CO_2点阵激光Deep与Superficial模式联合治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的临床分析

目的:评价CO2点阵激光Deep与Superficial模式联合治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的临床疗效和安全性。方法:对纳入的20例萎缩性痤疮瘢痕患者进行病例对照研究,每例患者治疗2个疗程,治疗后3个月进行疗效和安全性评价,对治疗前后萎缩性痤疮瘢痕严重程度评分,评估临床疗效和不良反应,同时统计患者主观评价。结果:所有患者瘢痕严重程度评分由治疗前(64.3±19.8)分下降至(39.8±14.3)分,改善百分比达(37.6±9.6)%,其中17例患者认为皮损明显或显著改善,无严重不良反应。结论:CO2点阵激光Deep与Superficial模式联合治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕,是一种安全有效的新型治疗方法。     

The use of 1540 nm fractional photothermolysis for the treatment of acne scars in Asian skin: a pilot study

Background: Various modalities have been used to treat acne scars, but limited efficacy and considerable side effects have restricted their proper use. Recently, a new-generation fractional photothermolysis modality has been introduced that has deeper penetrating ability; however, a 1540 nm fractional photothermolysis study has not yet been performed.
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of 1540 nm fractional photothermolysis for the treatment of acne scars in Asian skin.
Methods: Sixteen volunteers (Fitzpatrick skin types III–IV) with mild to moderate acne scars were enrolled. Acne scar lesions were treated with 1540-nm fractional photothermolysis (Starlux^™ 1540). Three treatment sessions were performed for each patient 4 weeks apart. Outcome assessments included the following four methods: (1) clinical evaluation of the photographs that were taken before and after the treatment; (2) comparison of the quality of life (QOL) of the patients before and after the treatment; (3) patients' satisfaction with the treatment; and (4) comparison of the quantity of collagen and elastic fibers in the skin biopsies before and 12 weeks after the last treatment.
Results: A mild to moderate clinical improvement was observed in most of the patients. Moreover, the QOL of all the patients improved, and all of them were satisfied with the results of the treatment. Significant collagen and elastic-fiber increases were also observed after the treatment, and side effects were limited to transient erythema and edema, which occurred in 50% of the patients. No severe side effect was observed.
Conclusions: 1540 nm fractional photothermolysis is an effective and safe method for improving acne scar, even in Asian skin.     

Skin rejuvenation with microthermal fractional photothermolysis

ABSTRACT:  Fractional resurfacing is gaining acceptance as a preferred method for skin resurfacing. Experience in treating photoaging, acne scars, and melasma is reviewed.     

铒激光联合E光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的临床效果评价

目的：评价铒激光联合E光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的临床疗效和安全性。方法：将大连市皮肤病医院美容皮肤科2013年1月至2016年6月就诊患者采用双色球方法随机分成治疗组和对照组,治疗组为铒激光联合E光治疗组;对照组为铒激光治疗组,每个月治疗一次,共3次。对照组与治疗组均于疗程结束1个月后比较两组患者治疗前后皮肤红斑、色沉,瘢痕,皱纹,粗糙度,光滑度的变化。结果：共就诊62例痤疮凹陷性瘢痕患者,治疗组31例,对照组31例,治疗组与对照组患者皮损治疗前光滑度、瘢痕、皱纹、粗糙度、色沉、红斑比较,差异无统计学意义(P＞0.05)。治疗后,治疗组,患者皮肤的光滑度,瘢痕,皱纹,粗糙度,红斑,色沉评分分别为73.32±0.236、2.21±0.152、168.6±0.177、63±0.128、8.63±0.122、5.20±0.232,对照组分别为70.45±0.354、3.28±0.138、180.6±0.412、66±0.422、13.62±0.121、11.22±0.121,两组比较差异有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。所有患者未见严重不良反应。结论：铒激光联合E光治疗痤疮凹陷性瘢痕较单独应用铒激光治疗组疗效明显提升。     

黄金微针射频联合低能量超脉冲CO2点阵激光治疗面部痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的疗效观察

