Defining platelet response to acetylsalicylic acid: the relation between inhibition of serum thromboxane B2 and agonist-induced platelet aggregation

Journal of Thrombosis and Thrombolysis - Arachidonic acid (AA)-induced platelet aggregation (PA) and serum thromboxane B2 (TxB2) inhibition are widely used to indicate cyclooxygenase-1 activity and...     

P2Y12 receptor inhibitors for secondary prevention of ischemic stroke

Introduction: Ischemic stroke (IS) is a major cause of death and disability worldwide. The P2Y₁₂ receptor plays a critical role in the formation of a stable thrombus leading to ischemic complications. Therefore, P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors constitute a major antiplatelet strategy in the secondary prevention of IS.

Areas covered: We searched articles about P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors and stroke in PubMed published until December 2014. This is a comprehensive review of the role of P2Y₁₂ receptor inhibitors alone and in combination with aspirin in the secondary prevention of noncardioembolic stroke.

Expert opinion: The potential benefit of more potent antiplatelet therapy for secondary stroke prevention must be weighed against the risk of bleeding in patients with IS. Short-term (≤ 3 months) dual antiplatelet therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin that is initiated early after IS or transient ischemic attack due to large artery atherosclerosis appears most efficient.     

Biarylmethoxy Nicotinamides As Novel and Specific Inhibitors of Mycobacterium tuberculosis

相似文献   

HDL3-C is a Marker of Coronary Artery Disease Severity and Inflammation in Patients on Statin Therapy

IntroductionLow high-density lipoprotein (HDL-C) and inflammation are risk factors for coronary artery disease (CAD). However, limited data are available determining the role of HDL-C sub-particles HDL₂-C and HDL₃-C for assessing CAD severity in patients on statin therapy.MethodsBlood samples were obtained prior to cardiac catheterization in 304 consecutive patients with suspected CAD on statin therapy in this sub-analysis of Multi-Analyte, thrombogenic, and Genetic Markers of Atherosclerosis (MAGMA, NCT01276678) study. Detailed lipid profiling and oxidized LDL (ox-LDL) were analyzed. CAD severity was angiographically defined as severe CAD (>75% luminal diameter stenosis [LDS]) and non-severe CAD (≤75% LDS). Multi-regression analysis was performed to test for statistical significance. Receiver operator curve (ROC) analysis was performed to determine cut-point for predicting severe CAD.ResultsPatients with severe CAD had a significantly lower total-HDL-C, lower HDL₃-C and higher lipoprotein(a) levels. HDL₃-C and lipoprotein(a) cholesterol [Lp(a)-C] retained statistical significance on multiple regression analysis. ROC analysis showed HDL₃-C to have a C-statistic of 0.60 (p = 0.003) and Lp(a)-C to have a C-statistic of 0.61 (p = 0.0007). Patients with HDL₃-C ≤ 33 mg/dL and Lp(a)-C > 7 mg/dL were found to have significantly elevated ox-LDL levels.ConclusionIn patients on statin therapy, HDL₃-C and Lp(a)-C improve prediction of severe CAD compared to a traditional lipid panel. In addition, patients with HDL₃-C ≤ 33 mg/dL and Lp(a)-C > 7 mg/dL have greater inflammation marked by ox-LDL. Further studies are needed to evaluate the utility of these novel biomarkers in predicting CAD severity.     

Thrombin‐Induced Platelet‐Fibrin Clot Strength Identified by Thrombelastography

Background and Objective

In‐stent restenosis (ISR) is a limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention and has been linked to specific clinical and angiographic variables. We aimed to simultaneously assess thrombosis biomarkers and lipid levels in patients with and without ISR.

Methods

Consecutive patients (n = 170) with a history of coronary stenting undergoing elective angiography were studied. Blood samples for thrombelastography, light transmittance aggregometry, and lipid levels were obtained prior to cardiac catheterization.

Results

Sixty‐nine patients (41%) had ISR (>50% luminal diameter stenosis). Among patients with ISR, 40 (58%) had ISR in more than one stent bed. Patients with ISR were more often female (37.7% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.04), had higher thrombin‐induced platelet‐fibrin clot strength (TIP‐FCS) (69.9 mm vs. 65.6 mm, P < 0.001), and a higher ApoB/A1 ratio (0.65 vs. 0.59, P = 0.03). In patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (n = 86), there were no differences in ADP‐, arachidonic acid‐, and collagen‐induced platelet aggregation between groups. The frequency of patients with ISR increased with TIP‐FCS quartiles and by ROC analysis, TIP‐FCS = 67.0 mm was the cutpoint for identification of ISR (AUC = 0.80 (95%CI 0.73–0.87, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, TIP‐FCS ≥67.0 mm strongly associated with ISR (OR = 7.3, P = 0.004).

