Rigid versus semi-rigid orthotic use following TMC arthroplasty: A randomized controlled trial

IntroductionThe trapeziometacarpal (TMC) joint of the human thumb is the second most common joint in the hand affected by osteoarthritis. TMC arthroplasty is a common procedure used to alleviate symptoms. No randomized controlled trials have been published on the efficacy of different post-operative orthotic regimes.MethodFifty six participants who underwent TMC arthroplasty were allocated to either rigid orthotic or semi-rigid orthotic groups. Both groups started an identical exercise program at two weeks following surgery. Outcome measures were assessed by an assessor blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome was the Patient Rated Wrist and Hand Evaluation (PRWHE) and secondary outcomes included the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ), thumb palmar abduction, first metacarpophalangeal extension and three point pinch grip. Measures were taken pre-operatively, at six weeks, three months and one year post-operatively. Between-group differences were analyzed with linear regression.ResultsBoth groups performed equally well. There was no significant between-group difference for PRWHE scores (0.47, CI −11.5 to 12.4), including subscales for pain and function, or for any of the secondary outcomes at one year follow-up.ConclusionWe found no difference in outcomes between using a rigid or semi-rigid orthosis after TMC arthroplasty. Patient comfort, cost and availability may determine choice between orthoses in clinical practice.Level of evidence1b RCT.     

Design and fabrication of the radial and ulnar wrist articulating control orthoses

Study DesignCase series.IntroductionPain and injury at the radial and ulnar aspects of the wrist due to overuse or trauma are commonly treated in hand therapy clinics.Purpose of StudyDescribe two orthoses that allow targeted rest and recovery of involved anatomical structure(s) while preserving function of surrounding uninvolved structures in patients who have sustained overuse or traumatic injury at the radial or ulnar aspect of the wrist.MethodsOutline the fabrication of the Ulnar-Wrist Articulating Control Orthosis (U-WACO) and Radial-Wrist Articulating Control Orthosis (R-WACO) as well as presents case examples for each orthosis.ResultsThe U-WACO and R-WACO designs may improve comfort, compliance, and functional ability to complete daily tasks while allowing targeted rest and recovery of involved anatomical structure(s) at the radial and ulnar aspects of the wrist due to overuse or trauma.ConclusionDynamic orthoses that allow for movement in one plane while restricting movement in another may overcome the shortcomings of some static orthotic designs.     

The Thoracic Suspension Orthosis-A Seating Option For Patients With Pressure Ulcers

Abstract

Background/Objective: For patients with pressure ulcers, wound healing and prevention are important steps in reducing disability. Ulcers that fail to heal adequately may interfere with normal sitting. By relieving pressure, the thoracic suspension orthosis (TSO) may allow some patients with recurrent pressure ulcers to return to sitting and sit for longer periods.

Methods: In this retrospective case series, 6 patients with chronic pressure ulcers were managed with TSO. Each patient had at least one of the following: (1) severe, non-healing pressure ulcers unresponsive to standard therapy, (2) recurrent ulcers requiring multiple surgeries, (3) chronic pain associated with sitting, or (4) bilateral lower extremity amputation resulting in instability or ischial pain in the seated position.

Results: Each participant had a favorable functional outcome. Patients were able to resume modified sitting. Others were able to sit for longer periods. Some have used the TSO for long-term management.

Conclusions: A TSO is an additional seating option for patients with chronic pressure ulcer, chronic pain associated with sitting, or bilateral lower extremity amputation. It is recommended after less restrictive, conservative measures have failed. In some patients, it has been used in lieu of extreme surgical measures.     

Calcaneal positioning in equinus immobilization of the ankle joint: A comparison of common orthoses used in the treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures

Orthoses are an important part of both conservative and operative treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture as they can be used to position the foot in equinus and protect the torn tendon from strain in the healing phase. The aim of the study was to test four different orthoses ability to position the foot in equinus. The study was performed as a cross-sectional study. 15 healthy study participants underwent radiographic examination with 11 true lateral radiographs of the right ankle and foot, one with the ankle joint in neutral position; one of a circular equinus cast (CEC); three of an adjustable equinus boot (AEB) with the foot in 30°, 15°, and 0° of plantar flexion, respectively; three of a fixed angle orthosis with 1, 2, and 3 wedges with a plateau (WWP); and three of a fixed angle orthosis with 1, 2, and 3 wedges without plateau (WWOP). The primary outcome was the Achilles Relief Distance (ARD). Secondary outcomes were the tibiocalcaneal angle (TCA), the tibiotalar angle (TTA), and the tibio- 1st metatarsal angle (1MTP). All measurements were performed by a radiologist. The mean (SD) ARD was 11 mm (7) in CEC, 23 mm (6) with 3 WWP, 11 mm (5) with 3 WWOP, and 15 mm (5) using AEB in 30° of plantarflexion. The mean (SD) TCA was 86° (7,8) in CEC, 76° (7,3) with 3 WWP, 90° (6,9) with 3 WWOP, and 84° (6,6) using the AEB in 30° of plantarflexion. CEC, AEB, and WWOP showed statistically significantly larger plantarflexion than WWP. CEC, AEB and WWOP produced significantly greater plantarflexion compared to WWP.     

