学生课堂教学质量评价问题浅析

综合分析河南中医学院近三年以来学生课堂教学质量评价反馈的信息，认为引发课堂教学评价偏差的人为因素有评价者的能力水平、责任心、情感倾向。其对策为：改变教师的被动地位，进一步修订评价体系，加强对组织评价者的培训，强化临床课的教学，进一步提高学生的认识，跟踪调查课堂教学质量评价。     

化学实验进行开放式教学的研究

通过与传统的化学实验教学模式的比较，详述了开放式教学模式的特点，并且针对实施过程中所遇到的问题提出了详尽的解决方案。     

加强学科建设提高中医儿科教学质量

中医儿科是河南省重点学科,加强学科管理,健全各项管理规章制度,科学合理设置儿科课程,实现理论与实践的结合,课堂与临床见习的结合;提高教师人文素质、教学水平,是保证儿科教学质量的关键.     

护理导师制教学法的临床应用研究

目的:为培养适应在新医学模式下开展以病人为中心整体护理工作的护理人员,改革传统临床教学模式,采用护理导师教学法,以提高教学质量.方法:制定导师职责,制定导师的选择聘任标准,制定导师培训方案,实施导师制教学法的临床过程,实行双向教学评价,通过以上活动达到提高教学质量的效果.结果:320余名实习学生调查表明,12%的学生认为护理导师教学法形式明显优于其它教学形式,82%的学生认为优于其它教学形式.结论:护理导师教学法提高了临床教学水平和导师的整体素质,也促进了临床护理质量和临床教学质量的不断提高.     

髋臼内壁内移截骨全髋置换治疗成人髋臼发育不良的有限元分析及临床意义

目的 通过计算机辅助设计有限元分析,找寻髋臼内壁截骨的合适内移范围,为临床工作提供理论依据.方法 利用SolidWorks 2005软件,建立髋臼发育不良骨盆的三维模型,模拟髋臼内壁内移截骨术式,使髋臼内壁骨从未完全陷入盆腔内保持2 mm骨性接触处开始,逐渐内移至完全陷入盆腔内7 mm处,每隔1 mm为1个实验组,分成10个实验组.每组髋臼人为划成4个象限,分别对各组假体臼-骨界面间进行计算机模拟对比力学实验分析,测量出髋臼假体-骨界面间的Mises应力及剪切应力值,找寻出应力分布较为均匀的实验组.结果 Mises应力及剪切应力均有1个象限内的值较大,通过2次统计学分析计算,得出实验结果.结论 当髋臼内壁内移至未完全陷入盆腔内1 mm处到完全陷入盆腔内1 mm处的范围内,髋臼假体-骨界面间的应力分布均匀,最佳位置在完全陷入盆腔内1 mm处.     

医学遗传学教学中计算机辅助教学的应用

目的:探讨计算机辅助教学在医学遗传学教学中的作用.方法:将180名护理中专生按学年分为对照组和观察组,分别采用传统的教学方法和计算机辅助教学进行医学遗传学教学,并在学期末对两组学生进行理论与综合考试,并调查两组学生对各组教学方法的作用及满意度.结果:两组学生考试成绩比较,观察组明显好于对照组(P＜0.05);两组学生对各自所在组教学方法的作用及满意度比较,观察组好于对照组(P＜0.05),差异有显著性意义.结论:计算机辅助教学有利于增强学生的学习兴趣,提高学生的学习效果,是一种较好的医学遗传学教学方法.     

关于护理院校日语教学的探讨

在护理专业院校教学中以护理专业知识为重点，如何遵循教学宗旨，培养个性化人才，使日话教学从普通的公共学科中脱颖而出，是护理院校日语教师教学工作的重中之重。     

Guidelines for Trials of Behavioral Treatments for Recurrent Headache, First Edition: American Headache Society Behavioral Clinical Trials Workgroup

Guidelines for design of clinical trials evaluating behavioral headache treatments were developed to facilitate production of quality research evaluating behavioral therapies for management of primary headache disorders. These guidelines were produced by a Workgroup of headache researchers under auspices of the American Headache Society. The guidelines are complementary to and modeled after guidelines for pharmacological trials published by the International Headache Society, but they address methodologic considerations unique to behavioral and other nonpharmacological treatments. Explicit guidelines for evaluating behavioral headache therapies are needed as the optimal methodology for behavioral (and other nonpharmacologic) trials necessarily differs from the preferred methodology for drug trials. In addition, trials comparing and integrating drug and behavioral therapies present methodological challenges not addressed by guidelines for pharmacologic research. These guidelines address patient selection, trial design for behavioral treatments and for comparisons across multiple treatment modalities (eg, behavioral vs pharmacologic), evaluation of results, and research ethics. Although developed specifically for behavioral therapies, the guidelines may apply to the design of clinical trials evaluating many forms of nonpharmacologic therapies for headache.     

Some practical perspectives for educating gifted children

This article identifies common characteristics of educationally related programs that form a common basis for understanding and working with gifted programs. Special approaches and programs for educational enrichment as well as specific activities that have been successful are discussed.     

The short-term stability of student ratings of instruction in medical school

The purpose of this study was to assess the degree of consistency in student ratings of teacher effectiveness during the first year of medical school. Student ratings of teaching effectiveness represent a commonly used source of information that enters into the academic decision-making process. In medical school, student evaluations often represent a major source of information that is used in promotion and tenure decisions. It is essential that the precision of such ratings be ascertained so that decision-makers will know how much confidence to place in this source of information on teaching effectiveness. In this study, each member of a first-year medical school class was randomly assigned a two-digit identification number at the beginning of the spring semester, 1986. As the semester progressed students were asked to evaluate each full-time teacher in three major courses. Multiple instructors were utilized in each course (n = 10). Each teacher was evaluated immediately after lectures during the first (T1) and second (T2) halves of the course. Students evaluated the teacher a third time (T3) as part of the end-of-semester overall course evaluation. The teachers were evaluated on a short eight-item Likert-type scale that identified several key indicators of effective teaching. Students attached their anonymous identification numbers to individual ratings so that their responses could be matched in the analysis. The results indicate that medical students are only moderately consistent in the extent to which they evaluate teachers. This inconsistency varied by course and by instructors within courses.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)