Long-term immunogenicity and safety of the hepatitis B vaccine HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B) compared with HepB-Eng (Engerix-B) in adults with chronic kidney disease

BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains a significant global burden, especially for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) receiving hemodialysis. Three doses of HepB–CpG (HEPLISAV-B® vaccine) induced a superior immune response compared with 4 double doses of HepB–Eng (Engerix-B®) in a phase 3 trial (HBV-17) in adults with CKD. Here we report the long-term immunogenicity and safety of HepB-CpG and HepB–Eng in eligible participants of HBV-17 who enrolled in this optional 34-month follow-up trial (HBV-19).MethodsHBV-19 is a multicenter, open-label, phase 3b trial of adults with CKD who previously received a complete series of HepB-CpG or HepB-Eng in the HBV-17 trial. Participants were assigned to seroprotection categories at enrollment on the basis of their antibody response to hepatitis B surface antigen (anti-HBs) in HBV-17. The objective was to evaluate the durability of seroprotection (defined as an anti-HBs concentration ≥ 10 mIU/mL) induced by HepB-CpG and HepB-Eng. Participants whose anti-HBs concentration was below 10 mIU/mL received additional HepB-CpG or HepB-Eng doses.Results147 participants were enrolled; 66.7 % were men, median age was 65.0 years, and 83.7 % were white. The durability of seroprotection in participants with CKD was similar in those who received HepB-CpG and those who received HepB-Eng. Antibody concentrations ≥ 100 mIU/mL persisted for longer in HepB-CpG than HepB-Eng recipients, among those with anti-HBs ≥ 100 mIU/mL post vaccination. The geometric mean anti-HBs concentration in the HepB-CpG group was significantly higher than in the HepB-Eng group over time (P ≤ 0.0001). The safety profiles were similar between the vaccine groups.ConclusionsDue to the higher antibody levels induced by HepB-CpG in participants with CKD, seroprotection against HBV may be expected to persist longer than that induced by HepB-Eng. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01282762.     

Safety and immunogenicity of HepB-CpG in women with documented pregnancies post-vaccination: A retrospective chart review

BackgroundThere are currently no published data on the use of HepB-CpG (HEPLISAV-B®) during pregnancy or in women with documented pregnancies in the post-vaccination period. We aimed to evaluate data from the clinical development program of HepB-CpG in women who became pregnant during study participation and follow up.MethodsWe identified all study participants in the HepB-CpG pivotal pre-licensure clinical trials that had documented pregnancies during study follow up. We measured immunogenicity among study participants in the HepB-CpG (Heplisav-B®) arm compared to the HepB-alum (Engerix-B®) arm of the studies by comparing seroprotection rates (SPRs; anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL) and geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) of anti-HBs, obtained with FDA approved anti-HBsAg antibody assays at prespecified time points up to 28 weeks of follow up. Pregnancy outcomes were ascertained by chart review of extracted medical records of study participants.ResultsWe identified 40 documented pregnancies in the HepB-CpG arm and 19 documented pregnancies in the HepB-alum arm. Among subjects with documentation of seroprotection rates, 97.2% (95% CI 85.5–99.9) were seroprotected in the HepB-CpG arm and 66.7% (95% CI 41.0–86.7) were seroprotected in the HepB-alum arm. In the HepB-CpG arm, thirty-six study participants from the pivotal trials had reported pregnancy outcomes, the majority, 21/36 (58%) had a healthy term delivery, with 3/36 (8%) with spontaneous abortions, 1/36 (3%) congenital anomaly, and 2/36 (6%) had preterm birth. In the HepB-alum arm, 10/17 (59%) had healthy term deliveries, with 2/17 (12%) had spontaneous abortions and 1/17 (6%) had congenital anomaly.ConclusionsThese limited data suggest that HepB-CpG is immunogenic in women who become pregnant after vaccination, and pregnancy outcomes appear to be similar to women who received HepB-alum prior to pregnancy. These results need to be further verified with larger prospective studies with HBV vaccine administration during pregnancy.     

