Electrophysiological characteristics of junctional rhythm during ablation of the slow pathway in different types of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Junctional rhythm (JR) is commonly observed during radiofrequency (RF) ablation of the slow pathway for atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia. However, the atrial activation pattern and conduction time from the His-bundle region to the atria recorded during JR in different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia have not been fully defined. METHODS: Forty-five patients who underwent RF ablation of the slow pathway for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia were included; 27 patients with slow-fast, 11 patients with slow-intermediate, and 7 patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia. The atrial activation pattern and HA interval (from the His-bundle potential to the atrial recording of the high right atrial catheter) during AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (HA(SVT)) and JR (HA(JR)) were analyzed. RESULTS: In all patients with slow-fast AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence recorded during JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway, and transient retrograde conduction block during JR was found in 1 (4%) patient. The HA(JR) was significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (57 +/- 24 vs 68 +/- 21 ms, P < 0.01). In patients with slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the atrial activation sequence of the JR was similar to that of the retrograde fast pathway in 5 (45%), and to that of the retrograde intermediate pathway in 6 (55%) patients. Transient retrograde conduction block during JR was noted in 1 (9%) patient. The HA(JR) was also significantly shorter than the HA(SVT) (145 +/- 27 vs 168 +/- 29 ms, P = 0.014). In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, retrograde conduction with block during JR was noted in 7 (100%) patients. The incidence of retrograde conduction block during JR was higher in fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia than slow-fast (7/7 vs 1/11, P < 0.01) and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (7/7 vs 1/27, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with slow-fast and slow-intermediate AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, the JR during ablation of the slow pathway conducted to the atria through the fast or intermediate pathway. In patients with fast-slow AV nodal reentrant tachycardia, there was no retrograde conduction during JR. These findings suggested there were different characteristics of the JR during slow-pathway ablation of different types of AV nodal reentrant tachycardia.     

Double Atrial and Double Ventricular Responses During Slow-Fast Fast-Slow Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

A case was described with fast-slow form of atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia as related with simultaneous fast and slow pathway conduction both antegrade and retrograde. Fast-slow form of tachycardia was induced by premature right atrial stimulation or incremental right ventricular pacing when the last paced beat conducted to the atria via both fast and slow pathways of the atrioventricular node causing double atrial response. Fast-slow form of tachycardia was spontaneously shifted to slow-fast form when the atrial echo, possibly through the retrograde intermediate pathway, was conducted antegradely over the fast and slow pathways simultaneously, producing double ventricular response.     

房室结双径路伴房室结折返性心动过速的室房传导探讨

根据电生理检查结果,将接受射频消融术患者62例分为房室旁道伴房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)32例,房室结双径路(DAVNP)伴房室结折返性心动过速(AVNRT)30例。以房室旁道伴AVRT室房(VA)传导特征为对照,探讨DAVNP伴AVNRT VA传导特征。结果表明DAVNP伴AVNRT其VA传导发生率为100％;室房逆传多经房室结快径;快径逆传具有房室旁道逆传特征。     

The Effect of Variable Retrograde Penetration on Dual AV Nodal Pathways: Observations Before and After Slow Pathway Ablation LDD

