Quality improvement training for burn care in low-and middle-income countries: A pilot course for nurses

BackgroundThere is an urgent need to empower practitioners to undertake quality improvement (QI) projects in burn services in low-middle income countries (LMICs). We piloted a course aimed to equip nurses working in these environments with the knowledge and skills to undertake such projects.MethodsEight nurses from five burns services across Malawi and Ethiopia took part in this pilot course, which was evaluated using a range of methods, including interviews and focus group discussions.ResultsCourse evaluations reported that interactive activities were successful in supporting participants to devise QI projects. Appropriate online platforms were integral to creating a community of practice and maintaining engagement. Facilitators to a successful QI project were active individuals, supportive leadership, collaboration, effective knowledge sharing and demonstrable advantages of any proposed change. Barriers included: staff attitudes, poor leadership, negative culture towards training, resource limitations, staff rotation and poor access to information to guide practice.ConclusionsThe course demonstrated that by bringing nurses together, through interactive teaching and online forums, a supportive community of practice can be created. Future work will include investigating ways to scale up access to the course so staff can be supported to initiate and lead quality improvement in LMIC burn services.     

临床护理路径用于ICU重症颅脑损伤患者护理中的价值

目的 探讨临床护理路径用于ICU重症颅脑损伤患者护理中的价值。方法 选择2017年11月～2018年10月进行ICU重症颅脑损伤治疗的患者100例作为对象,随机数字表法分为对照组(n=50)和观察组(n=50)。对照组给予常规护理,观察组在其基础上应用临床护理路径,15 d护理后比较患者依从性情况、对患者护理前后心理状态进行评分,对不良并发症产生情况进行比较。结果 观察组康复锻炼依从、按时用药依从及饮食依从高于对照组(P0.05)。护理前两组SDS与SAS评分比较差异无统计学意义(P0.05),护理后,观察组SDS与SAS评分低于对照组(P0.05)。观察组出现压疮、泌尿感染、以及发热的发生率显著低于对照组(P0.05)。结论 将临床护理路径用于ICU重症颅脑损伤患者的护理中,提高了患者的护理依从性,减少了不良情绪以及不良并发症的产生,有助于患者整体治疗,值得推广应用。     

以临床胜任力为导向的CBL在急危重症护理本科教学中的实践

目的　探讨临床胜任力为导向的病例教学（case-based learning，CBL）在急危重症护理学本科教学中的可行性和有效性。方法　将急危重症护理本科生120人随机分为CBL教学组和传统教学组。根据每次实习学生人数，CBL教学组分为数个小组，每小组固定一个带教教师，并以小组为单位进行临床教学实践；传统教学组采用既往的临床实习教学方式，即一个学生固定跟随一个带教教师。采用理论考试、技能考试以及问卷调查等多种考核方式评价两组的教学效果，采用SPSS 21.0软件行t检验和卡方检验。结果　与传统教学组相比，CBL教学组在理论考试[（92.5±3.0） vs. （85.3±3.3）]和技能考试[（93.1±4.5） vs. （88.1±3.4）]方面均更好，且差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）；在对教学满意度调查方面，CBL教学组优于传统教学组。结论　以临床胜任力为导向的CBL教学应用于急危重症护理本科教学是可行的，能有效培养学生的临床思维和提高实际的临床胜任力。     

评教评学模式在肿瘤外科护理带教中的应用评价

目的探讨评教评学模式在肿瘤外科护理带教中的应用效果。方法选择2017年6月—2019年2月于该院肿瘤外科实习的88名护生作为该次研究对象,随机将护生分为对照组与观察组,两组分别有护生44名,对照组给予传统带教方法,观察组给予评教评学模式带教,比较两组护生的护理带教结果。结果观察组护生对带教老师综合能力评价优良率是92.0%,对照组评价优良率是76.0%,组间对比差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.192,P=0.041<0.05)。观察组带教老师对护生综合能力评价优良率是90.9%,对照组评价优良率是72.7%,组间对比差异有统计学意义(χ^2=4.889,P=0.027<0.05)。观察组护生的理论知识与实操技能考核成绩均要显著比对照组高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论评教评学模式在肿瘤外科护理带教中具有显著应用价值,可充分激发师生的教学积极性,改善护理教学质量。     