 目的 观察黄金微针射频联合低能量超脉冲CO2点阵激光治疗面部痤疮凹陷性瘢痕的疗效。方法选取2018年4月—2020年4月就诊于河南大学第一附属医院的74例凹陷性痤疮瘢痕患者为对象,随机分为2组,每组各37例。治疗组采用黄金微针射频联合低能量超脉冲CO2点阵激光治疗;对照组采用黄金微针射频治疗。比较2组治疗前后痤疮瘢痕权重评分（ECCA）、瘢痕改善程度IGA评估及术后不良反应。结果2组治疗后ECCA评分均明显降低,但治疗组评分降低更明显(Z=-2.65,P＜0.05);治疗组IGA评估有效率较对照组高。2组不良反应发生率无统计学差异。结论黄金微针射频联合低能量超脉冲CO2点阵激光能更好地改善痤疮后凹陷性瘢痕,两种方法联合能够起到协同作用且不增加治疗相关副作用。     

Fractional CO2 laser for the treatment of acne scars

Background Numerous reports have been published on skin rejuvenation by the so‐called fractional laser device that delivers a laser beam in a dot form over a grid pattern. Aims In this study, we characterized the effects of a fractional CO₂ laser on atrophic acne scars at the clinical and ultrastructural levels. Methods Seven healthy adult Japanese volunteers (aged 32–46 years, mean 37.6, five men and two women of Fitzpatrick skin type III) were recruited for this study. A fractional CO₂ laser device, SmartXide DOT (DEKA, Florence, Italy), was used with irradiation parameters set as follows: output power 10 W, pulse width 600 μs, dot spacing 800 μm, and stack 2 (irradiation output power 0.91 J/cm²). A clinical examination and punch biopsy of each subject was performed before and just after the irradiation, and also at week 3 after three irradiation sessions. The biopsy specimens were stained with toluidine blue and were examined ultrastructurally. Results Clinical improvement of the atrophic acne scars was observed at week 3 after the third irradiation session in all cases compared with the condition before treatment. Histologically, outgrowths of many degenerated elastic fibers were observed as irregular rod‐shaped masses in the superficial dermis prior to the treatment in the region of the acne scars. At week 3 after the third irradiation, the degenerated elastic fibers were no longer observed, and the elastic fibers were elaunin‐like. Conclusions The fractional CO₂ laser is considered to be very effective for treating atrophic acne scars.     

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of fractional bipolar radiofrequency with high-energy strategy for treatment of acne scars in Chinese

Background: Fractional technology overcomes several problems of ablative lasers such as a high incidence rate of post- inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH). A new technology fractional radiofrequency, which induces deep dermal heating and leaves the epidermal less affected results in less adverse effect in Chinese. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerance of fractional bipolar radiofrequency (RF) in the treatment of acne scars in Asian people with the strategy of high energy. Methods: Twenty-six healthy Asian patients with acne scars received four monthly high energy (85–95mj/pin) treatments with a fractional bipolar RF device. Improvement and tolerance were evaluated at each treatment and a 4-week and 12-week follow-up visit. Results: Twenty-three patients completed the study. Acne score showed a significantly decrease at 4-week and 12-week follow-up visits. Patients’ evaluation of global improvement and satisfaction increased at the 12-week visit compared with baseline. Side effects were limited to transient pain, erythema, dryness and low risk of PIH. Conclusion: Treatment with high energy of fractional bipolar RF is safe and effective for acne scars in Asian people. Common side effects such as PIH, eschars are less than fractional lasers.     

黄金微针射频与超脉冲CO2点阵激光治疗面部痤疮所致的不同类型凹陷性瘢痕的疗效比较

 目的 比较黄金微针射频与超脉冲CO₂点阵激光治疗不同类型面部凹陷性痤疮瘢痕的临床疗效及安全性。方法 选取我院门诊2019年8月—2021年8月诊治的80例凹陷性痤疮瘢痕患者为研究对象,采用随机数字表法分为治疗组和对照组,每组各40例。治疗组采用黄金微针射频治疗;对照组采用超脉冲CO₂ 点阵激光治疗。比较两组疗效,并按临床亚型（V型、U型和M型）对患者进行分类和评价。结果 两组患者治疗后痤疮瘢痕临床评分量表（ECCA）权重评分均降低,但差异无统计学意义（t=0.46, P=0.644）。 两组患者总体有效率比较差异无统计学意义（X²=1.89,P=0.176）。两组瘢痕亚型比较,治疗组M型瘢痕疗效较好（t=2.34, P＜0.05）,对照组V型瘢痕疗效较好（t=-2.36, P＜0.05）,而两组U型瘢痕疗效无明显差异（t=0.24, P＞0.05）。治疗组患者术中疼痛程度、术后红肿期程度评分均低于对照组,痂皮脱落愈合时间短于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P＜0.05)。结论 黄金微针射频与CO₂点阵激光均能有效地改善面部凹陷性痤疮瘢痕,其中前者对M型瘢痕疗效显著,后者对V型瘢痕疗效显著。提示临床工作中可对痤疮瘢痕进行亚型分析,进而选择性治疗,必要时可联合治疗,起到协同作用。     

