Human duodenal motor activity in response to acid and different nutrients

Duodenal motor activity in response to intraduodenal infusion of small volumes of acid and nutrients of different chemical composition was studied in 10 healthy humans, using a water-perfused catheter incorporating 20 antropyloroduodenal sideholes. Saline and dextrose did not affect motility. Acid very rapidly (in 39 ± 11 sec) increased the number of pressure waves (P = 0.035) and antegradely propagated pressure waves (P = 0.02). After lipid infusion a considerable lag time (163 ± 81 sec) was observed, followed by a prominent increase in duodenal pressure waves (P = 0.02) and antegradely propagated pressure waves (P = 0.002). Furthermore, lipid-induced propagated pressure waves traveled over significantly longer distances (4.5 to 6 cm) than those induced by acid infusion (3 cm). We conclude that the motor response to small amounts of intraduodenal nutrients and acid is dependent on the chemical composition of the stimulus. The findings suggest that chemoreceptors in the duodenal wall provide input to local or regional control mechanisms involved in the regulation of duodenal motility.     

A new manometry device for evaluating the sphincter of Oddi using a fiber-optic pressure sensor

Introduction: Although measuring the pressure of the sphincter of Oddi and the bile duct is considered to be an important examination, called Sphincter of Oddi manometry (SOM), some complications related to the SOM device remain unsolved.

Material and methods: To decrease adverse complications, we developed a 0.46?mm manometry and we performed some in vitro studies.

Results: We successfully developed a 0.46?mm SOM. The diameter is the thinnest size used in endoscopic examinations. The results of in vitro studies show the suitability as SOM.

Conclusion: This device will decrease the risks related to SOM examination. To confirm the safety and feasibility, further studies including in vivo studies will be needed.     

''Efficacy'' of esophageal peristalsis: a manometric parameter to quantify esophageal body dysfunction

Esophageal motor abnormalities are currently categorized into separate entities based on standard manometry. The clinical significance of these categories is controversial. We evaluated whether ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility monitoring improves the assessment of patients thought to have a primary esophageal motor disorder. Standard and ambulatory 24-h esophageal motility records of 30 healthy volunteers and 136 symptomatic patients were compared. Regression analysis was used to identify parameters that relate to the presence of nonobstructive dysphagia. Prolonged ambulatory esophageal monitoring showed a marked circadian variation in the esophageal motor pattern and significant discrepancies to the findings on standard manometry in 47% of the 136 patients. Discrepancies were particularly frequent in patients categorized on standard manometry as having a 'nutcracker esophagus' or a nonspecific motor disorder. Of all data obtained, the prevalence of 'effective contractions', i.e. peristaltic contractions with an amplitude > 30 mmHg, during meal periods provided the best correlation with the presence of nonobstructive dysphagia. Of the 78 patients with nonobstructive dysphagia 71 (92%) had less than 50% of 'effective contractions' during meals. In five patients who had frequent simultaneous wave forms and less than 70%'effective contractions' during meals a long myotomy markedly reduced the severity of dysphagia. The 'efficacy' of esophageal contractions during meals best relates to patients' symptoms and allows expression of esophageal body dysfunction on a linear scale. This obviates the need for the current categories of esophageal motor disorders, permits an objective assessment of medical therapy and may improve the identification of patients that benefit from a surgical myotomy of the esophageal body.     

Descending Perineum Syndrome: Are Abdominal Hysterectomy and Bowel Habits Linked?

PURPOSE This retrospective study evaluates the effect of abdominal hysterectomy on patients affected by descending perineum syndrome. METHODS Eighty-nine female patients affected by descending perineum syndrome and one group of 10 healthy women with normal bowel habits were studied retrospectively. Thirty-two descending perineum syndrome patients (Group 1) had received an abdominal hysterectomy for benign diseases, while 57 descending perineum syndrome patients (Group 2) had not undergone this surgery. All 99 subjects underwent clinical evaluation, computerized anorectal manometry, and defecography. RESULTS Dyschezia was found predominantly in Group 2 subjects (P < 0.05). Fecal incontinence was significantly higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The worst anal resting pressure was found in the incontinent Group 1 patients (P < 0.01). Rectoanal intussusception was a significant defecographic sign in Group 1 subjects (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Clinical evaluation and instrumental data suggested a possible link between fecal incontinence and abdominal hysterectomy in patients affected by descending perineum syndrome.     

糖尿病患者的自主神经功能及其对肛管直肠动力的影响

目的 了解糖尿病患者的自主神经功能及其对肛管直肠运动的影响.方法 对26例糖尿病患者和15名健康志愿者分别行自主神经功能测定(标准心血管反射试验)和肛管直肠压力测定.结果 糖尿病自主神经功能异常者占95%,其交感、副交感和自主神经功能计分均显著高于健康对照组,副交感神经功能受损更为明显.肛管直肠压力测定显示直肠静息压、肛管静息压及肛管最大自主收缩压降低,肛管直肠协调功能障碍,直肠敏感性降低.结论 糖尿病患者有明显的自主神经功能异常,其中副交感神经功能受损更为明显,且存在肛管直肠动力障碍.糖尿病患者肛管直肠动力障碍与自主神经功能受损有关.     

