High nodal FDG uptake increases risk of distant metastasis in patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging - The purpose of this study was to investigate if FDG uptake metrics in primary tumor and lymph node metastases in patients with...     

Reproducibility of 18F-FDG PET uptake measurements in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on both PET/CT and PET/MR

Objective:

To investigate reproducibility of fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) uptake on ¹⁸F-FDG positron emission tomography (PET)/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR scans in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC).

Methods:

30 patients with HNSCC were included in this prospective study. The patients were scanned twice before radiotherapy treatment with both PET/CT and PET/MR. Patients were scanned on the same scanners, 3 days apart and according to the same protocol. Metabolic tumour activity was measured by the maximum and peak standardized uptake value (SUV_max and SUV_peak, respectively), and total lesion glycolysis from the metabolic tumour volume defined from ≥50% SUV_max. Bland–Altman analysis with limits of agreement, coefficient of variation (CV) from the two modalities were performed in order to test the reproducibility. Furthermore, CVs from SUV_max and SUV_peak were compared. The area under the curve from cumulative SUV–volume histograms were measured and tested for reproducibility of the distribution of ¹⁸F-FDG uptake.

Results:

24 patients had two pre-treatment PET/CT scans and 21 patients had two pre-treatment PET/MR scans available for further analyses. Mean difference for SUV_max, peak and mean was approximately 4% for PET/CT and 3% for PET/MR, with 95% limits of agreement less than ±20%. CV was small (5–7%) for both modalities. There was no significant difference in CVs between PET/CT and PET/MR (p = 0.31). SUV_max was not more reproducible than SUV_peak (p = 0.09).

Conclusion:

¹⁸F-FDG uptake in PET/CT and PET/MR is highly reproducible and we found no difference in reproducibility between PET/CT and PET/MR.

Advances in knowledge:

This is the first report to test reproducibility of PET/CT and PET/MR.Functional imaging with fluorine-18 fludeoxyglucose positron emission tomography combined with CT (¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT) has been shown to be useful for prognostication of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC),^1–3 and the use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT has also been shown to reduce interobserver variability in target delineation for radiotherapy.^4,5 Furthermore, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT can identify regions of the tumour with a high risk of relapse, leading to the idea that ¹⁸F-FDG uptake might be a target for dose painting.^6,7 Finally, ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT may be used in response evaluation.^8,9 Maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) has for many years been the main uptake measurement in prognostic studies for various malignancies. More recent studies have focused on demonstrating prognostic value of PET/CT-based volumetric parameters such as metabolic tumour volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG). MTV is the sum of the volume of voxels with standard uptake value (SUV) exceeding a certain threshold value in a tumour, and TLG is calculated by multiplying MTV and the mean standardized uptake value (SUV_mean) of the MTV. These volume-based PET parameters have increasingly gained interest and have been reported to be significant prognostic factors for various malignancies including HNSCC.^{10–13 18}F-FDG PET/CT is currently not routinely recommended as a diagnostic tool in HNSCC except in very specific situations,¹⁴ but reproducibility of the ¹⁸F-FDG signal is a prerequisite for a more widespread use of ¹⁸F-FDG PET for the above-mentioned indications. Yet, only a few studies of the reproducibility of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT exist^8,15–21 and none of these studies includes patients with HNSCC.MRI is gaining acceptance as an imaging modality for oncology as it offers superior soft-tissue contrast compared with CT alone, and it has been suggested that information from PET/CT and MR is complementary in head and neck cancer.²² The introduction of the integrated PET/MR scanner offers a unique opportunity to combine the high soft-tissue contrast of MR with the functional imaging from PET within a single imaging session. PET/MR is still in its infancy, but the combined modality imaging is potentially useful in the management of patients with HNSCC.^22–28 However, the same criteria of reproducibility as with PET/CT should be upheld by this new modality. The purpose of this prospective test–retest study is to assess the reproducibility of both ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT and ¹⁸F-FDG PET/MR in a homogenous cohort of patients with HNSCC.     

A closer look at RapidArc® radiosurgery plans using very small fields

RapidArc? has become the treatment of choice for an increasing number of treatment sites in many clinics. The extensive use of multiple subfields in RapidArc? treatments presents unique challenges, especially for small targets treated in few fractions. In this work, very small static fields and subsequently RapidArc? and conventional plans for two targets (0.4 and 9.9 cm(3)) were investigated. Doses from static fields 1-4 MLC leaves (0.25-1.00 cm) wide, and larger fields with 1-4 MLC leaves closed in their centres, were measured using the portal dosimeter-based QA system EPIQA (v?1.3) and gafchromic film. RapidArc and conventional plans for two tumours were then measured using EPIQA, gafchromic EBT2 film and the phantom-based QA system Delta4. Eclipse 8.6 and 8.9, grid spacings of 1.25 and 2.50 mm and a Varian HD linac were used. For static fields one MLC leaf wide, the dose was underestimated by Eclipse by as much as 53% (v?8.6, 2.5 mm grid). Eclipse underestimated the dose downstream from a few MLC leaves closed in the centre of a large MLC field by as much as 30%. Eclipse consistently overestimated the width of the penumbra by about 100%. For the conventional plans, there was good agreement between the calculated and measured dose for the 9.9 cm(3) PTV, but a 10% underdose was observed for the 0.4 cm(3) PTV. For the RapidArc? plans, the measured dose for the 9.9 cm(3) PTV was in good agreement with the calculated one. However, for the 0.4 cm(3) PTV about 10% overdosing was detected (Eclipse v 8.6, 2.5 mm grid spacing). EPIQA data indicated that the measured dose profiles were overmodulated compared to the calculated one. The use of small subfields, typically a few MLC leaves wide, or larger fields with one or a few MLC leaves closed in its centre can result in significant errors in the dose calculation. The detector systems used vary in their ability to detect the discrepancies. Using a smaller grid size and newer version of Eclipse reduces the discrepancies observed in this work but does not eliminate them.