A split-face comparison of a fractional microneedle radiofrequency device and fractional carbon dioxide laser therapy in acne patients

Abstract

Background: A number of lasers and light-based devices have been reported as promising treatment options for acne vulgaris. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fractional microneedle radiofrequency (MRF) device treatment compared to CO₂ fractional laser system (FS) for the treatment of acne vulgaris. Methods: Twenty healthy subjects underwent full-face treatment for acne vulgaris with CO₂ FS and MRF device. For each subject, two passes of CO₂ FS with a pulse energy setting of 80 mJ and a density of 100 spots/cm² were used on one side, and two passes of MRF device with a intensity of 8, density of 25 MTZ/cm², and a depth of 1.5–2.5 mm were used on the other. Patients were evaluated 3 months postoperatively and were also photographed. Results: Most of the patients improved based on clinical and photographic assessments 3 months after the treatment. No significant differences in physician-measured parameters, patient ratings, or intraoperative pain ratings were found, although downtime was significantly longer for the CO₂ FS treated side. Conclusions: MRF device and CO₂ FS can be used for acne vulgaris patients and MRF device is more convenient than CO₂ FS because of its short downtime.     

Atrophic acne scar treatment using triple combination therapy: Dot peeling,subcision and fractional laser

Abstract

Atrophic scars are a common complication of acne. Many modalities are proposed but each does not yield satisfactory clinical outcomes. Thus, a new combination therapy is suggested that incorporates (i) dot peeling, the focal application and tattooing of higher trichloroacetic acid concentrations; (ii) subcision, the process by which there is separation of the acne scar from the underlying skin; and (iii) fractional laser irradiation. In this pilot study, the efficacy and safety of this method was investigated for the treatment of acne scars. Ten patients received this therapy for a year. Dot peeling and subcision were performed twice 2–3 months apart and fractional laser irradiation was performed every 3–4 weeks. Outcomes were assessed using scar severity scores and patients’ subjective ratings. Acne scarring improved in all of the patients completing this study. Acne scar severity scores decreased by a mean of 55.3%. Eighty percent of the patients felt significant or marked improvement. There were no significant complications at the treatment sites. It would appear that triple combination therapy is a safe and very effective combination treatment modality for a variety of atrophic acne scars.     

Treatment of acne scarring with fractional CO2 laser

Abstract

Background: Fractional ablative CO₂ laser therapy is based on the theory of fractional photothermolysis. It can be effective in treating acne scars in a less invasive fashion than conventional ablative CO₂ laser therapy. Objective: In this clinical study, the safety and efficacy of a novel CO₂ fractional ablative laser was investigated for the treatment of facial atrophic acne scarring in Chinese individuals. Materials and methods: A total of 31 patients (11 females, 20 males, Fitzpatrick skin phototypes III–IV) with facial acne scarring received three sequential fractional treatments over a 6-month period. Outcome measurements included blinded evaluations of before and after photographs by two physicians at 3 and 12 months after the final treatment. Global improvement was noted as well as any untoward events. Results: At the 12 months follow-up time period, 12.9% of the patients showed excellent improvement in their acne scars, while 38.71% noted good to fair results. The clinical response at the 12-month follow-up visit tended to be better than at the 3-month follow-up visit, but was not statistically significant. Four patients experienced post-treatment and transient PIH but three patients were noted to have prolonged erythema. There was no evidence hypopigmentation or worsening of the scarring in any of the study patients. Conclusion: This high-energy pulsed and cool-scanned fractional ablative CO₂ laser system is safe and effective for facial atrophic acne scarring. Improvement in scarring was noted in the majority of patients with minimal discomfort and minimal downtime. Continued improvement over time is also an important clinical finding.     

Clinical trial of a pinpoint irradiation technique with the CO2 laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scars

Ablative laser resurfacing is an effective treatment for atrophic acne scars. However, it often induces complications such as edema, prolonged erythema, scarring and hyperpigmentation. Therefore, a new concept of laser treatment called fractional photothermolysis has been designed to create microscopic thermal wounds to achieve skin rejuvenation treatment of atrophic acne scars. This study was designed to prospectively evaluate the use of a technique similar to fractional photothermolysis using only the standard CO₂ laser without the fractional laser device in the treatment of atrophic scars and demonstrates it as a safe, effective and economical treatment option. Clinical improvement was achieved in all 35 patients with minimal adverse effects.     