Retrograde VA conduction is usually over the fast pathway and rarely over the slow pathway in patients with dual AV nodal pathways. It is unknown whether this apparent unidirectional conduction of the slow pathway is due to the lack of its retrograde conducting ability or the result of concealment. The effect of variable retrograde AV nodal penetration on antegrade AV nodal conduction was determined in patients with typical AV nodal reentrant tachycardia before and after the slow pathway ablation. Variable retrograde penetration was produced by delivering a ventricular extrastimulus simultaneously with (VE-0), 50 ms after (VE-50), or 100 ms after (VE-100) the last basic atrial stimulus, while atrial extrastimuli were used to determine changes of anterograde AV nodal effective refractory period (ERP) and A-H interval. The AV nodal functions measured without the ventricular extrastimuli served as the baseline. Although the mean slow pathway ERP was not significantly different among the different stimulation protocols, a significant shortening of the slow pathway conduction time (A-H from 348 ± 60 to 324 ±119 ms, P < 0.05) was observed with upper level retrograde penetration of the AV node (VE-0). This facilitating effect became a prolonging effect when the retrograde penetration level moved to the lower level (VE-100, A-H from 324 ± 119 to 366 ± 122 ms, P < 0.05). The fast pathway ERP shortened with an upper level penetration (VE–0) but tended to prolong with a lower level retrograde penetration (VE-100) both before and after the slow pathway ablation (preablation, from 348 ± 143 of the baseline to 302 ± 114 to 360 ± 143 ms, P < 0.05; postablation, from 314 ± 101 of the baseline to 274 ± 118 to 361 ± 143 ms, P < 0.05). The mean A₂?H₂ interval of the slow pathway was significantly shorter than the baseline (350 ± 44 ms) with VE-0 (249 ± 48 ms, P < 0.05) and VE-5O stimulation (285 ± 82 ms, P < 0.05) but not with VE-100 stimulation (330 ± 83 ms, P = NS). Refore slow pathway ablation, the A₂?H₂ interval of the fast pathway at equal coupling intervals was shorter than the baseline (165 ± 53 ms) with VE-0 (144 ± 47 ms, P < 0.01) and VE-50 stimulation (152 ± 43 ms, P < 0.05) but tended to be longer with VE-l00 stimulation (175 ± 47 ms, P = NS). After slow pathway ablation, the mean A₂?H₂ interval at the same coupling interval was shorter than the baseline (173 ± 39 ms) with VE-0 (139 ± 35 ms, P < 0.05), VE-50 (153 ± 32 ms, P = 0.05) but tended to be longer with VE-100 stimulation (178 ± 49 ms, P = NS). We conclude that: (1) concealed retrograde conduction can be demonstrated in both the slow and the fast A V nodal pathways; and (2) concealed retrograde conduction may either shorten or prolong anterograde refractoriness and conduction time, depending on the level of retrograde penetration.     

Dual Atrio-ventricular Nodal Pathways and Atrial Fibrillation

The determinants of the ventricular rate during atrial fibrillation were studied in a group of eleven patients demonstrating dual A-V nodal pathways during atrial stimulation. The shortest R-R interval and the mean ventricular cycle length during at least 1 min of pacing-induced atrial fibrillation were compared: a) to the effective and functional refractory period of the fast pathway; b) to the effective refractory period of the slow pathway determined during atrial stimulation, at two or more different basic cycle lengths of pacing; and c) to the shortest cycle length during atrial stimulation followed by 1:1 A-V conduction. A group of 8 patients not demonstrating dual A-V nodal pathway-curves during atrial stimulation was used as a control. In both groups the shortest R-R interval during atrial fibrillation was best predicted by the shortest cycle length followed by 1:1 A-V conduction during atrial stimulation. The mean ventricular cycle length during atrial fibrillation was not accurately predicted by any of the variables studied. The similar results in patients with and without dual A-V nodal pathways suggest that concealed conduction from one to another A-V nodal pathway does not play a role in determining the ventricular response during atrial fibrillation in patients with dual A-V nodal pathways.     

Modulation of conduction and refractoriness in atrioventricular junctional reentrant circuit. Effect on reentry initiated by atrial extrastimulus.

The importance of activation sequence of an atrioventricular junctional reentrant (AVJRe) circuit, before delivery of an extrastimulus, has received little attention in studies concerned with clinical tachycardias. In this study a change in activation sequence was accomplished using bidirectional activation (V-A sequential pacing) during the basic drive (V1A1-V1A1). It was noted that, compared with an atrial extrastimulus (A2) after an atrial drive (A1-A1), earlier activation (by V1 impulse of the V1A1-V1A1 drive) consistently improved conduction, or decreased refractoriness, or both, in the anterograde as well as the retrograde pathway of the AVJRe circuit. In all patients, five with AV nodal reentry and six with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, reentrant tachycardia could be prevented during V-A sequential pacing. In four of eleven patients, reentry was prevented despite achieving the so-called critical atrioventricular nodal delays that had previously caused reentry during control study. This finding suggested that conduction delay necessary for reentry was related to the site of block, which in turn was affected by V-A sequential pacing. We concluded that changing the activation sequence during basic drive modulates conduction and refractoriness in AVJRe circuits, and allows the study of a wide range of electrophysical factors that prevent or permit reentry.     

