人工耳蜗术后早期电极阻抗变化规律的研究

目的探讨人工耳蜗植入术后电极阻抗值与电极位置的关系及电极阻抗的总体变化特点。方法对2018年9月至2019年9月在中国科学技术大学附属第一医院行人工耳蜗植入术的患者100例(100耳),于术中、术后3天、术后1月(开机时)及术后3月测试电极阻抗值,分析结果。结果①100例患者总体及不同分区电极阻抗均值术中时最低,开机时(术后1月)升至最高,开机后(术后3月)呈降低趋势,三个时间点均值比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);②在术中、术后1月与术后3月均为蜗顶区电极阻抗值最高,与蜗中区及蜗底区比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05);③蜗顶区1号和2号电极的阻抗值在术后3天即已升高,与术中差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论电极阻抗值总体变化趋势为术中最低,术后1月(开机时)升至最高,开机后下降。蜗顶区阻抗值术后3天即明显升高且始终较蜗中区和蜗底区高。     

Assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation: A review of current tools and their utilization

ObjectiveTo provide an overview of the current available music assessment tools after cochlear implantation (CI); to report on the utilization of music assessments in the literature; to propose potential future directions in music assessment after CI.MethodsA thorough search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library through October 31, 2020. MeSH search terms, keywords, and phrases included “cochlear implant,” “cochlear prosthesis,” “auditory prosthesis,” “music,” “music assessment,” “music questionnaire,” “music perception,” “music enjoyment, and “music experience.” Potentially relevant studies were reviewed for inclusion, with particular focus on assessments developed specifically for the cochlear implant population and intended for widespread use.Results/conclusionsSix hundred and forty-three studies were screened for relevance to assessment of music experience among cochlear implantees. Eighty-one studies ultimately met criteria for inclusion. There are multiple validated tools for assessment of music experience after cochlear implantation, each of which provide slightly differing insights into the patients’ subjective and/or objective post-activation experience. However, no single assessment tool has been adopted into widespread use and thus, much of the literature pertaining to this topic evaluates outcomes non-uniformly, including single-use assessments designed specifically for the study at hand. The lack of a widely accepted universal tool for assessment of music limits our collective understanding the contributory and mitigating factors applicable to current music experience of cochlear implantees, and limits our ability to uniformly evaluate the success of new implant technologies or music training paradigms.     

Brain gliomas,hydrocephalus and idiopathic aqueduct stenosis in children with neurofibromatosis type 1

PurposeTo evaluate the incidence and clinical importance of brain gliomas – optic pathway gliomas (OPGs) and especially gliomas outside the optic pathway (GOOP) for children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1), additionally, to assess the causes of obstructive hydrocephalus in NF1 children with an emphasis on cases caused by idiopathic aqueduct stenosis.Subjects and methodsWe analysed data from 285 NF1 children followed up on our department from 1990 to 2010 by the same examination battery.ResultsWe have found OPGs in 77/285 (27%) children and GOOPs in 29/285 (10,2%) of NF1 children, of who 19 had OPG and GOOP together, so the total number of brain glioma was 87/285 (30,5%). GOOPs were significantly more often treated than OPGs (p > 0.01). OPGs contain clinically important subgroup of 14/285 (4.9%) spreading to hypothalamus. Spontaneous regression was documented in 4/285 (1.4%) gliomas and the same number of NF1 children died due to gliomas.Obstructive hydrocephalus was found in 22/285 (7.7%) patients and 14/22 cases were due to glioma. Idiopathic aqueduct stenosis caused hydrocephalus in 6/22 cases and was found in 2.1% of NF1 children. Two had other cause.ConclusionsThe total brain glioma number (OPGs and only GOOPs together) better reflected the overall brain tumour risk for NF1 children. However, GOOPs occur less frequently than OPGs, they are more clinically relevant. The obstructive hydrocephalus was severe and featuring frequent complication, especially those with GOOP. Idiopathic aqueduct stenosis shows an unpredictable cause of hydrocephalus in comparison with glioma and is another reason for careful neurologic follow up.     

Bilateral total deafness after preparation of wild boar meat

IntroductionStreptococcus suis is responsible for a zoonosis for which Suidae (pigs and wild boars) constitute the reservoir, mainly in Asia, with a much lower prevalence in Europe. The predominant clinical manifestation is meningitis, possibly resulting in deafness.Case reportWe report the case of a woman hospitalised for meningitis complicated by labyrinthitis, occurring several hours after preparing a meal composed of wild boar meat. Despite the presence of intracochlear fibrosis, the patient was managed by sequential bilateral cochlear implants.DiscussionThe discussion presents a review of the international literature and describes the mechanisms responsible for hearing loss related to this rare zoonosis.     

