Effectiveness of an early mobility protocol for stroke patients in Intensive Care Unit

Objectives:To evaluate the effectiveness of an early mobility protocol for stroke patients in the intensive care unit.Methods:Participants were patients with first or recurrent stroke (n=60, age=49.02±6.36 years, body mass index=32.95±5.67 kg/m²) admitted to the intensive care stroke unit in general hospitals, Riyadh during October and December 2016. Single group pretest-posttest design involving an early mobility protocol was started within first 24 hours admission. Pre and post measurements of muscle strength, pulmonary function and quality of life were carried out.Results:There were significant improvements in muscle strength of upper and lower extremities´ muscles after treatment (p<0.05), pulmonary functions including Forced Vital Capacity, Forced Expiratory Volume 1 (p<0.05) and quality of life, namely, Barthel Index and modified Rankin Scale (p<0.01).Conclusion:This study demonstrates that initiating an early mobility protocol is safe and effective for intensive care unit stroke patients and supports introducing the current protocol as a standard protocol in neurogenic Intensive Care Units.

Stroke is a life-threatening condition caused by interruption of the blood supply to any part of the brain. Stroke causes acute neurological disorders and long-term disabilities and imposes economic, social and health impacts on individuals and their families.1 Survivors of stroke are left with mental and physical disabilities that cause social and economic burdens and impair quality of life (QOL). In Saudi Arabia stroke is becoming a rapidly increasing problem and a primary cause of morbidity and mortality.2 Worldwide the incidence of first-time stroke was 17 million during 1990-2000.3 Cerebrovascular diseases including stroke is a leading cause of mortality,4 and stroke is the fifth leading cause of death, but it remains the first cause of disability in the USA.5 By 2030 there will be almost 12 million stroke deaths and 70 million stroke survivors globally.6 Stroke has an adverse influence on the QOL of patients. The onset of stroke is sudden, and unlike other disabling conditions, it leaves patients and their family’s ill prepared for its sequelae.7 Stroke may create unique conditions that affect the patients’ QOL, involving dysfunctions in physical, emotional, memory, thinking, and social interactions.8Stroke is an urgent health care issue. It is a common cause of the hospital admissions. Immediate admission to the neuro-intensive care unit can facilitate early stroke treatment strategies.9 Stroke patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) experience a decrease in physical activity that represents a significant stress on the body and leads to a considerable decrease in functional status, increases morbidity, mortality rate, and duration of hospital stay and cost of care.10 In addition to comorbid diseases, patients on mechanical ventilation have many barriers to mobility because they are surrounded by tubes, catheters, life support and monitoring equipment. Additionally, other factors besides weakness, such as sleep loss, lack of social communication, nutritional status, sedation, and an ICU culture that encourages bed rest further contribute to functional deterioration.11 There is considerable loss of the muscle mass during the initial weeks of immobility in the ICU, therefore its management is inherently related to QOL after discharge.12 Considerable published evidence indicates that patients in ICUs have high morbidity and mortality, high costs of care and a marked decline in functional status.13,14Early and progressive mobilization program has been described as a key component for patients in the ICU. It may decrease post stroke complications such as infections, deep venous thrombosis, pneumonia, pressure ulcers, falls and de-conditioning with bed rest.15 It has been recognized that mobilization of post stroke patients is essential to prevent hospital-associated complications, functional decline and facilitate recovery.16 Moreover, the benefits of early mobilization include decreased ICU-acquired weakness, improved functional recovery within hospital,17 Effective stroke intervention begins the day the patient has a stroke.18 It has a positive effect on patient functional ability, promotes positive psychological effects and improves walking at hospital discharge and reduces hospital length of stay.19 While on the other hand, long term inactivity may affect the patients’ physical, social, emotional, behavioral, and psychological pattern.20 In addition, secondary changes associated with stroke-related inactivity include muscle atrophy, a shift in muscle fiber type to a greater predominance of fast-fatigable, insulin-resistant fibers, loss of cardiovascular fitness, and increased intramuscular fat.21 Therefore, early mobilization program which is a complex intervention that needs crucial patient assessment and management, as well as interdisciplinary team collaboration and training.22,23 The early mobilization may improve patient outcomes and recovery.24 Few studies have investigated the role of increased mobility in ICU patients. Therefore, this prospective intervention trial evaluated the effectiveness of an early mobility program administered by physical therapists and nursing personnel for stroke patients admitted in ICU.     

Effect of obstructive sleep apnoea on retinal microvascular function: a randomised controlled trial

Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology - Retinal microvascular endothelial dysfunction is thought to be of importance in the development of ocular vascular diseases....     

LY3214996 relieves acquired resistance to sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma cells

Background: Sorafenib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor of rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma; vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2/3, platelet-derived growth factor receptor, c-Kit, and Flt-3 signaling, is approved for treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the benefit of sorafenib is often diminished because of acquired resistance through the reactivation of ERK signaling in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells. In this work, we investigated whether adding LY3214996, a selective ERK1/2 inhibitor, to sorafenib would increase the anti-tumor effectiveness of sorafenib to HCC cells.Methods: The Huh7 cell line was used as a cell model for treatment with sorafenib, LY3214996, and their combination. Phosphorylation of the key kinases in the Ras/Raf/MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways, protein expression of the cell cycle, and apoptosis migration were assessed with western blot. MTT and colony-formation assays were used to evaluate cell proliferation. Wound-healing assay was used to assess cell migration. Cell cycle and apoptosis analyses were conducted with flow cytometry.Results: LY3214996 decreased phosphorylation of the Ras/Raf/MAPK and PI3K/Akt pathways, including p-c-Raf, p-P90RSK, p-S6K and p-eIF4EBP1 activated by sorafenib, despite increased p-ERK1/2 levels. LY3214996 increased the anti-proliferation, anti-migration, cell-cycle progression, and pro-apoptotic effects of sorafenib on Huh7^R cells.Conclusions: Reactivation of ERK1/2 appears to be a molecular mechanism of acquired resistance of HCC to sorafenib. LY3214996 combined with sorafenib enhanced the anti-tumor effects of sorafenib in HCC. These findings form a theoretical basis for trial of LY3214996 combined with sorafenib as second-line treatment of sorafenib-resistant in advanced HCC.     

An Introduction to the Residency Application Process

Emergency medicine (EM) is a swiftly developing yet still relatively young discipline. We are going to present in the Medical Student Forum section of the Journal of Emergency Medicine several article series covering the key topics that medical students interested in emergency medicine will find helpful. This article introduces the topics that will be tackled in the first compilation of articles dealing with the residency application process.