The Impact of Patient Access to Their Electronic Health Record on Medication Management Safety: A Narrative Review

IntroductionAs the American’s Federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) stated that patients should be allowed to review their medical records, and as information technology is ever more widely used by healthcare professionals and patients, providing patients with online access to their own medical records through a patient portal is becoming increasingly popular. Previous research has been done regarding the impact on the quality and safety of patients’ care, rather than explicitly on medication safety, when providing those patients with access to their electronic health records (EHRs).AimThis narrative review aims to summarise the results from previous studies on the impact on medication management safety concepts of adult patients accessing information contained in their own EHRs.ResultA total of 24 studies were included in this review. The most two commonly studied measures of safety in medication management were: (a) medication adherence and (b) patient-reported experience. Other measures, such as: discrepancies, medication errors, appropriateness and Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) were the least studied.ConclusionThe results suggest that providing patients with access to their EHRs can improve medication management safety. Patients pointed out improvements to the safety of their medications and perceived stronger medication control. The data from these studies lay the foundation for future research.     

Does Dosage or Duration of Concurrent Oral Corticosteroid Influence Elevated Risk of Postoperative Complications After Total Joint Arthroplasty?

BackgroundThis report seeks to clarify whether the dosage and duration of preoperative concurrent corticosteroid use influence postoperative complications after primary total joint arthroplasty (TJA).MethodsThis retrospective single institutional study enrolled 1128 primary TJA cases, including 905 total hip arthroplasties and 223 total knee arthroplasties at a minimum 6 months of follow-up. Mean follow-up period was 51.9 ± 34.1 months (range 6-146). Of all joints, 120 joints (10.6%) were associated with chronic concurrent oral corticosteroid use. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify whether chronic concurrent oral corticosteroid use elevated the risk of postoperative complications including surgical site infection/periprosthetic joint infection, delayed wound healing, periprosthetic fracture, and implant loosening. For chronic concurrent oral corticosteroid user, we determined whether the dosage and duration of preoperative concurrent corticosteroid use influenced postoperative complications and have an effective threshold for postoperative complications using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.ResultsThe multivariate analysis revealed that American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 3 was an independent risk factor for postoperative complications, while concurrent oral corticosteroid use was not an independent risk factor. When we compared joints with (n = 13) and without (n = 107) postoperative complications in chronic concurrent oral corticosteroid user, there was no statistical difference in the dosage (P = .97) and duration (P = .69) between the 2 groups. Area under the curve values for the oral corticosteroid dosages and duration were 0.482 and 0.549, respectively.ConclusionThis study revealed that neither dosage nor duration of concurrent oral corticosteroid use was predictive of postoperative complications after TJA. American Society of Anesthesiologist Physical Status 3 is a major factor in postoperative complications after TJA.     

INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:Lexical shifts,substantive changes,and continuity in State of the Union discourse, 1790–2014

This study reveals that the entry into World War I in 1917 indexed the decisive transition to the modern period in American political consciousness, ushering in new objects of political discourse, a more rapid pace of change of those objects, and a fundamental reframing of the main tasks of governance. We develop a strategy for identifying meaningful categories in textual corpora that span long historic durées, where terms, concepts, and language use changes. Our approach is able to account for the fluidity of discursive categories over time, and to analyze their continuity by identifying the discursive stream as the object of interest.When did modern political discourse emerge in the United States? What is distinctive of basic understandings of the tasks of governance today, in contrast to those that organized the politics of an earlier period? Can the origins of contemporary political understandings be located in the discourse of the past? The annual State of the Union address (hereafter, SoU), in which the US president reports broadly on the progress and challenges of his administration, provides a singular standpoint from which to address the evolution of the tasks of governance. It can thus be used to investigate old questions like those above using network-based text analysis strategies.This study reveals that the entry into World War I (WWI) in 1917 indexed the decisive transition to the modern period in American political consciousness, ushering in new objects of political discourse, a more rapid pace of change of those objects, and a fundamental reframing of the main tasks of governance. At the same time, this study demonstrates that discourse distinctive to modern politics, although it later crystalized around the liberal welfare state, in fact emerged before the transition to the modern period.We offer a unique view of American political history, which tracks the articulation of the major tasks of governance in American political and social discourse. To do so, we develop a strategy for identifying meaningful categories in textual corpora that span long historic durées. We are able to account for the fluidity of discursive categories over time, and to analyze their continuity by identifying the discursive stream as the object of interest. The methodological approach developed in this article can be used to meaningfully analyze texts produced over very long historical periods, where terms, concepts, and language use changes—to our knowledge, a problem not satisfactorily solved.     

