组织工程化人形下颌骨髁状突的实验研究

目的　评价采用组织工程技术构建人下颌骨髁状突软骨复合组织的可行性。方法　以可降解生物材料聚羟基乙酸 (polyglycolicacid ,PGA) /聚乳酸 (polylacticacid ,PLA)预制人下颌骨髁状突模型 ,体外培养扩增牛骨膜成骨细胞和牛关节表面软骨。实验分 3组 :第 1组 ,模型内仅注入 1.5 %藻酸钙和 30 %氧化乙丙烯 ;第 2组 ,模型内分别注入成骨细胞和软骨细胞悬液 ,浓度为 5× 10 7/ml;第 3组 ,模型内接种成骨细胞藻酸钙悬液 ,同时在模型关节表面涂敷软骨细胞 PluronicF12 7悬液 ,浓度为 5× 10 7/ml。分别植入裸鼠皮下 ,12周后取材 ,作大体和组织学观察。结果　第 1组无骨和软骨形成 ,模型支架明显缩小 ,形态不规则 ;第 2组仅留残缺不全的组织结构 ,标本体积缩小变形 ;第 3组形态结构与原植入模型支架相同 ,组织学观察有骨和软骨组织结构 ,两者界面连接有序 ,骨组织内有大量新生骨板。结论　以人工合成生物材料预制人下颌骨髁状突支架 ,采用组织工程技术 ,可以在裸鼠体内构建具有骨软骨复合结构的正常形态的人形下颌骨髁状突 ,从而为进一步临床应用提供了理论依据     

An evaluation of the challenges to developing tumor BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing methodologies for clinical practice

Ovarian cancer patients with germline or somatic pathogenic variants benefit from treatment with poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors. Tumor BRCA1/2 testing is more challenging than germline testing as the majority of samples are formalin‐fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE), the tumor genome is complex, and the allelic fraction of somatic variants can be low. We collaborated with 10 laboratories testing BRCA1/2 in tumors to compare different approaches to identify clinically important variants within FFPE tumor DNA samples. This was not a proficiency study but an inter‐laboratory comparison to identify common issues. Each laboratory received the same tumor DNA samples ranging in genotype, quantity, quality, and variant allele frequency (VAF). Each laboratory performed their preferred next‐generation sequencing method to report on the variants. No false positive results were reported in this small study and the majority of methods detected the low VAF variants. A number of variants were not detected due to the bioinformatics analysis, variant classification, or insufficient DNA. The use of hybridization capture or short amplicon methods are recommended based on a bioinformatic assessment of the data. The study highlights the importance of establishing standards and standardization for tBRCA testing particularly when the test results dictate clinical decisions regarding life extending therapies.     

中西医结合治疗老年高脂血症

目的：探讨中西医结合治疗高脂血症的临床疗效。方法：符合高脂血症标准的老年患者120例，随机分为A、B2组各60例，A组采用益肾化淤、利湿化浊为主的中药及西药辛伐他汀片治疗；B组则单纯用辛伐他汀片治疗。治疗前及治疗4周后2组均行全套血脂水平测定。结果：与B组比较，A组血清总胆固醇（TC）及甘油三酯（TG）均明显下降，HDL明显上升（均P〈0．05）；A组临床控制率明显高于B组（P〈0．05）；治疗后A组患者未见肝功能损害，B组转氨酶及转肽酶轻度异常，2例。停药3个月后，A组复发率低于B组（2．2％、8．8％，P〈0．05）。结论：中西医结合治疗老年高脂血症的临床效果明显优于单一的一种治疗方法，值得临床进一步推广应用。     

Adaptive differentiation of murine lymphocytes. IV. (Responder × Nonresponder) F(1) T cells can be taught to preferentially help nonresponder,rather than responder, B cells

Responses to the synthetic terpolymer L-glutamic acid, L-lysine, L-tyrosine (GLT) in the mouse are controlled by H-2-1inked Ir-GLTgenes. (Responder × nonresponder) F(1) hybrid mice, themselves phenotypic responders, can be primed with GLT to develop specific helper cells capable of interacting with 2,4-dinitrophenyl hapten (DNP)-primed F(1) B cells in response to DNP-GLT. Unlike the indiscriminant ability of F(1) helper T cells for conventional antigens (i.e. not Ir gene-controlled), which can help B cells of either parental type (as well as F(1)) equally well, GLT-primed F(1) T cells can only provide help under normal circumstances for B lymphocytes of responder parent origin; they are unable to communicate effectively with nonresponder parental B cells (1, and the present studies). The present studies reveal, however, that the induction of a parental cell-induced allogeneic effect during priming of F(1) mice to GLT actually dictates the direction of cooperating preference that will be displayed by such F(1) helper cells for B cells of one parental type or the other. Thus, F(1) T cells, primed to GLT under the influence of an allogeneic effect induced by parental BALB/c cells, develop into effective helpers for nonresponder A/J B cells, but fail to develop effective helpers for responder BALB/c B cells, and vice-versa. In contrast, F(1) T cells, primed to GLT under the influence of an allogeneic effect induced by either parental type, display significantly enhanced levels of helper activity for B cells derived from F(1) donors. These results are interpreted to reflect the existence of two interdependent events provoked by the allogeneic effect: one event augments the differentiation of GLT-specific helper T cells belonging to the subset corresponding to the opposite parental type; this would explain the development of increased helper activity provided to partner B cells of opposite parental type (as well as of F(1) origin). The second event, we postulate, involves the production of responses against the receptors which normally self-recognize native cell interaction determinants; this form of anti-idiotype response is restricted against self- recognizing receptors of the same parental type used for induction of the allogeneic effect, hence explaining diminished helper activity of such F(1) cells for partner B lymphocytes of corresponding parental type.