锁骨钩钢板内固定术后钢板钩与肩峰匹配性影像学研究

目的通过测量锁骨钩钢板内固定术后患者影像学资料，分析发生肩峰骨侵蚀的原因是否与钢板钩-肩峰匹配度相关。 方法回顾性分析2015年8月1日至2018年8月31日期间在上海市浦东医院骨科就诊的210例患者的影像学资料，210例患者均因肩锁关节脱位或锁骨远端骨折行锁骨钩钢板内固定治疗，其中男110例、女100例；年龄24~76岁，平均（44.60±8.75）岁；肩锁关节脱位70例，锁骨远端骨折140例。测量术后及终末随访患者肩锁关节正位X线片相关数据，按锁骨钩钢板术后是否发生肩峰骨侵蚀，将纳入患者分为3组：无骨侵蚀组（A组）、伴钢板钩移位骨侵蚀组（B组）、不伴移位的骨侵蚀组（C组），分别测量钢板钩-肩峰的匹配度（β），统计分析术后发生肩峰骨侵蚀与钢板钩-肩峰匹配度之间的关系。 结果纳入研究的210例患者术后随访24~64周，平均（32.0±6.5）周。A组患者115例，B组患者54例，C组患者41例。A组匹配度β（3.72±0.48）mm与B组β¹（6.91±0.84）mm比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；A组匹配度β（3.72±0.48）mm与C组β²（5.88±0.65）mm比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；B组匹配度β¹（6.91±0.84）mm与C组β²（5.88±0.65）mm比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。 结论锁骨钩钢板内固定术后是否发生肩峰骨侵蚀与钢板钩-肩峰匹配度β存在明显相关性，钢板钩与肩峰之间的匹配度越好，β值越小，发生肩峰骨侵蚀的可能性更小。     

不同手术方法治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折临床疗效观察

目的探讨不同手术方法治疗复杂胫骨平台骨折临床疗效。方法选择2016年1月—2018年12月84例复杂胫骨平台骨折患者,随机分组。单侧锁定钢板内固定组选择单侧锁定钢板内固定手术,双侧切口双侧解剖钢板内固定组选择双侧切口双侧解剖钢板内固定。分析手术操作时间、手术失血、平均住院天数以及复杂胫骨平台骨折愈合时间;治疗前后患者视觉模拟评分和Rasmussen膝关节功能评分;膝关节僵硬发生率。结果双侧切口双侧解剖钢板内固定组视觉模拟评分和Rasmussen膝关节功能评分、手术操作时间、手术失血、平均住院天数以及复杂胫骨平台骨折愈合时间、膝关节僵硬发生率和单侧锁定钢板内固定组比较有优势,P<0.05。结论复杂胫骨平台骨折患者实施双侧切口双侧解剖钢板内固定可获得较好效果。     

碳纤维复合材料人工颅骨板急性期生物相容性的研究

目的 评价碳纤维复合材料人工颅骨板在急性期的生物相容性。方法 制作碳纤维复合材料、含重组人骨形态发生蛋白-2（rhBMP-2）的碳纤维复合材料、钛网、MEM培养基、含有0.64%苯酚的MEM培养基的浸出液，用于测试。采用L929小鼠成纤维细胞进行细胞毒性试验，采用健康ICR小鼠进行急性毒性试验，采用新西兰大白兔耳静脉血进行急性溶血试验，采用白化豚鼠进行皮肤致敏试验。结果 碳纤维复合材料、含rhBMP-2的碳纤维复合材料、钛网浸提液对L929细胞的相对增殖率均在75%以上，细胞毒性1级，无明显细胞毒性；小鼠腹腔注射相应材料的浸提液后，均活动良好，均无不良反应，均无明显急性毒性；碳纤维复合材料、含rhBMP-2的碳纤维复合材料、钛网浸提液溶血率均小于5%，均不引起溶血反应；碳纤维复合材料、含rhBMP-2的碳纤维复合材料、钛网浸提液不引起致敏性。结论 碳纤维复合人工颅骨板急性期生物相容性良好。     