目标教学运用在神经内科临床护理带教中的效果及方法

目的探究目标教学运用在神经内科临床护理带教中的效果及方法。方法选取2018年6月-2019年6月期间到该院神经内科实习的48名女护生作为研究对象,采取随机双盲方法,将其均分为两组,各24例,对照组护生行常规护理带教模式,观察组护生行目标教学护理带教,对比两组护生出科综合成绩和带教满意度。结果观察组出科综合成绩显著高于对照组(t=3.732、6.862、6.715,P<0.05),且带教满意度优于对照组(χ~2=5.400,P<0.05)。结论在神经内科临床护理带教工作中运用目标教学法可调动护生学习积极性,提升护士对护理知识的掌握程度,提高带教满意度。     

持续质量改进在体检科护理质量管理中的应用效果探讨

目的探究持续质量改进在体检科护理质量管理中的应用效果。方法该次将该院在2018年7-12月的体检者200名作为研究的对象,视为对照阶段,采取常规护理管理方法;将该院2019年1-6月的体检者200名作为观察阶段对象,在护理管理工作中采取持续质量改进管理模式,进一步对比两个阶段患者对于体检科工作质量的评分。结果在体检工作质量、服务态度、体检满意度这3个模块,观察阶段评分对照阶段比较均明显更高,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论持续质量改进应用于体检科护理质量管理中,可有效提升体检服务品质,值得推广应用。     

Preceptors’ perceptions of supporting nursing students in prison health services: A qualitative study

BackgroundOur university commenced clinical placements for third-year nursing students in Prison Health Services (PHS) in 2014. Registered nurse preceptors employed in these services facilitated students’ experiential workplace learning, assessed their competence and assisted them to meet course objectives in this challenging environment. To date, no studies have examined preceptors’ experiences of supporting students in the prison health setting.AimThe study aim was to investigate preceptors’ perceptions of supporting nursing students undertaking clinical placements in PHS, in order to inform development of resources and processes.MethodsQualitative data were collected via a focus group and interviews with preceptors (n = 6) working in metropolitan PHS. Data underwent thematic analysis.FindingsParticipants valued the opportunity to support student learning, finding students contributed to the workplace by bringing in new ideas, and conducting beneficial projects. However, preceptors requested better rostering and workload management by their employer. They also wished for more detailed information from the university regarding student orientation and preparation to support student learning. They felt that the employer-provided preceptorship training did not fulfil their needs.DiscussionPreceptors in PHS settings shared many of the support needs of those in other settings, although some challenges were more specific to the setting.ConclusionThis paper makes recommendations on how preceptors in PHS can be better supported to fulfil the role.     

癌症患者心理韧性质性研究的系统评价

目的 系统评价有关癌症患者心理韧性发展的真实体验,为更好地制定心理韧性干预方案提供理论依据。方法 计算机检索Cochrane Library、Medline、CINAHL、Embase、PubMed、Web of Science、Psyc INFO以及中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、维普、万方数据库从建库至2019年6月相关的质性研究。采用澳大利亚乔安娜布里格斯研究所循证卫生保健中心质性研究质量评价标准（2016）对文献进行评价,采用汇集性整合方法进行结果整合。结果 共纳入10篇文献,提炼42个明确的结果,形成8个类别,汇总成3个整合结果。①心理韧性发展是动态循环的过程：危机负性期,调节成长期,积极转化期,循环强化期;②心理韧性的阻碍因素：个体（消极应对,错误认知,症状和体象困扰）,环境（传统社会文化,医疗环境,家庭负担）;③心理韧性的保护因素：个体（积极心理与应对方式,复原经历,宗教信仰,自我表露,利他主义与行为）,环境（家庭因素,医疗照护,人际支持）。结论 心理韧性的发展是动态循环过程,受个体和环境因素影响,医护人员应根据不同阶段的影响因素给予针对性护理措施,促进患者心理韧性的形成和发展,提高患者的生活质量。