Conclusion

Patients with ISR identified at the time of cardiac catheterization have a prothrombotic phenotype indicated by high TIP‐FCS, a novel marker. Studies to confirm the prognostic utility of high TIP‐FCS for the development of ISR are ongoing. (J Interven Cardiol 2016;29:168–178)

     

The relation of dosing to clopidogrel responsiveness and the incidence of high post-treatment platelet aggregation in patients undergoing coronary stenting

OBJECTIVES: We determined the effect of clopidogrel dosing on the incidence of nonresponsiveness (NR) and high post-treatment platelet aggregation (post-PA). BACKGROUND: We have reported NR after a 300-mg loading dose. Limited information is available on the comparative effect of a 600-mg loading dose on the incidence of NR and high post-PA. METHODS: Clopidogrel responsiveness and post-PA were measured in patients undergoing stenting (n = 190) randomly treated with either a 300-mg or a 600-mg clopidogrel load. Nonresponsiveness was defined as <10% absolute change in platelet aggregation, and high post-PA was defined as >75th percentile aggregation after 300 mg clopidogrel. RESULTS: Nonresponsiveness was lower after 600 mg compared to the 300-mg dose (8% vs. 28% and 8% vs. 32% with 5 and 20 microM ADP, respectively, p < 0.001). Among the patients with high post-PA after 300 mg clopidogrel, 62% to 65% had NR, whereas after the 600-mg dose, all of the patients with high post-PA had NR. CONCLUSIONS: A 600-mg clopidogrel loading dose reduces the incidence of NR and high post-PA as compared to a 300-mg dose. Higher dosing strategies and methods to confirm platelet inhibition should be further investigated in order to optimally use clopidogrel in patients undergoing stenting.     

Platelet reactivity in patients and recurrent events post-stenting: results of the PREPARE POST-STENTING Study.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the relation of high ex vivo platelet reactivity, rapid fibrin generation, and high thrombin-induced clot strength to postdischarge ischemic events in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: High platelet reactivity and rapid fibrin generation may affect the incidence of ischemic events after PCI. However, limited data is available to link these ex vivo markers to the occurrence of events. METHODS: We measured platelet reactivity to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) by light transmittance aggregometry (LTA) in patients undergoing PCI (n = 192). Clot strength, a measure of thrombin-induced fibrin and platelet interactions, and the time to initial fibrin generation, a marker of thrombin activity, were measured by thrombelastography. The relation of these measurements to ischemic event occurrence was prospectively examined over six months. RESULTS: A total of 100% and 84% of patients were on aspirin and clopidogrel therapy, respectively, at the time of the initial event. Posttreatment ADP-induced aggregation by LTA (63 +/- 12% vs. 56 +/- 15%, p = 0.02) and clot strength (MA) were higher (74 +/- 5 mm vs. 65 +/- 4 mm, p < 0.001) and time to initial fibrin generation was shorter (4.3 +/- 1.3 min vs. 5.9 +/- 1.5 min, p < 0.001) in patients with events (n = 38). The event rates in the highest quartiles of LTA and MA were 32% and 58%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High platelet reactivity and clot strength, and rapid fibrin formation are novel risk factors for ischemic events after PCI. Clot strength is more predictive than ADP-induced platelet aggregation and may explain the occurrence of events despite treatment with cyclooxygenase-1 and P2Y12 inhibitors.     

Drug insight: Clopidogrel nonresponsiveness

Platelet reactivity to agonists and subsequent activation are important factors that affect the development of atherothrombosis and resultant ischemic events. Pharmacologic intervention with clopidogrel and aspirin during acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention is considered the gold standard for attenuating platelet activation and aggregation. Despite significant benefits reported with dual antiplatelet treatment in major clinical trials, the occurrence of adverse ischemic events, including stent thrombosis, remains a serious clinical problem. Nonresponsiveness, also called resistance, to current clopidogrel regimens might play a part in the occurrence of ischemic events. Various mechanisms have been implicated in nonresponsiveness to clopidogrel, including variability in intestinal absorption and hepatic conversion to the active metabolite, drug-drug interactions and receptor polymorphisms. Increased loading and maintenance doses and the use of new and more-potent P2Y12-receptor blockers might overcome the phenomenon of clopidogrel nonresponsiveness. The aim of this article is to provide a comprehensive and current review of clopidogrel response variability and nonresponsiveness.     

Aspirin and clopidogrel resistance: consideration and management

The efficacy with aspirin and clopidogrel treatment has been demonstrated in various clinical trials. Laboratory evaluation of platelet response in recent studies revealed that a distinctive response variability and nonresponsiveness/resistance in selected patients were associated with these antiplatelet agents. Moreover, some studies have correlated this nonresponsiveness/resistance phenomenon to the occurrence of thrombotic events. At this time there are no uniformly established methods to quantify exvivo platelet reactivity after clopidogrel and aspirin treatment of the extent of platelet inhibition by clopidogrel and aspirin. Therefore, specific treatment recommendations for patients exhibiting high platelet reactivity or poor platelet inhibition during clopidogrel or aspirin therapy are not established. A higher aspirin dose and strict compliance to therapy may overcome the occurrence of "aspirin resistance" in selected patients. A higher clopidogrel dose may be considered in patients exhibiting clopidogrel nonresponsiveness.