经皮微创锁定钢板内固定对老年肱骨近端骨折患者的临床疗效

目的探讨经皮微创锁定钢板内固定(MIPPO)对老年肱骨近端骨折患者疼痛程度及关节功能的影响。方法前瞻性选取2017年6月-2018年6月治疗的肱骨近端骨折患者105例,依据手术方法将其分为MIPPO组(n=55)和传统切开复位组(n=50),MIPPO组患者行微创锁定钢板改良内固定治疗,传统切开复位组患者行传统切开复位内固定治疗,比较两组患者围术期指标、治疗效果、治疗前后VAS评分及不良事件发生情况。结果MIPPO组患者手术时间[(69.1±16.4)min vs.(101.4±30.5)min]、术中出血量[(85.3±24.5)m L vs.(163.5±40.8)m L)]、术后引流量[(18.3±4.6)m L vs.(23.4±5.3)m L]、住院时间[(2.8±0.9)d vs.(4.5±1.0)d],骨折愈合时间[(11.6±2.3)周vs.(16.8±3.5)周],可负重时间[(8.1±2.1)周vs.(9.6±2.0)周]均短(少)于传统切开复位组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。MIPPO组、传统切开复位组患者治疗有效率分别为94.55%、80.00%,MIPPO组优于传统切开复位组(P<0.05)。治疗前两组患者VAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后2、4周,MIPPO组患者VAS评分均低于传统切开复位组(P<0.05)。传统切开复位组患者术后3例发生骨折延迟愈合,2例发生外展受限;MIPPO组患者术后1例发生骨折延迟愈合,1例发生外展受限;两组患者不良事件发生率比较差异无统计学意义(10.00%vs.3.64%,χ^2=1.538,P=0.173)。结论微创锁定钢板改良内固定治疗老年肱骨近端骨折治疗效果显著,不增加不良事件发生风险,值得临床推广使用。     

Emotional Communication in Advanced Pediatric Cancer Conversations

ContextCancer is a life-changing diagnosis accompanied by significant emotional distress, especially for children with advanced disease. However, the content and processes of discussing emotion in advanced pediatric cancer remain unknown.ObjectivesTo describe the initiation, response, and content of emotional communication in advanced pediatric cancer.MethodsWe audiorecorded 35 outpatient consultations between oncologists and families of children whose cancer recently progressed. We coded conversations based on Verona Coding Definitions of Emotional Sequences.ResultsAbout 91% of conversations contained emotional cues, and 40% contained explicit emotional concerns. Parents and clinicians equally initiated cues (parents: 48%, 183 of 385; clinicians: 49%) and concerns (parents: 51%; clinicians: 49%). Children initiated 3% of cues and no explicit concerns. Emotional content was most commonly related to physical aspects of cancer and/or treatment (28% of cues and/or concerns, present in 80% of conversations) and prognosis (27% of cues and/or concerns, present in 60% of conversations). Clinicians mostly responded to emotional cues and concerns implicitly, without specifically naming the emotion (85%). Back channeling (using minimal prompts or words that encourage further disclosure, e.g., uh-huh) was the most common implicit response that provided space for emotional disclosure (32% of all responses). Information advice was the most common implicit response that reduced space for further emotional disclosure (28%).ConclusionEmotional communication in advanced pediatric cancer appears to be a subtle process where parents offer hints and clinicians respond with non-emotion-laden statements. Also, children were seldom engaged in emotional conversations. Clinicians should aim to create an environment that allows families to express emotional distress if and/or when ready.     

“One-piece” patient-specific reconstruction plate for double-barrel fibula-based mandibular reconstruction

Segmental mandibular defects require reconstruction. The fibula flap serves as a versatile flap in restoring mandibular contour and bony height. With the advances in computer-aided design and additive manufacturing technology, an innovative “one-piece” patient-specific reconstruction plate to facilitate double-barrel fibula flap shaping and bone securing was developed; the plate is described in this study. The “one-piece” plate is fabricated with individualized specifications and is mainly composed of three components: the long-bar reconstruction plate, a short-bar plate, and connecting bars. Our initial experiences showed that mandibular reconstructive surgery was greatly facilitated by the “one-piece” reconstruction plate for double-barrel fibula flap reconstruction and achieved satisfactory outcomes. A well-designed clinical trial is required to confirm the superiority of the “one-piece” reconstruction plate in the future. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03057223.