Closing the gap: Novel therapies in treating acute lymphoblastic leukemia in adolescents and young adults

Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the most common cancer diagnoses identified in adolescents and young adults (AYAs). Although most children with ALL are cured of their disease, AYAs have experienced much worse outcomes over time, with event-free survival ranging from 30 to 45%. This survival disparity is likely due to differences in tumor biology, treatment-related toxicities, and nonmedical issues. This review summarizes these differences as well as focusing on the various trials that have demonstrated superior outcomes with pediatric protocols in AYAs with ALL. Even with the widespread use of these protocols, a treatment gap remains, and novel therapies are one way to address this problem. Still, these therapies also have significant toxicities and unique issues that need to be tested further, especially in the AYA population. The development of more AYA-specific trials will be an important way to examine novel therapies and interventions designed to reduce treatment-related toxicities and improve long-term outcomes.     

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Emerging therapeutic strategies

The seventh leading cause of cancer-related death globally, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) involves the exocrine pancreas and constitutes greater than 90% of all pancreatic cancers. Surgical resection in combination with systemic chemotherapy with or without radiation remains the mainstay of treatment and the only potentially curative treatment option. While there has been improvement in systemic chemotherapy, long-term survival among patients with PDAC remains poor. Improvement in the understanding of tumorigenesis, genetic mutations, the tumor microenvironment (TME), immunotherapies, as well as targeted therapies continued to drive advances in PDAC treatment. We herein review the TME, genetic landscape, as well as various metabolic pathways associated with PDAC tumorigenesis relative to emerging therapies.     

The Current Lung Cancer Neoantigen Landscape and Implications for Therapy

All tumors harbor unique mutant peptides, some of which are able to elicit T-cell–mediated immune responses. These are known as neoantigens. Lung cancers bear a heavy mutational burden and hence many potential neoantigens. Neoantigens are increasingly recognized as key mediators of tumor-specific immune activation and have been identified as potential targets for personalized cancer therapies. In this review, we discuss the current data on neoantigens in lung cancer and provide an overview of the recent advances in neoantigen-based immunotherapy. Furthermore, we look ahead to highlight the major opportunities and challenges for the clinical application of neoantigen-based treatment strategies for thoracic and other malignancies.     

The progress and confusion of anti-PD1/PD-L1 immunotherapy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Recently, immunotherapy has evolved into a true treatment modality with the approval of PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors as the standard care for first-line treatment in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Until now, for patients with advanced NSCLC, treatment of targeting immune checkpoints reveals a promising survival benefit, and some patients even get long term survive, which creates a paradigm shift in NSCLC treatment. However, many issues or problems are also appearing in clinical practice, such as the lower overall efficacy rate (20–40%), treatment modes, populations choice of immunotherapy, drug resistance, and safety, etc. Thus, in this review, we will mainly summarize and discuss the recent development and confusion of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors for advanced NSCLC patients based on current clinical studies.     

The Potential of Combined Immunotherapy and Antiangiogenesis for the Synergistic Treatment of Advanced NSCLC

Over the past few years, there have been considerable advances in the treatments available to patients with metastatic or locally advanced NSCLC, particularly those who have progressed during first-line treatment. Some of the treatment options available to patients are discussed here, with a focus on checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapies (nivolumab and pembrolizumab) and antiangiogenic agents (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, and nintedanib). It is hypothesized that combining immunotherapy with antiangiogenic treatment may have a synergistic effect and enhance the efficacy of both treatments. In this review, we explore the theory and potential of this novel treatment option for patients with advanced NSCLC. We discuss the growing body of evidence that proangiogenic factors can modulate the immune response (both by reducing T-cell infiltration into the tumor microenvironment and through systemic effects on immune-regulatory cell function), and we examine the preclinical evidence for combining these treatments. Potential challenges are also considered, and we review the preliminary evidence of clinical efficacy and safety with this novel combination in a variety of solid tumor types.