首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

硫酸奈替米星注射液与硫酸丁胺卡那注射液临床疗效及安全性的比较
引用本文:殷凯生,张劲松,傅完珍,戴玲娟,朱剑秋.硫酸奈替米星注射液与硫酸丁胺卡那注射液临床疗效及安全性的比较[J].南京医科大学学报,1999(1).
作者姓名:殷凯生  张劲松  傅完珍  戴玲娟  朱剑秋
作者单位:南京医科大学第一附属医院呼吸科,南京市鼓楼医院呼吸科
摘    要:为评价硫酸奈替米星的临床疗效及安全性,在170例急性细菌感染性病人中作多中心临床研究。结果显示:硫酸奈替米星的有效率(95.3%)显著高于对照药硫酸丁胺卡那的有效率(84.1%),试验组病人咳痰和腰痛症状的平均下降显著高于对照组;硫酸奈替米星治疗后细菌清除率达97.2%;2组病人不良反应发生率均为4.8%,对照组中有2例(3.2%)出现耳鸣、1例(1.6%)听力减退,但试验组病人用药后未发现听力异常。结论:硫酸奈替米星临床疗效优于硫酸丁胺卡那且较少耳毒性。

关 键 词:氨基糖苷类  硫酸奈替米星  硫酸丁胺卡那  细菌感染  治疗  疗效  安全性

A Comparison on Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Netilmicin Sulfate and Amikacin Sulfate
Yin Kaisheng,Zhang Jinsong,Fu Wanzhen,et al.A Comparison on Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Netilmicin Sulfate and Amikacin Sulfate[J].Acta Universitatis Medicinalis Nanjing,1999(1).
Authors:Yin Kaisheng  Zhang Jinsong  Fu Wanzhen  
Institution:Yin Kaisheng,Zhang Jinsong,Fu Wanzhen,et al Department of Respiratory Medicine,the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University,Nanjing\ 210029
Abstract:The clinical efficacy and safety of Netilmicin and Amikacin sulfate was compared in 170 patients with acute bacterial infections by a multi center study. The results showed that the effective case rate of Nitilmicin (95 3%) was significantly higher than that of Amikacin, the reduction of average scores (sputum and lumbago) in test group was more than that in control group, and the clearance rate of bacteria of Nitilmicin sulfate was 97.2%. The side effect rates were 4.8% in both test and control group, and in control group there were 2 cases (3.2%) with tinnitus and 1 case (1.6%) with reduced hearing, but there was no change of hearing in 107 cases with treatment of Netilmicin sulfate. It is concluded that as a useful drug with good clinical efficacy and safety, Netilmicin is better than Amikacin sulfate.
Keywords:aminoglycosides  netilmicin sulfate  amikacin sulfate  bacterial intection  treatment  efficacy  safety  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号