The electrophysiological characteristics in patients with ventricular stimulation inducible fast-slow form atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) can usually be induced by atrial stimulation. However, it seldom may be induced with only ventricular stimulation, especially the fast-slow form of AVNRT. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the specific electrophysiological characteristics in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. METHODS: The total population consisted of 1,497 patients associated with AVNRT, and 106 (8.4%) of them had the fast-slow form of AVNRT and 1,373 (91.7%) the slow-fast form of AVNRT. In patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT, the AVNRT could be induced with only ventricular stimulation in 16 patients, Group 1; with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation in 90 patients, Group 2; and with only atrial stimulation in 13 patients, Group 3. We also divided these patients with slow-fast form AVNRT (n = 1,373) into two groups: those that could be induced only by ventricular stimulation (Group 4; n = 45, 3%) and those that could be induced by atrial stimulation only or by both atrial and ventricular stimulation (n = 1.328, 97%). RESULTS: Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a lower incidence of an antegrade dual AVN physiology (0% vs 71.1% and 92%, P < 0.001), a lower incidence of multiple form AVNRT (31% vs 69% and 85%, P = 0.009), and a more significant retrograde functional refractory period (FRP) difference (99 +/- 102 vs 30 +/- 57 ms, P < 0.001) than those that could be induced with only atrial stimulation or both atrial and ventricular stimulation. The occurrence of tachycardia stimulated with only ventricular stimulation was more frequently demonstrated in patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT than in those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT (15% vs 3%, P < 0.001). Patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a higher incidence of retrograde dual AVN physiology (75% vs 4%, P < 0.001), a longer pacing cycle length of retrograde 1:1 fast and slow pathway conduction (475 +/- 63 ms vs 366 +/- 64 ms, P < 0.001; 449 +/- 138 ms vs 370 +/- 85 ms, P = 0.009), a longer retrograde effective refractory period of the fast pathway (360 +/- 124 ms vs 285 +/- 62 ms, P = 0.003), and a longer retrograde FRP of the fast and slow pathway (428 +/- 85 ms vs 362 +/- 47 ms, P < 0.001 and 522 +/- 106 vs 456 +/- 97 ms, P = 0.026) than those with the slow-fast form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that patients with the fast-slow form of AVNRT that could be induced with only ventricular stimulation had a different incidence of the antegrade and retrograde dual AVN physiology and the specific electrophysiological characteristics. The mechanism of the AVNRT stimulated only with ventricular stimulation was supposed to be different in patients with the slow-fast and fast-slow forms of AVNRT.     

The different ablation effects on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia in children with and without dual nodal pathways

BACKGROUND: Previous studies in adults have shown a significant shortening of the fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) after successful slow pathway ablation. However, information on atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) in children is limited. The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the different effects of radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation in pediatric AVNRT patients between those with and without dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. METHODS: From January 1992 to August 2004, a total 67 pediatric patients with AVNRT underwent an electrophysiologic study and RF catheter ablation at our institution. We compared the electrophysiologic characteristics between those obtained before and after ablation in the children with AVNRT with and without dual AV nodal pathways. RESULTS: Dual AV nodal pathways were found in 37 (55%) of 67 children, including 36 (54%) with antegrade and 10 (15%) with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways. The antegrade and retrograde fast pathway ERPs in children with dual AV nodal pathways were both longer than the antegrade and retrograde ERPs in children without dual AV nodal pathways (300 +/- 68 vs 264 +/- 58 ms, P = 0.004; 415 +/- 70 vs 250 +/- 45 ms, P < 0.001) before ablation. In children with antegrade dual AV nodal pathways, the antegrade fast pathway ERP decreased from 300 +/- 68 ms to 258 +/- 62 ms (P = 0.008). The retrograde fast pathway ERP also decreased after successful ablation in the children with retrograde dual AV nodal pathways (415 +/- 70 vs. 358 +/- 72 ms, P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: The dual AV nodal physiology could not be commonly demonstrated in pediatric patients with inducible AVNRT. After a successful slow pathway ablation, the fast pathway ERP shortened significantly in the children with dual AV nodal pathways.     

