Introduction: Central nervous system infection continues to be an important cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Our incomplete knowledge on the pathogenesis of how meningitis-causing pathogens cause CNS infection and emergence of antimicrobial resistance has contributed to the mortality and morbidity. An early empiric antibiotic treatment is critical for the management of patients with bacterial meningitis, but early recognition of bacterial meningitis continues to be a challenge.
Areas covered: This review gives an overview on current therapeutic strategies for CNS infection with a focus on recent literature since 2010 on bacterial meningitis. Bacterial meningitis is a medical emergency, requiring early recognition and treatment. The selection of appropriate empiric antimicrobial regimen, after incorporating the epidemiology of bacterial meningitis, impact of vaccination, emergence of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria, role of adjunctive therapy and the current knowledge on the pathogenesis of meningitis and associated neuronal injury are covered.
Expert opinion: Prompt treatment of bacterial meningitis with an appropriate antibiotic is essential. Optimal antimicrobial treatment of bacterial meningitis requires bactericidal agents able to penetrate the blood–brain barrier, with efficacy in cerebrospinal fluid. Emergence of CNS-infecting pathogens with resistance to conventional antibiotics has been increasingly recognized, but development of new antibiotics has been limited. More complete understanding of the microbial and host factors that are involved in the pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis and associated neurologic sequelae is likely to help in developing new strategies for the prevention and therapy of bacterial meningitis. 相似文献
BackgroundTo evaluate whether incorporating pertussis cocooning information into prenatal education for group B streptococcus (GBS) prevention increased postpartum rate of vaccination with tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine.MethodsWe performed a retrospective pre-intervention/post-intervention study of postpartum women at a teaching hospital in Taiwan. We compared the frequency of Tdap vaccination during the pre-intervention (May 1, 2009 to December 31, 2010) and post-intervention (March 1, 2011–March 31, 2012) time periods. The clinical intervention was incorporation of pertussis cocooning information into prenatal education for GBS prevention to pregnant women presented during a prenatal visit at 35–37 weeks of gestation. Postpartum Tdap vaccination rate during the pre-intervention and post-intervention periods was compared. We also specifically examined group differences in the percentage of women who received postpartum Tdap vaccination to explore factors that influenced their decision regarding Tdap vaccine.ResultsTdap vaccination was more likely during the post-intervention period compared with the pre-intervention period (2268 of 3186 [71.2%] compared with 2556 of 5030 [55.6%]; p < .001). Comparisons between each subgroup of pre-intervention and post-intervention women showed that incorporating pertussis information into prenatal education for GBS prevention was beneficial except for women of maternal age 30–34 years and women living in rural areas.ConclusionsPrenatal GBS screening activities represent an opportunity for healthcare providers to offer pertussis cocooning information to eligible pregnant women to improve rates of postpartum Tdap vaccination. 相似文献
A case of group A streptococcal meningitis is reported in a 14-year-old girl with a history of recurrent otitis media. She presented to the emergency room with an altered level of consciousness; the organism was isolated from her spinal fluid and blood. Her course was complicated by a left-sided sinus vein thrombosis with extension to the external jugular vein, which has previously been reported in the literature only once. Streptococcus pyogenes is a common cause of invasive infections, but is a highly uncommon cause of meningitis. 相似文献
Summary A 40-year-old man presented with peritonitis. Diagnosis of phlegmonous gastritis was made by laparotomy. Conservative treatment combined with antibiotics was successful. Multiple endoscopies with biopsies illustrate the natural history of this disease. The patient developed HIV-1 seroconversion during hospital stay. Prompt diagnosis and treatment may improve the prognosis of this often lethal disease. 相似文献
BackgroundAcute pharyngitis is one of the most common conditions in outpatient settings and an important source of inappropriate antibiotic prescribing. Rapid antigen detection tests (RADTs) offer diagnosis of group A streptococcus at the point of care but have limited sensitivity. Rapid nucleic acid tests (RNATs) are now available; a systematic review of their accuracy is lacking.ObjectivesTo evaluate the accuracy of RNATs in patients with pharyngitis; to explore test-level and study-level factors that could explain variability in accuracy; and to compare the accuracy of RNATs with that of RADTs.Data sourcesMEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science (1990–2020).Study eligibility criteriaCross-sectional studies and randomized trials.ParticipantsPatients with pharyngitis.Index test/s and reference standardsRNAT commercial kits compared with throat culture.MethodsWe assessed risk of bias and applicability using QUADAS-2. We performed meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity using the bivariate random-effects model. Variability was explored by subgroup analyses and meta-regression.ResultsWe included 38 studies (46 test evaluations; 17 411 test results). RNATs were most often performed in a laboratory. The overall methodological quality of primary studies was uncertain because of incomplete reporting. RNATs had a summary sensitivity of 97.5% (95% CI 96.2%–98.3%) and a summary specificity of 95.1% (95% CI 93.6%–96.3%). There was low variability in estimates across studies. Variability in sensitivity and specificity was partially explained by test type (p < 0.05 for both). Sensitivity analyses limited to studies with low risk of bias showed robust accuracy estimates. RNATs were more sensitive than RADTs (13 studies; 96.8% versus 82.3%, p 0.004); there was no difference in specificity (p 0.92).ConclusionsThe high diagnostic accuracy of RNATs may allow their use as stand-alone tests to diagnose group A streptococcus pharyngitis. Based on direct comparisons, RNATs have greater sensitivity than RADTs and equal specificity. Further studies should evaluate RNATs in point-of-care settings. 相似文献