排序方式: 共有6条查询结果,搜索用时 15 毫秒
1
1.
Josupeit Jan Dadaczynski Kevin Quilling Eike 《Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz》2022,65(7-8):829-835
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - Die Schule ist einer der wichtigsten Orte, an dem die Förderung der Gesundheit von Kindern und Jugendlichen ansetzen kann,... 相似文献
2.
Dadaczynski Kevin Rathmann Katharina Schricker Julia Bilz Ludwig Sudeck Gorden Fischer Saskia M. Janiczek Oliver Quilling Eike 《Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz》2022,65(7-8):784-794
Bundesgesundheitsblatt - Gesundheitsforschung - Gesundheitsschutz - Während vermehrt Studienbefunde zur allgemeinen Gesundheitskompetenz (GK) vorliegen, mangelt es an Erkenntnissen zur... 相似文献
3.
4.
Christine Graf Ralph Beneke Wilhelm Bloch Jens Bucksch Sigrid Dordel Stefanie Eiser Nina Ferrari Benjamin Koch Susanne Krug Wolfgang Lawrenz Kristin Manz Roland Naul Renate Oberhoffer Eike Quilling Henry Schulz Theo Stemper Günter Stibbe Walter Tokarski Klaus V?lker Alexander Woll 《Obesity facts》2014,7(3):178-190
Increasing physical activity and reduction of sedentary behaviour play important roles in health promotion and prevention of lifestyle-related diseases in children and adolescents. However, the question of how much physical activity is useful for which target group is still a matter of debate. International guidelines (World Health Organization; European Association for the Study of Obesity), which are mainly based on expert opinions, recommend 60 min of physical activity every day. Age- and sex-specific features and regional differences are not taken into account. Therefore, expert consensus recommendations for promoting physical activity of children and adolescents in Germany were developed with special respect to national data, but also with respect to aspects of specific target groups, e.g., children with a lower socio-economic status (SES) or with migration background. They propose 90 min/day of physical activity, or at least 12,000 steps daily. Additionally, lifestyle factors, especially restriction of media consumption, were integrated. The recommendations provide orientation for parents and caregivers, for institutions such as schools and kindergartens as well as for communities and stakeholders.Key Words: Physical activity, Sedentary behaviour, Children, Adolescents, Prevention 相似文献
5.
Prof. Dr. Dr. C. Graf R. Beneke W. Bloch J. Bucksch S. Dordel S. Eiser N. Ferrari B. Koch S. Krug W. Lawrenz K. Manz R. Naul R. Oberhoffer E. Quilling H. Schulz T. Stemper G. Stibbe W. Tokarski K. Völker A. Woll 《Monatsschrift für Kinderheilkunde》2013,161(5):439-446
Background
An increase in physical activity and a reduction of sedentary behavior play important roles in health promotion and prevention of life style-related diseases in children and adolescents. However, the question of how much physical activity is useful for which target group is still a matter of debate.Recommendations for promotion of physical activity
International guidelines based on expert opinions recommend at least 60 min of physical activity every day. Age-specific and sex-specific features and regional differences are not taken into account. Expert consensus recommendations were developed to promote physical activity of children and adolescents in Germany with special respect to national data and also aspects of specific target groups, e.g. children with lower socioeconomic status or with a migration background. The recommendations propose 90 min of physical activity or at least 12,000 steps daily. Additionally lifestyle factors, especially a limitation of media consumption were integrated. The recommendations provide orientation for parents and caregivers as well as institutions, such as schools and kindergartens through to communities and stakeholders. 相似文献6.
Raimund Geene Ute Thyen Eike Quilling Britta Bacchetta 《Pr?vention und Gesundheitsf?rderung》2016,11(4):222-229
Background
Health behaviour is substantially determined and shaped by early childhood experiences within the family environment. However, as a constitutionally protected social space, families are not obliged to follow specific health behaviour standards or to take part in preventive measures. This means that the family cannot be seen as a setting, as described in the prevention law (PrävG) and the intervention logic of the setting approach is not directly applicable to the family environment.Objectives
The purpose of the article is to explore the new challenges for family health promotion arising from the PrävG prevention law.Methods
The article analyses the new family-related statutory regulations of PrävG including the relevant actors, responsibilities and intersecting regulation issues taking into account the federal child protection law (Bundeskinderschutzgesetz) adopted in 2012. The article then goes on to define requirements for health promotion in families derived from the Ottawa Charter. In the final section, the transition approach is applied, considering relevant factors for health promotion especially around childbirth and identifying needs and enabling factors for health promotion in the family environment.Results
Family health promotion should be designed as a common task of health services, child and youth services and other local actors. The three core strategies of the Ottawa Charter—Advocate, Enable and Mediate—are suitable to guide the process. “Prevention Chains” are coordinated actor networks constructed to assist families in the promotion of health and the management of transitions. The PrävG creates a new role for medical prevention management and for communities to become the “umbrella setting” for health promotion.Discussion
Family health promotion is a complex challenge for actors involved in providing and supporting health services, those in the local environment and at the steering level. It requires an independent research-based intervention approach including the identification of adequate methods and clearly acknowledged institutional responsibilities.
1