Incessant Reciprocating Atrioventricular Tachycardia

The case of a patient suffering from incessant supraventricular tachycardia is presented. The electrophysiological study showed the presence of an accessory atrioventricular (A-V) bundle with nodal-like properties and long conduction times. This structure was used as the retrograde arm of the tachycardia circuit. Tachycardia was intermittent at rest, but had a sustained character during slight exercise. Administration of atropine and isoproterenol failed to sustain the arrhythmia and spontaneous initiation during sinus rhythm was no longer observed. During handgrip exercise a sustained tachycardia developed immediately. During ventricular stimulation a dual atrial response to a single paced ventricular premature beat was repeatedly observed, proving the availability of two separate A-V pathways for retrograde conduction. The case illustrates the labile nature of this type of accessory pathway, and suggests that autonomic changes can play an important role in the initiation, maintenance, termination, or even spontaneous cure of tachycardia in patients with this anomaly.     

Incessant Atrio‐Ventricular Node Reentrant Tachycardia Induced by Unapparent Dual Atrio‐Ventricular Node Conduction

We present the case of a patient with incessant slow‐fast atrio‐ventricular (AV) node reentrant tachycardia induced by dual AV node conduction with aborted conduction to the ventricles. The unapparent conduction over the slow pathway was suspected here because of spontaneous nodal echoes without QRS complexes occurring during sinus rhythm, manifested as isolated premature atrial beats and which repetitively induced the tachycardia.     

Double Ventricular Responses to a Single Atrial Depolarization in a Patient with Dual AV Nodal Pathways

Electrophysiological study was performed in a patient with atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). Double ventricular responses through dual AV nodal pathways were observed by atrial extrastimulus technique followed by initiation of AVNRT. The difference in conduction time between the slow and fast AV nodal pathways was longer than 320 msec. A ventricular extrastimulus delivered during sinus rhythm, which was not followed by ventriculoatrial conduction, also induced AVNRT. These findings indicated the presence of an antegrade critical delay and retrograde block in the slow AV nodal pathway, criteria necessary for the occurrence of a double ventricular response.     

Age Related Changes in Dual AV Nodal Physiology

Dual atrioventricular nodal (DAVN) physiology has been reported in up to 63% of pediatric patients with anatomically normal hearts, yet atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) accounts for only 13%–16% of supraventicular tachycardia (SVT) in childhood. The incidence of AVNRT increases with age and becomes the most common form of SVT by adolescence. We investigated the age related electrophysiological responses to programmed atrial and ventricular stimulation in 14 pediatric patients who underwent intracardiac electro-physiological study prior to radiofrequency catheter ablation for AVNRT and who exhibited DAVN physiology. Single atrial and ventricular extrastimuli were placed following drive trains with cycle lengths of 400–700 ms and 350–500 ms, respectively. Six children (mean age 8.2 years, range 5.2–11.5 years) were compared to eight adolescents (mean age 16.6 years, range 13.3–20.7 years). Adolescents were found to have a significantly longer fast pathway effective refractory period (ERP) (median 375 vs 270 ms, P = 0.03), slow pathway ERP (median 270 vs 218 ms, P = 0.04), atrio-Hisian (AH) during AVNRT (median 300 vs 225 ms, P = 0.007), and AVNRT cycle length (median 350 vs 290ms, P = 0.03). There was a strong trend for the AH measured at the fast pathway ERP to be longer in adolescents than in children (median 258 vs 198 ms, P = 0.055). The AH at the fast pathway ERP was more strongly correlated with baseline cycle length than with age (r = 0.7, P = 0.01 vs r = 0.5, P = 0.7). There was no significant difference in the retrograde VA conduction between adolescents and children. These results demonstrate an age related difference in AV nodal response to programmed atrial stimuli in pediatric patients with DAVN physiology and AVNRT. These differences are consistent with mechanisms that may explain the increased incidence of AVNRT in adolescents compared to children.     

房室折返性心动过速合并房室结双径路的射频消融治疗

目的:探讨房室折返性心动过速(AVRT)合并房室结双径路(AVNDP)的电生理特征和射频消融术式的选择。方法:对640例阵发性室上性心动过速(PSVT)进行电生理检查,观察PSVT发作时传导的顺序,然后进行消融治疗。结果:640例PSVT中检出AVRT AVNDP 68例,检出率为10.6%;有8例诱发房室结折返性心动过速,对此类患者进行慢径消融治疗。随访所有经治患者均无复发。结论:AVRT合并AVNDP者阻断房室旁道是消融成功的关键;房室旁道作为"旁观者"时也应作房室旁道消融;如仅有(AH)跳跃但无心动过速者无需接受房室结改良。     