Response to hepatitis B vaccination is co-determined by HLA-DPA1 and -DPB1

Background and aimsNo report explored the combined effects of HLA-DPA1 and -DPB1 with long-term response to hepatitis B (HB) vaccination (HBVac). The specific aims of the study were to assess the combined effects and relative contributions of DPA1 and DPB1 genes.MethodsThe cases were 152 adolescents who had undetectable (<1.0 mIU/mL) post-booster anti-HBs titers and the controls were adolescents who had residual anti-HBs ≥ 10 mIU/mL at aged 16 years (n = 207) or had detectable (≥1.0 mIU/mL) anti-HBs titers after booster HBVac (n = 481). HLA-DPA1 and -DPB1 genotypes were determined by sequence-based typing.ResultsHLA-DPA1*01:03:01 was correlated with lower ORs of undetectable anti-HBs titers, while -DPA1*02:02:02 and -DPB1*05:01:01 were correlated with higher ORs. The ORs for HLA-DPA1*01:03:01-DPB1*05:01:01 and DPA1*02:02:02-DPB1*protective combinatory types were significantly less than 1.0. As compared with subjects who had no protective allele, the adjusted ORs (95% CI) were 0.545 (0.328–0.906), 0.350 (0.174–0.702), and 0.122 (0.058–0.257), for subjects who had protective alleles on DPA1only, DPB1 only, and both genes, respectively. Analyses of amino acid polymorphisms showed that subjects who carried Arg81-Pro158-Val191-Pro259α + Met234β and Gln62-Arg82α + Met234β combinations had 4.3-to-4.6 folds of risks.ConclusionBoth DPA1 and DPB1 genes contribute to the persistence of immunological response to primary infantile HBVac. The effects of HLA-DP risk alleles were dominated by the protective alleles and there were significant gene-gene interactions. Our findings provide evidences for the design of more potent HB vaccine.     

Assessment of immunogenicity and safety across two manufacturing lots of a 3-antigen hepatitis B vaccine,Sci-B-Vac®, compared with Engerix-B® in healthy Asian adults: A phase 3 randomized clinical trial

BackgroundSci-B-Vac®, a 3-antigen hepatitis B vaccine (3A-HBV), contains all three recombinant hepatitis B virus (HBV) envelope proteins (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2). In 2005, 3A-HBV manufacturing transferred facilities (A to B), where it continues to be manufactured.MethodsThis phase 3, single-blind, randomized study, conducted at one site in Vietnam, compared efficacy and safety among two 3A-HBV lots, lot A and lot B, and a single-antigen hepatitis B vaccine (1A-HBV), Engerix-B®. Primary objective was to demonstrate equivalence at day 210 of two 3A-HBV lots in seroprotection rate (SPR; defined as percentage of participants achieving hepatitis B surface antigen antibody [anti-HBs] titers ≥ 10 mIU/mL). Secondary objectives were assessing immunogenicity at days 180, 210, and 360, and safety of 3A-HBV.Results3A-HBV SPR equivalence was demonstrated at day 210 (lot A: 97.3% [95% CI: 92.4%, 99.4%] vs. lot B: 100.0% [97.0%, 100.0%]). Compared to 1A-HBV, lot B SPR was higher at day 180 (98.3% vs. 81.2%; difference: 17.1% [9.7%, 24.6%]) and non-inferior at day 210 (100% vs. 98.3%; difference: 1.7% [-0.6%, 4.1%]). 3A-HBV lot B showed the same SPR after 2 doses (98.3%) as 1A-HBV after 3 doses (98.3%). Adverse events (AEs) were comparable with both 3A-HBV lots (lot A: 68.7% vs. lot B: 54.2%), but higher than 1A-HBV (35.3%). Vaccination-related AEs included transient injection site pain (38.9%), myalgia (9.3%), and fatigue (7.5%). Eight serious AEs were reported (lot A: 3/134 [2.2%]; lot B: 1/134 [0.8%]; 1A-HBV: 4/133 [2.3%]). One serious AE, syncope, was noted as probably related to study vaccine, lot B.ConclusionsThe two 3A-HBV lots had equivalent immunogenicity, but lot B elicited faster onset of seroprotection and higher anti-HBs titers than both lot A and 1A-HBV in an Asian population. This supports 3A-HBV lot B as an effective choice for HBV vaccination, with a favorable safety profile.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04531098.     

Immunogenicity and safety of a 2-dose hepatitis B vaccine,HBsAg/CpG 1018, in persons with diabetes mellitus aged 60–70 years

BackgroundHepatitis B virus (HBV) remains a major public health issue, although it is a vaccine-preventable disease. Adults with diabetes are at greater risk of contracting HBV than the general population. Commonly used 3-dose HBV vaccines have reduced immunogenicity in older individuals and in those with diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn this post hoc analysis of a phase 3 clinical trial, participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged 60–70 years received either 2-dose HBsAg/CpG 1018 (HEPLISAV-B®, n = 327) at 0 and 4 weeks and placebo at 24 weeks or 3-dose HBsAg/alum (Engerix-B®, n = 153) at 0, 4, and 24 weeks. Immunogenicity, including seroprotection rate (SPR) at week 28, and safety were assessed by subgroup (sex, body mass index, and smoking status). SPR was defined as antibody against hepatitis B surface antigen serum concentration ≥10 mIU/mL.ResultsThe SPR at week 28 was significantly higher with HBsAg/CpG 1018 (85.8% [235/274]) than with HBsAg/alum (58.5% [76/130]) in the per-protocol analysis, for an overall difference of 27.3% (95% CI, 18.0–36.8). SPRs with HBsAg/CpG 1018 were consistently markedly higher compared with HBsAg/alum, regardless of sex, body mass index, or smoking status. Adverse events and deaths were comparable between groups.ConclusionsTwo-dose HBsAg/CpG 1018 provides a higher level of seroprotection against HBV than does a 3-dose vaccine (HBsAg/alum) with a similar safety profile in patients aged 60–70 years with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Study identifier: NCT02117934.     

