Percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of thoracolumbar spine bursting fracture

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty can be very beneficial for patients with vertebral osteoporotic compression fractures. To the best of our knowledge, however, there has been no mention in any literature regarding the use of percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of spinal burst fracture. METHODS: A preliminary study was conducted on 6 patients with traumatic burst fractures of vertebrae treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty starting in June 2000. Fractures involving the anterior and middle columns of the vertebrae and the canal were mildly compressed by the retropulsed bone fragment. However, there was no obvious neurologic deficit in these patients. They initially underwent conservative treatment and thoracolumbar spinal orthosis (TLSO) brace for at least 3 months, but the intractable pain caused patients to be bedridden for prolonged periods of time and limited daily activity. As a result, the patients underwent percutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) for treatment of spinal burst fractures. RESULTS: Six male patients (mean age: 38.2) who suffered from burst fractures of vertebrae with disabling back pain refractory to analgesic therapy and TLSO brace were treated in this study. The duration of conservation treatment period was 3.5 months to 8 months (mean: 5.2 months). There was no motility. However, 4 vertebrae (66.7%), on radiographs revealed evidence of PMMA leakage through the endplate fracture site into either the disc space or the paravertebral space, without any evident clinical symptoms. No intracanal leakage was seen, and no patient needed a secondary surgical intervention. Pain decreased from 84.3 +/- 5.4 mm at baseline to 34.7 +/- 4.4 mm at the third postoperative day, 30.2 +/- 5.8 at 3 months and 24 +/- 3.5 mm at 12 months. The reduction in pain from baseline to the 3-day and 3 month mark was statistically significant (p < 0.05). The mobility was at least 2 levels of improvement (mean improvement 2.7 points) at 12-months postoperative. CONCLUSION: In highly selective patients, percutaneous vertebroplasty can be an alternative method for the treatment of spinal burst fractures and the prevention of complications from major surgical procedures. However, this procedure still has potential risks and should be employed with extreme caution to prevent extravasation of PMMA into the spinal canal.     

A rare case of low voltage electrical injury leading to bilateral femur fractures and vertebral body fractures: A case report and review of the literature

Introduction and importanceLow voltage electrical injuries (less than 1000 V) can produce enough tetany to cause fractures, usually of the upper extremities. Simultaneous bilateral fractures of the femoral neck are an extremely rare occurrence. It is even more uncommon for a young healthy male to suffer significant fractures from a low voltage injury.Case presentationA 25-year-old male attempted suicide by filling a bathtub with water and getting into it prior to dropping a blender into the water. He experienced full body convulsions but remained awake throughout the entire event. In the trauma bay his primary complaints were bilateral hip pain and back pain, without neurologic deficit. Radiological studies confirmed bilateral sub-capital femur fractures and thoracic vertebral fractures (compression fractures of T3, T4, T5, T6, T7, T9, and T11). The patient underwent bilateral open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of the femurs, while the spine fractures were treated with a thoracic-lumbar-sacral orthosis TLSO brace.Clinical discussionLow voltage electrical injury is more likely to lead to fractures in patients with chronic renal failure and metabolic conditions such as hypocalcemia, osetomalacia, and osteoporosis. Fractures after low voltage electrical injury are extremely uncommon and a high suspicion for these injuries should be maintained because if missed there is a high risk of morbidity and mortality.ConclusionWe present a rare case of low voltage electrical injury by 120 V from a domestic US power supply, amplified by water conduction resulting in bilateral femoral neck fractures and vertebral body fractures.     