Double Response of the Ventricle During Transient Entrainment in a Common Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

We report a patient with slow-fast atrioventricuiar (AV)nodal reentrant tachycardia, in which double ventricuJar response was demonstrated during rapid pacing at cycle length of 300 msec or less from the high right atrium. The determinants of double ventricular response during transient entrainment in the present case were: (1)a crucial conduction delay in the slow pathway; (2)the collision between the activation via the antegrade fast pathway (antidromically)of the last paced beat and the activation via the antegrade slow pathway (orthodromically)of the previous paced beat, instead of the unidirectional block in the slow pathway; and (3)the enhanced AV nodal conduction over the antegrade fast pathway.     

Specificity of Retrograde Conduction in Screening for Atrioventricular Nodal Reentrant Tachycardia

Baseline AV conduction properties (antegrade and retrograde) are often used to assess the presence of dual AV nodal physiology or concealed AV accessory pathways. Although retrograde conduction (RET) is assumed to be a prerequisite for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT), its prevalence during baseline measurements has not been evaluated. We reviewed all cases of AVNRT referred for radiofrequency ablation to determine the prevalence of RET at baseline evaluation and after isoproterenol infusion. Results: Seventy-three patients with AVNRT underwent full electrophysiological evaluation. Sixty-six patients had manifest RET and inducible AVNRT during baseline atrial and ventricular stimulation. Seven patients initially demonstrated complete RET block despite antegrade evidence of dual AV nodal physiology. In 3 of these 7 patients AVNRT was inducible at baseline despite the absence of RET. In the other four patients isoproterenol infusion was required for induction of AVNRT, however only 3 of these 4 patients developed RET. One of these remaining patients had persistent VA block after isoproterenol. Conclusions: The induction of AVNRT in the absence of RET suggests that this is not an obligatory feature of this arrhythmia. Therefore, baseline AV conduction properties are unreliable in assessing the presence of AVNRT and isoproterenol infusions should be used routinely to expose RET and reentrant tachycardia.     

Observations on Induction and Termination of Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia by External Pacing

Paroxysmal Supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT) can be reproducibly induced and terminated by critically timed atrial or ventricular depolarizations. In this study, noninvasive trans-cutaneous (external) cardiac pacing (NTCPJ was compared to endocardial ventricular pacing for the termination and induction of PSVT. In 24 patients, either atrioventricular (AV) nodal reentrant tachycardia or AV reciprocating tachycardia was reproducibly terminated with either critically timed ventricular depolarizations or overdrive ventricular pacing from an endocardial right ventricular site. There were 32 trials of NTCP attempts to interrupt PSVT in the 24 patients. External pacing was successful at terminating PSVT in 23 patients and in 30 of 32 (94%) trials. In 20 patients, there were 26 trials of external pacing attempts to induce PSVT. External pacing initiated PSVT in 21 of 26 trials (81%). The pacing sequences used to induce and terminate PSVT with external pacing were copied from the endocardial sequences. The external pacing threshold averaged 77 ± 22 mA but the current needed to terminate PSVT was about 1.5 greater than threshold at 117 ± 27 mA. Serial external pacing studies were performed in seven patients. The thresholds for external pacing were similar from trial to trial as were the mode of termination and induction between the endocardial and external methods. External pacing can terminate most AV reciprocating tachycardias and many AV nodal reentrant tachycardias. It appears promising as a means of inducing PSVT. However, the high stimulation amplitudes needed will prohibit wide acceptance of external pacing for induction and termination of PSVT.     

Intravenous Adenosine Triphosphate Disodium: Its Efficacy and Electrophysiologic Effects on Patients with Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardias

We studied the electrophysiologic effects of intravenous adenosine triphosphate disodium (ATP-2Na) on 17 patients with paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias (PSVTs). One patient had sinus node (SN) reentry, two had intraatrial (IA) reentry, 7 patients had AV nodal reentry and seven had atrioventricular reentrant tachycardias (AVRTs) with accessory pathways (APs). ATP-2Na was injected during ventricular pacing in patients with AV nodal reentry and AVRTs with APs. A bolus injection of ATP-2Na terminated all the PSVTs within 50 s except for one case of IA reentry (case 2). The sites of block at termination were the atrium in SN reentry and IA reentry, between A and H (AH) or between H and A (HA) in AV nodal reentry, and AH block in all the PSVTs with APs. The sites of action on the patients with AV nodal reentry were both the antegrade and retrograde pathways, while the modes of block were Mobitz type I and type II, respectively. ATP-2Na during ventricular pacing in patients with AV nodal reentry produced Mobitz type II ventriculoatrial block (VAB) in four of seven cases. ATP-2Na during ventricular pacing in patients with AVRTs with APs produced changes of atrial activation sequences in two patients, induction of PSVT in two patients, and Mobitz type II VA block in three patients. The former two phenomena suggested a retrograde AV nodal block and raised the possibility of a simple test for retrograde atrial fusion during ventricular pacing in patients with WPW syndrome. Chest discomfort of short duration was most commonly noted after ATP-2Na administration.     

起源于冠状静脉窦口的右侧旁路合并房室结双径路的诊断与鉴别

目的探讨复杂多径路心动过速时的应用拖带和程序S2刺激进行诊断和鉴别分析。 方法回顾性分析1例间歇性预激波患者频发室上性心动过速,经心脏电生理检查行右心室拖带刺激和心室程序S2刺激,测量最后一跳刺激信号到自身心房波间期减去心动过速下心室到心房的间期(SA-VA)和起搏后间期(PPI)－心动过速周长(TCC),并行常规射频导管消融术治疗。 结果术中心室分级刺激S1S1：350 ms诱发右侧旁路参与的房室折返性心动过速,TCL为372 ms, PPI为395 ms,继续行心房S1S2：500/310 ms刺激,"跳跃"诱发同前一样的室房波不融合心动过速。再次行心房S1S1：280 ms刺激,可反复诱发慢快型房室结折返性心动过速。在旁路参与的心动过速下给予心室程序S2刺激,测量PPI为385.1 ms, TCL为360.1 ms,PPI－TCL≤20 ms,证实为右侧旁路参与的房室折返性心动过速,同时存在慢快型房室结折返性行心动过速,给予常规射频导管消融成功径路和旁路。术后随访12个月未有心动过速发作。 结论通过右心室心室拖带刺激,以及测量SA-VA间期和PPI-TCL间期可以用来鉴别典型房室结折返性心动过速与间隔房室旁路。     

Effects of a blocked atrial beat on the atrioventricular nodal recovery property in patients with dual nodal pathways

Dual AVN physiology can be demonstrated by a variety of maneuvers. To determine whether AVN recovery times following a blocked extrastimulus facilitate or obscure detection of dual AVN physiology, 11 patients (9-17 years) were studied with dual AVN pathways by using single and double atrial extrastimuli. With a single atrial extrastimuli, the premature atrial stimulus (A2) was coupled to basic atrial beats (A1). The fast and slow AVN recovery curves were constructed with plots of the nodal conduction time against the recovery time (A1A2,A2H2). With double atrial extrastimuli, a fixed blocked A2 beat (A2B) was followed by a scanning atrial beat (A3). The nodal recovery property post-A2B was studied by plots of A2BA3,A3H3. In all patients the recovery curve of the fast pathway post-A2B had a leftward shift when compared to that of the pre-A2B curve (i.e., the AH was shortened at the same recovery time). The window of slow pathway conduction post-A2B disappeared totally in five patients and decreased significantly in six patients (post-A2B: 26 +/- 42 ms; pre-A2B: 80 +/- 65 ms, P < 0.05). In the six patients that still had slow pathway conduction post-A2B, the slow pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was significantly less than that of pre-A2B (215 +/- 38 vs 268 +/- 16 ms, P < 0.05). The fast pathway effective refractory period post-A2B was also diminished significantly (235 +/- 62 vs 357 +/- 76 ms, P < 0.0001). The authors conclude that blocked atrial beats decrease the visibility of the slow pathway conduction.     

One-to-Two Atrioventricular Conduction Causing Nonreentrant Tachycardia: Successful Treatment with Radiofrequency Ablation

The anatomical substrate for AV nodal reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT) is well known and is due to anterograde conduction through a siow conducting pathway and retrograde conduction using a fast conducting path way. In this report, we describe a patient with AVNRT who also presented with frequent episodes of paroxysmal nonreentrant tachycardia due to the occurrence of two conducted ventricular beats for each sinus depolarization. Palpitations and arrhythmias were abolished after radiofrequency ablation of the slow pathway.