Effect of the third dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine on anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in healthcare workers

PurposeAdministration of three doses of Pfizer-BioNTech BNT162b2 COVID-19 mRNA vaccine was completed in Japan in the spring of 2022. This study aimed to evaluate the antibody responses, and kinetics of three doses of vaccine in healthcare workers (HCWs).Patients and methodsWe conducted a longitudinal cohort study with HCWs, who had no history of COVID-19 or serologic evidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection, from a single hospital. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) titers of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein (SP) and nucleocapsid protein (NP) titers were measured using an automated chemiluminescent enzyme immunoassay system.ResultsA total of 636 HCWs participated in the study. The anti-SP IgG titers decreased slowly after the second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine in all participants, and robust antibody response was observed after the third dose of the vaccine. The peak anti-SP IgG titer after the third dose was approximately 4.1-fold higher than that after the first and second doses, and the rate of decrease in the anti-SP IgG titer after the third dose was significantly more gradual, than that after the second dose. After the second dose of vaccine, the antibody response was weaker in older participants than in younger participants, and in males than in females respectively, whereas the response to the third dose of vaccine did not differ significantly by sex or age. Adverse events following immunization were generally mild to moderate.ConclusionThe third dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine induced a significant and sustained increase in anti-SP IgG titers, and was generally safe and well-tolerated.     

A randomized phase 3 trial of the immunogenicity and safety of coadministration of a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) and an inactivated hepatitis a (HAV) virus vaccine in a dengue non-endemic country

BackgroundVaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) is largely recommended for travelers worldwide. Concurrent dengue and HAV vaccination may be desired in parallel for travelers to countries where both diseases are endemic. This randomized, observer-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated coadministration of HAV vaccine with tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) in healthy adults aged 18–60 years living in the UK.MethodsParticipants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive HAV vaccine and placebo on Day 1, and placebo on Day 90 (Group 1), TAK-003 and placebo on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 2), or TAK-003 and HAV vaccine on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 3). The primary objective was non-inferiority of HAV seroprotection rate (anti-HAV ≥ 12.5 mIU/mL) in Group 3 versus Group 1, one month post-first vaccination (Day 30) in HAV-naïve and dengue-naïve participants. Sensitivity analyses were performed on combinations of baseline HAV and dengue serostatus. Secondary objectives included dengue seropositivity one month post-second vaccination (Day 120), HAV geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and safety.Results900 participants were randomized. On Day 30, HAV seroprotection rates were non-inferior following coadministration of HAV and TAK-003 (Group 3: 98.7 %) to HAV administration alone (Group 1: 97.1 %; difference: ?1.68, 95 % CI: ?8.91 to 4.28). Sensitivity analyses including participants who were neither HAV-naïve nor DENV-naïve at baseline supported this finding. Anti-HAV GMCs on Day 30 were 82.1 (95 % CI: 62.9–107.1) mIU/mL in Group 1 and 93.0 (76.1–113.6) mIU/mL in Group 3. By Day 120, 90.9–96.8 % of TAK-003 recipients were seropositive (neutralizing antibody titer > 10) to all four dengue serotypes. Coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 was well tolerated, with no important safety risks identified.ConclusionImmune responses following coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 were non-inferior to administration of HAV vaccine alone. The results support the coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 with no adverse impact on immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of either vaccine.ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03525119.     

Assessing the impact of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) on responses to hepatitis B vaccine during co-administration

IntroductionA hepatitis B vaccination (HepB) series with an initial dose of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) is the recommended prophylaxis for infants born to mothers with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and for HBV-exposed persons without known protection. The HepB and HBIG are administered at different sites (limbs). Instances of HepB and HBIG administered at the same site are documented but the impact on immune responses to HepB remains unanswered.MethodsNewborn and adult BALB/c mice received one dose of HepB at time zero alone or with HBIG in the same or different sites, followed by 2 additional doses of HepB at 3 and 10 weeks (newborn mice) or 4 and 16 weeks (adult mice). To study memory responses mice were given a 4th, booster, dose of HepB at 26 weeks and B cells analyzed.ResultsAdministration of HepB with HBIG resulted in reduced responses to HepB following the first 2 doses, regardless of site, compared to mice that received HepB only. Lower levels of antibody to HBV surface antigen (anti-HBs) were observed at the end of the 3-dose series (p < 0.0001) in all groups of newborn mice that received HepB and HBIG. In adult mice, this difference was only seen when HepB and HBIG were delivered at the same site. However, following a HepB booster at 26 weeks, HBsAg-specific B-cell expansion and memory phenotype were not impacted by initial HBIG administrationConclusionAdministration of HBIG with HepB can delay and reduce responses to HepB in mice. Our findings suggest that the initial circulating levels of HBIG could prevent infection despite an impaired response to vaccine and support the current recommendation of assessing seroprotection after series completion for infants born to HBV carrier mothers, including in cases where vaccine and HBIG are administered incorrectly at the same site.     

