首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
检索        

英国、新加坡和中国香港全民医保的运行及启示
引用本文:易龙飞.英国、新加坡和中国香港全民医保的运行及启示[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(5):49-55.
作者姓名:易龙飞
作者单位:浙江大学公共管理学院 浙江杭州 310058
摘    要:作为医疗保障制度较为健全的国家和地区,英国、新加坡和中国香港三地的全民医疗保障体系经常成为学术界的研究对象。英国是全民免费医疗的典范,新加坡是政府主导的混合型医疗保障模式的代表,香港则凭借着质优价廉的公立医院服务享誉全球。本文将从卫生筹资的公平性、个人的可负担能力、医疗保障的覆盖模式、卫生筹资的可持续性以及个人责任的承担这五个核心维度来评估三地医疗保障系统的优越性和局限性,以期为我国新时期医疗改革的深化提供借鉴与参考。

关 键 词:卫生筹资  医疗保障  公平性  可负担性  可持续性
收稿时间:2014/4/16 0:00:00
修稿时间:5/4/2014 12:00:00 AM

The operation and implication of universal health insurance in the United Kingdom, Singapore and Hong Kong
YI Long-fei.The operation and implication of universal health insurance in the United Kingdom, Singapore and Hong Kong[J].Chinese Journal of Health Policy,2014,7(5):49-55.
Authors:YI Long-fei
Institution:School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Hangzhou 310058, China
Abstract:As the excellent country or region refers to medical insurance system, the United Kingdom, Singapore and Hong Kong are often the focus of international academic circles. However, the difference is that the United Kingdom is a model of free universal medical care, Singapore is a government-led mixed medical protection mode, and Hong Kong earns a worldwide reputation on health care by virtue of the high quality, low price public hospital services. This article assesses the advantages and limitations of the three medical insurance systems in terms of equity in financing, individual affordability, insurance coverage, sustainability in financing and individual responsibility, and provides a reference for health care reform in China.
Keywords:Health financing  Health security  Equity  Affordability  Sustainability
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录!
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》浏览原始摘要信息
点击此处可从《中国卫生政策研究》下载免费的PDF全文
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号