Scoliosis in-brace curve correction and patient preference of CAD/CAM versus plaster molded TLSOs

Purpose CAD/CAM technology is a newer technique for creating spinal orthoses than standard plaster molded methods. To our knowledge there has been only one previous study of CAD/CAM braces. The purpose of our study was to compare patient preference and in-brace correction of Cobb angle between plaster molded thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSO) and CAD/CAM designed TLSOs in a series of patients with scoliosis. Methods Ten patients with an average initial Cobb angle of 30.8° (range 18°–46°) had both a plaster molded TLSO and a CAD/CAM TLSO fabricated for them. In each case, the decision to brace was made by the treating surgeon based on curve magnitude and skeletal maturity. After 3 weeks of 23 h a day wear, in-brace correction of the Cobb angle was measured for each brace based on standard PA spine radiographs. After 3 months of use, patients were asked which brace they preferred. Results For the CAD/CAM brace, the mean curve correction after 3 months was 51% compared to 44% in the plaster molded TLSO cohort. (p = 0.46). Seven out of nine patients preferred the CAD/CAM TLSO over the plaster molded TLSO. There were no brace complications in either group. Conclusion In our matched cohort study, CAD/CAM TLSOs had at least equivalent if not superior correction of the Cobb angle compared to standard plaster molded TLSOs; 78% of our patients preferred the CAD/CAM brace over the standard TLSO.     

Effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace in the treatment of single-curve idiopathic scoliosis.

The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of the Charleston bending brace when compared with the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO or Boston) brace in the treatment of single-curve adolescent-type idiopathic scoliosis. The Charleston and TLSO braces were applied for approximately 8 nighttime hours and 18 to 22 hours per day, respectively. Treatment success was defined as improvement of curve deterioration with <5 degrees progression from the start of brace therapy until the conclusion of treatment, as well as the absence for the need to perform corrective surgery. The success rates were determined by Risser stage, initial angle, type of curvature, and sex of the patient. In addition, the success rate of the Charleston brace was assessed by analyzing the degree of initial correction. One hundred twenty-two patients (94 girls, 28 boys) were studied. Eighty-five patients were treated with the Charleston brace and 37 with the TLSO brace. Mean Cobb angle of curvature before bracing was 30.4 degrees. The curvature was lumbar in 60 patients, thoracic in 56, and thoracolumbar in 6. The average follow-up time was 23 months, with a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Surgery was performed in 11.8% and 13.5% of patients in the Charleston and TLSO groups, respectively. In this patient population, no significant difference in success rate was found between the groups.     

短节段经皮微创与传统椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗伴后方韧带复合体损伤的胸腰椎骨折的比较

目的 :探讨短节段经皮微创与常规切开椎弓根螺钉内固定治疗伴后方韧带复合体损伤的胸腰椎骨折的临床疗效。方法:对2013年2月至2014年8月收治的伴后方韧带复合体损伤的32例不稳定胸腰椎骨折进行回顾性分析,均为单节段椎体骨折,其中男13例,女19例;年龄25~55岁。根据治疗方法不同分为两组,15例采用经皮微创椎弓根螺钉固定(微创组),17例采用常规切开椎弓根螺钉内固定(传统组)。观察两组患者的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、带支具离床时间及术后24 h肌酸激酶数值;比较两组患者术后VAS评分、Oswestry功能障碍指数;测量并计算椎体恢复高度、后凸Cobb角。结果:所有患者获得随访,时间8~14个月,平均12.3个月。微创组的手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、带支具离床时间、术后24 h肌酸激酶数值均少于传统组。微创组术后1~3 d的VAS评分小于传统组,术后3个月ODI指数优于传统组。两组术后的椎体恢复高度和后凸Cobb角差异无统计学意义。结论:经皮微创椎弓根螺钉内固定技术符合微创原则,在治疗单节段伴有后方韧带复合体损伤的胸腰椎骨折是安全的,有良好的临床疗效。     

A comparison of the thoracolumbosacral orthoses and providence orthosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: results using the new SRS inclusion and assessment criteria for bracing studies