The efficacy of fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser combined with other therapies in acne scars

Fractional ablative carbon dioxide laser resurfacing is a frontline treatment for acne scars. It creates multiple microscopic treatment zones to accelerate the collagen formation and the healing process of reepithelialization, according the principle of fractional photothermolysis. At present, the fractional CO₂ laser with a wavelength of 10,600 nm is commonly used in the field of cosmetology and clinical therapies for various skin diseases, and it can effectively improve skin regeneration and scar formation. To obtain satisfactory results for patients with scars, repetitive fractional laser therapy is always required; however, this treatment could easily lead to complications such as erythema, edema, infection, and post‐inflammatory hyperpigmentation. In addition, different types of acne scars may have different responses to laser, further limiting its widespread use. In recent studies both home and abroad, a new pattern of fractional laser combined with other therapies to improve acne scar has been recommended to guarantee the safety and effective of treatment. This article reviews the recent pertinent literatures and summarized the progression of ablative fractional CO₂ laser combined with other therapies on acne scar.     

A Chinese experience of fractional Ultrapulsed CO2 laser for skin rejuvenation

Abstract

Background and objectives: The ablative fractional CO₂ laser has been successfully used in treating photoaged skin in the Caucasian population. However, its application in Asian skin has not been widely reported. The purpose of this study is to observe the efficacy and safety of the protocol ‘ActiveFX’ for photodamaged facial skin in Chinese patients. Methods: A non-sequential fractional ultrapulsed CO₂ laser with specific settings is used in addition to a new computer pattern generator (CPG). Twenty patients received a single-session, single-pass, ablative fractional treatment on a split face. The patients were evaluated at baseline, and 1 and 3 months (M1, M3) after the treatment using a quartile grading scale. They were also asked to assess their overall satisfaction using a 4-point scale. The improvement of the coarse wrinkles was also quantitatively analyzed with a 3D in vivo imaging system. Results: At M1 and M3, the blinded investigator rated global improvement as 2.8 ± 0.95 and 3.00 ± 0.73, which was consistent with the patients' assessment (2.55 ± 0.83 at M1 and 3.15 ± 0.88 at M3). The roughness analysis (Rz) demonstrated a significant decrease in periorbital wrinkles (p < 0.0001). Minimal and reversible adverse side effects and rapid healing were noted. Conclusions: Non-sequential fractional ultrapulsed CO₂ laser resurfacing (ActiveFX) is considered an excellent treatment modality for photodamaged Chinese facial skin.     

Fractional picosecond laser for atrophic acne scars: A meta-analysis

Background

Conventional fractional lasers (FLs) are well-established treatments for acne scars with some inevitable adverse events. Fractional picosecond laser (FPL) is increasingly used for acne scars.

Aims

To compare the efficacy and safety of FPL with non-picosecond FLs for acne scars.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases were searched. We also searched ClinicalTrials, WHO ICTRP, and ISRCTN websites. A meta-analysis was conducted to assess the clinical improvement and adverse events after FPL compared with other FLs.

Results

Overall, seven eligible studies were included. Three physician evaluation systems showed no difference between FPL and other FLs in clinical improvement of atrophic acne scars (MD = 0.64, 95% CI:−9.67 to 10.94; MD = −0.14, 95% CI:-0.71 to 0.43; RR = 0.81, 95% CI:0.32 to 2.01). Patient-assessed effectiveness was also not significantly different between FPL and other FLs (RR = 1.00, 95% CI:0.69 to 1.46). Although temporary pinpoint bleeding was more common after FPL (RR = 30.33, 95% CI:6.14 to 149.8), the incidence of post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) and pain level were lower for FPL (RR = 0.16, 95% CI:0.06 to 0.45; MD = −1.99, 95% CI:−3.36 to −0.62). Additionally, edema severity after treatment did not differ between the two groups (MD = −0.35, 95% CI:−0.72 to 0.02). As for the duration of erythema, no difference between FPL and nonablative FL groups (MD = −1.88, 95% CI:−6.28 to 2.51).

Conclusions

FPL seems similar to other FLs regarding clinical improvement of atrophic acne scars. With lower PIH risk and pain scores, FPL is more suitable for acne scar patients prone to PIH or sensitive to pain.