Aplicación de la tecnología de enrutamiento inalámbrico contralateral de la señal (CROS) en usuarios de implante coclear unilateral

IntroductionSingle cochlear implantation usually provides substantial speech intelligibility benefits but bilaterally deaf, unilaterally implanted subjects will continue to experience limitations due to the head shadow effect, like single-sided deaf individuals. In the treatment of individuals with single-sided deafness one option is contralateral routing of signal (CROS) devices, which constitute a non-surgical intervention of the second ear in unilaterally implanted individuals.MethodTwelve experienced adult cochlear implant users with Naída Q70 processor and the CROS device used in combination participated in the study. For the study 3 conditions were provided: cochlear implant only, omnidirectional microphone mode (CROS deactivated); cochlear implant plus CROS activated, omnidirectional microphone mode and cochlear implant plus CROS activated, UltraZoom mode. Speech reception thresholds were determined in quiet and noise. Subjective feedback regarding the practical usability of the CROS device and the perceived benefit were collected.ResultsThere was a 27.6% improvement in speech understanding in quiet and 32.5% improvement in noise when CROS device was activated. Using advanced directional microphones, a statistically significant benefit of 35% was obtained. The responses to the questionnaires revealed that the subjects perceived benefit in their everyday lives when using the CROS device with their cochlear implants.ConclusionThe investigated CROS device used by unilateral CI recipients in cases where bilateral implantation is not an option provides both subjective and objective speech recognition benefit when the signal is directed to the CROS device. Unfavourable conditions where speech is presented from the cochlear implant side and noise from the CROS side or diffusely were not included in this evaluation since the CROS device adds additional noise and performance is expected to decrease as has previously been shown.     

Immediate activation after cochlear implantation: Preliminary Study

ObjectiveTo assess the feasibility of immediate activation of cochlear implants.Material and methodsA retrospective study compared speech audiometry results at 6 months post-implantation, implant fitting data and complications, on Student test, between 19 patients receiving day-1 implant activation (immediate activation: IA) and 10 patients with activation at 2 weeks (classical activation: CA).ResultsMean speech comprehension, using Fournier bisyllabic word lists at 60 dB 6 months after implantation, was 61.58% in IA and 71% in CA (P > 0.05). Mean intelligibility thresholds for 50% word-recognition were respectively 39.74 dB and 36.5 dB (P > 0.05). Speech audiometry results at 6 months were not affected by immediate versus classical activation. Comfort-level settings at 1 month in IA were not significantly different (Student test: P > 005) from intraoperative neural response thresholds: i.e., were practically stable. One IA patient required delayed activation at 1 month because of hematoma interfering between the external and internal parts of the implant. There were no other complications. The mean number of fitting sessions during the first year was 6.05 in the IA group and 6.55 in the CA group (P > 0.05).ConclusionGiven certain precautions during follow-up, immediate activation after cochlear implantation was feasible, and did not impair audiometric results.     

感音神经性聋患儿伴分泌性中耳炎同期人工耳蜗植入效果分析

目的探讨伴分泌性中耳炎的感音神经性聋患儿同期植入人工耳蜗术后的听觉言语康复效果。方法回顾性分析安徽医科大学第一附属医院2015年1月到2017年12月期间伴分泌性中耳炎同期植入人工耳蜗的感音神经性聋患儿30例(A组)的临床资料,并与同期不伴分泌性中耳炎的感音神经性聋患儿30例(B组)比较。所有患儿均采用面隐窝入路植入人工耳蜗,术后随访24个月,采用听觉行为分级(categories of auditory performauce-Ⅱ,CAP-Ⅱ)和言语可懂度分级(speech intelligibility rating,SIR)评估并比较两组患儿的听觉言语康复效果。结果 A组患儿同期植入人工耳蜗后均未出现术后并发症,术前A组CAP-II评分为0.87±1.07分,SIR评分为1.07±0.37分,术后分别为5.07±0.91和3.73±0.87分,术后较术前明显提高(P<0.01)。B组术前CAP-II评分为0.93±1.17分,SIR评分为1.10±0.40分,术后分别为5.23±0.77和3.77±0.73分,术后较术前明显提高(P<0.01)。A组与B组之间术前、术后CAP-II和SIR评分差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论感音神经聋患儿伴分泌性中耳炎患儿同期人工耳蜗植入安全可行,且分泌性中耳炎对术后听觉言语康复效果无明显影响。