This is a retrospective cohort study comparing the effectiveness of the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) and the Providence orthosis in the treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) using the new Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) Committee on Bracing and Nonoperative Management inclusion and assessment criteria for bracing studies. These new criteria will make future studies comparable and more valid and accurate. METHODS: We have used a custom TLSO (duration, 22 hours/day) and the Providence orthosis (duration, 8-10 hours/night) to control progressive AIS curves. Only 83 of 160 patients met the new SRS inclusion criteria: age of 10 years and older at initiation of bracing; initial curve of 25 to 40 degrees; Risser sign 0 to 2; female; premenarcheal or less than 1 year past menarche; and no previous treatment. There were 48 patients in the TLSO group and 35 in the Providence group. The new SRS assessment criteria of effectiveness included the percentage of patients who had 5 degrees or less and 6 degrees or more of curve progression at maturity, the percentage of patients whose curve progressed beyond 45 degrees, the percentage of patients who had surgery recommended or undertaken, and a minimum of 2 years of follow-up beyond maturity in those patients who were thought to have been successfully treated. All patients are evaluated regardless of compliance (intent to treat). RESULTS: There were no significant differences in age at brace initiation, initial primary curve magnitude, sex, or initial Risser sign between the 2 groups. In the TLSO group, only 7 patients (15%) did not progress (相似文献   

Is posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation a safe and effective alternative approach to TLSO rigid bracing for single-level pyogenic spondylodiscitis? Results of a retrospective cohort analysis

Background contextCurrently, treatment for patients diagnosed with noncomplicated (ie, known infectious agent, no neurologic compromise, and preserved spinal stability) pyogenic spondylodiscitis (PS) is based on intravenous antibiotics and rigid brace immobilization. Since January 2010, we started offering our patients percutaneous posterior screw-rod instrumentation as an alternative approach to rigid bracing. Supposed benefits of posterior percutaneous instrumentation over rigid bracing are earlier free mobilization, increased comfort, and faster recovery.PurposeTo evaluate safety and effectiveness of posterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation for single-level PS and compare clinical and quality-of-life outcomes with standard thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) rigid bracing.Study design/SettingRetrospective observational cohort study.Patient sampleTwenty-seven patients consecutively diagnosed with single-level noncomplicated lower thoracic or lumbar PS from January 2010 to December 2011.Outcome measuresHealing rate, healing time, and changes in segmental kyphosis Cobb angle were compared in the two treatment groups. Erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), and complete blood count at regular time points until complete healing were also obtained. Self-report measures included Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Short-Form 12 (SF-12), and EuroQol five-dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaires.MethodsAt enrollment, patients were offered to choose between 24/7 TLSO rigid bracing for 3 to 4 months and bridging posterior percutaneous screw-rod instrumentation followed by soft bracing for 4 weeks after surgery. All patients underwent antibiotic therapy accordingly to isolated infectious agents. Patients were seen in the clinic at 1, 3, 6, and 9 months, and ESR, CRP, complete blood count, VAS, SF-12, and EQ-5D questionnaires were obtained. Segmental kyphosis was measured at diagnosis and at 9 months follow-up. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to assess group and time differences across time points.ResultsFifteen patients chose conservative treatment, whereas 12 patients chose surgical treatment. Complete infection healing was achieved in all patients with no significant differences in healing time (p<.366). C-reactive protein and ESR levels decreased in both groups accordingly with positive response to therapy with no significant differences. Surgically treated patients had significantly lower VAS scores at 1 month (2.76±0.80 vs. 5.20±1.21, p<.001) and 3 months (2.31±0.54 vs. 2.85±0.54, p<.016) post-diagnosis over TLSO patients. Moreover, surgery patients also showed steeper and statistically significant improvements in SF-12 scores over TLSO patients at 1, 3, and 6 months post-diagnosis (p<.012); no significant differences were detected at the other time points. EuroQol five-dimension index was significantly higher in surgery patients at 1 month (0.764±0.043 vs. 0.458±0.197, p<.001) and 3 months (0.890±0.116 vs. 0.688±0.142, p<.001); no significant changes were observed in segmental pre- and posttreatment kyphosis between the two groups. No instrumentation-related complications were observed in any patient.ConclusionsPosterior percutaneous spinal instrumentation is a safe, feasible, and effective procedure in relieving pain, preventing deformity, and neurologic compromise in patients affected by noncomplicated lower thoracic (T9–T12) or lumbar PS. Posterior instrumentation did not offer any advantage in healing time over TLSO rigid bracing because infection clearance is strongly dependent on proper antibiotic therapy. Nevertheless, surgical stabilization was associated with faster recovery, lower pain scores, and improved quality of life compared with TLSO conservative treatment at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment.     

Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. II. Effect on trunk muscle myoelectric activity

The effects of wearing commonly prescribed low-back braces and corsets on myoelectric signal levels in the erector spinae and oblique abdominal muscles were investigated. A lumbosacral corset, a chairback brace, and a molded thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) were studied. Nineteen tasks involving sitting and standing were performed by five healthy adult men. Myoelectric signal levels measured when wearing each orthosis were compared with those measured when performing the same task while wearing no orthosis. The changes in mean myoelectric signal levels ranged from a 9% reduction to a 44% increase when the lumbosacral corset was worn, from a 27% reduction to a 25% increase when the chairback brace was worn, and from a 38% reduction to a 19% increase when the TLSO was worn.     

Intervertebral disc viability after burst fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine treated with pedicle screw fixation and direct end-plate restoration

Background contextControversies persist for the best treatment of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine. Anterior corpectomy and discectomy followed by reconstruction with intervertebral cage and posterior fixation, for example, are based mainly on the widespread assumption that intervertebral discs involved in burst-type fractures, typically, do not survive the traumatic event and will degenerate irrevocably.PurposeTo evaluate whether intervertebral discs, located adjacent to traumatic burst fractures and treated with pedicle screw fixation and direct end-plate restoration, survive the traumatic event or irrevocably progress to severe disc degeneration.Study designProspective trial.Patient sampleTwenty adult patients with traumatic burst fractures of the thoracolumbar spine and treated with pedicle screw fixation and direct end-plate reduction were included.Outcome measuresDisc degeneration according to the Pfirrmann classification.MethodsMagnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained preoperatively, 1 month after surgery and 1 month after pedicle screw removal 12 to 18 months after index surgery. Degeneration of the intervertebral discs adjacent to the fracture was assessed using the Pfirrmann classification. Grade 1/2/3 was defined as mild-to-moderate degeneration of the intervertebral disc (MDID), whereas Grade 4/5 was defined as severe-to-endstage degeneration of the intervertebral disc (SDID). Repeated measure analysis was performed to detect significant differences between MDID and SDID scores.ResultsA total of 19 patients (38 discs) were fully documented and available for study. All discs showed MDID preoperatively, and while five discs (13%) progressed to SDID at 12 to 18 months posttrauma, the other discs did not show progression of degeneration.ConclusionsIntervertebral discs adjacent to traumatic burst fractures treated with pedicle screw instrumentation and direct end-plate restoration do not routinely seem to progress to severe degeneration at 12 to 18 months postinjury.     

The classification of scoliosis braces developed by SOSORT with SRS,ISPO, and POSNA and approved by ESPRM

Purpose

Studies have shown that bracing is an effective treatment for patients with idiopathic scoliosis. According to the current classification, almost all braces fall in the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO) category. Consequently, the generalization of scientific results is either impossible or misleading. This study aims to produce a classification of the brace types.

Methods

Four scientific societies (SOSORT, SRS, ISPO, and POSNA) invited all their members to be part of the study. Six level 1 experts developed the initial classifications. At a consensus meeting with 26 other experts and societies’ officials, thematic analysis and general discussion allowed to define the classification (minimum 80% agreement). The classification was applied to the braces published in the literature and officially approved by the 4 scientific societies and by ESPRM.

Results

The classification is based on the following classificatory items: anatomy (CTLSO, TLSO, LSO), rigidity (very rigid, rigid, elastic), primary corrective plane (frontal, sagittal, transverse, frontal & sagittal, frontal & transverse, sagittal & transverse, three-dimensional), construction—valves (monocot, bivalve, multisegmented), construction—closure (dorsal, lateral, ventral), and primary action (bending, detorsion, elongation, movement, push-up, three points). The experts developed a definition for each item and were able to classify the 15 published braces into nine groups.

