非骨水泥长柄股骨假体治疗Vancouver B型股骨假体周围骨折

目的 探讨非骨水泥长柄股骨假体治疗人工髋关节置换术后VancouverB型股骨假体周围骨折的临床疗效.方法 回顾性分析宜昌市第一人民医院骨科2008年5月至2014年9月应用非骨水泥长柄股骨假体行股骨侧翻修结合钢丝或记忆合金环抱器固定治疗的Vancouver B2和B3型股骨假体周围骨折患者的临床资料,其中B2型8例,B3型9例.末次随访时采用Harris评分行髋关节功能评估,采用Beals和Tower标准行影像学评估,并记载随访时不良反应.结果 所有患者均获随访,平均随访41.7个月,末次随访时Harris评分平均为68.2分,所有骨折均愈合,4例股骨柄下沉不超过10 mm,无假体松动表现.影像学评估按照Beals和Tower标准,其中优8例,良5例,差4例.结论 加长型非骨水泥型股骨长柄假体加钢丝或环抱器能为骨折愈合提供较好的初始稳定性,有利于骨折愈合,是治疗Vancouver B型股骨假体周围骨折的理想方法.     

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Non-database Comparative Studies on Cemented Versus Uncemented Femoral Stems in Primary Elective Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundCemented and uncemented femoral stems have shown excellent survivorship and outcomes in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). Cementless stems have become increasingly common in the United States; however, multiple large database studies have suggested that elderly patients may have fewer complications with a cemented stem. As conclusions from large databases may be limited due to variations in data collection, this study investigated femoral stem survivorship and complication rates based on cement status in non-database studies.MethodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were utilized to identify articles for inclusion up until June 2021. Included articles directly compared outcomes and complications between patients undergoing primary THA without femoral stem cementing to those with cementing. Studies were excluded if they utilized large databases or consisted of patients with a preoperative diagnosis of trauma.ResultsOf the 1700 studies, 309 were selected for abstract review and nineteen for full-text review. A total of seven studies were selected. Meta-analyses indicated substantial heterogeneity between studies. There were no differences in revision rates (cementless: 5.53% vs. cemented 8.91%, P = .543), infection rates (cementless: 0.60% vs. cemented: 0.90%, P = .692), or periprosthetic fracture rates (cementless: 0.52% vs. cemented: 0.51%, P = .973) between groups.ConclusionThere is scarce literature comparing outcomes and complications between cemented and cementless femoral stems in primary elective THA without utilizing a database methodology. In our study, there were no differences in complications detected on meta-analyses. Given previous findings in database studies, additional high-quality cohort studies are required to determine if selected patients may benefit from a cemented femoral stem.     

Does Body Mass Index Influence the Outcomes and Survivorship of Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BackgroundHigher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with higher rates of aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of BMI on the durability of modern cementless TKA. We aimed to assess the association between BMI and clinical outcomes following cementless TKA and to determine if there was a BMI threshold beyond which the risk of revision significantly increased.MethodsWe identified 1,408 cementless TKAs of a modern design from an institutional registry. Patients were classified into BMI categories: normal (n = 136), overweight (n = 476), obese class I (n = 423), II (n = 258), and III (n = 115). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and 12-item Short Form Health Survey scores were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Survivorship was recorded at minimum 2 years (range, 24 to 88 months). BMI was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable.ResultsThe improvement in patient-reported outcomes was similar across the groups. Thirty four knees (2.4%) were revised and 14 (1.0%) were for aseptic failure. Mean time-to-revision was 1.2 ± 1.3 years and did not differ across BMI categories (P = .455). Survivorship free from all-cause and aseptic revision was 97.1% and 99.0% at mean 4 years, respectively. Using Cox regression to control for demographics and bilateral procedures, BMI had no association with all-cause revision (P = .612) or aseptic revision (P = .186). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found no relationship between BMI and revision risk (c-statistic = 0.51).ConclusionBMI did not influence functional outcomes and survivorship of modern cementless TKA, possibly due to improved biological fixation at the bone-implant interface. Longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings.     