The impact of immunomodulating treatment on the immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with immune-mediated inflammatory rheumatic diseases compared to healthy controls. A Swedish nationwide study (COVID19-REUMA)

ObjectivesTo elucidate antibody responses after the second and third dose of COVID-19 vaccine in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRD) treated with biologic/targeted disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/ts DMARDs).MethodsAntibody levels to antigens representing spike full length protein and spike S1 were measured before vaccination, 2–12 weeks after the second dose, before and after the third dose using multiplex bead-based serology assay. Positive antibody response was defined as antibody levels over cut off (seropositivity) in seronegative individuals or ≥ 4-fold increase in antibodies in individuals seropositive for both spike proteins.ResultsPatients (n = 414) receiving b/ts DMARDs (283 had arthritis, 75 systemic vasculitis and 56 other autoimmune diseases) and controls (n = 61) from five Swedish regions participated. Treatments groups were: rituximab (n = 145); abatacept (n = 22); Interleukin 6 receptor inhibitors [IL6i (n = 79)]; JAnus Kinase Inhibitors [JAKi (n = 58)], Tumour Necrosis Factor inhibitor [TNFi (n = 68)] and Interleukin12/23/17 inhibitors [IL12/23/17i (n = 42)]. Percentage of patients with positive antibody response after two doses was significantly lower in rituximab (33,8%) and abatacept (40,9%) (p < 0,001) but not in IL12/23/17i, TNFi or JAKi groups compared to controls (80,3%). Higher age, rituximab treatment and shorter time between last rituximab course and vaccination predicted impaired antibody response. Antibody levels collected 21–40 weeks after second dose decreased significantly (IL6i: p = 0,02; other groups: p < 0,001) compared to levels at 2–12 week but most participants remained seropositive. Proportion of patients with positive antibody response increased after third dose but was still significantly lower in rituximab (p < 0,001).ConclusionsOlder individuals and patients on maintenance rituximab have an impaired response after two doses of COVID-19 vaccine which improves if the time between last rituximab course and vaccination extends and also after an additional vaccine dose. Rituximab patients should be prioritized for booster vaccine doses. TNFi, JAKi and IL12/23/17i does not diminished humoral response to primary and an additional vaccination.     

Variable anti-HBs antibody titers in vaccinated birth cohorts – A cross-sectional population-based study

BackgroundAfter the introduction of hepatitis B (HB) vaccination in 1995 in newborns, two catch-up campaigns targeted unvaccinated 9 year old in 2000–2003 (born 1991–1994) and the 18 year old in 2004–2008 (born 1986–1990), resulting in several birth-cohorts. Our objective was to assess the anti-HBs titers in each birth-cohort.MethodsWe included all outpatients (78.5%) and hospitalized patients with measured anti-HBs antibody titers in the Teaching Hospital of Infectious Diseases, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, during April 2014 – December 2018 (without HB history). We compared the anti-HBs titers in all birth-cohorts using the Lexis surfaces (titers by age, time period and cohort patterns). We also evaluated the number of acute HB in the corresponding inpatient birth-cohorts and special groups.ResultsWe included 2963 participants, mean age = 31.0 ± 14.2, 64.1% women. The birth-cohort 1995–2006, vaccinated after delivery (n = 424, 3-dose HB vaccine coverage > 90%), had significantly lower protective titers (41.3% >10 mIU/mL) compared to the other birth-cohorts: born after 2007 (also vaccinated at birth, 67.0%, n = 106), 1991–1994 (age 9, 74.3%, n = 847), 1986–1990 (age 18, 71.3%, n = 543). In the unvaccinated cohort (n = 1043, mean age = 45.5 ± 12.4) protective titers were found in 44.8%, probably after self-limited HB infection.Concordant results were found using the proportion of patients with detectable or robust titers, and median or geometric mean titers.Four breakthrough acute HB infections were hospitalized of the corresponding vaccinated cohorts (birth years 1988, 1990, 1995, 1996). Data on a few tested infants (n = 47, not included in the main study) demonstrated good protection, 88.9%.ConclusionsOur study demonstrated the long-term evidence of protection of HBV vaccine at two decades following the primary immunization and a booster seems unsupported. Further studies should be done to assess the need of a booster dose within the general population and special groups.     