New evidence supporting lung cancer screening with low dose CT & surgical implications

IntroductionLung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-death worldwide. The U.S. Preventative Services Task Force (USPTSF) approved screening for current or former smokers aged 55–80 based on the results of the National Lung Screening trial (NLST). Following the NLST, new evidence has emerged from clinical trials and updates to previous trials prior to the anticipated update to the USPSTF guideline. We review the new evidence on lung cancer screening with low dose computed tomography (LDCT) and the surgical implications.MethodsA review of new literature was performed pertaining to lung cancer screening since implementation of UPSTF guidelines. Articles for inclusion were identified by both authors’, then search of the Pubmed and Cochrane database was performed from January 1st, 2013 through February 4th, 2020 using the MeSH search terms: “lung cancer”; “screening”; “low dose CT”. The results of these studies are summarized.ResultsWe identified multiple prospective randomized control trials and meta-analysis since the NLST supporting lung cancer-specific mortality with screening. We identified new nodule classification systems and the development of risk-models which may reduce false positive rates and identify high risk patients not currently eligible for screening. Finally, we discussed the surgical implications of screening.ConclusionNew data supports NLST findings and show ongoing benefit to LDCT for lung cancer screening. Standardized LDCT screening classification has been shown to reduce harm and lower false positive rates. Further study is needed regarding use of risk-modeling. Screening will require an increase in the thoracic workforce to accommodate the amount of surgically operable cancers.     

Single-source dual energy CT to assess myocardial extracellular volume fraction in aortic stenosis before transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)

PurposeTo assess myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) measurement provided by a single-source dual-energy computed tomography (SSDE-CT) acquisition added at the end of a routine CT examination before transcatether aortic valve implantation (TAVI) compared to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).Materials and methodsTwenty-one patients (10 men, 11 women; mean age, 86 ± 4.9 years [SD]; age range: 71–92 years) with severe aortic stenosis underwent standard pre-TAVI CT with additional cardiac SSDE-CT acquisition 7 minutes after intravenous administration of iodinated contrast material and myocardial MRI including pre- and post-contrast T1-maps. Myocardial ECV and standard deviation (σECV) were calculated in the 16-segments model. ECV provided by SSDE-CT was compared to ECV provided by MRI, which served as the reference. Analyses were performed on a per-segment basis and on a per-patient involving the mean value of the 16-segments.ResultsECV was slightly overestimated by SSDE-CT (29.9 ± 4.6 [SD] %; range: 20.9%–48.3%) compared to MRI (29.1 ± 3.9 [SD] %; range: 22.0%–50.7%) (P < 0.0001) with a bias and limits of agreement of +2.3% (95%CI: −16.1%– + 20.6%) and +2.5% (95%CI: −2.1%– + 7.1%) for per-segment and per-patient-analyses, respectively. Good (r = 0.81 for per-segment-analysis) to excellent (r = 0.97 for per-patient-analysis) linear relationships (both P < 0.0001) were obtained. The σECV was significantly higher at SSDE-CT (P < 0.0001). Additional radiation dose from CT was 1.89 ± 0.38 (SD) mSv (range: 1.48–2.47 mSv).ConclusionA single additional SSDE-CT acquisition added at the end of a standard pre-TAVI CT protocol can provide ECV measurement with good to excellent linear relationship with MRI.     

Thirty-Day Morbidity after Simultaneous Resection of Colorectal Cancer and Colorectal Liver Metastasis: American College of Surgeons NSQIP Analysis

1. Download : Download high-res image (235KB)
2. Download : Download full-size image

     

Comparison of professional medical society guidelines for appropriate use of coronary computed tomography angiography

BackgroundMultiple appropriate use criteria (AUC) exist for the evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), but there is little data on the agreement between AUC from different professional medical societies. The aim of this study is to compare the appropriateness of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) exams assessed using multimodality AUC from the American College of Cardiology Foundation (ACCF) versus the American College of Radiology (ACR).MethodsIn a single-center prospective cohort study from June 2014 to 2016, 1005 consecutive subjects referred for evaluation of known or suspected CAD received a contrast-enhanced CCTA. The primary outcome was the agreement of appropriateness ratings using ACCF and ACR guidelines, measured by the kappa statistic. A secondary outcome was the rate of obstructive CAD by appropriateness rating.ResultsAmong 1005 subjects, the median (5–95th percentile) age was 59 (37–76) years with 59.0% male. The ACCF criteria classified 39.6% (n = 398) appropriate, 24.2% (n = 243) maybe appropriate, and 36.2% (n = 364) rarely appropriate. The ACR guidelines classified 72.3% (n = 727) appropriate, 2.6% (n = 26) maybe appropriate, and 25.1% (n = 252) rarely appropriate. ACCF and ACR appropriateness ratings were in agreement for 55.0% (n = 553). Overall, there was poor agreement (kappa 0.27 [95% confidence interval 0.23–0.31]). By both AUC methods, a low rate of obstructive CAD was observed in the rarely appropriate exams (ACCF 7.1% [n = 26 of 364] and ACR 13.5% [n = 34 of 252]).ConclusionsCompared to ACCF criteria, the ACR guidelines of appropriateness were broader and classified significantly more CCTA exams as appropriate. The poor agreement between appropriateness ratings from the ACCF and ACR AUC guidelines evokes implications for reimbursement and future test utilization.