The jumbo cup: Easiest and safest solution

Jumbo cups can be used to address many acetabular revision cases with bone loss. The technique of implantation is relatively straight forward, and there is the potential to maximize bone-to-cup surface area, approximate the natural hip center, and to obtain a construct that allows immediate weight bearing. Experience from multiple sources has demonstrated survivorship up to 83% at 20 years, limited mostly by the wear of conventional polyethylene. A contraindication to this method is irradiated bone and a limitation is restoration of peripheral acetabular bone stock, which could compromise further revision surgery.     

Minimum 15-Year Results of a Dual-Offset Uncemented Femoral Stem in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BackgroundThe aim of the present study is to assess the long-term clinical and radiological outcomes of a proximal porous-coated, dual-offset, tapered titanium alloy uncemented stem at a minimum of 15 years of follow-up.MethodsWe reviewed 210 total hip arthroplasties (in 193 patients) performed between 1996 and 1999 and followed prospectively in our database who received the Synergy stem. We report a Kaplan-Meier survival analysis as well as the Harris Hip Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index, and the Short Form Health Survey-12 scores. Radiographs were evaluated for evidence of subsidence, osteolysis, osteointegration, or loosening.ResultsThe average follow-up was 16 years (range, 15-17.7 years). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with revision of stem for aseptic mechanical loosening (1 stem) as the end point revealed a cumulative survival rate of 99.5% at 16 years. The Harris Hip Score, the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index, and the Short Form Health Survey-12 physical scores were all significantly improved (P < .001) from the preoperative period to latest follow-up. Minor osteolysis was observed proximally in 14 hips (6.6%) with no osteolysis distal to the porous coating.ConclusionTo our knowledge, this study represents the largest series reporting the longest clinical follow-up of this third-generation, dual-offset, proximal ingrowth, tapered cementless stem. The Synergy stem design has achieved excellent clinical outcomes, predictable osteointegration, and outstanding survivorship of 99.5% at a minimum of 15 years follow-up, representing the standard for femoral stems at our institution.     

Uncemented Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Tapered Femoral Component in Obese Patients: An 18–27 Year Follow-Up Study

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an uncemented tapered femoral component in obese patients at a mean follow-up of 23 years. We retrospectively reviewed 119 consecutive uncemented total hip arthroplasties in 105 obese patients using a tapered femoral component between 1983 and 1987. The mean body mass index of these patients was 34 (range 30–47). Complete clinical and radiographic follow-up was obtained on the 55 hips in 47 patients who survived a minimum of 18 years (range 18–27 years). Three femoral components (6%) have been revised, none for aseptic loosening. One was loose by radiographic criteria. These results demonstrate that an uncemented tapered stem can provide excellent fixation in obese patients out to 27 years.     

Short-Term Results of Ultra-Short Anatomic vs Ultra-Short Non-Anatomic Proximal Loading Uncemented Femoral Stems

Background

Question arises as to whether rigid fixation of ultra-short anatomic or ultra-short non-anatomic proximal loading uncemented femoral stem can be obtained without diaphyseal stem fixation. The purpose of this study is to compare the short-term clinical results, radiographic results, revision and survival rates, and complication rates of ultra-short anatomic versus ultra-short non-anatomic uncemented femoral stems.

A Comparative Study Between Uncemented and Hybrid Total Hip Arthroplasty in Octogenarians

Background

The aim of this prospective cohort study is to evaluate the outcome of octogenarian patients undergoing uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) with a control group of similarly aged patients undergoing hybrid THA with a minimum 5-year follow-up.

Successful Performance of the Bi-Metric Uncemented Femoral Stem at a Minimum Follow-Up of 13 Years in Young Patients

We report the mean 15.2 year follow-up results for a porous coated version of the Bi-Metric (Biomet UK Ltd, Bridgend, UK) uncemented femoral stem in young patients. Sixty-four hips were implanted into 54 patients (mean age, 54.3 years) and followed up using the Hospital for Special Surgery score and regular radiographs. The first 13 patients had a TTAP-ST acetabulum (Biomet UK), the remainder receiving a Universal cup (Biomet UK). At 15.2 years, there were no stem failures or femoral revisions. The mean Hospital for Special Surgery score was 34.7 (20-40), and there was no evidence of stem loosening radiologically. There were 3 acetabular revisions and 3 liner changes at 10 years, with a further 5 cup revisions and 9 liner changes at final follow-up.