老年特发性便秘直肠肛门压力测试59例分析

目的　探讨老年慢性特发性便秘 (CIC)患者直肠肛门运动功能变化 ,　 方法 　采用瑞典Medtronic公司生产的 8通道水灌注式消化道压力检测系统对 5 9例老年CIC患者及 36例老年对照者进行直肠肛门压力测定。　 结果 　老年CIC患者最大缩榨压、模拟排便时肛管压力变化低于老年对照组 (P <0 0 5 ) ,直肠初始感觉阈值、排便阈值和最大耐受容量均高于老年对照组 (P <0 0 5 ) ,2 8例 (47 5 % )老年CIC患者模拟排便时出现肛管压力异常升高。　 结论 　老年CIC与直肠低敏感、高耐受及排便时直肠肛管运动不协调有关     

Analysis of fasting antroduodenal manometry in children

Antroduodenal manometry has been used to determine the pathophysiology associated with signs and symptoms of gastrointestinal motility disorders. The diagnostic value of antroduodenal manomentry has been limited by the paucity of data from normal children. In this study, we compared antroduodenal manometry findings from 95 patients with symptoms suggesting a gastrointestinal motility disorder to 20 control children. Phase III of the migrating motor complex (MMC) was less frequent in patients (P<0.05), especially in those who required total parenteral nutrition (P<0.001), than in controls. Abnormal migration of phase III and short intervals between phase IIIs were more frequent in patients than in controls (P<0.01 andP<0.05, respectively). During phase II, persistent low-amplitude contractions and sustained tonic-phasic contraction were found only in parenteral-nutrition-dependent children. Short or prolonged duration of phase III, absence of phase I following phase III, tonic contractions during phase III, low amplitude of phase III contractions in a single recording site and clusters of contractions or prolonged propagating contractions during phase II were not more frequent in patients than in controls. We conclude that there are five manometric features having a clear association with pediatric gastrointestinal motility disorders: (1) absence of phase III of the MMC, (2) abnormal migration of phase III, (3) short intervals between phase III episodes, (4) persistent low-amplitude contractions, and (5) sustained tonic-phasic contractions.     

High-resolution manometry and impedance-pH/manometry: valuable tools in clinical and investigational esophagology

Both high-resolution manometry (HRM) and impedance-pH/manometry monitoring have established themselves as research tools and both are now emerging in the clinical arena. Solid-state HRM capable of simultaneously monitoring the entire pressure profile from the pharynx to the stomach along with pressure topography plotting represents an evolution in esophageal manometry. Two strengths of HRM with pressure topography plots compared with conventional manometric recordings are (1) accurately delineating and tracking the movement of functionally defined contractile elements of the esophagus and its sphincters, and (2) easily distinguishing between luminal pressurization attributable to spastic contractions and that resultant from a trapped bolus in a dysfunctional esophagus. Making these distinctions objectifies the identification of achalasia, distal esophageal spasm, functional obstruction, and subtypes thereof. Ambulatory intraluminal impedance pH monitoring has opened our eyes to the trafficking of much more than acid reflux through the esophageal lumen. It is clear that acid reflux as identified by a conventional pH electrode represents only a subset of reflux events with many more reflux episodes being composed of less acidic and gaseous mixtures. This has prompted many investigations into the genesis of refractory reflux symptoms. However, with both technologies, the challenge has been to make sense of the vastly expanded datasets. At the very least, HRM is a major technological tweak on conventional manometry, and impedance pH monitoring yields information above and beyond that gained from conventional pH monitoring studies. Ultimately, however, both technologies will be strengthened as outcome studies evaluating their utilization become available.     

Comparison of idiopathic achalasia and Chagas' disease esophagopathy at the light of high‐resolution manometry

The comparison between idiopathic achalasia (IA) and Chagas' disease esophagopathy (CDE) may evaluate if treatment options and their outcomes can be accepted universally. This study aims to compare IA and CDE at the light of high‐resolution manometry. We studied 86 patients with achalasia: 45 patients with CDE (54% females, mean age 55 years) and 41 patients with IA (58% females, mean age 49 years). All patients underwent high‐resolution manometry. Upper esophageal sphincter parameters were similar (basal pressure CDE = 72 ± 45 mmHg, IA = 82 ± 57 mmHg; residual pressure CDE = 9.9 ± 9.9 mmHg, IA = 9.8 ± 7.5 mmHg). In the body of the esophagus, the amplitude was higher in the IA group than the CDE group at 3 cm (CDE = 15 ± 14 mm Hg, IA = 42 ± 52 mmHg, P = 0.003) and 7 cm (CDE = 16 ± 15 mmHg, IA = 36 ± 57 mmHg, P = 0.04) above the lower esophageal sphincter (LES). The LES basal pressure (CDE = 17 ± 16 mmHg, IA = 40 ± 22 mmHg, P < 0.001) and residual pressure (CDE = 12 ± 11 mmHg, IA = 27 ± 13 mmHg, P < 0.001) were also higher in the IA group. Our results show that: (i) there is no difference in regards to the upper esophageal sphincter; (ii) higher pressures of the esophageal body are noticed in patients with IA; and (iii) basal and residual pressures of the LES are lower in patients with CDE. Our results did not show expressive manometric differences between IA and CDE. Some differences may be attributed to a more pronounced esophageal dilatation in patients with CDE.