The effect of massage therapy on pain after surgery: A comprehensive meta-analysis

BackgroundFindings on the usefulness of massage therapy (MT) in postoperative pain management are often inconsistent among studies.ObjectivesThis study’s aim is to conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to clarify the effects of massage therapy in the treatment of postoperative pain.MethodsThree databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) were searched for RCTs published from database inception through January 26, 2021. The primary outcome was pain relief. The quality of RCTs was appraised with the Cochrane Collaboration risk of bias tool. The random-effect model was used to calculate the effect sizes and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95 % confidential intervals (CIs) as a summary effect. The heterogeneity test was conducted through I². Subgroup and sensitivity analyses were used to explore the source of heterogeneity. Possible publication bias was assessed using visual inspection of funnel plot asymmetry.ResultsThe analysis included 33 RCTs and showed that MT is effective in reducing postoperative pain (SMD, −1.32; 95 % CI, −2.01 to −0.63; p = 0.0002; I² = 98.67 %). A similar significant effect was found for both short (immediate assessment) and long terms (assessment performed 4–6 weeks after the MT). Remarkably, we found neither the duration per session nor the dose had an impact on the effect of MT and there seemed to be no difference in the effects of different MT types. In addition, MT seemed to be more effective for adults. Furthermore, MT had better analgesic effects on cesarean section and heart surgery than orthopedic surgery.LimitationsPublication bias is possible due to the inclusion of studies in English only. Additionally, the included studies were extremely heterogeneous. Double-blind research on MT is difficult to implement, and none of the included studies is double-blind. There was some heterogeneity and publication bias in the included studies. In addition, there is no uniform evaluation standard for the operation level of massage practitioners, which may lead to research implementation bias.ConclusionsMT is effective in reducing postoperative pain in both short and long terms.     

补充与替代疗法治疗肠易激综合征的研究进展

肠易激综合征是临床常见的功能性胃肠病之一。由于多数患者的症状经过一线药物治疗后仍不能得到较好改善，许多患者为获得更好的治疗效果，转向选择补充与替代疗法进行治疗。然而，由于研究质量和数量的限制，大部分治疗肠易激综合征的补充与替代疗法并未被相关共识和指南所推荐。本文从补充与替代疗法的分类入手，从天然产品、身心治疗、传统医药3个方面就目前国内外常用的补充与替代疗法治疗肠易激综合征的研究进行概述，以期为临床工作者和患者更好地了解和应用提供帮助。     

超高分辨率眼前节光学相干断层成像技术在结膜增生性疾病诊断中的应用

目的 探讨超高分辨率眼前节OCT在结膜增生性疾病诊断中的应用效果。方法 选取2017年1月～2018年12月浙江大学附属第一医院及北仑分院眼科门诊收治的150例(150眼)结膜增生性疾病患者作为研究组。另选同期在我院进行体检的结膜正常者80例(80眼)作为对照组。统计分析超高分辨率眼前节OCT在睑裂斑,翼状胬肉及鳞状上皮瘤等结膜增生性疾病中临床诊断与病理诊断的符合率。观察分析睑裂斑,翼状胬肉及鳞状上皮瘤等结膜增生性疾病的特征性表现。结果 150例(150眼)结膜增生患者临床诊断为睑裂斑患者30例(30眼),翼状胬肉患者100例(100眼),以及眼表鳞状细胞瘤的患者20例(20眼)。与病理学诊断相比,UHR-OCT诊断睑裂斑诊断符合率为100.00%(30/30),翼状胬肉诊断符合率100.00%(98/98),眼表鳞状细胞瘤诊断符合率为90.91%(20/22),经统计学处理,差异无统计学意义(P0.05)。睑裂斑患者图像特征:生长在角巩膜缘处停止,且角膜上未见隆起,与前弹力层间未见高反射信号,与巩膜间未见明显分界。翼状胬肉患者图像特征:结膜上皮厚度轻度增厚,上皮层表现为中等程度的高反射,角膜上皮与前弹力层间表现为较高程度的高反射信号。OSSN患者图像特征:结膜上皮增厚,呈高反射,结膜正常上皮与异常上皮转变突然,无过渡区域,深部组织间上皮内可见瘤变。结论 超高分辨率眼前节OCT在结膜增生性疾病的诊断中具有较高的准确性,且影像特征明显,具有广阔的临床应用前景。     

Targeting an RNA-Binding Protein Network in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

1. Download high-res image (232KB)
2. Download full-size image

     

A comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for severe mycoplasma pneumonia in children: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

Background:In recent years, the incidence rate of children with severe Mycoplasma pneumoniae pneumonia (SMPP) is increasing, which poses a great threat to children''s life and safety. There are some limitations in the existing drugs for the treatment of SMPP, and the supplementary and alternative therapy of SMPP plays an irreplaceable role in the treatment of this disease. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of various complementary and alternative therapies for SMPP by means of mesh meta-analysis. In order to provide the basis for clinical rational use.Methods:Two researchers will independently and comprehensively searched the Cochrane Central controlled trials registry, Cochrane Library, PubMed, web of science, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang database to collect randomized controlled trials (RCT) studies on complementary and alternative therapies for SMPP. And the relevant references included in the systematic review/meta-analysis are screened. The retrieval time limit is from the establishment of the database to November 2020. We will use Revman 5.3 software for meta-analysis and use grade to grade the quality of evidence in the net meta-analysis (NMA).Results:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of different complementary and alternative therapies in the treatment of SMPP, with a view to evaluating and ranking different interventions.Conclusion:The supplement and replacement therapy of SMPP can improve the clinical efficacy, relieve the clinical symptoms, improve the quality of life of children, and reduce adverse reactions, which can provide strong support for the rational use of clinicians.INPLASY registration number:INPLASY2020110079.