首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

趋势导向视野检查法与常规阈值视野检查法的对比研究
引用本文:钟一声,叶纹,高骏,俞方知,王康孙.趋势导向视野检查法与常规阈值视野检查法的对比研究[J].中华眼底病杂志,2002,18(4):269-272.
作者姓名:钟一声  叶纹  高骏  俞方知  王康孙
作者单位:200025,上海第二医科大学附属瑞金医院眼科
摘    要:目的 评价趋势导向视野检查法(tendency-oriented perimetry, TOP)在青光眼视功能检测中的应用价值。 方法 利用Octopus 101全自动视野计分别对20名正常人的20只正常眼、32例原发性开角型青光眼(primary open angle glaucoma, POAG)患者的32只患眼和14例可疑POAG患者的14只眼分别进行常规阈值视野检查(Normal/Normal程序)和TOP视野检查(TOP/Normal程序)。所有受检眼在2周内再次分别进行常规阈值视野检查和TOP视野检查。将两种视野检查的结果、视野检查指数、点对点阈值变异及视野缺损点数进行比较和分析。 结果 TOP视野检查正常人的阴性检出率为90%,POAG的阳性检出率为75%,其中检测中晚期POAG的阳性检出率达100%。2种视野检查的视野指数呈明显正相关,平均敏感度(mean sensitivity, MS)的相关系数为0.9335,平均缺损(mean defect, MD)的相关系数为0.9189,偏离缺失(loss variance, LV)的相关系数为0.9621。点对点阈值变异和视野缺损点数TOP视野检查结果略高于常规阈值视野检查结果,但二者间差异均无显著性的意义(P=0.2019,P=0.4448)。 结论 TOP视野检查指数与常规阈值视野检查指数呈明显正相关,其检测中晚期POAG的敏感性及可重复性高。 (中华眼底病杂志, 2002, 18: 169-272)

关 键 词:趋势导向视野检查法  视野检查法  阈限值  TOP  青光眼
修稿时间:2002年7月19日

The comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry and traditional threshold perimetry
ZHONG Yi-sheng,YE Wen,GAO Jun,et al.The comparison between tendency-oriented perimetry and traditional threshold perimetry[J].Chinese Journal of Ocular Fundus Diseases,2002,18(4):269-272.
Authors:ZHONG Yi-sheng  YE Wen  GAO Jun  
Institution:The Ophthalmology Department, Affiliated Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Second Medical University, Shanghai 200025, China
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the application of tendency-oriented perimetry (TOP) in detecting the visual function of glaucoma. Methods The traditional threshold perimetry (Normal/Normal strategy) and TOP (TOP/Normal strategy) carried out by Octopus 101 perimetry were used to examine the visual field of 20 normal subjects (20 eyes), 32 cases (32 eyes) of primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), and 14 cases (14 eyes) of suspected POAG, respectively. The visual field outcomes, indices, point by point threshold variability and defective points of the two perimetries were compared and analysed. Results The negative rate of TOP was 90% in normal subjects. The positive rate of TOP was 75% in POAG , and 100% in middle and late stage of POAG. The visual field indices of two perimetries were positively correlated, with mean sensitivity (MS) of r=0.9335, mean defect (MD) of r=0.9189, and loss variance (LV) of r=0.9621. The point by point threshold variability and defective points of TOP were higher than those of traditional threshold perimetry, but the difference between the two perimetries was not significant (P=0.2019, P=0.4448). Conclusion The visual field indices of TOP and traditional threshold perimetry are positively correlated. The sensitivity and reproducibility of TOP are high in detecting the visual function of middle and late stage of POAG.
Keywords:Perimetry  Threshold limit values  Comparative study
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中华眼底病杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中华眼底病杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号