基于“肝阳虚”理论探讨化疗所致周围神经病变的病机与治疗＊

化疗所致周围神经病变（Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy，CIPN）是临床常见的由化疗药物引起的一系列神经毒性症状，易造成神经功能障碍，四肢感觉弱化、缺失等，严重影响肿瘤患者生活质量及临床疗效。CIPN的发病机制尚不十分明确，目前也没有可广泛用于临床的特效药物治疗。中医药治疗CIPN具有特定的优势，取得了一定成绩，但在理论依据和临床疗效方面仍有一定的局限性。本文通过分析CIPN的临床症状特点，深入剖析其与中医肝阳虚理论之间的关系，探讨CIPN的中医病因病机与用药规律，指导临床治疗CIPN，以期更好地发挥中医药在肿瘤治疗中的减毒增效作用。     

COX20基因变异线粒体复合物Ⅳ缺乏症相关的遗传性周围神经病4例病例系列报告及文献复习

背景：原发性线粒体病具有高度的临床和遗传异质性，其中周围神经是线粒体病的常见受累器官之一。 目的：总结COX20基因变异相关周围神经病的临床表型及遗传学特征。 设计：病例系列报告。 方法：回顾性收集2018年5月至2020年5月复旦大学附属儿科医院诊治的COX20基因变异相关周围神经病患儿的临床资料，总结其临床表现、基因检测结果及治疗效果，并以“COX20”、“线粒体复合物Ⅳ缺乏症（Complex Ⅳ deficiency）”为关键词检索中英文数据库。检索时间均为从建库至2021年12月。总结已报道COX20基因变异与临床表型的关系。 主要结局指标：临床表型和COX20基因变异位点。 结果：4例患儿纳入分析，男、女各2例，其中3例自幼运动发育落后。4例均在儿童期起病，均以行走不稳为首发症状。肌电图均提示多发性周围神经损害改变，感觉神经轴索受累为主。4例患儿均携带COX20基因复合杂合变异，包括错义变异2个，无义变异和移码变异各1个，其中移码变异c.262delG(p.E88Kfs*35)尚未见报道。文献复习目前共报道COX基因变异18个家系22例患儿（包括本文病例）,起病中位年龄为5（1.0~17）岁，22例均以行走困难或步态不稳起病，11例（50.0%）有精神运动发育迟滞，病程中14例(63.6%)出现构音障碍，14例(63.6%)出现肌力下降和/或足部畸形，8例（36.4%）出现共济失调，6例(27.3%)出现肌张力障碍，5例（22.7%）存在认知倒退等。21例患儿行神经传导及肌电图检查，19例(90.5%)提示多发性周围神经病变。头颅（18例）及脊髓（10例）MR检查提示，脊髓萎缩4例（40%），小脑萎缩4例（22.2%）。9例患儿已无法独立行走，丧失独立行走能力中位年龄为10（7~21）岁。目前共报道9个变异位点，4种变异类型，其中错义变异5个，剪切变异2个，无义变异和移码变异各1个。 结论：COX20基因变异患者多早期起病，以周围神经系统病变为主要表现，可合并构音障碍、共济失调、肌张力障碍、认知倒退等，病情逐渐进展，致残率高。COX20基因变异类型以错义变异最常见。     

医院-社区-家庭闭环式模式在老年糖尿病周围神经病变患者中的应用价值

【摘要】目的 探讨“医院-社区-家庭”闭环式管理模式在老年糖尿病周围神经病变（DPN）患者中的应用价值。方法 选取2017年6月～2019年6月我院收治的老年DPN患者96例，随机分为观察组与对照组，每组各48例。对照组采用常规护理，观察组采用医院-社区-家庭闭环式管理模式。比较两组患者治疗依从性、血糖控制、心理健康状况、周围神经病变情况以及神经传导速率。结果 干预后，观察组患者用药、饮食、血糖测量、健康行为等方面依从率均高于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组空腹血糖、饭后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组SCL-90症状自评量表躯体化、人际关系敏感、抑郁、焦虑、敌对以及睡眠饮食情况得分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组密西根糖尿病周围神经病变量表（MDNS）和多伦多临床神经病变评分量表（TCSS）评分均低于对照组（P＜0.05）；观察组正中神经、腓总神经神经传导速度（SNCV）和运动神经传导速度（MNCV）均高于对照组（P＜0.05）。结论 对老年DPN患者应用医院-社区-家庭闭环式管理模式能有效提高患者自我管理效能，维持血糖平稳，缓解不良情绪以改善DPN病情。     

Dorsal Root Ganglion Stimulation for the Management of Intractable Painful Polyneuropathy: A Prospective Pilot Study

Objectives: Dorsal root ganglion stimulation (DRGS) is a promising neurostimulation modality in the treatment of painful polyneuropathy. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to investigate the effect of DRGS on pain intensity in patients with intractable painful polyneuropathy.Materials and Methods: Nine patients with chronic, intractable painful polyneuropathy in the lower limbs were recruited. In each subject, between two and four DRGS leads were placed at the level of the L5 and S1 dorsal root ganglion. If trial stimulation was successful, a definitive implantable pulse generator (IPG) was implanted. Pain intensity was scored using an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) and reported as median and interquartile range (IQR), and compared to baseline values using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Additionally, patients’ global impression of change (PGIC), pain extent, presence of neuropathic pain, physical functioning, quality of life, and mood were assessed.Results: Eight out of nine patients had a successful trial phase, of which seven received an IPG. Daytime pain decreased from a median (IQR) NRS score of 7.0 (5.9–8.3) to 2.0 (1.0–3.5) and 3.0 (1.6–4.9) in the first week and at six months after implantation, respectively. Similar effects were observed for night time and peak pain scores.Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that DRGS significantly reduces both pain intensity and PGIC in patients with intractable painful polyneuropathy in the lower extremities. Large-scale clinical trials are needed to prove the efficacy of DRGS in intractable painful polyneuropathy.     

Effect of peer support on adults with diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy

ObjectiveTo explore the effect of peer support on exercise self-efficacy, physical activity level, and neuropathic symptoms in patients with diabetes-related peripheral neuropathy (DPN).MethodsA total of 60 adults with DPN were assigned to groups. Patients in the control group received routine education (RE), while patients in the intervention group received peer support (PS) combined with routine diabetes education. Data were collected at baseline and after intervention (12 weeks).ResultsAt 12 weeks, better outcomes were found in the PS group compared to the RE group for the following aspects: exercise self-efficacy, steps, total physical activity, fasting blood glucose and 2-hour postprandial blood glucose. Decreases in scores on Toronto Clinical Scoring System occurred between baseline and post-intervention in both groups.ConclusionPeer support is an effective way to improve exercise self-efficacy, number of steps, and general physical activity and to reduce blood glucose for patients with DPN. But the effects of peer support on neuropathic symptoms is are obvious. Further research is needed.Practice implicationsAs a low-cost, effective education approach, peer support strategies should be integrated into our healthcare system to meet the minimum needs of patients with DPN.