首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

帕尼培南-倍他米隆的临床评价
引用本文:杨帆,张婴元,郑丽叶.帕尼培南-倍他米隆的临床评价[J].中华内科杂志,2000,39(2):107-110.
作者姓名:杨帆  张婴元  郑丽叶
作者单位: 
摘    要:目的 评价碳青霉烯类新药帕尼培南-倍他米隆的疗效与安全性。方法 以亚胺培南-西司他丁为对照药,对两种药物治疗重症下呼吸道、尿咱和腹腔细菌性感染共246例的疗效和窀生进行随机对照观察。另以帕尼培南-倍他米隆开放治疗其他感染10例。结果 帕尼培南-倍他米隆组和亚胺培南-西司他丁组的有效率分别为89.0%和89.9%,细菌清除率分别为78.4%和80.0%;治疗组和对照组的不良反应发生率各为5.8%和9

关 键 词:细菌感染  帕尼培南  倍他米隆  安全性  疗效
修稿时间:1999-03-28

Clinical evaluation of panipenem betamipron
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of panipenem betamipron, a new carbapenem. Methods A randomized controlled study of panipenem betamipron vs imipenem cilastatin in the treatment of 246 patients with severe bacterial infection of lower respiratory tract, urinary tract and abdomen was carried out. Panipenem betamipron was also administered non comparatively to 10 patients with septicemia and infection of central nervous system. Results The total effective rates of panipenem betamipron and imipenem cilastatin were 89.0% (113/127) and 89.9% (107/119), and bacterial eradication rates were 78.4% (98/125) and 80.0%(100/125), respectively. Adverse reaction rates of panipenem betamipron and imipenem cilastatin were 5.8% (8/137) and 9.3%(12/129), and the rates of laboratory abnormality caused by the two drugs were 5.8%(8/137) and 3.9%(5/128). There was no significant statistical difference between the two groups. The clinical response of non comparative cases was cure in 8 and improvement in 2. Conclusion Panipenem betamipron is effective and safe in the treating severe infections of lower respiratory tract, urinary tract and abdomen.
Keywords:Bacterial infections  Panipenem  Imipenem  
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号