首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

GnRH激动剂联合HCG双扳机对高龄女性IVF的影响
引用本文:肖宇,王旻,刘凯.GnRH激动剂联合HCG双扳机对高龄女性IVF的影响[J].医学研究杂志,2018,47(8):125-129.
作者姓名:肖宇  王旻  刘凯
作者单位:200030 上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院,200030 上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院,200030 上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院
基金项目:上海市卫生和计划生育委员会临床研究专项青年项目(20184Y0289)
摘    要:目的 探索促性腺激素释放激素激动剂(GnRH-a)联合人绒毛膜促性腺激素(HCG)双扳机是否有益于接受体外受精(IVF)治疗的高龄女性。方法 回顾两年来不孕高龄女性在笔者所在科室接受IVF治疗的699个周期,根据扳机用药不同分为3组,即单用HCG组、单用GnRH-a组、GnRH-a联合HCG组。比较3组间的获卵、胚胎质量、并发症等情况,并对其后续冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期进行分析,比较3组间妊娠结局。结果 双扳机组与GnRH-a组相似,其获卵数、成熟卵数、有效胚胎数均显著多于HCG组(P=0.000),但3组间的受精率、卵裂率、有效胚胎率比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。HCG组中重度卵巢过度刺激综合征(OHSS)发生率为3.07%,而其他两组中均无发生。GnRH-a组有获卵失败比例升高的趋势,但与其他两组差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同扳机方式的后续FET妊娠结局间比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论 与传统HCG或GnRH-a扳机方式比较,GnRH-a联合HCG双扳机更有利于得到更多的卵子数和成熟卵数,同时避免发生诱导排卵失败、或中重度OHSS的风险。

关 键 词:高龄  体外受精  促性腺激素释放激素  激动剂  双扳机
收稿时间:2018/1/5 0:00:00
修稿时间:2018/1/15 0:00:00

Effects of Double Trigger by Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone Agonist and Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin on Advance-aged Females Receiving in vitro Fertilization Treatment
Xiao Yu,Wang Min and Liu Kai.Effects of Double Trigger by Gonadotrophin-releasing Hormone Agonist and Human Chorionic Gonadotrophin on Advance-aged Females Receiving in vitro Fertilization Treatment[J].Journal of Medical Research,2018,47(8):125-129.
Authors:Xiao Yu  Wang Min and Liu Kai
Institution:International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China,International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China and International Peace Maternity and Child Health Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200030, China
Abstract:Objective To investigate whether there are benefits of double trigger by GnRH agonist and HCG on advance-aged females receiving IVF treatment. Methods The data of 699 IVF cycles in 2 years treated for 35 and above years old women were collected retrospectively. According to the differences of trigger protocol, these cycles were divided into 3 groups:HCG group, GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) group, and Double trigger group for the protocol by using GnRH-a and HCG together. Oocytes retrieved, embryo quality, complications of treatment were compared among 3 groups, as well as the pregnancy outcomes of frozen embryo transfer (FET). Results Double trigger and GnRH-a groups had the comparable number of oocytes, matured oocytes and viable embryos, which were both significantly higher than the number in HCG group (P=0.000). However the rates of fertilization, cleavage and viable embryo among 3 groups were similar (P>0.05). No moderate or severe hyperstimulation ovarian syndrome happened in Double trigger and GnRH-a groups, while the incidence in HCG group was 3.07%. GnRH-a trigger might be accompanied by a slight but not significant higher incidence of failed oocyte retrieve (P>0.05). The pregnancy outcomes of FET were comparable among 3 groups (P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with traditional trigger protocol, the Double trigger may have benefits on more retrieved oocyte and matured oocytes. Double trigger by GnRH-a and HCG may also prevent the occurrences of the failed ovulation and severe hyperstimulation ovarian syndromes.
Keywords:Advanced age  IVF  GnRH  Agonist  Double trigger
点击此处可从《医学研究杂志》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《医学研究杂志》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号