Post-licensure safety study of new-onset immune-mediated diseases,herpes zoster,and anaphylaxis in adult recipients of HepB-CpG vaccine versus HepB-alum vaccine

BackgroundHepB-CpG (Heplisav-B) is a licensed hepatitis B vaccine with a novel adjuvant that requires 2 doses (0, 1 month) compared to HepB-alum (Engerix-B) which requires 3 doses (0, 1, 6 months). Monitoring safety outcomes following receipt of vaccines with novel adjuvants outside trial settings is important. Hence, as part of a post-marketing commitment, we compared the incidence of new-onset immune-mediated diseases, herpes zoster (HZ), and anaphylaxis among recipients of HepB-CpG versus HepB-alum.MethodsThis cohort study included adults not on dialysis who received ≥1 dose of hepatitis B vaccine from 8/7/2018 to 10/31/2019, during which HepB-CpG was routinely administered in 7 of 15 Kaiser Permanente Southern California medical centers while HepB-alum was administered in the other 8 centers. Recipients of HepB-CpG or HepB-alum were followed through electronic health records for 13 months for occurrence of pre-specified new-onset immune-mediated diseases, HZ, and anaphylaxis identified using diagnosis codes. Incidence rates were compared using Poisson regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting when there was ≥80 % power to detect a relative risk (RR) of 5 for anaphylaxis and RR of 3 for other outcomes. Chart review to confirm new-onset diagnosis was conducted for outcomes with statistically significant elevated risk.ResultsThere were 31,183 HepB-CpG and 38,442 HepB-alum recipients (overall 49.0 % female, 48.5 % age ≥50 years, and 49.6 % Hispanic). Among immune-mediated events that occurred frequently enough for formal comparison, rates among HepB-CpG versus Hep-B-alum recipients were similar except for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) (adjusted RR 1.53 [95 % CI: 1.07, 2.18]). After chart confirmation of new-onset RA, the adjusted RR was 0.93 (0.34, 2.49). The adjusted RR for HZ was 1.06 (0.89, 1.27). Anaphylaxis occurred in 0 HepB-CpG and 2 HepB-alum recipients.ConclusionsThis large post-licensure study did not identify evidence of safety concerns for HepB-CpG compared to HepB-alum for immune-mediated diseases, HZ, or anaphylaxis.     

Systematic literature review of neutralizing antibody immune responses to non-vaccine targeted high-risk HPV types induced by the bivalent and the quadrivalent vaccines

IntroductionStudies on the cross-protective effect of HPV bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines demonstrated inconsistent findings against additional HPV types covered by the nonavalent vaccine. The objective of this study was to conduct a systematic literature review to assess the consistency and durability of the cross-protective neutralizing antibody immune responses of the currently licensed bivalent and quadrivalent vaccines to non-vaccine HPV types targeted by the nonavalent vaccine (HPV 6, 11, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58).MethodsPubMed and EMBASE databases were searched from 2008 to 2019 to identify studies reporting antibody/immune response after vaccination with either the bivalent, quadrivalent, or nonavalent vaccine. Key outcomes were seroconversion, seropositivity or geometric mean titers against HPV types 6, 11, 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58.ResultsEighteen publications met inclusion criteria, reporting on 14 interventional and five observational studies. Across all studies, immune responses to non-vaccine high-risk HPV types after bivalent vaccination were higher than baseline or quadrivalent vaccine. Nonavalent vaccine elicited near total seroconversion to HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52, and 58, with seropositivity remaining near 100% up to 24 months post-dose 1. In contrast, bivalent and quadrivalent vaccination resulted in lower seroconversion levels for non-vaccine types, which waned over time.ConclusionsThe cross-protection antibody/immune response among participants having received all three doses of bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine is not comparable to the specific response elicited by HPV vaccine types. Even in cases where a statistically significant cross-reactive immunological response is reported, long-term data on the duration of the response beyond two years are very limited. Further, the lack of a standard for assays limits comparability of results between studies.     

Assessment of the anti-HBs antibody response in Beninese infants following 4 doses of HBV vaccine,including administration at birth,compared to the standard 3 doses regime; a cross-sectional survey

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection remains one of the major neglected health issues worldwide. In sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), HBV endemicity is high, with more than 8% of the population being chronic HBV carriers. Recently, WHO recommended that all infants should receive their first dose of the HBV vaccine as soon as possible after birth. Unfortunately, the incorporation of a birth dose of HBV in the expanded programme immunization (EPI) has not occurred in the majority of countries in SSA. From April to September 2017, a cross-sectional survey was conducted in two vaccine units located in southern Benin. We assessed the sustained anti-HBs antibody response in infants induced by a standard scheme of 3 doses of HBV vaccination (6, 10, 14 weeks) in comparison to a scheme of 4 doses with a birth dose included (0, 6, 10, 14 weeks). Blood samples were systematically collected in the first 140 children aged 9 months and their mothers who had consented to participate for the detection of HBs antigen and the quantification of anti-HBs antibodies. The prevalence of HBV infection among infants and mothers was 2.2% and 7.1%, respectively. Infants who received 4 doses of HBV vaccine had a significantly higher level of anti-HBs antibody than those who received 3 doses of vaccine (557.9 UI/L vs. 386.9 UI/L, respectively, P = 0.03). We also showed that the scheme of 4 doses was associated with a significantly higher sustained protective response in comparison to the scheme of 3 doses (aOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.03–6.03, P = 0.04). This result provides further evidence of the importance of administering HBV vaccine at birth, but also highlights the importance for the prevention of vertical transmissions. Additional studies are needed to better establish the cost-effectiveness of such a 4 doses immunization strategy before implementing the HBV vaccination at birth in the EPI.     