Conclusion

The classification is based on the best current expertise (the lowest level of evidence). Experts recognize that this is the first edition and will change with future understanding and research. The broad application of this classification could have value for brace research, education, clinical practice, and growth in this field.

     

The nonoperative treatment of burst fractures of the thoracolumbar junction

Treatment of thoracolumbar spine burst fracture with a neurologically intact patient is controversial, with advocates of operative and nonoperative approaches. Of 404 patients in a prospective spinal trauma study, 21 had burst fractures, were neurologically intact, and had greater than 1-year followup. This group was analyzed to evaluate treatment with early mobilization using a thoracolumbar total contact orthosis. The average time in a brace was 6 months. Two patients had pulmonary embolus treated successfully with anticoagulants. No patient required subsequent surgery for increasing kyphosis or neurologic deficit. Change in K angle at followup was 4.6 degrees (+/- 5.7) and change in anterior vertebral height was 6.1 degrees (+/- 10). All patients had a satisfactory pain score and most individuals returned to full employment. It is concluded that it is not necessary to routinely treat patients operatively with burst fractures if they fulfill the following criteria: 1) neurologically intact; 2) kyphosis angle less than 35 degrees; 3) other injuries do not preclude the use of a total contact orthosis; and 4) the patient is capable of understanding and cooperating with the treatment regime. These criteria are irrespective of the CT findings of posterior vertebral retropulsion and spinal canal narrowing.     

Comparative prospective study of proximal femoral nail and dynamic hip screw in treatment of intertrochanteric fracture femur

ObjectivesThe aim of this study was to compare the outcome of intertrochanteric fractures treated with Dynamic Hip Screw and Proximal Femoral nail.MethodsThis study was conducted on 50 cases of Intertrochanteric fractures of femur treated by a dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. Patients were operated on standard fracture table under image intensifier control.ResultsThe average age of the patient was 62.3 years. Most common mechanism of fracture was domestic fall. Twenty percent four percent had stable, 58% unstable and 18% reverse oblique pattern of fracture. The unstable pattern was more common in old aged patients with higher grade of osteoporosis. The average blood loss was 100 and 250 ml in PFN and DHS group respectively. In PFN there were more no. of radiation exposure intraoperatively. The average operating time for the patients treated with PFN was 55 min as compared to 87 min in patients treated with DHS. Total complications were 15% with implant failure 6%, infection 4%, nonunion 2% and greater trochanter splintering 4%. In the PFN group the amount of sliding on X-rays was less as compared to DHS. The patients treated with PFN started early ambulation as they had better Harris Hip Score in the early period (at 1 and 3 month). In the long term both the implant had almost similar functional outcomes.ConclusionThe DHS was tolerated better by young patients with stable fracture while PFN had a better outcome with osteoporotic patients and weak bone mass and reverse oblique fractures.     

A pneumatic leg brace for the treatment of tibial stress fractures

Forty-two competitive athletes with posterior medial pain in the lower one-half of the tibia were evaluated by plain roentgenograms and bone scans. Twenty stress fractures were diagnosed in 17 patients by plain roentgenograms or bone scans or both. The remaining 25 patients were diagnosed as having shin splints. All 42 patients subsequently had a pneumatic leg brace applied to the affected limb or limbs. The 17 patients with stress fractures were able to ambulate without pain and were allowed to resume light training in an average of one week. Their injuries were nontender to palpation. The patients were allowed to resume intensive training at an average of 3.7 weeks postinjury. Patients returned to competition at the preinjury level in an average of 5.3 weeks after application of the brace. The pneumatic leg brace allowed the athletes with tibial stress fractures to begin pain-free ambulation and rehabilitation, thus facilitating the maintenance of their cardiovascular fitness and permitting an early return to competition.     

Impact of the type of brace on the quality of life of Adolescents with Spine Deformities.

