidence of bystander CPR. Incremental cost-effectiveness analysis for the community CPR program demonstrated a total cost of $22,539 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). A significantly increased proportion of those who received BCPR also had an automated external defibrillator (AED) applied. There was no correlation between witnessed arrest and performance of BCPR. A significantly increased proportion of those who received BCPR were found to be in a shockable rhythm when the initial ECG was performed. In the home setting, the chances of receiving BCPR were significantly smaller, whereas in the public setting a nearly equal number of people received and did not receive BCPR. Witnessed arrest, AED application, public location, and shockable rhythm on initial ECG were all significantly associated with positive ROSC and neurologic outcomes. A home arrest was significantly associated with worse neurologic outcome. Conclusions. Cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates that a community CPR outreach program is a cost-effective means for saving lives when compared to other healthcare-related interventions. Bystander CPR showed a clear trend toward improving the neurologic outcome of survivors. The findings of this study indicate a need for additional research into the economic effects of bystander CPR.     

Dispatcher instruction of chest compression-only CPR increases actual provision of bystander CPR

BackgroundA preceding randomized controlled trial demonstrated that chest compression-only cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) instruction by dispatcher was more effective to increase bystander CPR than conventional CPR instruction. However, the actual condition of implementation of each type of dispatcher instruction (chest compression-only CPR [CCCPR] or conventional CPR with rescue breathing) and provision of bystander CPR in real prehospital settings has not been sufficiently investigated.MethodsThis registry prospectively enrolled patients aged =>18 years suffering an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) of non-traumatic causes before emergency-medical-service (EMS) arrival, who were considered as target subjects of dispatcher instruction, resuscitated by EMS personnel, and transported to medical institutions in Osaka, Japan from January 2005 through December 2012. The primary outcome measure was provision of CPR by a bystander. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to assess factors that were potentially associated with provision of bystander CPR.ResultsAmong 37,283 target subjects of dispatcher instruction, 5743 received CCCPR instruction and 13,926 received conventional CPR instruction. The proportion of CCCPR instruction increased from 5.7% in 2005 to 25.6% in 2012 (p for trend <0.001). The CCCPR instruction group received bystander CPR more frequently than conventional CPR instruction group (70.0% versus 62.1%, p < 0.001). In the multivariable analysis, CCCPR dispatcher instruction was significantly associated with provision of bystander CPR compared with conventional CPR instruction (adjusted odds ratio 1.44, 95% CI 1.34–1.55).ConclusionsCCCPR dispatcher instruction among adult OHCA patients significantly increased the actual provision of bystander CPR.     

CPR Training and CPR Performance: Do CPR‐trained Bystanders Perform CPR?

Objectives: To determine factors associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provision by CPR‐trained bystanders and to determine factors associated with CPR performance by trained bystanders. Methods: The authors performed a prospective, observational study (January 1997 to May 2003) of individuals who called 911 (bystanders) at the time of an out‐of‐hospital cardiac arrest. A structured telephone interview of adult cardiac‐arrest bystanders was performed beginning two weeks after the incident. Elements gathered during interviews included bystander and patient demographics, identifying whether the bystander was CPR trained, when and by whom the CPR was performed, and describing the circumstances of the event. If CPR was not performed, we asked the bystanders why CPR was not performed. Logistic regression was used to calculate odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for factors associated with CPR performance. Results: Of 868 cardiac arrests, 684 (78.1%) bystander interviews were completed. Of all bystanders interviewed, 69.6% were family members of the victims, 36.8% of the bystanders had more than a high‐school education, and 54.1% had been taught CPR at some time. In 21.2% of patients, the bystander immediately started CPR, and in 33.6% of cases, someone started CPR before the arrival of emergency medical services (EMS). Important overall predictors of CPR performance were the following: witnessed arrest (OR = 2.3; 95% CI = 1.4 to 3.8); bystander was CPR trained (OR = 6.6; 95% CI = 3.5 to 12.5); bystander had more than a high‐school education (OR = 2.0; 95% CI = 1.2 to 3.1), or arrest occurred in a public location (OR = 3.1; 95% CI = 1.7 to 5.8). These variables were significant predictors of CPR performance among CPR‐trained bystanders, as was CPR training within five years (OR = 4.5; 95% CI = 2.8 to 7.3). Common reasons that the CPR‐trained bystanders cited for not performing CPR were the following: 37.5% stated that they panicked, 9.1% perceived that they would not be able to do CPR correctly, and 1.1% thought that they would hurt the patient. Surprisingly, only 1.1% objected to performing mouth‐to‐mouth resuscitation. Conclusions: A minority of CPR‐trained bystanders performed CPR. CPR provision was more common in CPR‐trained bystanders with more than a high‐school education and when CPR training had been within five years. Previously espoused reasons for not doing CPR (mouth‐to‐mouth, infectious‐disease risk) were not the reasons that bystanders cited for not doing CPR. Further work is needed to maximize CPR provision after CPR training.     