Robust antibody response after a third BNT162b2 vaccine compared to the second among immunocompromised and healthy individuals,a prospective longitudinal cohort study

PurposeAs protection from COVID-19 following two doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine showed a time dependent waning, a third (booster) dose was administrated. This study aims to compare the antibody response following the third dose versus the second and to evaluate post-booster seroconversion.MethodsA prospective observational study conducted in Maccabi Healthcare Services. Serial SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG tests, 1,2,3 and 6 months following the second vaccine dose and one month following the third were obtained. Neutralizing antibody levels were measured in a subset of participants. Per individual SARS-CoV-2 Spike IgG titer ratios were calculated one month after the booster administration compared to titers one month following the second dose and prior to booster.ResultsAmong 110 participants, 56 (51%) were women. Mean age was 61.7 ± 1.9 years and 66 (60%) were immunocompromised. One month after third dose, IgG titers were induced 7.83 (95 %CI 5.25–11.67) folds and 2.40 (95 %CI 1.90–3.03) folds compared to one month after the second, in the immunocompromised and immunocompetent groups, respectively. Of the 17 immunocompromised participants who were seronegative after the second dose, 4 (24%) became seropositive following the third. Comparing the titers prior to the third dose, an increase of 50.7 (95 %CI 32.5–79.1) fold in the immunocompromised group and 25.7 (95 %CI 19.1–34.7) fold in and immunocompetent group, was observed.ConclusionA third BNT162b2 vaccine elicited robust humoral response, superior to the response observed following the second, among immunocompetent and immunocompromised individuals.     

STING pathway stimulation results in a differentially activated innate immune phenotype associated with low nitric oxide and enhanced antibody titers in young and aged mice

BackgroundOne of the most concerning public health issues, related to vaccination and disease prevention, is the inability to induce durable immune responses following a single-dose immunization. In this regard, the nature of the inflammatory environment induced by vaccine adjuvants can negatively impact the resulting immune response. To address these concerns, new strategies to vaccine design are needed in order to improve the outcomes of immune responses, particularly in immunologically disadvantaged populations.MethodsComparisons of the scope of innate immune activation induced by TLR agonists versus cyclic dinucleotides (CDNs) was performed. Their effects on the activation characteristics (e.g., metabolism, cytokine secretion) of bone marrow derived dendritic cells (BMDCs) were studied. In addition, the differential effects on in vivo induction of antibody responses were measured.ResultsAs compared to TLR ligands, the stimulation of BMDCs with CDNs induced distinctly different metabolic outcomes. Marked differences were observed in the production of nitric oxide (NO) and the cytokine BAFF. These distinct differences were correlated with improved (i.e., more rapid and persistent) vaccine antibody responses in both aged and young mice.ConclusionsOur results illustrate that the innate immune pathway targeted by adjuvants can critically impact the outcome of the immune response post-vaccination. Specifically, CDN stimulation of APCs induced an activation phenotype that was characterized by decreased innate effector molecule production (e.g., NO) and increased BAFF. This was attributed to the induction of an innate inflammatory environment that enabled the host to make the most of the existing B lymphocyte potential. The use of adjuvants that differentially engage mechanisms of innate immune activation would be particularly advantageous for the generation of robust, single dose vaccines. The results of this study demonstrated that CDNs induced differential innate activation and enhanced vaccine induced antibody responses in both young and aged mice.     

A phase 1 dose-sparing,randomized clinical trial of seasonal trivalent inactivated influenza vaccine combined with MAS-1, a novel water-in-oil adjuvant/delivery system