STUDY DESIGN: A group of 102 brace-treated adolescents, aged 10-19 years with spine deformities participated in a cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of various types of orthoses on self-perceived health status. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Spinal orthosis is an effective means of controlling progressive scoliosis, but bracing has shown a considerable impact on several aspects of adolescent functioning. METHODS: Skeletally immature patients with spine deformities (75% with idiopathic scoliosis) who visited consecutively for routine biannual follow-up evaluations of orthotic treatment were studied. Twenty-five patients used the Milwaukee brace, 30 the Boston brace, 13 the thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO), and 34 the Charleston bending orthosis. Patients completed the Quality of Life Profile for Spine Deformities (QLPSD), a specific instrument that measures quality of life in five areas labeled psychosocial functioning, sleep disturbances, back pain, body image, and back flexibility. Higher QLPSD scores mean a high level of impairment of quality of life. RESULTS: Milwaukee brace-treated patients scored significantly higher than Boston brace-treated and TLSO-braced patients and patients with Charleston bending orthosis in the overall QLPSD score (mean +/- SD, 53.60 +/- 13.26 vs. 45.65 +/- 12.81 and 42.79 +/- 12.99, respectively) and in back flexibility and psychosocial functioning. Other quality-of-life-related variables selected in multivariate analysis were the Risser sign, clinical diagnosis, duration of brace treatment, and degrees of correction. CONCLUSION: In cases of different orthoses of proven similar effectiveness in controlling the scoliotic curves, the use of bracing with the lowest impact on the quality of life should be recommended.     

Effects of thoracolumbosacral orthosis on spinal deformities, trunk asymmetry, and frontal lower rib cage in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. OBJECTIVES: To document immediate and late changes in shape and balance of the thoracic and lumbar spine and lower rib cage on the frontal plane induced by treatment with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis (TLSO). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The effect of TLSO on lateral plane of spinal deformity, frontal lower rib cage, trunk balance, and natural history are poorly understood. METHODS: Twenty-four female adolescents with major thoracic and/or lumbar scoliosis, averaging 30 degrees and 26 degrees, respectively, were treated with a full-time TLSO program. Scoliosis, kyphosis, convex, and concave rib-vertebral angles T7 to T12, frontal trunk balance, frontal vertebral inclination, rotation and translation from T7 to L4-vertebrae were measured before bracing, 1 month after bracing, and biannually thereafter in brace and without brace for a 4-year period and reevaluated at the age of 20 years, at an average of 3.5 years after termination of bracing to measure any permanent changes. RESULTS: Thoracolumbosacral orthosis treatment corrected both thoracic and lumbar scoliosis and reduced lateral trunk shift at the expense of significant, although temporary reduced physiological thoracic kyphosis, increased lateral displacement of T7 to T10, increased frontal inclination of L2 to L4, and elevation of the apical concave rib in favor of reduction of lateral displacement of T11 to L4; decreased frontal inclination of T7, T9, and T11; and derotated L1 and L2 and thoracic apical vertebra without affecting drooping of the 7th to 12th ribs. In this series, there was marked inconsistency in the obtained changes in several of the roentgenographic parameters in the different evaluations, which is probably because of the empiric application of the TLSO during different periods of treatment. 3.5 years after termination of TLSO-wearing, all roentgenographic parameters remained to the prebrace values. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracolumbosacral orthosis program maintained the measured roentgenographic parameters at the prebrace levels in progressive adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, but it had no effect on the droop of the seven lower ribs. The TLSO treatment stopped progression of scoliosis and reduced the number of patients requiring surgery. Thus, it changed the natural history of scoliosis.     

Three dimensional analysis of brace biomechanical efficacy for patients with AIS

Purpose

Corrective three dimensional (3D) effect of different braces is debatable. We evaluated differences in in-brace radiographic correction comparing a custom thoracic-lumbo-sacral-orthosis (TLSO) (T) brace to a Chêneau type TLSO (C) brace using 3D EOS reconstruction technology. Our primary research question was the 3D effect of brace on the spine and in particularly the apical vertebra rotation (AVR).

Methods

This was a retrospective comparative analysis of patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who had orthogonal AP and lateral X-rays with and without brace. A 3D image of the spine was reconstructed. Coronal, sagittal and axial spine parameters were measured before bracing and then on the first post-brace X-ray. Brace efficacy in controlling coronal, sagittal and axial parameters was evaluated.

