首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

直视下行大鼠气管插管的方法比较
引用本文:叶明霞,孔利佳.直视下行大鼠气管插管的方法比较[J].中国比较医学杂志,2013,23(3):49-52,I0004.
作者姓名:叶明霞  孔利佳
作者单位:叶明霞 (华中科技大学同济医学院实验动物学部,武汉,430030); 孔利佳 (华中科技大学同济医学院实验动物学部,武汉,430030);
摘    要:目的探讨更简单有效的大鼠气管插管方法。方法将40只大鼠随机分成经额镜辅助组和经颈透照直视组两组,比较插管时间、插管次数、插管一次成功率及拔管1周后存活率。结果经颈透照组的插管操作时间、插管次数、一次插管成功率均优于经额镜辅助组(P<0.05),拔管1周后的存活率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论采用自制器材的经颈透照直视插管法优于经额镜辅助插管法,自制器材值得推广应用。

关 键 词:大鼠  直视  气管插管

Improved method of orotracheal intubation under direct vision in rats
YE Ming-xia,KONG Li-jia.Improved method of orotracheal intubation under direct vision in rats[J].Chinese Journal of Comparative Medicine,2013,23(3):49-52,I0004.
Authors:YE Ming-xia  KONG Li-jia
Institution:(Faculty of Laboratory Animal Science,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan,430030,China)
Abstract:Objective To investigate more simple and effective method of rat orotracheal intubation. Methods 40 rats were randomly divided into two groups. The intubation time and intubation frequency, the success rate of the first intubation, the survival rate in 1 week were compared between the improved group and the conventional group. Results The time and frequency of intubation were significantly less in the improved group than those in the conventional group ( 10. 83 ± 1.69 ) s vs (36.41 ± 3.71 ) s, 1.04 :e 0. 21 vs 1.78 ± 1.03,P 〈 0. 05 ]. The success rate of the first intubation in the improved group was obviously higher than that of the conventional group ( 95% vs 60% , P 〈 0.05 ). There was no obviously difference in the survival rate after extubation in I week between groups (100% vs 85% , P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion The improved method is superior to the conventional method, Homemade instruments is worth promoting.
Keywords:Rats  Direct vision  Orotraeheal intubation
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号