Orthosis versus no orthosis for the treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurologic injury: a multicenter prospective randomized equivalence trial

Background contextThoracolumbar burst fractures have good outcomes when treated with early ambulation and orthosis (TLSO). If equally good outcomes could be achieved with early ambulation and no brace, resource utilization would be decreased, especially in developing countries where prolonged bed rest is the default option because bracing is not available or affordable.PurposeTo determine whether TLSO is equivalent to no orthosis (NO) in the treatment of acute AO Type A3 thoracolumbar burst fractures with respect to their functional outcome at 3 months.Study designA multicentre, randomized, nonblinded equivalence trial involving three Canadian tertiary spine centers. Enrollment began in 2002 and 2-year follow-up was completed in 2011.Patient sampleInclusion criteria included AO-A3 burst fractures between T11 and L3, skeletally mature and older than 60 years, 72 hours from their injury, kyphotic deformity lower than 35°, no neurologic deficit. One hundred ten patients were assessed for eligibility for the study; 14 patients were not recruited because they resided outside the country (3), refused participation (8), or were not consented before independent ambulation (3).Outcome measuresRoland Morris Disability Questionnaire score (RMDQ) assessed at 3 months postinjury. The equivalence margin was set at δ=5 points.MethodsThe NO group was encouraged to ambulate immediately with bending restrictions for 8 weeks. The TLSO group ambulated when the brace was available and weaned from the brace after 8 to 10 weeks. The following competitive grants supported this work: VHHSC Interdisciplinary Research Grant, Zimmer/University of British Columbia Research Fund, and Hip Hip Hooray Research Grant. Aspen Medical provided the TLSOs used in this study. The authors have no financial or personal relationships that could inappropriately influence this work.ResultsForty-seven patients were enrolled into the TLSO group and 49 patients into the NO group. Forty-six participants per group were available for the primary outcome. The RMDQ score at 3 months postinjury was 6.8±5.4 (standard deviation [SD]) for the TLSO group and 7.7±6.0 (SD) in the NO group. The 95% confidence interval (?1.5 to 3.2) was within the predetermined margin of equivalence. Six patients required surgical stabilization, five of them before initial discharge.ConclusionsTreating these fractures using early ambulation without a brace avoids the cost and patient deconditioning associated with a brace and complications and costs associated with long-term bed rest if a TLSO or body cast is not available.     

The Senami Wrist Supporter for patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Abstract

One of the wrist orthoses, the Senami Wrist Supporter (SWS), was applied to 203 rheumatoid wrists in 112 patients who had persistent wrist pain and restricted forearm rotation due to synovitis and instability at the distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ). The study was performed by sending out a questionnaire to the patients about the use of the SWS at home, and examining grip strength and forearm rotation with and without the use of the SWS. The average age of the patients was 61 years, and the average follow-up period was 18 months. The rate of compliance of wearing the SWS at home was 73% on average. It was higher in wrists of Larsen–Dale–Eek (LDE) grades 0, I, and II (normal, slight, and definite early abnormality) than in those of grades III, and IV (medium and severe destructive abnormality). Decreased pain was noted in 52% of the wrists at the time of applying the SWS. The SWS was not used in 10% of the wrists because of remission of pain at follow-up. Grip strength increased significantly (P < 0.01) and so did forearm rotation (P < 0.05) by the stabilizing effect of the SWS on the unstable DRUJ. The use of the SWS was confirmed to be an efficient measure to treat painful rheumatoid wrists with early stages of disease at the DRUJ.     

Factors affecting orthosis adherence after acute traumatic hand tendon repairs: A prospective cohort study

IntroductionCustom-made orthoses are used to prevent contractures and reinjury of tissues such as tendon rupture after traumatic tendon repairs. Despite their wide usage in hand rehabilitation, orthosis adherence is usually an overlooked problem.Purpose of the StudyThis study aims to evaluate the possible factors affecting the orthosis adherence in patients with acute traumatic tendon repairs.Study DesignThis is a prospective cohort study.MethodsTwo hundred twelve patients with acute traumatic hand tendon repair were included in this prospective cohort study. Patients were evaluated on the third day postoperatively and at three weeks. All patients were told to wear their orthosis 24 h a day for three weeks and allowed to take it off to wash the hand carefully once a day. Adherence was measured as fully adherent, partially adherent, and nonadherent. Factors that may affect orthosis adherence were evaluated according to the five dimensions of the multidimensional adherence model including socioeconomic, condition-related, treatment-related, patient-related, and health-care system–related factors. The Modified Hand Injury Severity Scale was used to assess the severity of the injury. Depression and anxiety symptoms were evaluated with the Beck Depression Inventory and Beck Anxiety Inventory. A multivariate logistic regression model was constructed for orthosis adherence.ResultsOne hundred thirty-three patients were analyzed. Forty-four (33.1%) patients were fully adherent with the prescribed orthosis, whereas 67 (50.4%) were partially adherent and 22 (16.5%) were nonadherent. Higher depression symptoms caused orthosis nonadherence [odds ratio = 1.2 (95% confidence interval = 1.1-1.3), P = .001] and partial adherence [odds ratio = 1.1 (95% confidence interval = 1.0-1.2), P = .01].ConclusionsAmong our patients with acute traumatic tendon repair, only one-third of the patients were fully adherent with the orthosis wear program. Depression in the very acute period of injury impaired orthosis adherence.     

Effects of a hip brace on biomechanics and pain in people with femoroacetabular impingement

Objectives

This study evaluates whether hip bracing in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) (a) immediately reduces range of hip internal rotation, flexion, adduction, and pain during functional tasks; and (b) improves patient-reported outcomes when worn daily over 4 weeks.