BackgroundNew influenza vaccines are needed to increase vaccine efficacy. Adjuvants may allow hemagglutinin (HA) dose-sparing with enhanced immunogenicity. MAS-1 is an investigational low viscosity, free-flowing, water-in-oil emulsion-based adjuvant/delivery system comprised of stable nanoglobular aqueous droplets.MethodsA phase 1, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity, HA dose escalation, randomized clinical trial was conducted. MAS-1 adjuvant with 1, 3, 5 or 9 µg per HA derived from licensed seasonal trivalent high dose inactivated influenza vaccine (IIV, Fluzone HD 60 µg per HA) in a 0.3 mL dose were compared to standard dose IIV (Fluzone SD, 15 µg per HA). Safety was measured by reactogenicity, adverse events, and clinical laboratory tests. Serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers were measured for immunogenicity.ResultsSeventy-two subjects, aged 18–47 years, received one dose of either 0.3 mL adjuvanted vaccine or SD IIV intramuscularly. Common injection site and systemic reactions post-vaccination were mild tenderness, induration, pain, headache, myalgia, malaise and fatigue. All reactions resolved within 14 days post-vaccination. Safety laboratory measures were not different between groups. Geometric mean antibody titers, geometric mean fold increases in antibody titer, seroconversion rates and seroprotection rates against vaccine strains were in general higher and of longer duration (day 85 and 169 visits) with MAS-1-adjuvanted IIV at all doses of HA compared with SD IIV. Adjuvanted vaccine induced higher antibody responses against a limited number of non-study vaccine influenza B and A/H3N2 viruses including ones from subsequent years.ConclusionMAS-1 adjuvant in a 0.3 mL dose volume provided HA dose-sparing effects without safety concerns and induced higher HAI antibody and seroconversion responses through at least 6 months, demonstrating potential to provide greater vaccine efficacy throughout an influenza season in younger adults. In summary, MAS-1 may provide enhanced, more durable and broader protective immunity compared with non-adjuvanted SD IIV.Clinical Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT02500680.     

A Phase III,multicenter, randomized,double-blind,active comparator-controlled study to evaluate the safety,tolerability, and immunogenicity of V114 compared with PCV13 in healthy infants (PNEU-PED-EU-1)

BackgroundV114 (15-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine [PCV]) contains all serotypes in 13-valent PCV (PCV13) and additional serotypes 22F and 33F. This study evaluated safety and immunogenicity of V114 compared with PCV13 in healthy infants, and concomitant administration with DTPa–HBV–IPV/Hib and rotavirus RV1 vaccines.MethodsV114 and PCV13 were administered in a 2+1 schedule at 2, 4, and 11–15 months of age. Adverse events (AEs) were collected on Days 1–14 following each vaccination. Serotype-specific anti-pneumococcal immunoglobulin G (IgG) was measured 30 days post-primary series (PPS), immediately prior to a toddler dose, and 30 days post-toddler dose (PTD). Primary objectives included non-inferiority of V114 to PCV13 for 13 shared serotypes and superiority of V114 to PCV13 for the two additional serotypes.Results1184 healthy infants 42–90 days of age were randomized 1:1 to V114 (n = 591) or PCV13 (n = 593). Proportions of participants with solicited AEs and serious AEs were comparable between vaccination groups. V114 met pre-specified non-inferiority criteria for all 13 shared serotypes, based on the difference in proportions of participants with serotype-specific IgG concentrations ≥0.35 μg/mL (response rate; lower bound of two-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] >−10.0) and IgG geometric mean concentration (GMC) ratios (lower bound of two-sided 95% CI >0.5), and pre-specified superiority criteria for serotypes 22F and 33F (lower bound of two-sided 95% CI >10.0 for response rates and >2.0 for GMC ratios). Antibody responses to DTPa–HBV–IPV/Hib and RV1 vaccines met pre-specified non-inferiority criteria, based on antigen-specific response rates to DTPa–HBV–IPV/Hib and anti-rotavirus IgA geometric mean titers.ConclusionsAfter a 2+1 schedule, V114 elicited non-inferior immune responses to 13 shared serotypes and superior responses to the two additional serotypes compared with PCV13, with comparable safety profile. These results support the routine use of V114 in infants.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04031846; EudraCT: 2018-003787-31     

MAS-1, a novel water-in-oil adjuvant/delivery system,with reduced seasonal influenza vaccine hemagglutinin dose may enhance potency,durability and cross-reactivity of antibody responses in the elderly

BackgroundIncreased influenza vaccine efficacy is needed in the elderly at high-risk for morbidity and mortality due to influenza infection. Adjuvants may allow hemagglutinin (HA) dose-sparing with enhanced immunogenicity. MAS-1 is an investigational water-in-oil emulsion-based adjuvant/delivery system comprised of stable nanoglobular aqueous droplets.MethodsA phase 1, randomized, double-blind, safety and immunogenicity, adjuvant dose escalation trial was conducted in persons aged 65 years and older. MAS-1 adjuvant dose volumes at 0.3 mL or 0.5 mL containing 9 µg per HA derived from licensed seasonal trivalent influenza vaccine (IIV, Fluzone HD 60 µg per HA, Sanofi Pasteur) were compared to high dose (HD) IIV (Fluzone HD). Safety was measured by reactogenicity, adverse events, and safety laboratory measures. Immunogenicity was assessed by serum hemagglutination inhibition (HAI) antibody titers.ResultsForty-five subjects, aged 65–83 years, were randomly assigned to receive 9 µg per HA in 0.3 mL MAS-1 (15 subjects) or HD IIV (15 subjects) followed by groups randomly assigned to receive 9 µg per HA in 0.5 mL MAS-1 (10 subjects) or HD IIV (5 subjects). Injection site tenderness, induration, and pain, and headache, myalgia, malaise and fatigue were common, resolving before day 14 post-vaccination. Clinically significant late-onset injection site reactions occurred in four of ten subjects at the 0.5 mL adjuvant dose. Safety laboratory measures were within acceptable limits. MAS-1-adjuvanted IIV enhanced mean antibody titers, mean-fold increases in antibody titer, and seroconversion rates against vaccine strains for at least 168 days post-vaccination and enhanced cross-reactive antibodies against some non-study vaccine influenza viruses.ConclusionMAS-1 adjuvant provided HA dose-sparing without safety concerns at the 0.3 mL dose, but the 0.5 mL dose caused late injection site reactions. MAS-1-adjuvanted IIV induced higher HAI antibody responses with prolonged durability including against historical strains, thereby providing greater potential vaccine efficacy in the elderly throughout an influenza season.Clinical Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov # NCT02500680.     