Results

Eighteen patients treated with the C brace and ten patients treated with the T brace were included. No difference was found regarding patients’ age, gender, magnitude of Cobb angle, sagittal parameters or AVR at inclusion. Following bracing, AVR was significantly reduced by the C brace compared to the T brace [average correction of 8.2° vs. 4.9° (P = 0.02)]. Coronal and sagittal correction did not differ significantly between the two groups.

Conclusions

By utilizing a novel 3D reconstruction technology, we were able to demonstrate that braces differ in their immediate effects on the spine. Although clinical relevance should be evaluated in a future trial we feel that the ability to measure treatment effects in 3D, and especially the transverse plane, is an important tool when evaluating different treatments.     

How quantity and quality of brace wear affect the brace treatment outcomes for AIS

Purpose

To determine the reliability of a prognostic curve progression model and the role of the quantity and quality of brace wear for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) brace treatment.

Methods

To develop a curve progression model for full-time AIS brace treatment, 20 AIS subjects (Group 1) prescribed full-time thoracolumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) were monitored and followed for 2 years beyond maturity. The developed curve progression model was: curve progression (in degrees) = 33 + 0.11 × Peterson risk (%) ? 0.07 in-brace correction (%) ? 0.45 × quality (%) ? 0.48 × quantity (%) + 0.0062 × quantity × quality. To validate the model, 40 new (test) subjects (Group 2) who met the same inclusion criteria and used the same type of monitors, were monitored and followed for 2 years after bracing.

Results

For the 40 test subjects (Group 2), the average in-brace correction was 40 ± 22 %. The average quantity and quality of the brace wear were 56 ± 19 and 55 ± 17 %, respectively. Twelve subjects (30 %) progressed of which 10 subjects (25 %) required surgery and 28 subjects (70 %) showed no progression. The accuracy of the model to determine which patients would progress was 88 % (35/40) which was better than the Peterson’s risk model (68 %; 26/40) alone. Patients who had the combined quantity times the quality over a threshold 43 % had a success treatment rate of 95 %.

Conclusions

This study showed the prognostic model of brace treatment outcome on AIS patients treated with full-time TLSO was reliable. Both the quantity and quality of the brace wear were important factors in achieving successful brace treatment.

     

Factors associated with the success of the Rigo System Chêneau brace in treating mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is the most prevalent spine deformity within the pediatric population. Orthosis is the mainstay of conservative treatment for mild to moderate AIS. The Rigo System Chêneau (RSC) brace is a custom-made thoracolumbar sacral orthosis (TLSO) based on a three-dimensional correction concept. The purpose of this study was to identify factors that could predict the therapeutic success/failure of the RSC brace.

Materials and methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed on all consecutive patients according to the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) criteria for the success of conservative treatment. Participants had a 2-year follow-up beyond the termination of brace treatment. All patients were treated with the RSC orthotic device.

Results

Ninety-three patients met the inclusion criteria. At treatment onset, their average age was 12.9 years, average Cobb angle 31.97°, Risser score 1.07, and the mean angle of thoracic rotation (ATR) was 10.2°. The mean brace treatment period was 36 months. Treatment was successful in 83.8 % of these patients (n = 79). The average final Cobb angle was 28.97°, Risser score 4.88, and ATR 8.09°. The pre-treatment factors associated with the success of applying the RSC brace were a high Risser score [odds ratio (OR) = 2.97, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.18–7.44; p = 0.02), a low Cobb angle (OR = 0.92, 95 % CI 0.85–0.99; p = 0.02), and low ATR (OR = 0.86, 95 % CI 0.75–0.99; p = 0.04).

Conclusions

The treatment of mild to moderate AIS with the RSC brace provides excellent clinical results. Its added benefit is enabling a three-dimensional correction of a three-dimensional deformity. Pre-treatment high Risser score, low Cobb angles, and low ATRs are associated with treatment success.

Level of evidence

Retrospective analysis, Level III.