首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

对胡永才虚假文章的剖析
引用本文:张向清,肖摩.对胡永才虚假文章的剖析[J].中国烧伤创疡杂志,2006,18(3):187-196.
作者姓名:张向清  肖摩
作者单位:1. 中国中西医结合学会烧伤专业委员会,北京,100020
2. 中国烧伤创疡科技中心,北京,100020
摘    要:目的:揭露胡永才虚假文章的事实真相,消除负面影响。方法:对“湿润烧伤膏治疗烧伤总面积>50%TBSA患者的疗效观察”一文的课题设计、处理因素、效应指标、统计方法及论文写作等内容进行全面剖析。结果:课题设计违背了科研原则,观察组与对照组处理因素随意性太大,效应指标缺乏可信性,诊断依据不标准,统计学概念不清,论文写作不规范。结论:论文内容失真,不能代表总体样本真实情况。

关 键 词:虚假文章  错误剖析
文章编号:1001-0726(2006)03-0187-10
收稿时间:2006-06-10
修稿时间:2006年6月10日

Analysis of a spurious article written by HU Yong Cai
Zhang Xiang-qing,XIAO Mo.Analysis of a spurious article written by HU Yong Cai[J].The Chinese Journal of Burns Wounds & Surface Ulcers,2006,18(3):187-196.
Authors:Zhang Xiang-qing  XIAO Mo
Institution:1. Special Committee of Burns, Chinese Society of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Beqing, 100020, China; 2. Chinese Science and Technology Center for Burns, Wounds and Ulcers, Bering, 100020, China
Abstract:Objective: To expose the spuriousness of the article written by HU Yong Cai and to clarify the truth of the matter. Method: A comprehensive analysis of the spuriousness of the article entitled "Observation of the efficacy of MEBO in treating patients with a total burn area over 50% TBSA" was made. The analysis included ideology of design, factors of treatment, indexes of effect, method of statistical treatment and paper writing, etc. Result: The design violated the principle of scientific research. The arbitrariness in the treatment of the data was very serious. The indexes of effect were not reliable. The basis of the diagnosis was not standardized. The concept of the statistics was not clear and the paper writing did not conform to the standard. Conclusion: The content of this paper was not true and could not reflect the actual condition of the samples as a whole.
Keywords:Spurious paper  analysis of the mistakes
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号