Immunogenicity and safety of the RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine co-administered with measles,rubella and yellow fever vaccines in Ghanaian children: A phase IIIb,multi-center,non-inferiority,randomized, open,controlled trial

BackgroundTo optimize vaccine implementation visits for young children, it could be efficient to administer the first RTS,S/AS01 malaria vaccine dose during the Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) visit at 6 months of age together with Vitamin A supplementation and the third RTS,S/AS01 dose on the same day as yellow fever (YF), measles and rubella vaccines at 9 months of age. We evaluated the safety and immunogenicity of RTS,S/AS01 when co-administered with YF and combined measles-rubella (MR) vaccines.MethodsIn this phase 3b, open-label, controlled study (NCT02699099), 709 Ghanaian children were randomized (1:1:1) to receive RTS,S/AS01 at 6, 7.5 and 9 months of age, and YF and MR vaccines at 9 or 10.5 months of age (RTS,S coad and RTS,S alone groups, respectively). The third group received YF and MR vaccines at 9 months of age and will receive RTS,S/AS01 at 10.5, 11.5 and 12.5 months of age (Control group). All children received Vitamin A at 6 months of age. Non-inferiority of immune responses to the vaccine antigens was evaluated 1 month following co-administration versus RTS,S/AS01 or EPI vaccines (YF and MR vaccines) alone using pre-defined non-inferiority criteria. Safety was assessed until Study month 4.5.ResultsNon-inferiority of antibody responses to the anti-circumsporozoite and anti-hepatitis B virus surface antigens when RTS,S/AS01 was co-administered with YF and MR vaccines versus RTS,S/AS01 alone was demonstrated. Non-inferiority of antibody responses to the measles, rubella, and YF antigens when RTS,S/AS01 was co-administered with YF and MR vaccines versus YF and MR vaccines alone was demonstrated. The safety profile of all vaccines was clinically acceptable in all groups.ConclusionsRTS,S/AS01 can be co-administered with Vitamin A at 6 months and with YF and MR vaccines at 9 months of age during EPI visits, without immune response impairment to any vaccine antigen or negative safety effect.     

DS-5670a,a novel mRNA-encapsulated lipid nanoparticle vaccine against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2: Results from a phase 2 clinical study

BackgroundDS-5670a is a vaccine candidate for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) harnessing a novel modality composed of messenger ribonucleic acid (mRNA) encoding the receptor-binding domain (RBD) from the spike protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles. Here, we report the safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profile of DS-5670a from a phase 2 clinical trial in healthy adults who were immunologically naïve to SARS-CoV-2.MethodsThe study consisted of an open-label, uncontrolled, dose-escalation part and a double-blind, randomized, uncontrolled, 2-arm, parallel-group part. A total of 80 Japanese participants were assigned to receive intramuscular DS-5670a, containing either 30 or 60 µg of mRNA, as two injections administered 4 weeks apart. Safety was assessed by characterization of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Immunogenicity was assessed by neutralization titers against SARS-CoV-2, anti-RBD immunoglobulin (Ig)G levels, and SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific T cell responses. Plasma pharmacokinetic parameters of DS-5670a were also evaluated.ResultsMost solicited TEAEs were mild or moderate with both the 30 and 60 µg mRNA doses. Four participants (10 %) in the 60 µg mRNA group developed severe redness at the injection site, but all cases resolved without treatment. There were no serious TEAEs and no TEAEs leading to discontinuation. Humoral immune responses in both dose groups were greater than those observed in human convalescent serum; the 60 µg mRNA dose produced better responses. Neutralization titers were found to be correlated with anti-RBD IgG levels (specifically IgG1). DS-5670a elicited antigen-specific T helper 1-polarized cellular immune responses.ConclusionsThe novel mRNA-based vaccine candidate DS-5670a provided favorable immune responses against SARS-CoV-2 with a clinically acceptable safety profile. Confirmatory trials are currently ongoing to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of DS-5670a as the primary vaccine and to assess the immunogenicity when administered as a heterologous or homologous booster.Trial registry: https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2071210086.