Heart rupture as an acute complication of cocaine abuse: A case report

The purpose of this study is to show a very rare complication of acute cocaine poisoning, namely heart rupture. In the present case report, acute cocaine intoxication caused massive myocardial infarction, resulting in heart rupture and cardiac tamponade. A crime scene investigation found a dead body on the street in a drug dealing district. Examination of the body showed no external injuries. A thorough autopsy was performed showing massive cardiac tamponade with 510 ml of blood within the pericardium and full-thickness tissue lesion at the posterior wall of the left ventricle of 3.5 × 3 cm. Histological examination in hematoxylin and eosin was performed and confirmed the interruption of the posterior wall of the left ventricle with the presence of blood. In fact, although the correlation between cocaine and myocardial damage is well established, the relationship between heart rupture and acute cocaine intoxication is an extremely rare event. Moreover, since there are, to date, few reports of similar deaths, our report provides useful information regarding sudden death in a cocaine abuser. It is, therefore, of crucial importance to report this case to the scientific community.     

术中同期韧带修复治疗踝关节骨折伴三角韧带断裂疗效及预后影响因素探讨

目的探讨术中同期韧带修复治疗踝关节骨折伴三角韧带断裂疗效及预后影响因素。方法回顾性分析溧阳市人民医院2016年1月至2018年12月收治踝关节骨折伴三角韧带断裂患者共183例临床资料,其中未行同期韧带修复者共48例设为A组,术中行同期韧带修复者135例设为B组,而B组根据修复方式分为浅层修复(54例),深层修复(48例)及完全修复(33例);比较不同组术中出血量、住院时间、美国足踝外科学会(AOFAS)评分、视觉模拟评分法(VAS)评分、术后并发症发生率及矢状面足跟着地角度,采用Logistic回归模型进行预后影响因素分析。结果B组住院时间、VAS评分、术后并发症发生率及矢状面足跟着地角度均少于A组(P<0.05);B组AOFAS评分高于A组(P<0.05);B组冠状面和水平面足跟着地角度则高于A组(P<0.05);深层组和完全组AOFAS评分少于浅层组(P<0.05);深层组和完全组VAS评分显著高于浅层组(P<0.05);完全组术后并发症发生率高于浅层组(P<0.05);Logistic回归模型单因素分析结果显示,年龄、合并其他损伤、受伤至手术时间、深层及浅层修复均是患者临床预后影响因素(P<0.05);而多因素分析结果则显示,浅层修复是患者临床预后独立保护因素(P<0.05)。结论踝关节骨折伴三角韧带断裂患者术中同期行韧带修复可有效提高临床疗效,改善关节生物力学指标;其中行浅层修复三角韧带更有助于增加临床获益。     

Association between R1 resection and oncological outcome in resectable gastrointestinal stromal tumors without tumor rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundThe influence of positive microscopic margin (R1) resection on the prognosis of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is controversial. Tumor rupture is significantly associated with the occurrence of R1 resection and may be a confounder of R1 resection in GISTs. The present meta-analysis evaluated the real influence of R1 resection on the prognosis of GISTs by excluding the confounding effect of tumor rupture.MethodsThe PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Studies that compared R1 with negative microscopic margin (R0) resection in GIST patients and reported the time-to-event data of recurrence-free survival (RFS) or disease-free survival (DFS) were eligible for inclusion. The quality of the observational studies was assessed using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.ResultsOf the 4896 records screened, 23 retrospective studies with 6248 participants were selected. In the overall analysis, R1 resection resulted in a significantly shorter RFS/DFS than R0 resection for GISTs (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.54–2.10, P < 0.001, I² = 14%). However, the inferior RFS/DFS vanished when tumor rupture cases were excluded (HR = 1.34, 95% CI = 0.98–1.83, P = 0.07, I² = 33%). Sensitivity analysis by high-quality studies brought about a more robust HR of 1.15 (95% CI = 0.88–1.50, P = 0.29), with low heterogeneity (I² = 0%). The qualities of evidence for the outcomes were high.ConclusionsThis meta-analysis shows that R1 resection did not influence the survival outcome of GISTs. Reresection may not be necessary when positive microscopic margins exist. This analysis could provide high-quality evidence for the development of guidelines.     

风险前瞻应对模式在肝破裂围手术期患者中的应用

目的探讨风险前瞻应对模式在肝破裂术后患者并发症预防中的应用效果。方法采用便利抽样法,于2019年1月—2020年12月选取在河南省人民医院肝胆外科收治的130例肝破裂患者作为研究对象。将2020年1—12月就诊的65例肝破裂患者作为研究组,采用风险前瞻应对模式进行干预,将2019年1—12月就诊的65例肝破裂患者作为对照组,采用常规方式进行干预。比较两组肝破裂患者手术耐受优良率、术后并发症发生情况及护理满意度。结果研究组患者手术耐受优良率为95.38%(62/65),高于对照组的80.00%(52/65),研究组患者术后并发症总发生率为7.69%(5/65),低于对照组患者的21.54%(14/65),研究组患者护理满意度为95.38%(62/56),高于对照组患者的83.08%(54/65),以上差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。结论在肝破裂围手术期开展风险前瞻应对模式不仅能够提高患者手术耐受性,降低术后并发症发生率,促进护患关系和谐发展。