Parents’ expectations,preferences, and recall of germline findings in a childhood cancer precision medicine trial

Background

Germline genome sequencing in childhood cancer precision medicine trials may reveal pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in cancer predisposition genes in more than 10% of children. These findings can have implications for diagnosis, treatment, and the child’s and family’s future cancer risk. Understanding parents’ perspectives of germline genome sequencing is critical to successful clinical implementation.

Methods

A total of 182 parents of 144 children (<18 years of age) with poor-prognosis cancers enrolled in the Precision Medicine for Children with Cancer trial completed a questionnaire at enrollment and after the return of their child’s results, including clinically relevant germline findings (received by 13% of parents). Parents’ expectations of germline genome sequencing, return of results preferences, and recall of results received were assessed. Forty-five parents (of 43 children) were interviewed in depth.

Results

At trial enrollment, most parents (63%) believed it was at least “somewhat likely” that their child would receive a clinically relevant germline finding. Almost all expressed a preference to receive a broad range of germline genomic findings, including variants of uncertain significance (88%). Some (29%) inaccurately recalled receiving a clinically relevant germline finding. Qualitatively, parents expressed confusion and uncertainty after the return of their child’s genome sequencing results by their child’s clinician.

Conclusions

Many parents of children with poor-prognosis childhood cancer enrolled in a precision medicine trial expect their child may have an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome. They wish to receive a wide scope of information from germline genome sequencing but may feel confused by the reporting of trial results.     

Congenital Retroperitoneal Teratoma in Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) is caused by mutations in the tumor suppressor gene NF1. The increased tumor risk in affected individuals is well established, caused by somatic biallelic inactivation of NF1 due to loss of heterozygosity. Pediatric teratoma has not been reported in individuals with NF1 previously. We report a case of congenital teratoma in an infant with a heterozygous maternally inherited pathogenic NF1 mutation (c.[1756_1759delACTA] and p.[Thr586Valfs*18]). We detected a “second hit” in the form of mosaic whole NF1 deletion in the tumor tissue using multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification, as a proof to support the hypothesis of NF1 involvement in the pathogenesis of teratoma.