Comment on EBPG guideline on dialysis strategies

Sir, In the EBPG guideline on dialysis strategies (Nephrol Dial Transplant2007; 22 [Suppl 2]: ii5–15) is stated on ii12: ‘Indeed,several randomized trials conducted in the last years have confirmed     

Serum guanidino compound levels and the influence of a single hemodialysis in uremic patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis

Guanidino compounds are increased in uremia and are highly suspected to be uremic toxins. The serum levels of 11 guanidino compounds and the influence of a single hemodialysis were evaluated in 30 steady-state uremic patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. Guanidino compound levels were detected using liquid cation exchange chromatography with a highly sensitive fluorescence detection method. Highly standardized dialysis procedures were performed. Before hemodialysis, high levels were found for guanidinosuccinic acid, N-alpha-acetylarginine, argininic acid, creatinine, gamma-guanidinobutyric acid, guanidine and methylguanidine. Guanidinosuccinic acid reached levels associated with toxic effects in vitro. After hemodialysis, although lowered, guanidinosuccinic acid, creatinine, guanidine and methylguanidine were still markedly increased. No differences in the percent decrease, during a single hemodialysis, of the studied compounds were found using different membranes such as cellulose acetate, cuprophane and polyacrylonitrile membranes. Substantial differences, however, in the percent decrease of the different guanidino compounds were found, ranging from 25 +/- 13% for arginine to 74 +/- 7.5% for guanidinosuccinic acid. Data reported here show that guanidino compounds are raised in serum of uremic patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, before as well as after a single hemodialysis, while substantial differences in the percent decrease of the different guanidino compounds are found.     

Intermittent venovenous haemodiafiltration in critically ill patients with acute renal failure

Various renal replacement therapies have been used for the treatment of acute renal failure in critically ill patients in the last decade. Due to the slower rate of solute and fluid removal, the continuous renal replacement therapies are generally better tolerated than conventional therapy. There is no consensus whether different treatment strategies effect the outcome of critically ill patients and no clear definition of adequacy of renal support in the severely ill patient. Despite their possible benefits, the continuous renal replacement therapies place major demands on the organisation and workload in the dialysis unit. Having taken this into consideration our unit has opted for a ten hours daytime intermittent venovenous haemodiafiltration technique as an alternative for patients in severe conditions of haemodynamic instability, the so-called "go slow" dialysis.     

Impact of convective flow on phosphorus removal in maintenance hemodialysis patients.

OBJECTIVE: Hyperphosphatemia leads to increased risk of death in maintenance hemodialysis patients (MHD). This study investigated phosphorus (P) removal, P reduction rate (PRR), and P rebound, comparing on-line, high-volume hemodiafiltration in postdilution (HDF) and high-flux hemodialysis (HD) in a setting of an equal amount of produced dialysate solution in both modalities. METHODS: A total of 22 MHD patients, treated with regular 3 x 4 hours HDF weekly, were randomly dialyzed with one 4-hour session of HDF and of HD. In both modalities, an equal amount of produced dialysate solution of 800 mL/minute was used. The only variable was the fact that in HDF, 100 mL/min of this produced dialysate solution was used as replacement fluid. The other parameters were kept identical: blood flow rate, 350 mL/min; high-flux polysulfone F80 dialyzer; and 4800 E monitor, (Fresenius, Bad Homburg, Germany). The P removal was measured in total spent dialysate and ultrafiltrate volumes. Statistical analyses were done with the paired t-test. RESULTS: The mean total P removed with HDF was 1159 +/- 296 mg, and 972 +/- 312 mg with HD (P < .001), ie, 19% higher in HDF; PRR was significantly higher in HDF (63.3%) versus HD (58.6%) (P = .014). The mean serum P did not differ: 5.3 mg/dL in HDF and 5.2 mg/dL in HD. There was a linear correlation between serum P and P removal. With a serum P level up to 5 to 5.5 mg/dL, HDF achieved a higher P removal compared with HD. The difference gradually decreased as the serum P value increased. Above 7 mg/dL, no difference in total P removal was observed. There was a high but equal rebound percentage at 60 minutes in HDF (42%) and HD (39%) (P = .42). With HDF, no predialysis metabolic acidosis was noted. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with on-line HDF in postdilution resulted in a higher P removal and higher PRR compared with HD. The long-term implementation of this modality may result in a more optimal serum P control, without an increase in the number of or lengthening of the dialysis sessions.     

Diagnostic criteria of analgesic nephropathy in patients with end-stage renal failure: results of the Belgian study.

Diagnostic criteria of analgesic nephropathy with well-defined sensitivity and specificity are not available. During a 2-year period all new patients (n = 273) starting renal replacement therapy in 13 Belgian dialysis units were investigated aiming to select diagnostic criteria of analgesic nephropathy with acceptable performance. Using several interview techniques, a history of analgesic abuse was found in 31% of the patients. Analgesic abusers presenting a clear non-analgesic-related renal diagnosis were excluded from analysis (n = 25). Comparing the remaining abusers (n = 60) and patients without a history of analgesic abuse (n = 188) it was found that renal imaging investigations (sonography plus tomography), showing a decrease in length combined with bumpy contours of both kidneys, presented a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 95%. The additional finding of signs of renal papillary necrosis resulted in an overall sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 97%, giving a positive predictive value of 92%. Other signs frequently mentioned in the literature (hypertension, anaemia, sterile pyuria, bacteriuria, proteinuria) showed insufficient sensitivity and/or specificity to be of help for diagnosing analgesic nephropathy in end-stage renal failure (ESRF) patients starting renal replacement therapy.