排序方式: 共有4条查询结果,搜索用时 31 毫秒
1
1.
Weidner Kathrin Behnes Michael Schupp Tobias Hoppner Jorge Ansari Uzair Mueller Julian Lindner Simon Borggrefe Martin Kim Seung-hyun Huseyinov Aydin Ellguth Dominik Akin Muharrem Meininghaus Dirk Große Bertsch Thomas Taton Gabriel Bollow Armin Reichelt Thomas Engelke Niko Reiser Linda Akin Ibrahim 《Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology》2022,63(1):13-20
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology - The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in patients with electrical storm (ES). ES represents a... 相似文献
2.
Kathrin Weidner Michael Behnes Jonas Rusnak Tobias Schupp Jorge Hoppner Gabriel Taton Linda Reiser Armin Bollow Thomas Reichelt Dominik Ellguth Niko Engelke Philipp Kuche Uzair Ansari Ibrahim El‐Battrawy Siegfried Lang Christoph A. Nienaber Muharrem Akin Kambis Mashayekhi Dennis Ferdinand Christel Weiß Martin Borggrefe Ibrahim Akin 《Internal medicine journal》2019,49(6):711-721
3.
Julian Müller Dominik Ellguth Tobias Schupp Kambis Mashayekhi Martin Borggrefe 《Scandinavian cardiovascular journal : SCJ》2019,53(2):71-76
Objectives. The study sought to assess the prognostic impact of recurrences of electrical storm (ES-R) on mortality, rehospitalization and major adverse cardiac events (MACE). Background. Data on the prognostic impact of ES-R is rare. Methods. All consecutive ES patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were included retrospectively from 2002 to 2016. Patients with ES-R were compared to patients without ES-R. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, secondary endpoints were in-hospital mortality, rehospitalization and MACE. Results. A total of 87 consecutive ES patients with an ICD were included, of which 26% presented with ES-R at 2.5 years of follow-up. ES-R patients revealed lower LVEF compared to non-ES-R patients (91% vs. 61%; p?=?.081). There was a numerically higher rate of the primary endpoint of all-cause mortality at 2.5 years (50% vs. 32%; log-rank p?=?.137). Furthermore, ES-R was associated with increasing rates of rehospitalization (64% vs. 37%; p?=?.031; HR 1.985; 95% CI 1.025–3.845; log-rank p?=?.042), especially of acute heart failure (32% vs. 12%; p?=?.001; HR 3.262; 95% CI 1.180–9.023; log rank p?=?.023). MACE were higher in ES-R patients (55% vs. 35%; p?=?.113; log rank p?=?.141). ES patients with LVEF ≤35% were 12.4 times more likely to develop ES-R (HR 12.417; 95% CI 1.329–115.997; p?=?.027). Conclusion. At long-term follow-up of 2.5 years, ES-R was associated with numerically higher rates of long-term all-cause mortality and significantly higher rates of rehospitalization due to acute heart failure. LVEF ≤35% was associated with increased risk of ES-R.Condensed AbstractThis study examined retrospectively the impact of recurrences of electrical storm (ES-R) on survival in 87 patients. ES-R was associated with numerically higher long-term all-cause mortality, whereas significantly higher rates of rehospitalization, respectively of acute heart failure were observed.
- Highlights
ES-R is associated with numerically higher rates of all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up.
ES-R is associated with significantly higher rates of rehospitalization and numerically higher rates of MACE at long-term follow-up, mainly due to acute heart failure.
Patients with LVEF ≤35% were 12.4 times more likely to develop ES-R.
4.
Tobias Schupp Michael Behnes Christel Weiß Christoph Nienaber Siegfried Lang Linda Reiser Armin Bollow Gabriel Taton Thomas Reichelt Dominik Ellguth Niko Engelke Uzair Ansari Ibrahim El-Battrawy Thomas Bertsch Muharrem Akin Kambis Mashayekhi Martin Borggrefe Ibrahim Akin 《Cardiovascular drugs and therapy / sponsored by the International Society of Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy》2018,32(4):353-363
Objective
The study sought to assess the impact of treatment with beta-blocker (BB) or ACE inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker (ACEi/ARB) on secondary survival in patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmia.Background
Data regarding outcome of patients presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmia treated with BB and ACEi/ARB is limited.Methods
A large retrospective registry was used including consecutive patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation from 2002 to 2016 on admission. Applying propensity-score matching for harmonization, the impact of “BB” and “ACEi/ARB” was comparatively evaluated. The primary prognostic outcome was long-term all-cause death at 3 years.Results
A total of 972 matched patients were included. Both patients with BB (long-term mortality rate 18 versus 27%; log rank p?=?0.041; HR?=?0.661; 95% CI?=?0.443–0.986; p?=?0.043) and with ACEi/ARB (long-term mortality rate 13 versus 23%; log rank p?=?0.004; HR?=?0.544; 95% CI?=?0.359–0.824; p?=?0.004) revealed better secondary survival compared to patients without after presenting with ventricular tachyarrhythmia on admission. The prognostic benefit of BB was comparable to ACEi/ARB (long-term mortality rate 21 versus 26%; log rank p?=?0.539).Conclusion
BB and ACEi/ARB were associated with improved secondary survival in patients surviving ventricular tachyarrhythmia on admission.Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02982473
1