Early cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of Automated External Defibrillators by laypersons in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using an SMS alert service

Aim

To evaluate an SMS service (SMS = short message service = text message) with which laypersons are alerted to go to patients with suspected out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and perform early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and use an Automated External Defibrillator (AED). This study is the first to report on a program in which an emergency medical service (EMS) is able to alert citizens by sending them SMS messages on their mobile phone.

Methods

Web-based questionnaires were completed by laypersons who were sent an alert by the AED-Alert system between February 1, 2010 and April 30, 2010. Questions concerned the process of training, receiving alerts, actions taken and follow-up care.

Results

AED-Alert was activated for 52 patients suspected of cardiac arrest, sending 3227 alerts to 2287 laypersons. Out of 2168 eligible laypersons 1679 (77%) completed 2098 questionnaires, one for each alert. Action was taken in only 579 alerts. Laypersons were not in the patient's vicinity (41%), noticed alerts too late (35%), or other reasons (24%). In 298 alerts laypersons faced problems with retrieving AEDs (51%), finding addresses (29%), traffic (5%), or other (15%). Aid was provided in 75 alerts, involving 47 patients. Laypersons started early CPR and defibrillation (49%), assisted EMS personnel (52%), or took care of family (39%). Laypersons arrived before EMS personnel in 21 patients, started CPR and defibrillation in 18, and assisted EMS personnel in 9 patients.

Conclusion

Improvements of the SMS alert service by laypersons, the EMS, and through technical adjustments, could increase the number of laypersons who provide early aid.     

Association of response time interval with neurological outcomes after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest according to bystander CPR

BackgroundThis study intended to find out how association between response time interval (RTI) and good neurological outcome is affected by bystander CPR. We hypothesized that bystander CPR will ensure positive effect in relationship between RTI and clinical outcome.MethodsA retrospective, observational study was made with Pan-Asian Resuscitation Outcome Study data from January 2009 to December 2016. Six cities from four Asian countries were selected. EMS-treated, non-traumatic witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) cases were included. General demographic data, prehospital cardiac arrest details and clinical outcome were collected and analyzed according to whether bystander CPR was performed. Good neurological outcome and survival discharge were primary and secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 13,245 OHCA cases were analyzed. Median EMS response time intervals were 6 min, regardless of bystander CPR. Dividing into RTI time range by 3 min, good neurological outcome and survival discharge were only significant in 3 to 6 minutes group (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.42, 1.17–1.73 95% confidence interval [CI] and AOR 1.31, 1.15–1.51 95% CI) in non-bystander CPR group but in bystander CPR group significant RTI time range was 3 to 9 min (AOR 2.02, 1.82, 1.62–2.52, 1.48–2.25 95% CI for primary, AOR 1.66, 1.43, 1.41–1.96, 1.22–1.67 95% CI for secondary).ConclusionsAs response time interval increased, slower deterioration of good neurological outcome and survival discharge was shown in cardiac arrest patients with bystander CPR performed. If bystander CPR is provided, RTI time range showing significant neurological outcome and survival improvement seems to be relatively lengthened.